discussion, i'm happy to having that discussion closer to april when applications have come in and when linda avery made the first cut. >> can i respond? >> well, it wasn't exactly what i wanted to imply by the meeting that we're having with dhr, we're just basically going to be made privy of the decisions that were made by dhr in terms of their first cut, we're not making further cuts that day, that's why i was careful to make sure we didn't ask for any approval of anything after that point because that's when it would become more selective, we wanted the commission to have input on that and as far as the actual job description and the criteria, that will be available to the public as of tomorrow and it will be reviewable, we can make sure the whole commission should have a copy of that to review and it gives a lot of specificity as to the criteria and how they are weighed and these types of things. >> commissioner sugaya? >> yes, if we could give feedback to the sub-committee i guess at this point, as i understand it, the job description is going to get responded to human resources will go throug