las 5 mejores de rompiendo los límites! hoy con el tema.ean las yantas. número 3. si sentes que estás fuera de control dale descanso. la número 2 que sea aterrizaje perfecto. y la número 1 que eno eres cientifico cuando abras los ojos y encuentres estos cuatro ángeles. >> divirtámonos con estás escenas. estos muchachos nos pidieon que no revelaramos este espacio. piensa mal y acertarás algo mo ha de tener esto. algún efecto secundario. debe tener esto. exceso de baba. paranoia, los bichos algo pues hombre no puede ser tanta felicidad. estudios clínicos dice que les ha aumentado el deseo de jugar. de comenzar todos sus parlamentos. "solo se vive una vez" definitivamente esto si es vida, otros comienzan a caminar con las manos. pregunte a su doctor si esto es para usted. >> rompiendo los límites. ahora los aterrizajes en la nieve. al >> los locos deportes de la sena. >> una motonieve es fantástico. para estar sobre la nieve. pero cuando vemos a una en el campo es algo espectacular. algo fuera de serie. como es que funciona este artefacto si n

i just wanted to ask about term limits because i had initially supported term limits, but then i've seen how it has been enacted in some states, the particular example that i'm thinking of is ohio which i have some familiarity with. where the, they've had term limits for a number of years, they've had -- what happens is people take their maximum in the lower house of the legislature or the upper house, wherever they were when they started, then they run for the other seat in the other house of the legislature. pretty soon you've got 20-some years in there. and then the others aspect of it is when people first come in, they're often reliant on the non-elected staff members to, to do things. so this is a kind of continuing legislative bureaucracy. so could you address those points? >> yeah. first of all, even in the 12 years i had in the house, 12 years senate which means some individuals might end up with 24, but that would be a tiny minority most of the time. in terms of staff, if you're lazy, you can be run by staff. i wasn't run by staff. but i had a marvelous staff. i had, i think i h

>> there have been limitations. i sat at counsel's table with the prevailing argument in morrison united states v morrison because i believed the relevant provisions of violence against women act were unconstitutional. the court so held. but that was because the court found correctly that as despicable and criminal as is for a man to beat up his girlfriend, it is not commerce. there is no doubt health insurance is commerce. >> did not the congress go back and redraft based on the ruling in morrison? >> i believe they did. i cannot swear to that. and i have sworn to my testimony. [laughter] >> one of the reasons why i in georgia your tenure as solicitor general under president reagan -- anybody want to add to this -- one of the reasons why i enjoyed your tenure as solicitor general. >> i never pass up an opportunity to disagree with charles. you are compelling people to engage in commerce. is it that by not contract in with insurance companies that sum up acts as an impediment to congress. congress created a problem

-- i government of limited powers. i wish to suggest how far we have gotten on these issues when they are explicit constitutional provisions, the right to keep and bear arms, whereas we at four members of the court to want to read that out of the constitution. it has a specific provision that provides individuals the right to not have their property taken except for public use, it has specific provisions that allow free and robust debates and the ability to speak out in public forums. those things are individual rights that our courts somehow gone to the. they are not very important anymore. in those cases, the staid almost one it would diminish individual rights. i just think this is a fundamental point that we ought to note. we did not hearing -- have hearings in this committee on the health care bill, the constitutionality of it, and will people raised it on the floor of the senate, as quite a number did, they were ignored for the most part, and it was dismissed out of hand. we also had our congressmen -- i saw on t

it is without limiting principle. in the florida case, the more congress can distort in the first place the commercial marketplace, it can bootstrap that original distortion into regulating all sorts of things, all sorts of contracts, from credit cards, to cars, to mortgages that it could never get that in the first instance. it is also not proper. mr. fried suggests it is fine to compel people to contract. recently, the court said you could not force coal companies to provide health insurance contracts to former miners. it forces citizens to contract with a wealthy corporation to ameliorate the corporations loss of profit. that is proper, there's nothing that congress cannot do. what is the limiting principle that is being suggested here and elsewhere? i used to call it the due process clause. it suggests that will limit congress's power. that is a restriction on the state's. they concede that the only limitation on congress's enumerated powers is the same as the limits on the state's plenary police power. the suprem

