he's a linguist at uc berkeley. he joins us to talk about how democrats and progressives are confused. linguistically, size up donald trump for me. >> he knows how not just to speak, but how to change your brain and effect your brain. he's a super salesman, and he's very good at it, and you need to know a little bit about your brain. ideas don't float in the air, if you have a world view, your understanding of the world in general, then that's a lot of neural circuits. those neural circuits are fixed. once they're fixed, they become what you might call a neural filter, you can only understand what your brain allows you to understand. if you have only one world view, you're stuck to understand things that fit that world view. and if information comes in that doesn't fit it, it will be either not noticed, ignored, ridiculed or attacked. >> people choose to have one world view? >> not necessarily. a lot of times they're brought up with it. >> he could expand his world view if he wanted to. >> i don't think so. >> you d

who are culturally and linguistically able to handle that. we're going as fast as we can. we're addressing all of the specific items that were addressed, but we completely also agree with your perspective that, you know, its scope of the da is this, and we're down to these few items. we should be able to find a way to get those items off the table. >> regarding the culturally linguistic -- people were relieved in year's past for doing what they needed to do and it created the gap and we have this time period go by and we have one other person. why not call these people back and say -- >> it wasn't that people were relieved of their duties. the program was consolidated across our entire enterprise and the fte load, particularly in certain aspects of the program did not need to be as high as it had been when there were separate programs across the campuses, so those fte were offered other roles at other places and i'm not sure if they've ended up and they're working at u.c. and i believe they're not working with us at cpmc, so we can't ask them

who are culturally and linguistically able to handle that. we're going as fast as we can. we're addressing all of the specific items that were addressed, but we completely also agree with your perspective that, you know, its scope of the da is this, and we're down to these few items. we should be able to find a way to get those items off the table. >> regarding the culturally linguistic -- people were relieved in year's past for doing what they needed to do and it created the gap and we have this time period go by and we have one other person. why not call these people back and say -- >> it wasn't that people were relieved of their duties. the program was consolidated across our entire enterprise and the fte load, particularly in certain aspects of the program did not need to be as high as it had been when there were separate programs across the campuses, so those fte were offered other roles at other places and i'm not sure if they've ended up and they're working at u.c. and i believe they're not working with us at cpmc, so we can't ask them

who are culturally and linguistically able to handle that. we're going as fast as we can. we're addressing all of the specific items that were addressed, but we completely also agree with your perspective that, you know, its scope of the da is this, and we're down to these few items. we should be able to find a way to get those items off the table. >> regarding the culturally linguistic -- people were relieved in year's past for doing what they needed to do and it created the gap and we have this time period go by and we have one other person. why not call these people back and say -- >> it wasn't that people were relieved of their duties. the program was consolidated across our entire enterprise and the fte load, particularly in certain aspects of the program did not need to be as high as it had been when there were separate programs across the campuses, so those fte were offered other roles at other places and i'm not sure if they've ended up and they're working at u.c. and i believe they're not working with us at cpmc, so we can't ask them

he's a professor of cognitive science and linguistics.rge, what have we been doing wrong trying to fact check the president? >> well, first of all, you do need the facts but you need to know how to present those facts because if you just negate what he's saying, you're going to just strengthen him. remember, richard nixon said i'm not a crook and people thought of him as a crook. i wrote a book called don't think of an elephant. it made you think of an elephant. if you repeat what donald trump says and negate it and say know and say it's false. what you're doing is strengthening that because in your brain, the neurocircuits have to activate what you're negating it and that strengthens what you're negating. every time you negate it, you help the other side. what you can do is the opposite. trump is diverting attention from real issues. real issues like russia, for example. like his foreign policy, like his business connections and on and on. lots of real issues that he's diverting attention from. what you can do in reporting this is talk f

then finally, they are linguistically, ethnically, culturally, religiously different from the heart of these europe societies and that is causing a backlash. soledad: when we return, a "saturday night live" skit skewers the white house staff. when is imitation not a form of with the xfinity tv app, anything with a screen is a tv. stream 130 live channels. plus 40,000 on demand tv shows and movies, all on the go. you can even download from your x1 dvr and watch it offline. only xfinity gives you more to stream to any screen. click, call or visit an xfinity store today to learn more. or, get started with this great offer. soledad: welcome back to "matter of fact." two strategies are unfolding in the first weeks of the trump administration, mocking the president and hating on the media. this past week, gallup's tracking poll showed president trump with a 42 percent approval rating, and a 54 percent disapproval rating. at the poll's release president trump took to twitter to declare "any negative polls are fake news." then there was this gallup poll about the media and the president. 36 pe

