s/ linda sánchez (d-ca) "muchas de estas madres de la violencia. huyen tortura ymatanzas.ayuda y los encarcelan en condiciones inhumanas". la solucin, segn estos congresistas demcratas y activistas, es que las familias sean dejadas en libertad condicional bajo supervisin. s/dree collopy, abogada "no he conocido a una mujer que no tiene a alguien aquí. también hay igleas y otroservicios sociales" por su parte el servicio de inmigracin y control de aduanas dijo hoy que "estos centros son una alternativa efectiva y humana para preservar la unidad familiar mientras se lleva a cabo el proceso deinmigracin o las familias esperan el regreso a sus pases" el gobierno ha enfrentado este aÑo dos demandas que cuestionaron la legalidad de esos centros de detencin. s/ randy serrano, @randytelemundo el gobierno reconoce estar deteniendo a familias que han cruzado la frtera con eln de desmotivar a ots a venir ilegalmtal país. unpráctica que l activist asegurans injusta e ineficiente. topvo blanca ---queremos que usted nos de su punto de vista sobre esta tema a traves de nuestra pregunta d

linda sanchez of california, the ranking member on that committee. let's go to lucas, line for independents. caller: good morning. quick question. did the members of congress after this trip get money -- give money to this oil company in azerbaijan, or has it been at any actual effect of the trip? was a just an enjoyable trip? guest: that is a good question. we have not found any effort by any memory of congress to help this oil company after the trip. and, we have not see any money or campaign donations going back and forth. this looks like a trip where they took a gift they were not entitled to take. they may have excepted some token gifts. the process did not work the way it was supposed to work. a fake nonprofit paid for your travel. there is no evidence that any member of congress was swayed by this trip to take some kind of action. host: you think this changes things in the future? guest: i do not know. there are several ongoing cases in congress that have led two questions about whether the rules need to change. i am sure your viewers remember

congressman loretta sanchez and congresswoman linda sanchez. all of them supported along with many others, nearly 50. i'm proud to say that the community in houston, the nepalese community has come together and they had a goal of raising $100,000. they have exceeded that goal under the leadership of mr. gimray and mr. nepal. they have exceeded the goal of $100000 and they are still raising additional funds. i believe that h.r. 2033 affords all of us to live not in vain. i think this is a great opportunity to do unto others as we would have them do unto us. i ask that we support h.r. 2033 and live not in vain. help somebody as we travel along our way. thank you, mr. speaker. i yield back. the speaker pro tempore: the gentleman has yielded. pursuant to clause 12-a of rule 1, the chair declares the house in recess until noon today. go to appeal but was never formally certified. it's not counted in the regional office and it's not count in the veterans appeals. that case doesn't exist until somebody certifies it. this is criminal, in my opinion. th

linda sanchez of california, the ranking member on that committee.et's go to lucas, line for independents. caller: good morning. quick question. did the members of congress after this trip get money -- give money to this oil company in azerbaijan, or has it been at any actual effect of the trip? was a just an enjoyable trip? guest: that is a good question. we have not found any effort by any memory of congress to help this oil company after the trip. and, we have not see any money or campaign donations going back and forth. this looks like a trip where they took a gift they were not entitled to take. they may have excepted some token gifts. the process did not work the way it was supposed to work. a fake nonprofit paid for your travel. there is no evidence that any member of congress was swayed by this trip to take some kind of action. host: you think this changes things in the future? guest: i do not know. there are several ongoing cases in congress that have led two questions about whether the rules need to change. i am sure your viewers remember t

linda t. sanchez of california, mr. green gene of texas, mr. polis of colorado, ms. jackson lee of texas, and mrs. torres of california. the speaker pro tempore: under the speaker's announced policy of january 6 2015, the chair recognizes the gentleman from georgia, mr. johnson, for 30 minutes. mr. johnson: i thank the speaker. and i want to say that i appear here tonight to talk about police and community relations throughout our country. the purpose of this special order is to talk about how the relationship between police and local communities can be repaired. over the last year, we have witnessed tensions rise between local law enforcement officers and local communities. events we have witnessed across the country have highlighted the need for mending the strained relationship between police and communities across the country. this week, the judiciary committee in the house held a hearing titled policing strategies for the 21st century. the purpose of this hearing was to look at how law enforcement is trained and how it is received in our communities across the c

rhett polis the -- jared polis the honorable derek richmond the honorable bobby rush the honorable linda sanchez the honorable loretta sanchez, the honorable bobby scott, the hon yorbling who are day serrano, the honorable brapped sherman the honorable chris smith, the honorable jackie spehr -- speier, the honorable maxine waters the honorable bonnie watson coleman, and i might add this is bipartisan. it's always a wonderful thing to have bipartisan legislation. this legislation is bipartisan in nature. i want you to know that in sponsoring this legislation it is our hope that the united states house of representatives will take it up. that it will come to the floor of the house for a vote. so that we can do more than say we support the people of nepal. this is a way for the congress of the united states of america to go beyond endorsing aid, it is a way to provide aid, because the people who are here will have an opportunity to continue to work. and as they continue to work, they will be permitted to return funds to their home country. this is a way for us to not only keep people out of harm's

congresswoman linda sanchez of california the ranking member on that committee., good morning. caller: quick question. did the members of congress after this trip give money to this oil company or the government or have there been any actual effect of the trip or was it just an enjoyable trip? guest: we have not found any effort by any member of congress to help the oil company after this trip and haven't seen any money going back and forth. so this looks like a trip where they took a gift they were not entitled to take, that is the free travel and may have accepted some token gifts that they should not have accepted. and the it didn't work the way it was supposed to work because a drk fake nonprofit paid for your travel. there is no evidence at this point that any member of congress was swayed by this trip to take some sort of action on behalf of this oil company. host: does this change things about how members accept gifts in the future? guest: there are several ongoing cases in congress that has led to questions about whether the rules need to change. so i'm s