amy: can you explain, linda black elk, the fires that were set?some said to return the land, the resistance camp, to its original condition before they were evicted. is that true? >> well, you know, it is true that controlled burning is certainly a part of the lakota culture traditionally. the lakota woodburn large pieces of land -- would burn large pieces of land in order to enrich the soil. i can't say that was the goal of the people who set those fires. i think a part of it was just that they did not want to see -- when people came to camp, when people came to oceti, they came for the long haul. people built their lives in cap who even would go to work everyday from camp and then come back. they have their families there. it really was about creating sustainable community where live forever. people were not in traditional lakota teepees. so i think people did not want to see their beloved home taken or confiscated by the same people who are attacking us and oppressing us. north dakota -- i have said it many times. north dakota has lost its mind