she was training to be a linguist. she said that all changed when she was raped and retaliated against. she had no choice but to leave. >> it's frustrating to think about where i could have been. versus where i am at now. where i'm trying to rebuild my life. >> reporter: that means biking to nonstop appointments. she goes to therapy in northeast. veterans center in silver spring. and gets fed at miriam's kitchen in northwest. >> the job interview is getting to work medical appointments. those are all huge barriers, with easy solution of transportation assistance. so when you have that, it can really make a big difference. >> reporter: the after the women's -- after the women's march, the nonprofit took to facebook, asking for metro cards. 800,000 later, they are getting doled out. jen is using hers to take the bus. it's faster than her bike. a road to recovery, built on facebook phenomenon. >> it means a lot to someone who doesn't have much. >> it started with the woman's march. but they are still taking donations will

then finally, they are linguistically, ethnically, culturally, religiously different from the heart ofurope societies and that is causing a backlash. soledad: when we return, a “saturday night live” skit skewers the white house staff. when is imitation not a form of flattery? soledad: welcome back to “matter of fact.” two strategies are unfolding in the first weeks of the trump administration, mocking the president and hating on the media. this past week, gallup's trump with a 42 percent approval rating, and a 54 percent disapproval rating. at the poll's release president trump took to twitter to declare "any negative polls are fake news." then there was this gallup poll about the media and the president. 36 percent say the press has been "too hard" on trump. 28 percent say the press hasn't been tough enough. and, 31 percent say coverage has been "about right." now break it down by republicans and democrats. 74% of the republicans say the press has been too hardton donald trump. only 9 percent of the democrats agree. no shock there. that's the data. but does the mocking of the presiden

on the aircraft, i have linguists. their weapon is language. their ability to tell me what daesh is doing allows me as an electronic warfare officer to prioritize their effects and operations in support of our iraqi aillies. stephen: right now, the battle for mosul is one of the biggest operations. is the ec-130 participating, and if so, how are you helping? >> it's a low density, high demand asset. we are also low density, high demand when it comes to our operations. we are always in demand for how high priority operations. aaron: such as the mosul fi ght? >> i can't comment on where we are operating. stephen: how do they use commercial, off-the-shelf technology to try to stay ahead of you guys? >> i can't speak to their tactics. they are clever. if it radiates, they will use it. every commander wants to be able to command and control his forces from the strategic, down to the tactical level. they are very clever. they are a very good adversary. our guys are just a little bit better. stephen: how old is this aircraft, and how old are the syste

regarding culture linguistic and eligible standards, it's cpmc policy to deliver services with these standards and they have provided a copy of their policy implementing the standards, but the health and planning commissions expressed both in 2013 and in 2014, that they still have questioning about the appropriateness of this services. the coalition for san franciscans addressed concerns at saint luke. cpmc had a task force to review their compliance status and opportunities for improvement and secured an outside expert to advise them. on september of 2015, they shared their class standards assessments and our own experts at dph reviewed the assessments and called attention to areas to benefit from focus and requested that cpmc address these issues in their 2015 annual compliance report which they have done. so, as i said at the beginning, i would summarize here to talk about your concerns in the past and what -- what accomplishments have been made since the 2015 report was filed. so in 2014, the commission may remember there were concerns about the 1500 medicare beneficiaries in the

is a senior lecturer in linguistics in new zealand, there's inappropriate usage that could subject us to judgment >> we instantly make inferences about somebody's education level and so on based on the language they use >> that's why she says it's important to understand that what's acceptable on the street or social media >> no faith in the educational system after you read social media. >> doesn't always fly in an office memo. >> correct someone it would just be a little mental notice >> what are common mistakes? she said many people mistake their, with there: literally utilizing the word literally 1,000 times incorrectly. >> when you say i'm literally want, you know, and my brain was literally on fire, people get annoyed with that. they say your brain is not on fire >> so many rules, so little time, which is why some opt to keep it simple >> if you don't how to say it correctly change the phrasing >> that's a solid rule. the doctor says some examples have become more socially acceptable than actually saying it correctly. for instance, very few people will ask whom does this book be

