let's listen to the us invested into the united nations, linda thomas of greenfield, who's speaking now and now russian, china will give you all sorts of explanations for his obstruction. but whether or not it will admit it there too deeply. the police cynical reasons behind it's folks . first brushing china still could not bring itself to condemn her. mazda is terrorist attacks on october 7th. can we just pause on that for a moment? russian, china refuses to condemn us from burning people alive. for gunning down the innocent civilians at a concert for raping women and girls for taking hundreds of people hostage. this was the deadliest single attack on jews since the holocaust. and a permanent member of this council can't even condemn it. i'm sorry it's, it's really our ages and it's below the dignity of this friday. the 2nd reason behind this veto is not just cynical. it's also petit. the russian china simply did not want to vote for resolution that was pinned by the united states because they would rather see its fail then to see this counsel succeed even after inclusive consultations

linda, thomas greenfield, plenipotentiary of the united states to the united nations. conditions cane applied in relation to china to russia, this may not even be dreamed of, of course, and if american diplomacy insists on this, it is felt that there is some kind of weakness in its position, but still, speaking essentially, it’s an interesting idea, although we of course know that we will be deceived, but it is very important to understand how exactly... we will be deceived in this proposal, i’ll start with china, that the proposal of the united states to start negotiations on nuclear weapons control with china, this is actually from the realm of fantasy, china and the united states have their own communication channel of the top military leadership, it was interrupted after nancypilosi’s visit, well, after a year and a half or even earlier, china, the united states was restored, and therefore recently there were online negotiations. yesterday, the deputy head of the soviet mission, the russian mission, fen polyansky, he said everything on this topic, but what did he say, and i don’t

your latest column in which you call out the use of the vice president, kamala harris >> and the us ambassador to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield, as quote, the faces of america's ugly gaza policy. you write about the vice president. she was not the face of biden's week yes. then she was the face of continued us cruelty toward palestinians with a spoonful of hashtag, black girl magic to make the poison go down. a little easier? or is it your suggestion here is make a plane for us. you believe this administration is putting black women forward because they they are black women to sell this policy >> i >> think that >> when this administration first came on, i think a huge part of the appeal of the biden administration has been obviously the connection to black voters through the vice president being vice president to obama hamas, with kamala harris, we heard a whole lot about the first black women, women being vice president. i do think the president, vice president, excuse me, giving remarks about calling for only a temporary ceasefire when people have been asking him particularly black people, we saw 1,000 black pastors asking

a vote because and here is what the us and best that are to the you and linda thompson, green, thomas greenfield said because of the u. s degrees with the fundamentals, immediate ceasefire is warranted, is needed in gaza. and of course the u. s. hopes that this is sustainability. what the u. s. is missing there and what this resolution is missing and that is a reason given why the abstain from the vote, is that it doesn't come them home us. what do you think about the timing of all of this with the as well as defense, but as the heading to washington today its yeah, very interesting. uh, timing. uh and potentially protell years. i mean very bad timing. why is that? because report suggests that prime minister benjamin netanyahu, israel's prime minister, has threatened that if this vote goes to this resolution is adopted, that he will cancel the visit of his delegation. national security is early national security officials and the defense minister is very defensive as to in washington. that would be unfortunate. why? because those official from israel are, were supposed to be sent here and arrived here in washin

of it today. at the security council, the us ambassador, linda thomas—greenfield said the release of hostages by hamasasting ceasefire agreement. we did not agree with everything in the resolution. for that reason, we were unfortunately not able to vote yes. however, as i've said before, we fully support some of the critical objectives in this non—binding resolution, non—binding resolution. it's certainly a significant moment. security council resolutions when adopted, become international law and all parties need to abide by what's in them. the white house says their decision to abstain in the vote does not signal a policy shift in washington. but that is not how the israeli prime minister sees it. mr netenyahu said the us change in position would hurt the war effort and his government's effort to release the hostages held in gaza. a visit of israeli defence officials — a delegation president biden had requested — has been cancelled. the israeli defence minister yoav gallant who was already in washington gave this response from outside the white house. translation: we have no moral right to stop the

