and the second alternative is extreme remove the entire third floor of the building so you'd loss lifrm, difrm and kitchen and severely impact the second floor thank you. >> mr. sanchez. >> thank you skooz planning staff i'll try to be brief we've had an doesn't even briefing the subject within a rh2 zoning district with regards to the rear yard requires an rh245 percent of the rear yard in this case, the work being proposed none of it is within the rear yard as denied in the planning code as pointed out there's an interpretation of the planning code that's been adapted over the years r&d a city council gent view when a building is set back with regards to the application i'll point out they proposed for their alternative that has a c shaped building that itself is not compiling with the appellants interpretation that central courtyard as noted further it states thatarea- it's something that the commission struggled with there should be changes to the project deferring opinions that was continued for several hearings for the sponsor to work with the department some changes were proposed