it chronicles what happens to a linguist who learns the aliens' language. aliens, learning their language, this particular language will change her life, basically. i maybe should not say that on camera, because it's one of the keys of the movie, but it is really a film about our relationship with nature also, i would say. i've dreamt about being a doctor, but... with six nominations, hacksaw ridge is also up for best picture. i'm adopted, i'm not really indian. lion has six nominations, too. a feel—good real—life tale of a young australian man of indian heritage who uses google earth to find his birth mother in india. it stars dev patel, virtually upstaged in the film by young sunny pawar, who plays the younger version of his character — a boy who gets very lost. this is a boy who, you know, was struggling for survival on the streets of india. he's torn away from his family and the first half of the movie is about him using his instincts to escape danger and predators in this maximum city. what happened to my brother? manchester by the sea also has six nom

it chronicles what happens to a linguist who learns the aliens' language.should maybe not say that on camera, was it is one of the keys of the movie, but it is really a film about our relationship with nature also. i've dreamt about being a doctor... with six nominations, hacksaw ridge is also up for best picture. lyon also has six nominations. it is the feelgood tale ofa nominations. it is the feelgood tale of a young australian man of indian heritage who uses his google earth to find his birth mother in india. the boy gets very lost. this is a boy who was the boy gets very lost. this is a the by f first half of the film is about him using his instincts to escape danger and predators in the city. manchester by the sea also has six nominations. the story is emotionally powerful and some would say brilliant cinema. other best picture include fences, an adaptation of a play. and hell or high water which could be described asa high water which could be described as a modern western, as two bank robbing brothers robert bank. one of the most liked best picture n

is a senior lecturer in linguistics in new zealand, there's inappropriate usage that could subject us to judgment >> we instantly make inferences about somebody's education level and so on based on the language they use >> that's why she says it's important to understand that what's acceptable on the street or social media >> no faith in the educational system after you read social media. >> doesn't always fly in an office memo. >> correct someone it would just be a little mental notice >> what are common mistakes? she said many people mistake their, with there: literally utilizing the word literally 1,000 times incorrectly. >> when you say i'm literally want, you know, and my brain was literally on fire, people get annoyed with that. they say your brain is not on fire >> so many rules, so little time, which is why some opt to keep it simple >> if you don't how to say it correctly change the phrasing >> that's a solid rule. the doctor says some examples have become more socially acceptable than actually saying it correctly. for instance, very few people will ask whom does this book be

she plays a linguist. i like the idea behind arrival.ys the interpreter. that is right. i am a linguist myself, so i found it touching, that you would invent a language to speak to them. the talking and communication would be the way forward. it is a powerful message. it is a film i saw before the political upheaval of these days. films like this, this is when cinema can be important, it can show you how behaviours can work, what scenarios may be. arrival is one of those important movies. not self—important, those important movies. not self—importa nt, it is those important movies. not self—important, it is about the practicalities of sci—fi. in the end, it is a film that comes down to amy adams and the personal aspect of it. while it was being cosmic, it had me. i loved it. there are some great effects. and jeremy renner, who plays opposite her, he is very strong as well. i think we‘re looking at naomie harris. we are. she is from moonlight. she is wearing gucci. yes, an extraordinary collection. it is so upbeat and pretty. they had a n

especially no one left behind was instrumental after a four year, four-month fight, my linguist just came to the united states in late november, 2016. and they were instrumental in making that happen. my question to you, sir, is, one, if they meet the requirements, why should there be a cap of numbers on the s.i.v. programs? if we have this out there for them and they qualify, why are we capping the number? general petraeus: yeah. >> and i participated in a panel on refugees and spoke specifically about s.i.v.'s at princeton in the fall and i couldn't tell you the number of vietnam veterans that were in the crowd that came up and talked to me about the moral injury that they still deal with today, thinking about leaving their comrades behind. how could we potentially program this in the future planning for the military if we go into a large-scale war where we need these people, how could we make that happen so it's part of the planning process like phase four, phase five? thank you, sir. general petraeus: first, obviously i don't know what was in the minds of the architects of this p

