that it lindsey hoyle the speaker of the - tonight's news. yle the speaker of the house of commons injust hoyle the speaker of the house of commons in just the last couple of minutes. no doubt we will hear from plenty more political leaders in the coming hours. i can bring you the reflections of a few others beyond westminster. humza yousaf the first minister of scotland saying this evening, my thoughts and prayers are with his majesty the king, i wish him the very best for a speedy recovery and a return to public life. my thoughts are also with her majesty. mark drakeford as well, the first minister of wales, writing on social media, i am saddened to hear the news that his majesty king charles iii is facing further health challenges. my thoughts and those of people across wales will be with him and his family this evening. i sent my very best wishes as he starts treatment for a full and swift recovery. reflections there from cardiff and edinburgh and from the house of commons. ichris cardiff and edinburgh and from the house of commons.— cardi

his house of commons, lindsey hoyle, has again apologized for allowing a controversial vote on amendment by the labor party on gauze. the scottish national party says the speakers decision preventative vote on it's 65 motion, some of these not want him to resign or the full set reports from london. so after the cereal wednesday evening, there was comparative calm in the house of commons on thursday, but then he said the anger, ling good. we do not on these benches therefore, believe that you can continue in your whole speaker. we do not have confidence in your ability to do so. the scottish national party says to lindsey holders decision to allow a vote on an amendment by the main opposition made of policy prevented voting on its own guns, a sci fi motion, and its language referring to collective punishment. instead there was chaos. as the governing conservative party removed its own amendment and the labor one was possible to magically heading off a potentially embarrassing labor split. when it goes a ceasefire is dozens that may be conservative in us and team members. signing a motion

put forward by the scottish national party, the incident eventually so to speak of the house, lindsey hoyle apologized for his actions, his hurtful sense outside parliament protested to monte to vote. backing the scottish national policies cool for immediate c side and gaza inside a flurry of controversy and assigned as things to come as the speak. unexpectedly put forward the prospect of allowing a vote, not just on the government's amendment to do so on one foot fluid by the name of position later party support. so this motion would follow the remove not ever sending vale of legitimacy that the u. t is continued support just as feels this it was, was a gas off today, but there was political danger. hit worried that many of its own and peace might vote with the s and p as they had in a similar debate in november. hence its own amendments for the 1st time endorsing an immediate cease fire, but with caviar, so it must 5 assess and safety. it's uh, filed or does this install? yeah, that's why we all clear. it's real panel. we expect you to see spicy is to mass continues with violets. it's rig

so lindsey hoyle is being accused of breaking precedent by allowing a labor party amendment to the motion which is put forward by the scottish national party. the decision was heavily criticized by s and p and conservative members of parliament for the in blackfoot is on s and p. m p. he explained what happened. we didn't walk the problem. we actually went into the voting lobby. so we could vote for the lieberman, but of course we never wants to be in that situation. you know, today was supposed to be a problem and being given the opportunity to help you vote on whether the should be 65, then guys. and i'll probably see it is across design of this upfront hundreds, thousands of positions that have written to them. asking that we support a ceasefire. 75 percent of the public of these items. what not to take place. and then what happens is that in the positions, you know, we get to a c o position days a year, effectively was hijacked by the liberal party because they came up with this proposition that allowed them to have a goals. and the purpose of that particular been the government part

and goza speaker, sir lindsey hoyle, is being accused of breaking precedence by allowing a labor party amendment to the motion which was put forward by scott the scottish national party. the decision was heavily criticized by the s and p and conservative members of parliament. how are you false, it has more on this from london. or the easiest way to frame is, is what should've happened. and what did, what should have happened was the opposition. the smaller of the 2 major opposition parties, the certainty, the scottish national policy was supposed to have an opposition day motion, which it was using to put forward a cold for an immediate cease fire in gaza. and now that was going to put the labor party, the bigger opposition party, a widely tips to. so it'd be likely to win the election later this year in a very difficult position because of the members on its left. having already rebels in a previous such votes in november, it had shifted its position somewhat to call for an immediate cease fire, but with some caviar to ensure is there any security? so it is real, cannot be expected t