so many times while the us and best of the, to the un linda thomas greenfield said that the fundamentals were what the us supported to you, and that is the call for an immediate and sustainable ceasefire. now what she also said is that us is not entirely happy with the language used often this resolution, and that refers to the legs off a condemnation of home us and their attack on october 7 on israel as well as the hostage question. however, the us decided to side with the security council with china, with russia, with the 22 of nations at the united. they represented that the united nations in this resolution to call for a ceasefire before this about israel had warned washington that if it's a didn't veto it, then the delegation of that was of venice in washington a would be called back. so prime minister benjamin netanyahu has made good on his promise. how is washington responding? of the difference of line is from the white house. that's the us and the why. those is very close, very disappointed. however you have gone to the israeli defense minister is in washington. today and he is

deputy preda wood was accusing russia of sabotaging the work of the security council, his boss, us ambassador to the un linda thomas greenfield a press conference. six votes in its favor, which is three less than necessary, but already more than on monday, the representative of china made it clear that if meetings were disrupted in this way and further, the work of the security council could, in principle , be paralyzed. different members of the security council may have different points of view on conflicts, but despite the disputes, maintaining cooperation, at least on procedural issues, is the least we can do. and until there is no consensus even on procedural issues, russian diplomats have promised. in the thirtieth year, to build another fifty bypass roads, details were told about the first moscow-kazan section in plans by deputy prime minister marat khusnulin. the route from st. petersburg to vladivostok, we have broken her at all stages. for example, i can say that the section from st. petersburg to moscow, bypassing tver, will be launched on july 17 of this year, that is, this section will be completely ready, then th

of the palestinians would stop. u.s. ambassador to the un, linda thomas greenfield said that the veto was because the draft did not mention what she called " right to self-defense. already, over 3,0 palestinians had been killed. then, on december 8th, last year, washington rejected another security council resolution aiming to mandate a cease fire in gaza. deputy us ambassador to the un, robert wood, said that text was rushed and ignored us demands. the palestinian death doll at the time was 17,400. the third us rejection of a ceasefire came on. february 20th, when thomas greenfield bizarely claimed any ceasefire would jeopardize us negotiations with the warring sides, the palestinian death doll kept mounting and the humanitarian crisis in gaza grew worse. the us stonewalling at the security council came even as votes at the united nations general assembly overwhelmingly called for sease fire. while resolutions agreed at the general assembly are non-binding, they carry... political weights and reflect the international community's real stance on the israeli war, but the united states calous posture and utmost disregard fo

of the palestinians would stop. us ambassador to the un, linda thomas greenfields: said that the veto was because the draft did not mention what she called israel's right to self-defense. already over 3,00 palestinians had been killed. then on december 8th last year, washington rejected another security council resolution aiming to mandate a cease fire in gaza. deputy us ambassador to the un, robert woodd said that text was rushed and ignored us demands. the palestinian death doll at the time was 17. the third us rejection of a ceasefire came on february 20th when thomas greenfield bizarly claimed any cease fire would jeopardize us negotiations with the waring sides, the palestinian death toll kept mounting and the humanitarian crisis in gaza grew worse. the us stonewalling at the security council came even as votes at the united nations general assembly overwhelmingly called for a ceasefire while. resolutions agreed at the general assembly are non-binding, they carry political weights and reflect the international community real stance on the israeli war, but the united states calous posture and utmost disregard for civi

of the voting is as follows — 1a votes in favour. zero votes against. one abstention. applause. the draught resolution has been adopted as resolution 27—28. at the security council, the us ambassador, linda thomas—greenfield hostages by hamas is key to any lasting ceasefire agreement. certain key edits were ignored. _ including the inclusion - of the condemnation of hamas. and we did not agree _ with everything in the resolution. for that reason, we were - unfortunately not able to vote yes. however, as i've said before, we fully support some - of the critical objectives in this non—binding resolution, - and we believe it was important for the council to speak out - and make clear that| our ceasefire must — any ceasefire — must come - with the release of all hostages. earlier, i got the reaction to the vote from our north america correspondent, john sudworth, who is in new york. the symbolism made clear by that applause. a sense of relief, i think, for many members of the security council that this vote finally went through. 1a votes in favour, one abstention. that abstention, of course, notably from the united states. but, you know, the significant thing is it wasn't a veto, every other attempt — and the

