lipavskyi: joint debates about our strategy towards russia are not conducted in nato, not in the eu.onsider this a mistake. i think we should have that debate. during such a discussion, it is necessary to discuss how the war in ukraine should end. the minister emphasized that ukraine should have the right to vote when deciding on the future. peace with russia. lipavskyi spoke out against the freezing of the war, which, in his opinion, would not bring a just and lasting peace to the european continent. there is one thing missing in all these discussions offered by stoltenberg, lipavsky and grand shabs. it is not clear how the western partners see the defeat of russia, what, what, what will be considered, what they will consider as a defeat. perhaps the articulation of this and that goal would somehow make it easier for them to decide on that, and what actually needs to be done for this? well, you see, a lot depends on the position of the united states of america and on what joe biden's closest advisers advise him to say and not say and how to act in the election campaign. actually, th

lipavskyi said: a joint debate about our strategy towards russia is not being conducted either in nato or in the eu. i consider this a mistake. i think we should have this debate. during such a discussion, it is necessary to discuss how the war in ukraine should end. the minister emphasized that ukraine should have the right to vote when making a decision about future peace with russia. lipavsky spoke out, opposed the freezing of the war, which, in his opinion, would not bring justice. peace on the european continent, in all these discussions proposed by stoltenberg, lipavsky, and grand shaps, one thing is missing, i.e. it is not clear how the western partners see the defeat of russia, what, what, what will be considered, what will they consider as defeat, perhaps the articulation of this and that goal would somehow make it easier for them to decide on that, and what actually needs to be done for this? well you see a lot depends on the position of the united states of america and on what the closest advisers of joe biden advise him in... such an election campaign to speak and not to sp

lipavskyi. there is no joint debate about our strategy towards russia in nato. in the eu. i consider this a mistake. i think we should have that debate. during such a discussion , it is necessary to discuss how the war in ukraine should end. the minister emphasized that ukraine should have the right to vote when deciding on future peace with russia. well, friends, what i always say during our broadcasts in the verdict program is that the western partners should clearly define what this is. for them , the defeat of russia, that is, they have to explain and ukrainians and the whole world, what they understand by the concept of the defeat of russia, that it is the removal of putin from power. demilitarization of russia, deputinization of russia, de-rasification of russia, de-nationalization of russia, that is, the removal of its nuclear weapons, which means the defeat of russia, because it seems that behind these verbal mantras that we often hear that ukraine should not be defeated, we are not we see the main, main thing in these statements is that they want to end it. with p

the head of the czech foreign policy initially said this the day before. department jan lipavskyi, and then this was also confirmed to journalists in the ministry itself. in the motivational part, it is said, in particular , that a significant part of russian espionage activities takes place under diplomatic cover. accordingly, they want to include the proposal in the 14th package of anti-russian sanctions, work on which is just beginning. well, at the moment, czech diplomats are looking for support for their proposal in the circle. with other member states of the european union. it is a good initiative, a necessary initiative, but it seems to me that it is still not supported in the european union in order for it to become a draft law, and then a law, because, unfortunately , there are still many representatives of those countries on the territory of the eu who say that oh, no, no, no, we need to continue to hold on to russia. we will open a window of opportunities for dialogue and so on and so on, and they say that even now they are writing about that, and in this way we will close a