this was the idea, of the likud, and others after the 67 war.ould be that we would live happily ever after, giving equal rights to those between the jordan after, giving equal rights to those between thejordan river and mediterranean sea but in the end that leads to a situation in which israel, would stop being a jewish democratic state. and we would have a binational state, one state with everybody living there but i think it would not be you know, living happily ever after, it would be more bloody. with this ongoing conflict amongst us, and this is against what i believe is the vision of zionism, to create a state for thejewish people. and in this state everybody‘s equal rights citizens. is it down to the demographics, the idea that if you take into and a half million palestinians, that is the end of a jewish state? yes, in the end of a jewish state? yes, in the end, listen, we live and my values are to keep in harmony the values are to keep in harmony the values of the state of israel as a jewish democratic state. this is also a question of n

this was the idea likud members, including my parents, basically after the 1967 law.that we would live happily ever after, giving equal rights to those living between thejordan river and the mediterranean sea, but in the end, this can lead to a situation in israel in which israel would stop being a jewish democratic state. and we would have a bi—national state, one state, with everybody living there, but i don't think it would be living happily ever after — it would be more bloody, with this ongoing conflict amongst us. and this is against what i believe is the vision of zionism, to create a state of thejewish people, and in this state, everybody is equal rights citizen. is it down to demographics, then, the idea that if you take in 2.5 million palestinians, that's the end of thejewish state? yes. in — in the end, listen... we live, and my values are, to keep in harmony the values of the state of israel as a jewish democratic state. and this is also an issue of number. we need to have a jewish majority, in order to keep this, and not have a clash between the values of

and the likud government, headed by bb netanyahu is not a majority government.t's part of a coalition government, it's not a majority of the israeli people and all of these questions are very delicate, but what we know about donald trump, those of us who have really studied him, is that he has ad liberal democr-libbedh life, being unprepared. he boasts about not doing his homework, he comes into a room, he tries to read the room and then by the seat of his pants, take control of it. i believe that's a lot of what we're seeing here. it doesn't work for a president of the united states very often. and what we're seeing today, especially, but also throughout these first weeks is evidence that this seat of the pants approach to being the president of the united states doesn't serve governance or the people of the country very well. >> kirsten, i have to ask you, jared kushner has known prime minister netanyahu for a while. "the new york times" reports that the prime minister actually slept in his bed once when he was a kid, visiting his family. i think he slept in t

in the past we can separate between the likud party which is the center right party in the government and the party of 20 years ago which controlled on the strong right wing voters today we can see how netanyahu and bennett are fighting on the same -- with the same attitude with the same ideas and actually tries to describe themselves as right wing leaders that believe in the motives and the metaphors of the right wing if you add to that affect that today netanyahu is also under a police investigation and under a lot of pressure which comes from this kind of a situation you understand that he has a real problem to put something new on the table which will risk his position. he's a strong right wing leader control on the strong right wing voters. now all those on these points brings us to the israeli dilemma. in the israeli dilemma regarding trump, if trump at all -- president trump at all is going to interest in the peace agreement between israel and the palestinians, in his campaign he talks about israel/palestinian conflict as internal conflict. since he was elected he changed and s

home party, the voters from the strong right-wing in israel, in the past we can separate between the likud party, which is center right party, governmental party, and the model of 20 years ago, which controlled on the right, on the strong right to win voters. today we can see how netanyahu invented actually fighting on the same votes, it's the same attitude with the same ideas. and actually try to -- describes himself as the right-wing leaders that believe in the mol h -- motives and metaphors of the right right-wing. if you add to that, netanyahu is also under police investigations and under a lot of pressure which comes from this kind of situation, to understand that he has a real problem, to put something new on the table, which will risk his position as a strong right-wing leader, the control on the strong right-wing voters. now all those bring us to the israeli dilemma. and the israeli dilemma regarding trump is first of all, if president trump at all is going to interest in the peace agreement between israel and the palestinians, in his campaign, he talks the israel/palestinian confl