the way, that the seas demand is conditional on the release of hostages and secondly that the resolution is nonbinding. linda thomas-greenfielde these claims in the session of security council after the adoption of the resolution. both of these claims are false and have no legal grounding. the u.n. charter and article 25 -- in article 25 had made this understandable. security council resolutions are binding on member states. this is black letter law in the charter that says all members of the united nations are bound to accept and carry out the decisions of the security council will stop confirmed by the international court of justice. the claim that the ceasefire is to be conditioned on other factors like the release of hostages, this is false as well. this was a key central focus of the negotiations was to make sure these things were not conditioned one on the other, but are separate demands of this ticketed council. the u.s. knows this but it is cynically distorting the record in order on the one hand to be able to claim it has gone along and not blocked an international ceasefire because of pressure from domestic and inte

international community had been doing, what we now know is from the words of the us ambassador to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield. is that what the us position is, is that they want to work with the haitian of bassett, or take a listen, is what we've asked uh, the haitian prime minister to do is move forward on a political process that will lead to the establishment of a presidential transitional council that will lead to elections and we think that it's urgent that it's urgent that he moves forward in, in that direction and start the process of bringing normalcy back to uh, to the people of haiti. and what does it mean to say there is that they want to work with the haitian prime minister? what we should also say is that right now they are working very closely. they being the button administration with senior government officials within the haitian government. the big question has been here in washington, whether or not the united states will send military troops to support the haitian national police in their security operations. given the spiraling violence, the big house or has been know from the national se

of all hostages. linda thomas-greenfield, the us nations, says the ball is now in hamas's court to accept the deal, whiching a surge of humanitarian aid to palestiniansúin dire need. well, tensions continue to build on the israel-lebanon border as hezbollah fires dozens of rockets and it comes as negotiators in cairo work to in cairo work to secure a potential ceasefire ceasefire deal. fox fox's trey yanks reps says. trey yates reports at a tel aviv. >> israel's iron dome sho. israe shooting down rockets fired fron lebanon southern lebanon tuesday night.h says hezbollah says it launched the k attack in retaliation forion foa deadly israeli airstrike airstrike earlie earlier in the day. day. in response in response, israeli a hezbollah launch post. post. the sp the latest round of of violem violence comes as lebaneseese oy officials say they're studying a proposal from f the us envoy designed to calm tensions atione border. there is no suchhere isg as a limited war escalatemited l not help the the lebanese and israeli peoplele returnn home. escalation will not will not resolve resolve this ts crisis. mean

of the palestinians would stop. us ambassador to the un linda thomas greenfield said that the veto was because the draft did not mentionhat she called israel's right to self-defense. already over 3,0 palestinians had been killed. then on december 8th last year washington rejected another security council resolution aiming. to mandate a cease fire in gaza. deputy us ambassador to the un, robert wood said that text was rushed and ignored us demands. the palestinian death doll at the time was 17,400. the third us rejection of a ceasefire came on february 20th when thomas greenfield bizarrely claimed any cease fire would jeopardize us negotiations with the wiring sides. the palestinian death toll kept mounting and the humanitarian... crisis in gaza grew worse. the us stonewalling at the security council came even as votes at the united nations general assembly overwhelmingly called for a ceasefire. while resolutions agreed at the general assembly are non-binding, they carry political weights and reflect the international community's real stance on the israeli war. but the united states callous posture and utmost disregard

release of all captives, it's all for that obviously, and the support of the ongoing negotiations on the ground, linda thomas greenfield, the us ambassador to the un is circulating this text to then be officially submitted. now the u.s. hypocracy however is in full display when it comes to palestinians that are getting killed, for example from lack of food and medicine, why? well check out this most recent entry which reveals you... hypocrisy when it comes to military assistance. just came out yesterday, us has quietly approved more than 100 weapons package for israel, amounting to thousands of munitions since the onslot began. thousands of these bombs, the us has approved somewhat without making any noise about it. next up, the video, as you saw, three of them by the un, and then this, the us request for a ceastfire, was not a permanent one, so uh, we can see that that's something hamas is requiring, but the u.s. is only opting for a uh, not a permanent ceasefire, which puts again us hypocrisy at play. in the midst of the war between the arab and israel, june 8th, 1967, unidentified attackers target a us navy warship

