. >> i am linda chapman, speaking in a general sense because we don't have an overall organization like we used to have, but it is formed on years at of housing. i am quite impressed with this plan compared with what we used to have back then, and i feel, though, under community plans it does not acknowledge the van ness plan as an adaptive plant -- i don't know why. the policies are in place, the cmpc and the rapid transit that was proposed, and that would have liked to have seen that included. it does not mention that van ness tis is a housing opportunity and the definition of a transit corridor. i would like to keep that in mind. we really need to uphold the policies and project review in dealing with these issues on van ness, because we have conflicts in the proposals right now. what is the van ness potential? it does not show their what was achieved, what is remaining, so forth. we need to update that planned to them eliminate the parking requirement that has been talked about. flexibility and the number of units, 1.6 policy is excellent for densely built neighborhoods. if you were