. >> linda chapman from not hill -- nob hill. supervisor mar said he wished he had more opportunity to look at this. some of you are lawyers. i had to study the ceqa guidelines in connection with writing a support document for the appeal about live nation. it is very easy to read. it is plain english. it is very vanilla. it would be very clear to you, what they were intended to do was not to chop big hunks out of ceqa or have something handy for the planning staff. it is really four things that are common sense. -- for things that are common sense. i am not surprised the judge expects planning to return the decision to use a cadex in that case. the second thing is i used to be a civil rights specialist. i dealt with disability. one of the things that concerns people is having impediments' like this in the public right of way for people with visual impairment are using real tears. even i run into an impediment all the time, outside the theater. every time i come to it, i have to decide whether to walk into traffic or go under this

jason henderson, mark solomon and linda chapman. whatever order. >> i have an overhead. can we get the overhead, please? thank you. i wanted to make a comment here about the previous speaker who was talking about densification of the city. here is his home. as you can see, it is a single-family home. two parking spaces there. a beautiful view out of the hillings right? so we're not seeing any densification happening here. in the paper this morning he was quoted talking about nimbies. here is his backyard. it is a nice backyard. i don't have a backyard that big. it is much bigger than my house. he is being paid by developers to create the illusion of some sort of broad coalition demanding more housing. now i take issue to the chair with what commissioner borden said here, that we need to get the talent in this room to figure out how to accommodate future growth without trashing the transit system. that's the task here. and just saying, oh, growth is going to be coming, waving our hands is not going to cut it because that is going actually trash sb 75 and demolish ab 72 an