that is after sir lindsey hoyle selected other amendments from the labor party and government to the motion put forward by the scottish national party. the decision which is said to be unusual was criticized by the s and p, and by conservative and peas. the spring and harry fawcett, who was outside the british parliament in london. harry, i'm going to be completely honest with you. i barely understand what's going on. explain it. thanks to that. what i think it's called a hospital pause in sporting part of the do my best. this is an extremely chaotic situation after what was through the most of the debates, seen as a relatively high quality and serious debate. but it has ended in real political foss. what happened was that the certainty, the scottish national policy, had what is known as an opposition day at parliament in the house of commons, when it can make its own motions. and so it again, as it did in the van to put forward a motion for an immediate cease fire. now this is putting real pressure not so much on the government, which is holding to its line and calling for an immedi

over 60 m p 's are calling on speaker lindsey hoyle to quit for his handling of that parliamentary session. the scottish national party s and p which a table the motion and the conservative government has both condemned him for selecting the labor parties amendment. they accused the speaker of trying to avoid internal divisions within the labor party. despite his duty of impartiality. every fawcett has more from outside, the british parliament, us increasing pressure, especially since in the last hour or so. the scottish national policy officially said as a policy is the 3rd largest policy and comment. it had no longer any confidence in lindsay oil, so lindsey oil to carry on. it is position as feature of the house accusing him of pauses on politics in favor of labor. during the debate, he came to the house himself a little earlier in the day, and he apologized again for the decision making on wednesday. but he said it was out of concern for m p 's safety and he said he never wanted to pick up a phone and find that one of his friends on either side of the house had been murdered by terrori

sort, lindsey hoyle is the accused of breaking precedence by allowing a labor party amendment to the motion which was put forward by the scottish national port. palestinians in ramallah had been protesting to voice their supports. the people in the besieged gaza strip. they're also calling for improve conditions for palestinians being held in his really presence it. abraham has more from ramallah and the occupied west back. we're not going to get used to the genocide in gaza. this is one of the chance with getting heat in the, by processors for saying that the world is normalizing these way, the aggression against palestinians in the be seized gauze and strip. as you can see, these are the names of the kind of cities who have been killed by these really forces also proves us. those here are saying that this role is using the dogs out to us to make this situation in the few cars. but we continue this way, the ways intimidation, 2nd point. what we need is more pressure from what on to the to and all the support that was coming through is what this is what would make an effect is and th

lindsey hoyle, so let's see how it plays out.— let's see how it plays out.surprising to see _ which is interesting? , yes, quite surprising to see the _ which is interesting? , yes, quite surprising to see the prince - which is interesting? , yes, quite surprising to see the prince of. surprising to see the prince of wales talking about such a hot button issue. people say it is a humanitarian statement rather than a political statement, humanitarian statement rather than a politicalstatement, i humanitarian statement rather than a political statement, i think that is right, he is not calling for a ceasefire in political language it, he is saying that too many civilians have died on both sides of the conflict in israel and gaza. while there has been a busy funnies in some political quarters about this, there hasn't been a lot. the government was consulted before prince william released a statement and decided to have this engagement with the british red cross who he visited yesterday, and he will visit a synagogue next week to hear about surging and him a ——

today, he spoke out today and it was that um , uh, was that that led, um, uh, lindsay, lindsey doyle, lindsay hoyle. no relation at all to make those comments and i think we'd be much better to come at this from the other way around and just openly we were talking openly admit it. we were talking about free speech earlier. i think should be able to think people should be able to say what like. you say what they like. i think you can, plaster you can, you know, plaster what you like but let's like on big ben, but let's always have open and honest debate it. let's talk debate about it. let's talk about who the perpetrator is. >> absolutely right >> ah, you're absolutely right that addressed. that they weren't addressed. this of david this after the murder of david amess. horrific amess. absolutely horrific attack radical. attack by an islamist radical. they started talking in parliament about how they wanted to a bit to police people's tweets a bit more, on hate speech. more, clamp down on hate speech. it had literally nothing to do with happened. well they with what happened. well they don't address