release of all captives, it's all for that obviously, and the support of the ongoing negotiations on the ground. uh, linda, thomas greenfieldomes to military assistance, just came out yesterday, us has quietly approved more than 100 weapons package for israel, amounting to thousands of munitions since the onslot began, thousands of these bombs, the us has approved, somewhat without making any noise about it. next up, the video as you saw, three of them by the un, and then this, the us request for ceasefire was not a permanent one, so uh, we can see that that's something. is requiring, but the us is only opting for a uh, not a permanent ceasefire, which puts again us hypocracy at play. an international congress has been held in the iranian capital, focusing on occupation of palestine. legal experts participating in this event have been discussing violations of international humanitarian law in gaza. gisumisha ahmadi reports. discussing legal avenues to stop the israeli genocide in gaza, adamant about finding a way to end the catastrophe in gaza, iran's red cresent society brought together legal experts from 21 countries in t

at the security council, the us ambassador, linda thomas—greenfield said the release of hostages by hamasfire agreement. certain key edits were ignored, including our requests to add a condemnation of hamas. and we did not agree with everything in the resolution — for that reason, we were unfortunately not able to vote "yes". however, as i've said before, we fully support some of the critical objectives in this nonbinding resolution, and we believe it was important for the council to speak out and make clear that our cease—fire must — any cease—fire must come with the release of all hostages. joining me now is our washington correspondent, gary o'donoughue, and hugo bachega, our correspondent injerusalem. gary, first of all to you, we are nearly six months into this war in gaza, just your says thoughts on the significance of this resolution being passed at the un? well, is the first time that _ being passed at the un? well, is the first time that a _ being passed at the un? well, is the first time that a cease-fire _ first time that a cease—fire has been endorsed by the security council i

that this group also did get to meet with some members of the security council, including the united states and bassett, or linda thomas greenfield. here's what they told us. i think we were heard. and i think it's important that all of us have shared our stories. the disconnect is always to the powerlessness that seems to be, could be communicated. we understand, we understand. but again, today none of us are here for condolences. we're not here for apologies. we're here for immediate action. we have demonstrated that every minute signifies the loss of a life the starvation of a child. and so we need an immediate and permanent not temporary permanent ceasefire. now they said that the united states promised to carry the family's messages to washington dc and 2 officials, they're as they continue to work on a ceasefire resolution here at the united nations and talks are ongoing in the region. kristen, sending me the following that i'm using for us do in headquarters. thanks kristen. a while and bracing years synagogues presidents, monkey sol, has, does also the government and replaced the prime minister naming syndicate called the

linda thomas-greenfield if the u.s. approves ofsrael using ai in its assault on gaza. >> the israeli litter has confirmed they are using artificial intelligence in targeting in their war in gaza. do you condemn that and will that be taken into your account in this ai resolution? >> we have been clear this resolution is about making ai safe and secure and trustworthy. we have 60 cosponsors who have signed on to that, including israel. i think as we move forward, we will cai bridge -- see ai ridge the gap we have seen in the past. >> fighting in gaza right now? >> that is not for me to comment on. amy: this comes as the eu approved last week its own, first-ever artificial intelligence act. but rights groups warn the legislation sets a dangerous precedent. the group access now said -- "the new ai act is littered with concessions to industry lobbying, exemptions for the most dangerous uses of ai by law enforcement and migration authorities, and prohibitions so full of loopholes that they don't actually ban some of the most dangerous us