happening in sri lanka with the tamil issue and there was the concern about whether it is economic or linguisticthe last 30 or a0 years. minister of the state is not an easyjob. the last 30 or a0 years. minister of the state is not an easy job. we will be watching this closely, fascinating political times. thank you for talking us through that, anbarasan ethirajan. you‘re watching newsday on the bbc. still to come on the programme: violinist lee—chin siow talks about her plans to bring singaporean music to the new york‘s carnegie hall when she plays there this week. this is the moment that millions in iran had been waiting for. after his long years in exile, the first hesitant steps of ayatollah khomeini on iranian soil. south africa‘s white government has offered its black opponents concessions unparalleled in the history of apartheid. the ban on the african national congress is lifted immediately, and the anc leader, nelson mandela, after 27 years injail, is to be set free unconditionally. the aircraft was returning from belgrade, where manchester united had entered the semi—final of the europ

especially no one left behind was instrumental after a four year, four-month fight, my linguist just came to the united states in late november, 2016. and they were instrumental in making that happen. my question to you, sir, is, one, if they meet the requirements, why should there be a cap of numbers on the s.i.v. programs? if we have this out there for them and they qualify, why are we capping the number? general petraeus: yeah. >> and i participated in a panel on refugees and spoke specifically about s.i.v.'s at princeton in the fall and i couldn't tell you the number of vietnam veterans that were in the crowd that came up and talked to me about the moral injury they deal, thinking about leaving their comrades behind. how could we potentially program this in the future planning for the military if we go into a large-scale war where we need these people, how could we make that happen so it's part of the planning process like phase four, phase five? thank you, sir. general petraeus: first, obviously i don't know what was in the minds of the architects of this program of the legislat

. >> hello, my name is yesterday ka lopez, and i am a phd student studying the linguistic experience of the parents in the bay area, and my husband teaches in san francisco and he teaches 7th grade. and i like to make a comment about how attorney defenders for people in deportation proceedings is a human right and is absolutely essential for us to be able to teach our children ideals of equality and of fairness, but also of the same children that are being educated here in san francisco, come to school every day with die pregs and severe anxiety because they are worried about their parents being deported. our children here in san francisco and i am also emotionally upset by a term that was used earlier to say that we are unsure that at best we are it is unclear how the federal government is fwoeg to respond to issues of immigration, and i think obviously if anybody has been following anything in the news, the response by the federal government to immigrant communities is hostile, people are already experiencing deportations and raids and i think that it is time for san francisco to s

because you're looking at the most mono linguist there is. but we'll see.s on the list anyway. >>> live look outside. it is our michael and sons weather cam. winds are still gusting to 25 miles an hour. feels like it's in the 20s. if you're going out tonight, dress accordingly. temperatures, though, just check this out. 72 in kansas city. with 74 today in denver. with an outdoor relative humidity at 40%. still 52 in bismarck. and we're now in the cold spot. 39. but not that cold. i mean, the coldest air is yes, in the east. and if we go back and look at temperature change between now and 24 hours ago. okay, we're a little colder. 5 degrees colder. 5 degrees colder. and maybe 8 degrees in philadelphia. i gotta tell you, the rest of the week and the weekend and into next week, is going to be some kind of warm for us. colder tonight, yes. but then bus stop temps, 20 to 50. then a rapid warmup tomorrow. we'll be in the 50s tomorrow. maybe upper 40s, frederick north and west. but downtown, low to mid-50s. and boom, warmer over the weekend. temperatures in the 60

you are famous for your linguistic rigour, why didn't you say something more like what you've just said high tension, high nervousness encounter. there is a difference between the considered use of language in a conversation like this and having to think fast on your feet. do you regret it? do you regret having used the word experts in that context? no, i think, life is too short for regrets. i think one of the things that is occasionally irritating a blanket rejection of facts, evidence, rigour. so you don't trust mark carney? or the chancellor or the prime minister? not really, no. they don't know any more than we do, do they, really? no. before the referendum, newsnight came to bognor wherejoan and some friends told us why they would ignore warnings does he know what it's like to go around sainsbury's, shopping? does he know what it's like? that line seemed to reveal something profound about our changing relationship with experts, so we've come back. joan is away but over a cup of tea i asked a few of the locals how experts lost their trust. it's too much scaremongering from so—calle