the age limit, anyone with child up to 12 years. perhaps they would consider a lower age limit where the child can be left for 10 or 15 minutes alone. i am also concerned about the time of day and use of nanny permits and how transferrable transferable they may be. -- i hope they can find other ways to take care of the children. >> good afternoon, president nolan. the supervisors sent a letter in support for child care providers. as noted in the letter, child- care providers that come to their home, again, it is noted in the letter. they might need a car for a grocery shopping or other things. he believes it is important to have policies in place that support working families. i think a lot of working families out there have tried transit first. i am a mother. i work full time. so does my husband. it is extremely difficult to get around san francisco and do everything we need in terms of doctors' appointments. the parents have come to you and they have to find a way to fix it. we were using muni the other day. we just want to thank

i do not think tennessee electric limited itself to commandeering claims. mr. dreeben refers to the enduring force of tennessee electric. i do not think it has enduring force. the further you go in the decision, the less satisfying it is. if you go on to reading the georgia power case and look at the role of consent of the states, in the district court opinion, that is in the merits section of the opinion. the courts held contrary to tennessee electric that the utility company had standing. you hopelessly conflate the merits and standing question. that kind of happened today in oral argument. that is a bad approach. it should perfect the camp decision by saying this sentence the longer survives. on the commerce clause, i think justice alito shows why the court is right not to make the argument below. it does not reinject the commerce argument in a way that does not allow us to argue it was clearly waived in the third circuit. we have a better argument to defend the statute. claim error should be a two-way street. asian not be allowed to sneak the commerce claus

there are no limitations. says the tenth amendment of the th united states conestitution says all powers not delegated to the federal government are reserved to the states and the people. it might as well be written out think of the constitution. so that's why i think thesee one decisions are very important. the one in florida and the early one in virginia because they reveal a defect in this bille over and above the others that i have already mentioned, raising new taxes, taking from medicare to create a new entitlementnd program, and of course inem with thi opposing this onerous mandate. mad but the real problem with this anced bill, madam president, is more re nuanced than my remarks would suggest. what it does is by imposing a mandate on employers to provide vernment government approved health insurance or pay a penalty whatost many employers are going to findo out is a will cost them less to pay the penalty than it will to provide health insurance for their employees and thus many whi americans who have c

commissioner sugaya: this is not intended to limit public comment in any way.ple can say what they want to in this limited time that we have given them, but we may want to think of a more pro-active way of working with the request is and the project's sponsors, and the neighborhood groups with respect to how to more effectively make their presentations. at times when you have 50 people speaking, this is fine, they are exercising their rights. but at times you could take that same number of people and get the point across, much more effectively. i remember one time, a neighborhood group was organized into, i forget how many people. there was a presentation that was being made and the next person followed up on this, and by the end they had given us a complete presentation. i do not know. this would be more of trying to work with the group's that have come in before us, because there are different ways to approach the presentation. and this may make things more efficient. i am not volunteering to do this. i actually have given some lectures to the other groups ab

or the davis debt limit. but that is not how we ran things in the boom. as a result, we had overnight unemployment and a policy that was a huge hill mary. -- huge hail mary, if i may use a football metaphor. >> thank you. this has been an excellent hearing. i want to thank senator sessions for his contributions as well. we stand adjourned. [captioning performed by national captioning institute] [captions copyright national cable satellite corp. 2011] >> coming up in judicial nominations on c-span 3. among those speaking today was what house counsel robert bauer. the u.s. senate is meeting this afternoon to consider federal aviation programs, including air transportation fees. you can see live coverage of the debate on c-span 2 starting at 2:15 p.m. eastern. the house is not in session this week. they will return next week. >> there is no other way forward. in this crisis, we simply to learn together. as california's first, members of a political party second. >> today, step by step, we are putting ourselves o

we have a very limited opportunities. until we find a solution, we should not use up those opportunities. as far as the medium income work reports, they are not being provided for housing. unfortunately, the middle area, we are losing ground on continuously. it is rent-controlled. unfortunately, that opportunity is not here. the central subway is not really housing. however, very important, the central subway is draining muni funds away from where it is most needed throughout the city. from what i understand, it will cost over half of the reserves this year. in the future, it will have an impact that will decrease the efficiency that is not there any way. it is a major problem. [chime] president olague: any additional public comment? >> i want to commend the staff for their heroic work they have done trying to move this housing element for word. it is now two years out of date. everybody has qualms, it is something they did not like. but we have got to move it forward.