release of law captives, it's all for that obviously, and the support of the ongoing negotiations on the ground, uh, linda, thomas greenfield, the us ambassador to the un is circulating this text to then be officially submitted, now the us hypocresy, however is in full display when it comes to palestinians that are getting killed, for example from lack of food and medicine, why? well check out this most recent entry which reveals hypocrisy when it comes to military assistance, just came out yesterday, us has quitely approved up the video as you saw, three of them by the un, and then this, the us request for a ceasefire, was not a permanent one, so we can see that that's something hamas is requiring, but the us is only opting for a uh, not a permanent ceasefire, which puts again us hypocrisy at play. now continuing with the news, we go to the leader of iran's islamic revolution who has called on newly elected members of the assembly of experts not to neglect the principles of islamic republic in choosing new leader. said selecting the country's leader and monitoring his qualification is probably the biggest task of the roone

ruslan stashka, two news stories from different parts of the world literally blew up the information space, post pre-usa prion, linda thomas greenfieldter thousands of accusations against us, endless sanctions and tons of things put against us weapons. well, in general , there have been big changes in western rhetoric, a satellite of the united states, south korea here doubted the ukrainian version of events in bunche, korean defense minister sinmon sik said that it is not appropriate to make any assessments yet. well, here’s how all these events are connected, we will talk right after a short advertisement, don’t switch. the gray eminence of ukrainian politics, the architect of the maidan, sergei lyovochkin, it was you who pumped up the country of ukraine and europe for a year, now that people won’t leave the square they want, you’re extreme, his wife was also handing out these cookies, it was just that a photo of his wife ended up on the quitoria table, he fueled not only the maidan, but also the anti-maidan, it was just a legend of oneself in the matter. or did not appear, now we will show it and discuss it. sergey lyovochkin, gap

of time, as the u.s. tries to prevent more civilian casualties in the gaza strip. the u.s. ambassador to the united nations, linda th thomas-greenfield is optimistic about that resolution, but it comes as we are seeing ongoing violence at the al shifa hospital complex in gaza where the israeli military is in the midst of a multi-day operation. the viewers may remember the hospital from november when there was a controversial israeli siege on that hospital. now israel's military says hamas is once again using that facility. they have killed well over 100 militants over the past few days and detained hundreds more. they have lost contact with the medical teams. it is a very delicate and precarious situation at the hospital in the gaza strip. >> josh, thank you. >>> the biden administration is moving forward with another round of student debt forgiveness. yesterday the administration said it would cancel $5.8 billion in student debt. nearly 78,000 public service workers, including teachers, nurses and firefighters will be impacted through the public servi service loanf forgivene forgive program. >>> late spring snow could make for a ver

this is something that we also heard the us in facet or to the united nations, linda thomas greenfield. say a few hours earlier of what we have asked that they have been prime minister to do is move forward on a political process that will lead to the establishment of a presidential transitional council that will lead to elections. and we think that is urgent that it's urgent that he moves forward in, in that direction and start the process of bringing norma c back to uh, to the people of haiti. so there had been a lot of confusion in the us media and international media about with the by the administration's position, had been this seems to be a clarification of that. in addition, another clarification has been where it stands on supporting the haitian police force, given the fact that the violence in the country has been escalating to an alarming rage, what the national security council spokesperson, john kirby has said this week, is that the us will not be sending troops to support the haitian national police instead, it will be mobilizing its international partners to support and help restore security. in the

that they were throwing voters of bone by this resolution the us ambassador linda thomas-greenfield said the objections were petty and said the us is going to keep at it not much help here. i don't know how much trump there was before for the people of gaza or anyone in israel who believes in the un, but not today. >> not today, not happening in un security council today in doha, qatar than glaciations to try to move those talks along. do you continue? but an important moment nonetheless, richard roth, thank you so much. it's great to see you still ahead for us, will the dow crack 40,000 for the first time ever? it would be obviously a historic milestone that's a question today as we are watching markets open. and is cracking down on ai usic tennessee just became the first state, making it illegal to recreate a singer's voice the situation with both blitzer night it >> six once cnn liquid iv powdered hydration now it's sugar-free scientifically formulated to deliberate three times the electrolytes of the leading sports drink packed with flavor and zero artificial sweet, liquid ib now it'