lacked no linguistic ability to conduct government. second, the number of occupation -- the public demand to bring the boy so meant that the number of occupation forces would decline from 500,000 to 200,000. that left macarthur without enough bayonets to enforce policies by intimidation or rob power. there was one further factor that appeared critical to the course of the occupation of japan, both official and public interest in japanese matters very swiftly declined. american leadership was highly egocentric. the distances to asia were vastly greater. japan was much less well-known in the european states. macarthur had already established a distant relationship with washington and superiors there than other american commanders. finally, the attention of the american people was diverted to conversion of the economy from war to peace. 1946 is still the record for the most industrial turmoil the u.s. has ever experienced. what about the japanese side of this equation? within the japanese inner circle, and what those might storage, andria

the linguistic leaps, the punch line on saturday night live. >> if you read the whole tweet, that isit says. >> reporter: conway's character showcased getting testy about having to constantly defend her boss. >> what do you want me to stay? yes, he said that, he's crazy. >> reporter: even letting loose basking in her notorious name recognition. ♪ conway >> reporter: but it is not all lives, the office of government ethics could recommend punishment for kellyanne conway's promoting of ivanka trump's brand. in the end it is really up to the president. but federal law does bar employees from promoting a product that would benefit a friend or relative. >> now the director for ted cruz's campaign, dan pfeiffer, kellyanne conway says the president supports her 100%. we have heard reports that the president is upset with her. how much does it hurt her credibility? >> hurts her correct a lot. her job is to go on tv and advocate for the president. she's made mistake after mistake and she's learned the difference between being a cable tv pundit and being a spokesperson for the president of the

joining us now to help us decipher it all is linguistics expert rob drummond from the university of manchesters forever being used in a sports environment. we have got goals for the squad, but you are saying that isa the squad, but you are saying that is a different meaning. a similar meaning, but i think the squad is different. we are now saying squads of friends, especially teenage girls. so it is your aspirations and things, as a group. yes. what do you think of all these new words?m things, as a group. yes. what do you think of all these new words? it is great, some won't hang around for long, but on a serious note, the fa ct long, but on a serious note, the fact that language does change and people can create new words, it is a good thing because language has a lwa ys good thing because language has always changed and will always change, and whether some of these stick around, i am not sure. talk us through this one. dash—macro smishing. that is a clever one. it sounds nice as well. some of them, when they sound nice, they stick around. the fraudulent practice of sending text messages fro

i like that linguistic knowledge. she is calling it a humble cuisines. is making us realize that these are food systems and have a logic. they are using what they have, but there is also a definite cuisine element that we can talk about in terms of techniques and spicing elements and ingredients. knowecond thing i want to -- note, is she spends a certain amount of time talking about the islamic influences on european western cuisine. if you're into. periods and ato lot of spices and products -- wheat and barley, a lot of food and cooking techniques are coming via the arabs and islamic civilization, moving into spain, and then moving into europe. age, maybe wed need to be reminded of that more. maybe we need to think about these things in the long range. another fascinating moment in this book and elsewhere that she writes is the connection between malay in mexico and indian curries. they are both playing from the same source, similar grammar, similar ingredients, similar logic to them all across the world. defaultnot progress or in the same way that euro

she joined the united states army and was trained as a russian linguist for military intelligence in the army and as most people know here she worked for the state attorney's office for many years as a prosecutor after graduating from the university of florida, college of law and she worked under jerry blair at the state attorney's office and then went to work at a constitutional law firm defending religious and first amendment liberty for several years. came back again to the state attorney's office and worked under the honorable steve jarvis and was providentially launched from there into speaking about our liberties and the constitution. she now travels and teaches an average of 265 events in over 22 states for about the last six years since that providential launching. she has a radio show in addition to all of that but she does six days a week. one of those is broadcast as a television show on the christian television network lifestyle channel. and many more things. she has been a plumber, an emt, a biochemist, a paralegal, an attorney. i think the label that she carries most pr