there is no changes to hight limit because those with all require additional environmental review. on the gold's jim -- gym property, the owner would be to go forward and pursue a zoning map and give it added height for the additional floor. a zoning map would cost money, but even if the zoning map amendment were initiated by the board of supervisors, the procedures at the planning department is again to pass the cost of that review, including environmental review, on to any real property owner of interest. even in a rezoning map and then that were initiated by the board, in order for us to process the work, we would still be billing the property owner. as you know, nothing can happen by the board or city without a free its sequel clearance -- without appropriate ceqa clearance. supervisor mar: i appreciate all the testimony from the groups that are strongly supportive of this and other different stakeholders as well. supervisor cohen, do you have questions? supervisor cohen: i did not have any questions. supervisor mar: i guess i appreciate the community effort that has been ongoi

street that is not a historical resourced that will be limited to 50 feet, and that is pretty significant when you think about it. the only corner parcel that is not of a historic resource that will be limited to 50 feet, so we will be required to go for an sed. we did not have the certainty of the eir process that others are granted, so we support the guideline. we support the extension. we've been working closely with neighborhood groups, but we will have to come back. supervisor mar: thank you. >> thank you. supervisor mar: mr. kaelin? -- mr. cohen, how's it goin'? >> we are obviously a major supporter and hope to be part of the architecture with this. this is a long time coming. i think staff work hard to come up with a good solution to what we referred to as the orphan block. it was this last little part of the upper market. for a 20-some odd years, the entire stretch of the commercial district of copper markets -- this was back in the 1980's when the city went through a number of commercial district rezoning -- let's call it inadvertently or for a variety of reasons, that got split

second, we are proposing that the general ifd funding be limited. the primary reason is that unlike redevelopment, ifd's can only be formed by a vote, and it is only by two thirds of the voters within an ifd or by another manner if there are fewer than 12 voters.

let's limit this to two minutes per speaker. >> good afternoon, supervisors. i represent the 12,000 members of the san francisco bicycle coalition. we are very supportive of the proposal. it is very common sense. it rationalizes and harmonizes the zoning and deals with this orphan block. you have heard about this already. if anything, it will make development there more predictable, more fair, and it really brings the standards that we have developed at length for market and octavia to this last block, and it really helps to protect market street as a transit bicycle pedestrian corridor, so it seems like a very common-sense thing to do, and again, we bring you our wholehearted support for the measure. thank you. supervisor mar: thank you. those that would like to speak, please come and line of the pecan -- line up if you can. >> hello, supervisors. i represent the castro area planning. our members and members of other neighborhood groups have been working with the planning department and also some of the developers who are working to build new developments wit

so far the impact has been limited.nited states has plenty of extra oil supplies on hand, but if crude prices remain at the current levels consumers worldwide will feel the pinch. >>> also making headlines out of cnbc, facing a budget showdown with the white house and senate democrats. house republicans are scrambling to find some options to avoid a government shutdown. reports say gop leaders are drafting a new short-term bill to fund the federal government. on saturday the house passed a spending bill that includes $61 billion in spending cuts. so the new bill would have fewer cuts, it would just keep the government open, basically, for two extra weeks while lawmakers hold broader budget talks because congress is in recess until next week. and the stopgap spending bill expires on march 4. they have to get their act together. >>> markets are watching that as well. >>> and the new consumer watchdog agency releases facts today showing credit card practices have become more consumer friendly. this is good news. the bigges

rompiendo los límites. les presentamos una batalla entre denise y sofía. nstro amigo con dolor de caballo nos veremos en la próxima emisión de rompiendo los límites. ♪ (música) .

mentioned, jim, in "freedom at a risk" is term limits. you say you favor term limits. and so i was thinking about this and i was thinking well, that might meant the early retirement, for example, bob kaft or barry goldwater and even newt gingrich before they became famous and those are important conservatives. >> also congressman frankie. >> yes, yes barney frank, yes indeed. are you supportive of term limits. >> yes, i am. >> talk megapixel >> the constitution involves all kinds of compromises. human nature is human nature. and service -- as we have moved from a system of citizen legislators into career legislators, i think from my own experience, if i had been able to see and i think from what people have been able to put together in reading and following the news carefully, the temptation to protect your right to get re-elected -- the ability to get re-elected overwhelms your willingness to always vote the way your conscience tells you how to vote. when i was elected -- even though i was elected as a candidate of the conservative party, i joined the republican caucu