of substance. bbc news, new york. sumi: the u.s. ambassador to the united nations linda thomas-greenfield says the u.s.g to broker a cease-fire through negotiations. she blames hamas for the delay in reaching a cease-fire deal and argued that monday's resolution should have condemned hamas. >> certain key edits were ignored, including our request to add a condemnation of hamas. and we did not agree with everything in the resolution. for that reason, we were unfortunately not able to vote yes. however, as i have said before, we fully support some of the critical objectives in this nonbinding resolution and we believe it was important for the council to speak out and make clear th our cease-fire must -- in a cease-fire must come with the release of all hostages. sumi: moments after the resolution passed, israel's prime minister canceled sending a high-level degation to washington because the u.s. did not veto the cease-fire resolution. white house spokesman john kirby responded monday afternoon, saying the administration was caught offguard by that response. mr. kirby sucked to play down e impact of the

of the haitian prime minister instead that it was urging the transition towards an empowered and inclusive governance structure. a position that was reiterated at the united nations by the us ambassador, linda thomas greenfield. what we have asked the haitian prime minister to do is move forward on a political process that will lead to the establishment of a presidential transitional council that will lead to elections. and we think that it's urgent that it's urgent that he moves forward in, in that direction and start the process of bringing normal c back to uh, to the people of haiti. as the united nations security council takes up the issue of the crisis and escalating violence in haiti, there is also the question about whether or not the united states will send troops to support the haitian national police. it's security operations, the latest word from the national security council spokesperson, john kirby, however, is that the 5 and administration will not send troops. instead, what the bible administration is proposing is to mobilize support through with international partners to support and restore security as well. we know that the by the ministration senior government officials is in contact with s

today, the us ambassador to the security council, linda thomas—greenfield, said a ceasefire can begin immediately, but only with the release ofst hostage. certain key edits were ignored, including the inclusion - of the condemnation of hamas. and we did not agree _ with everything in the resolution. for that reason, we were - unfortunately not able to vote yes. however, as i've said before, we fully support some - of the critical objectives in this non—binding resolution, - and we believe it was important for the council to speak out - and make clear that our ceasefire must — any ceasefire — _ must come with the release of all hostages. _ but this us abstention will further strain already tense relations between israel and washington. a delegation of israeli security officials that was supposed to travel to the us this week will now stay at home. the israeli defence minister yoav gallant was already in washington to discuss israel's planned offensive in rafah. from the white house this afternoon — outside, not within the gates. translation: we have no moral right to stop the war _ in gaza until we return all the hostages home

linda thomas greenfield. you, i know we've had postings to 4 different countries as us on the box of the, you know, the precious, but she must be under a great deal of pressure here. and i just wanna bring in a little bit of my own reporting because i mean based that the you and the last 11 years were out to 0. and i've had a number of conversations with her in recent months. and with me, she sticks to the official us line, but i've been told by a number of senior security counsel diplomats that she's increasingly uncomfortable in her role and uncomfortable with her countries policy. and yet, she's the one who has to stick a hand up in veto. if those, if that reporting is correct and i can only tell you that's what people are telling me. how difficult must that be. it certainly is difficult, but she is a professionals professional and she has a uh, an oath of office and a deep professional and personal loyalties to her office and her responsibilities under the constitution. but this question leads to the follow up with dr. usher always like she so wonderfully articulated, the palestinian, the outside of the pal

sort of start reaching an agreement, talking , shaking hands, there is one direction. in its manner a little, but here they propose, indicate this direction, let's listen to linda thomas greenfieldse. the united states is ready to engage in bilateral discussions on arms control with russia and china right now, without preconditions. all they have to do is just say yes and come to the table in good faith, we must interact with each other to reduce. by the way, not particularly ideological, i would say that she is extremely pragmatic, they remembered, just now the meeting on the elbe, but before the meeting on the elbe, truman basically says: that it’s not known how it will be, we need to see, now the russians have entered into battle with the germans, who will begin to win, that we will support, that is, it was not about the fight against fascism, but about supporting the one who begins to win this battle, and this again, well, this is a historical fact, they are all in this, that is, again, in less than 3 months after the meeting on the elbe, the us military command had plans for... well, the presence of this naturally human component, but politicians, the way they behave in suc