deserve the pulitzer, you may change your nine because he may deserve a pulitzer for the orwellian linguisticymnastics in his article. there is no actual starvation, but there's widespread mortality from diseases due to malnutrition. [laughter] duranty is an easy target, and we could as many do dismiss him as a liar. but duranty was not an outlier at the time. famous people, intelligent like george bernard shaw, hg wells, french prime minister, fooled byull by -- the russian propaganda campaign during the holodomor. author ofr kessler, one of the best books on communism ever written, dieneunately dismissed ukrainians as "enemies of the people who preferred baking to work." workg."n to why the lies? who do these people think they are fooling? george orwell holds the key to the minds that can believe freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. it was, orwell wrote considered equally proper to publicize famines when they had them in india and conceal them when they happened in the ukraine. war,is was true before the the intellectual atmosphere is certainly no better now. 2017.k now it extends

world she has segments on the high and also the humble cuisines and i like that kind of lit rarely linguistic nudge that she's calling it. a humble cuisine. because it's making us realize, oh, yeah, these are food systems and these have a logic. that are using what they have. but there's also a definite cuisine element that we can talk about in terms of techniques and spicing elements and ingredients. the second thing i want to note is that one important thing about the book that maybe many people aren't aware of is that she spends a certain amount of time talking about the islamic influences on european western cuisine. and if you're into that -- those periods, you're pretty aware that, you know, citrus and ice and irrigation and grafting and a lot of spices and a lot of products, wheat i think is -- mediterranean at least. but barley, a lot of food and cooking techniques are coming via the arabs and via islamic civilization and moving into spain and then moving up into europe, which i think is in this day and age, maybe we need to be reminded of that more. maybe we need to kind of think abo

which i do not, you may change your mind because he mak may deserve a pulitzer for the orwellian linguistics gymnastics in his article. he writes simply, there is no actual starvation, but there is widespread mortality from diseases due to malnutrition. [laughter] now, duranty is an easy target and we could as many to dismiss him as a liar. but duranty enforcer was not an outlier at the time. famous people come intelligent people like george bernard shaw, h.g. wells, french prime minister were all fooled by russia's propaganda campaign during the holodomor. even arthur kessler -- that's the goal. even arthur kessler, author of darkness and knew which i think is one of the best books on common is ever written, unfortunately dismissed the dying ukrainians as quote enemies of the people who preferred begging to work it so my question is why? why this shameless lying? the almost hilarious doublespeak, the complete denial of reality. who do these people think they are fooling? as always george orwell holds the key to the mind that can believe freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. in 1945,

there are linguistic limits in terms of language, signage for instance has sometimes been seen as a problem. ,here have been moments when there was one incident when the nypd local precinct 109th was called for some kind of crime. and they could not find the store because the sign was in korean only. there are some issues they are sometimes. there are spatial limits as well. it is a small space, as you can see. a lot of people densely packed in this urban area. people tend to be fairly protective of whatever little space they have as city dwellers. that is one of the things different about living in a city, has one of the famous sociologists wrote back in the 1930's in an essay called "urbanism as a way of life," when he described the city as a large heterogeneous space. because of those factors, it can affect, he argued, behavior. it changes how people in cities live in some ways. they tend to be more private. you are on the subway, the bus. what do you do? you hide behind a book or newspaper. this is a good book to hide behind, or your ipad or iphone, or whatever. just to shield whatever

whether it's linguistic or religious or ethnic. which is fine, we all want to have an identity. the only problem is if my identity hates your identity, then it creates all kinds of conflict. and i think that patriotism is a good thing. nationalism is very dangerous. and hyper-nationalism is something that is definitely out there that we'll probably talk about more. but it is part of the down side of globalization. the other mega trend is the growth of technology, which has been unbelievable, in terms of things that the rapidity that people can connect with each other, all over the world. a good example always to talk about is a woman farmer in kenya who can pay her bills with a mobile phone instead of walking many miles to do it. so that's the upside. the downside of it is that it has disaggregated voices. and so people have their own way of talking to each other, or how they get their information. i happen to believe in political parties, but if voices are disaggregated then people are also disaggregated politically. and so, that's the downside of it. we've seen it, for instanc

jury and the united states army trash - - training is a russian linguist and she worked for the state attorney's office says a prosecutor after graduating the college of law and worked under jerry blair and went to work at a constitutional law firm then came back again to the state attorney's office working in under the honorable steve jarvis and was providential a launched from there into speaking about private liberty's head the constitution profession travel said teaches an average of 265 defense in 22 states since the launching. she has a radio show in addition to all of that six days a week. one is broadcast as a television show of the christian television network and to many more things. a plumber, even teeth, biochemists, a paralegal, attorney, and the labels that she carries would be mother, wife, christian and patriot. [applause] >> the slogan is liberty over secure 80 truth over your favorite personality. she takes a lot of slack because she holds the belief that we should protect and abide by the constitutional principles matter which party is in is in power. please will co

