what about limburg? forget it, do you really want to become an ordinary countess?e are waiting for you there. the will has already been prepared. master your manners, don’t forget that russians cross themselves with three fingers, that’s all. by the way, what sauce are you using to marry this dandy from limburg? i'm a persian princess. for the elector of brondarburg. as far as i remember, you went out like a mamluk princess. it was a long time ago. i will probably have expenses. the path to the crown is not close. wait for your groom's best man and take the money from him. they will really come in handy for you. can you mix up cards? our successes in poland caused serious discontent in france and turkey. your majesty is very important here whether he will support us austria. the allies are cautious. they don’t want to, they force themselves into war. when lunch is brought, then the appetite will appear. how can you not see that she doesn’t need you? she brings others closer to you and sometimes drives you away, sometimes she favors you, how much? you will endure, n

under what circumstances are you marrying this frant limburg?that same heiress. as for the throne, i i specifically accepted the postrick in order to avoid this very power, as a temptation from the devil. how the life of the false princess ended is again a mystery. by order of catherine, the impostor was kidnapped from the italian city of livorna and imprisoned in the peter and paul fortress. it is believed that tarakanova died in captivity from tuberculosis. there is another more tragic version, she drowned in a cell during a flood. it was this legend that he depicted. in his famous canvas, konstantin flovitsky is so deeply rooted in our memory. let's unravel the tangle of intrigue around the russian crown together. great golden age. continuation today on channel one. natalya leonova, alexey nikozakov. first channel. tuesday morning the news will continue. a word from colleagues from the channel one information service. hello, the news is live in the studio sergei tugushev. the platoon stronghold of the ukrainian armed forces, along with the mi

jonathan: that conversation this next, this is limburg.♪ how am i going to find a doctor when i'm hallucinating? what do you think, fever monster? what about zocdoc? zocdoc? dr. castell has a great bedside manner. so many options. but dr. xichun will take your sketchy insurance. xi-chun! xi-chun, xi-chun, xi-chun! thanks, bro! you've got more options than you know. book now. hyah! sheriff! the adversaries are back! [gasps] not again. sheriff, i got this. protecting your business from cyber attacks can be unrelenting. [triumphant adventure music plays] today's adversaries move fast. crowdstrike moves faster. crowdstrike. we stop breaches. jonathan: cpi is 42 minutes away. smp is -.4%. 10 year at 4.15. they are making the case for aid to ukraine. >> our whole goal is to prevent war. if you look at russia right now the reason people should care about ukraine is cited as a pro-american country but look at what putin said, once he takes ukraine poland and the balkans are next and that puts the u.s. that were. jonathan: nikki haley saying it's o

supreme court sits to hear arguments it is a good day to bring in greg stohr the court reporter from limburgews. the case is garland v. carville. viewers will be able to hear it live. what will it be about if they stick around? guest: it is a device called a bump stock which can be attached to a semi automatic rifle to be able to fire as rapidly as a machine gun. the issue is whether the government, or the atf can classify that bump stock as something that creates a machine gun, which is illegal and create a criminal ban. host: merrick garland is the garland and kargil is the kargil. who is he? guest: a gunshot owner and a veteran. he acquired a couple of bump stocks and under the rule that went into effect they said you had to destroy them or turn them over and he did that but said i am turning them over and hang on because i will sue. he sued and that made it up to the supreme court. host: take us back to that process and when it happened and when that decision was made to go to the supreme court. guest: this rule was put into place in the trump administration after the las vegas massacre