. >> had you received text messages from linnette peralta haynes that afternoon before speaking with your wife about that investigation? >> only in a very vague way. i believe if i recall correctly the text messages said, call me. it's an emergency. call me. that's all i had seen. >> so sheriff, i want to go back to exhibit 83. we're on page two of exhibit 83. now, sheriff if we go down to 3:47 p.m., we see a text message from ms. peralta haynes to you that says can you call me, it is you are intelligent regarding illiana. did you see that text message before or after speaking with your wife that afternoon? >> after. >> ok. >> how do you know you saw that after speaking with your wife that afternoon? >> because i was putting this all together when my wife informed me after 4:00, and it all became more clear what was happening. and that was within the next, if i'm not mistaken 20-25 minutes from when my wife had called me. >> now sheriff i want to be clear in my question about this. what i just understood you to say was at least you understood the import of this text message after you

from ross mirkarimi to linnette haynes. is that the call the question is about? is there when you are referring to in your questioning? >> if i recall what exactly was, the question was, what time did the sheriffs have a call with miss peralta haynes where he found out she had a conversation with miss madison. i was trying to pin down when the call was regarding this specific conversation miss peralta hayes had with miss madison. >> i believe this was the first time of learning between contact between my wife, miss haynes, and miss madison. >> was in the first call we have reflected in exhibit 83? >> at 5:12 p.m., maybe. there was not a lot of time to go into details. i will say maybe. >> ok. was it in the first or second -- was in a call if you had with her before you got to the lafco that you found out she had a conversation with miss madison? >> i remember i was walking feverishly to the lafco meeting. i was getting calls that i was late. i did have a phone call with miss peralta haynes while i was on the way. >> was it in one of the conversations before you g

sheriff, was that 12:03 text message to ask what happened with your wife and linnette peralta haynes? >> objection. asked and answered. >> overruled. >> no. i do not believe it is. >> and if we look at the next exhibit after the 12:03 text message asking your wife what happened, we see a 12:24 p.m., 21 minutes later a text message from your wife to ivory madison saying she is not going to call police, she is going to open a record with her doctor. >> i see that, yes. >> ok. >> and it's your -- there's no connection between text message to your wife and -- >> no. >> all right. sheriff let's go back to where we left off on january 4. you told us after your bridge et committee meeting, you were moving from office to office from your supervisoral office to the sheriff's office. did you go home after that move? >> i quickly went home to grab -- i'm trying to recall what time of the day. but i went home to grab some papers and then just left. >> ok. so when you went home, did you go out to the back steps area of your house? >> i did. the back door was open. >> ok. >> and what did you see on

. >> this is a text message you sent to linnette peralta haynes? >> yes. >> in this text message, you say this is a political witch hunt. what did you mean when you said a loud drumbeat needs to vibe? >> overruled. >> that our messaging needs to get out. concerns exchanged between miss haynes and myself was that we had been quiet. >> in the message that was sent out, this was all political. >> it appeared, yes. >> i am asking you, what message did you intend to send out on january 12? what message did you say you wanted to send out on january 12? >> in response, what i said. the vibe that needs to vibe that this is a witch hunt. >> you wanted this to be the media strategy. >> objection. >> i think it has been answered. sustained. >> ok. >> sheriff, he knew at the time is as message that he had injured your wife on december 31. >> objection. >> i think it is foundational. overruled. >> yes. >> you knew you had committed a crime? >> yes. >> whose political witch hunt was it? >> objection. >> who was behind it? >> could you withdraw the question and s

linnette peralta haynes, your wife, and others. let me ask you very directly. at any time did you dissuade anyone from any law enforcement investigation? >> never. >> at any time, did you ever ask anyone to destroy any evidence? >> never. >> thank you. we have also heard testimony about your weapons that were turned over to law enforcement. let me ask you first, how did you store those weapons? >> the two semiautomatic, at the six and the beretta, they are -- their slide chambers were completely setback. they were neutralized by a lot of tape. there was never ammunition in the weapons themselves at all. and it were completely immobilized from being of any use, and they were stored in a cabin vent -- cabinet in a storage room that would take both the padlock and a bald what, two keys, in order to gain entry. on at the smith, it was an open a cylinder, no ammunition, a taped so that the cylinder would not be -- so that the cylinder cannot be engaged, so that, again, they would be rendered neutralized. >> thank you. at any time after your address in january -- arr

>> it was in response to the message i received previously from linnette peralta haynes, and i had repeated the term that was in her previous message, yes. >> i guess my question would be then, in terms of domestic violence advocates and the kind of protests that certainly have been prevalent in the city of san francisco and with our very progressive record on how we deal with domestic violence in this city, do you consider all of those of vehement protests or anger about domestic violence a political witch hunt in every case? >> no, but in this particular case what i was informed of is that people who were part of that protest were also well- connected to my opponent's campaign for sheriff, and at the time of limited information, that is what people were speculating. >> and if others were speculating, so did you agree with this speculation? was that your conclusion as well? i mean, does the fact that they may have been connected to political opponents in the race automatically make it a political witch hunt? >> not at all, no, but at that particular time we're taking in information and pro

san francisco, ross mirkarimi, no sostuvo conversaciones telefonicas con su jefe de campaÑa linnette peralta haynesiciembre... take vo ---el archivo de las llamadas del telefono movil de mirkarimi no refleja que hubiese existido alguna entre ambos, tal y como se aseguraba que el alguacil solicitaba a su asistente detener cualquier investigacion policiaca por el altercado sucedido con su esposa... ---lo que si existio, de acuerdo al reporte en poder del chronicle, fueron mensajes de texto. cu ---la linea aerea united dejo de prestar servicio en el aeropuerto de oakland el fin de semana... take vo ---la aerolinea funciono en los ultimos 75 aÑos en oakland pero debido a la disminucion de pasajeros decidieron suspender sus operaciones... ---el vocero de united dijo que los pasajero que ya tenian sus boletos de avion comprados que seran colocados en otras lineas aereas o se les devolvera el dinero. topvo ---la agencia de transporte bart podria imponer una nueva marca.. esto por el gran numero de escaleras electricas que actualmente estan descompuestas... ---segun informes, un total de 25 escaleras de la