sometimes the bad guys say something to the linguist that they wouldn't say to the good guys.eep an open mind about why people do what they do. >> following up on your first question from the bush and obama administration of dealing with two thirds and islamists it seems more an issue of prevention and management and winning. all they are going to do is retreat. you have to treat the source. we make it look sexy for them because we allow them to operate in the open. instead of confronting them, we try to get them to like us enough that they want to attack us -- won't attack us and that conveys that we are weak and it's put in our mind. they do not represent an mac substantiaand accessdigital thrd states. let me tell you what that means. i then right at the point of this pier and whethespear and ws that, i hear they cannot kill enough americans to bring down the government, but the government doesn't exist so you can stack up americans and it exists to protect americans. it's the opposite. they predicted your country would turn on you. >> is about the 2004. they said i understa

. >> hello, my name is yesterday ka lopez, and i am a phd student studying the linguistic experience of the parents in the bay area, and my husband teaches in san francisco and he teaches 7th grade. and i like to make a comment about how attorney defenders for people in deportation proceedings is a human right and is absolutely essential for us to be able to teach our children ideals of equality and of fairness, but also of the same children that are being educated here in san francisco, come to school every day with die pregs and severe anxiety because they are worried about their parents being deported. our children here in san francisco and i am also emotionally upset by a term that was used earlier to say that we are unsure that at best we are it is unclear how the federal government is fwoeg to respond to issues of immigration, and i think obviously if anybody has been following anything in the news, the response by the federal government to immigrant communities is hostile, people are already experiencing deportations and raids and i think that it is time for san francisco to s

if i have any budding linguist students out there, i urge you to write a master's thesis. one of the notes read man -- ma'am, that negro new hire did this, a long, tall, slim negro. i writes well play with me. that is absolutely wild, and it was on the front page of the atlanta journal the next day. a child labor found dead in the basement of a child labor factory, that was an earthquake going on that set in motion these underlying religious fault, because leo frank was jewish. it didn't help in atlanta was in the midst of a horrific newspaper war, there were three independent newspapers in atlanta at the time, the journal, the constitution, and the atlanta georgian, owned by william randolph hearst. we all think we are unique and living in an age in media bombardment, but if you lived in a big city in america in 1913, you would know what it was like. multiple extras every day, and the hearst paper just one wild with the story. i think we would notice it, if it happened today. host: who was leo frank? steve: leo frank was the exact opposite of mary phagan. he was a quiet,

. >> so it's all a question of li linguistics here really. it's not an essential knockdown of the border adjustment tax? >> not necessarily. it could be. the president has said repeatedly he seems to favor a much simpler form of tariffs and also has legal questions with wto. i think you have an administration as mnuchin said, everything is on the table. that's how they still view it. ultimately it will be what the president decides one way or another. he has not seemed to make a firm decision and has been waffling back and forth on it. >> another adviser would be steven bannon and we know that he has supported the adjustment tax, reporting from john harwood. >> correct. a bunch of different folks in this administration who have different feelings on this particular issue and there does not yet seem to be a consensus. it's interesting that cohn didn't beat around the bush when he said the way it's currently written it's not something that the white house would support. >> dan primack, interesting scoop. thank you for joining us. moving markets

. >> hello, my name is yesterday ka lopez, and i am a phd student studying the linguistic experience of the parents in the bay area, and my husband teaches in san francisco and he teaches 7th grade. and i like to make a comment about how attorney defenders for people in deportation proceedings is a human right and is absolutely essential for us to be able to teach our children ideals of equality and of fairness, but also of the same children that are being educated here in san francisco, come to school every day with die pregs and severe anxiety because they are worried about their parents being deported. our children here in san francisco and i am also emotionally upset by a term that was used earlier to say that we are unsure that at best we are it is unclear how the federal government is fwoeg to respond to issues of immigration, and i think obviously if anybody has been following anything in the news, the response by the federal government to immigrant communities is hostile, people are already experiencing deportations and raids and i think that it is time for san francisco to s