second, we are proposing that the general ifd funding be limited. the primary reason is that unlike redevelopment, ifd's can only be formed by a vote, and it is only by two thirds of the voters within an ifd or by another manner if there are fewer than 12 voters. this represents a smaller pool of folks. obviously, either approach could be taken. for practical reasons, we think it would be advantageous to concentrate on commercial or vacant properties. cuff -- we would like to use non city resources. i think, most notably, those at the state and federal level. four, this is a specific input from our public citizens, stakeholders. we also like to require procedures to help the city agencies prioritize implementation of the infrastructure. as you can see from rincon hill, i think we are all interested to hear from residents what they view is important in helping the city decide which projects. and then finally, this was a direct recommendation from supervisor cohen, malia cohen, essentially reporting back on how is the ifd doing and how are the monies

we are limited by what the actual stakes are right now. director nolan: it doesn't seem like much of a penalty to me. >> i don't believe that we have been asked to look at the various options or penalties. the answer is related. we would be happy to look into that. director nolan: it doesn't seem like much of a penalty. it seems to me it should be a lot more severe. anyone want to comment? let's try to -- >> i would have no problem with penalties. people that defraud the city and should face a penalty. it is not designed by my goal to expand. people that use this legitimately which have no objection to the penalties. director nolan: may become buying -- maybe combining director bridges' notion, changing the age limits, strengthening the penalties. maybe a six-month trial. transit frisirst is very important. but i'm aware of how family unfriendly the city can be. we think it is a very small number of people. most households that have that number of permits, it is not somebody going from 3 to 4. maybe two to three. i could support that. dire

traffic moving at the limit. golden gate bridge, no problems, i just checked those or of sensors and no problems to for your entire ride throughout marin county. great start this morning for public transportation no problems to report. james? >> thank you, a special team of police officers is now writing certain part trains all day. the goal is to prevent terrorism, other crimes that may occur. reggie kumar looks at this. >> these police officers are moved through each part looking for anyone suspicious. that may try to rob or commit an act of terrorism. the agency says a group of eight highly trained officers, who were party on the police force are now part of a new team. their job is to ride trains. that area is the transit bay to, it started last month. >> it is very say, we're making it even safer. there are a number of possibilities that we have identified, this is just topping us make it safer. this is about fighting would-be terrorist, it might want to see a problem and exploited. not only can they fight t

chairman, choices that have been remarkably limited and will continue to be limited by this law. so what mr. rehberg has done here is said, the only way we can begin to dismantle this, which is what the american people desire in significant numbers, majority numbers, is to say, you can't use resources that you have in your department to implement the law itself. . if the states and federal government would listen to the

it is characterized by the limited use of mechanical farm equipment and that equipment be screened from sight. and that sales of produce grown on the site is restricted from 6:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. and the higher intensity use and is characterized by the following, being larger than one achor in size and not able to meet that and the unlimited sales and donation and fresh food and the urban use category. and be principally permitted in all zoning districts and urban industrial agricultural requires the zoning districts except for the industrial use districts where it's permitted. i would like to make a note that the neighborhood al cultural use is exempt from neighborhood notification section 311 and 312 except in the eastern neighborhoods mixed use district where there is an introduction of a use that jumps the use categories. the planning department has received numerous letters and chief concerns with the elimination of the fencing requirement and the change of use fees and allowing the sale of value added goods and produce to be sold at one residential site. the planning department b

the statute of limitations has gone on. [laughter] however, i do have to show, the director -- >> i thought that this was an excellent article. i thought that everyone had seen this. i have attended several meetings in the last week, and i was hoping to rebuild this project, and we had an all-day meeting last saturday. this started at 10:00 and ended at 4:00. i have about 150 people there, and this was very well attended. this was excellent. and this is just an indication to me of a great out -- that is going into this particular project. i had a tour with the partners said residents -- parkmerd-- parkm-- park merced residents. there was a total overflow. this was double what this should have been able to handle. they were open, just to listen to this. this was very well protected. i was meeting with the project manager, on this design for rebuilding the safeway. this is the third architect with this design and they actually are starting to get some volume with the general public out there. and yesterday, this was last nigh

these policies would limit the use of ifd's in the future. party development areas are areas where there is a transit close to housing or fixed real opposite. these are model development areas. they are also eligible for more federal, state, and regional funding. we are suggesting that may be limited only to those areas of the city. we are suggesting that they only be used in areas where the resulting -- the resulting benefits to the general fund. on if you look at the before and after, there should be a net fiscal benefit. this is a way of looking out for the general fund. in addition, we are suggesting that -- be greater than 50% of cumulative increment over 30- year. there is a 50% cap on the new tax rate. also it should not exceed the fiscal surplus to the city. that is for police, fire, administrative costs. we are proposing that this never exceeds what we anticipate being the surplus. we're suggesting that the money is used solely to addressed if a shark should efficiencies. we are suggesting that the money only be allocated to infrastr

