commissioner olague: thank you. >> and linda chapman. i wanted to speak further about the subject of people negotiating a conditional use conditions and saying that the represent the community and that not being taken very seriously. i brought up the subject of nob hill senior housing last time and the in lieu fees over $5 million that could have been directed there, and they can be directed to a particular project. it was mentioned that there was some doubt that there could be. but quite a while ago i discussed with -- with this with calvin welsh and the person in housing, and i think i originally consulted them. this was the second time that that happened, you know, right in the nob hill area without the knowledge -- i mean, it is find to come in and say we represent the neighborhood association. but what about the people who actually live in the community or even members of the neighborhood association who know nothing about the fact that this is happening? i was asked to write a synopsis for the mayor's office about the project, the

. >> i am linda chapman, and i live at the heart of the campus. this is a good institution. someone in our building thought this was -- and there is the academy of students. they were all at the academy. this is where the boss has to go. this is a very serious problem. the encroachment was a different kind before the academy. this is the executive suite. and they're turning this informally. and they would be out, one way or another. things were done and they were gone. the same thing happens with the academy. these buildings cannot be grandfathered in. as an official in the federal government, i would say -- they have been doing something illegal. and henceforth they will not be able to continue this. they cannot continue to rent those units on those terms. they have to post this in the newspaper with discrimination finding that would be done, and they would have to know the rental agencies that they would have to go through. this is how they deal with the unlawful discrimination. under no circumstances can they be grandfathered in. they never went through the process. and t

. >> i am linda chapman. i will second at the request. my reason is that this is very complicated and more than i think the officers understand. i have not seen the package yet, of course, but i understand that the environmental review of any kind will not happen because this is exempt. the last time around, there was some documentation i could look at and eventually there will be a rationale in writing but it is hard for the officers to understand what i am talking about. i was able to look at the rationale and then to go researched the guidelines. it was obvious that could not apply by the time it went to the conditional use. the judge found that this was true. the judge says that this needs to go back for environmental review. . this is exempt from the statute. this is something that needs legal analysis and people have to have time to do this. i will mention on the environmental side of things that there was a traffic study that was done. -- >> you need to keep your comments to the continuance. >> the reason the continuance is needed

. >> linda chapman from nabi hill. i wanted to continue a subject i have mentioned before, which was concerned about the members of my community being pre-empted. they are considering being pre- empted by someone who will say they represent neighbors or this mysterious entity which calls itself from time to time the navajo coalition. i came in here for 1645 pacific, and i saw quite a few residents in the area who were concerned. then, i saw an assertion that david chiu , the supervisor, and the neighbors had made an agreement, and here it is, and this is your marching order. i do not think -- i think the first of all, if something like that is happening, maybe you should consider consulting the attorney because the board of supervisors has a role where the appeal, not in the process of making the conditions in the first place. then, i saw something rather similar, without maybe the signed agreement in which i heard that lower pulp neighbors and middle hold neighbors supporting use of affordable housing. that did not ha