hence, we are limited in what we know and can say. what we do know from the limited information that was provided was that there were several collection missions to this overseas undisclosed site, that multiple methods including pcr, a molecular tests, a molecular and say, as well as cultivation efforts were applied to samples brought back to the united states. from at least one and perhaps two of those overseas collections missions, they were inconsistent but some positive results using the molecular approach, the pcr test that you mentioned. but no positive results from the use of cultivation. from the third collection mission, we are told that both molecular tests and cultivation

we are suggesting that these tools be limited to areas that have been rezoned as part of an area of land for development agreement, and that are also located within what we call a priority development area, which is an association of bay area government designation, which is essentially an area that is close to transit and that is planned for more housing. this designation, which is regional, moves that area of in terms of priority for regional, state, and federal transportation infrastructure funding. one of our strategies is to leverage any ifd monies we have with outside sources. supervisor mar: can you give examples of areas that are designated for housing and transit? >> san francisco has more than any other city in the region. they are sprinkled throughout the area, which i believe now is nine counties. the majority of them are all long bart -- along bart or caltrain lines. sort of along the corridor. the entire -- well, not the entire. a good portion of the eastern half of san francisco, where you would expect to see it, all of downtown, south of market, and the majority of easter

we will limit it to two minutes. >> thank you, commissioners. as usual i think the environmental report on this is quite inadequate. i think we're seeing a situation now where media is being disinvested in. we're seeing deteriorating levels of service yet we're trying to add more load onto those systems as if they don't exist. what we're seeing here is shove ling of public resources into private pockets to bail out a too big to fail development by making it even bigger so that next time speculative investors come at this, we're going to see an even larger bailout required. i think it's really bad for san francisco we're getting rid of rent-controlled units. that's critical for affordability in san francisco. this is a place where i wouldn't want to live and folks live there and find the community there and respect that and acknowledge that if we're not going to be seeing the kind of investment in transwit this project that's going to mitigate any of the impacts, in fact this project is located within three minutes of interstate 280. so that's go

now it's up to the foster city council to approve their limit to the three-dog limit. changes one dog owner told me should be made. >> they cannot see the dogs has a mess on the ground. five of them. five of them are too many of them. three is a max. >> reporter: if changes are made by the city council. police issued citation would be forwarded to the city attorney who would make an independent attorney. that could meet a letter to active or pursue a civil fine. i want to come back out live here. this is an announcement made of the amendment of the dog rule here in foster city. there will be a city council meeting tonight for public comment. that public comment is at 6:30. reporting live jade hernandez. >>> the new star of nascar race willing be in the bay area this evening. on sunday trevor bayne became the first youngest -- the youngest winner to become a winner. bayne will be at a nascar event. that is at 900 north point street at san francisco's fisherman's war -- wharf. >>> california's rising traffic penalties are being called a tax by another name. red light cam

it provides for a 35-foot height limit instead of the more usual 40 foot limit and a 45% rear yard setback instead of a 25% rear yard setback. our neighborhood has seen good projects like 700 sanchez which is now under construction where project sponsors have negotiated with neighbors and other projects that have been contentious. the concern of neighbors about projects are important to dhic as we hope to live, continue to live in a community and we feel that it is important that project sponsors engage with neighbors from the beginning to minimize problem. we encourage project sponsors to make presentations to our board and answer any questions that the community may have. the project sponsor at 775 sanchez recently presented to us and worked o it a successful xroiz with his neighbors and -- successful comprise with his neighbors and construction is proceeding. we would like to avoid d.r. we are also interested in following the residential guidelines of the special use district, guidelines designed to protect our open space, the groanness of our neighborhood -- the greenness of the our ne

that may still be the case even with the 65 foot height limit. is also cite efficient and cost- effective not to have the 1-for- 1 parking requirement. it keeps the densely built. liveable not to have that parking. discouraging demolition it is really important. we have had a huge progress on this back in the day, when we had no demolition controls and everything was threatened, but now we have to be concerned about enforcement of the policies against conversion to commercial and short-term rentals, which is still rampant. we have lost whole buildings, including a whole high-rise building, to short-term rentals because there is no enforceable requirement at present. and we need to it and force the sro laws. i see those lost from time to time. you need enforcement and actually do it, not just have policies. economic integration it is important, but i would suggest avoiding doing that within a building if it is home ownership. for rentals, it might work. that does not work for home owner buildings, which i could explain at another time. president o

i government of limited powers. i wish to suggest how far we have gotten on these issues when they are explicit constitutional provisions, the right to keep and bear arms, whereas we at four members of the court to want to read that out of the constitution. it has a specific provision that provides individuals the right to not have their property tak except for public use, it has specific provisions that allow free and robust debates and the ability to speak out in public forums. those things are individual rights that our courts somehow gone to the. they are not very important anymore. in those cases, the staid almost one it would diminish individual rights. i just think this is a fundamental point that we ought to note. we did not hearing -- have hearings in this committee on the health care bill, the constitutionality of it, and will people raised it on the floor of the senate, as quite a number did, they were ignored for the most part, and it was dismissed out of hand. we also had our congressmen -- i saw on tel

con sprint, por el mismo precio, obtienes texto, internet gps y llamadas sin límites a cualquier móvil tan especial. porque en él entran todos. por $69.99 obtén texto internet y llamadas sin límites con el plan todo de datos de sprint. >> las Últimas dos semanas han sido particularmente violentas en mÉxico. asesinaron al alcalde de ciudad juÁrez. mataron a una misionera. el dos de febrero, fue ejecutado el en y director de seguridad pÚblica de nuevo laredo. a hablarnos sobre esto, el excanciller jorge castaÑeda. me llamÓ la atenciÓn la visita de hillary clinton a mÉxico. tiene un discurso muy distinto, absolutamente diplomÁtico. diciendo que apoyaban absolutamente al presidente calderÓn a pesar las muertes. _apoyaba. >> ella fue un poco a de arreglar las cosas. el problemas son justamente los 34.000 muertos, se ha triplicado la violencia. >> en wikileaks habÍa aparecido que un subsecretario de seguridad, habÍa dicho que tenÍan el temor de los narcotraficantes. la frontera la han perdido ante los narcos? >> es cierto que en la frontera suceden cosas trÁgica astutos los dÍas. pero tambiÉ

in addition to the restriction, we are proposing a maximum limit of 50% of available increments, and again, this is a cautionary policy. this board can alter these policies in the future if you feel you need more flexibility, but the desire here was to not give away the store. we would say no more than did the% of the available anchorman over 30 years -- that is cumulatively over the 30-year life. remember, this builds up over time. that does not prevent us from bonding or spending a lot on the front, and then pay it back later through bond payments. it just says that over the life of the program, we would spend no more than 50%. supervisor mar: i think you use the too many hands in the cookie jar analogy last time. >> so we are saying only half the cookie, to continue that analogy. on top of that, we are saying that in no event should that 50% of the increment exceed the net available surplus. so it might be back some plan areas, our projected fiscal surplus amounts to something smaller than 50% of the available to increment. why would that be? let's say the amount of general fund c

if we can, we attach limited conditions and move on. my concern with the merger order as we laid out in the joint statement by commissioner baker was there are lot of conditions and upfront concessions made that had nothing to do with the merger. they might be noble goals, good corporate citizenship but nothing to do with the merger. expanding broadband deployment is noble but did that have to become a matter of law over what was essentially a vertical merger? distributor of content. over the years, the commission more and more has been looking to resolve or achieve other ends to garner support for other items on a personal or political agenda. emerging companies come for the commission and are pretty vulnerable. it has become a cost of doing business for those companies. if you want to anax policy to encourage those nonspecific issues, go ahead and open a rulemaking. >> by the way i agree entirely with that. we are going to open up to questions. we will follow the rule we have had throughout the day. and appreciate asking in the form o

traffic is moving at the limit.ts, incidents drive times are good out 26 minutes ahead of novato to city limits come across town looks good, incident free no problems for the james lick meets the in-a central. no current problems reported for public transportation for ac come apart, muni. >> another story we are monitoring president obama is promoting clean energy information. they're talking about investment in technology. let's listen in. >> democrats and republicans came together, americans' paychecks will be a little bigger this year. businesses will ride that their investments. companies will grow, the jobs created. that is good. the reason i wanted to come here to penn state, to talk about the long-term. the reason i want to talk to young people is to talk about the future and how we will win it. if we want to make up for the millions of jobs several lost in this recession but more importantly, we want to make sure america is still a place were you can make it if you tried, where you can go as far as hard work