>> my name is lisa gibson, environmental review officer and through the chair i'd like to respond to supervisor cohen. to ber your question under ceqa, we are prohibited from considering aesthetic impacts as noted by josh pollock in his presentation, ceqa does prohibit us us from projects that qualify as in-fill development projects within transit oriented sites. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. my second question, is there -- well, it's more of a -- a little bit of a statement first than a question. there is a senior center and a visitacion valley middle school that's located not far from the project site. does this project disrupt access to public lands fore those community members? >> no, it does not. the project was basically designed to allow continued access to the park to occur. >> supervisor cohen: thank you. that's important. and then, my third question is the appellant claims that there's a loss of ada accessible space. can you speak to the project's impact on the ada access on public property? [ inaudible ] >> regarding accessibility, the appellant states that a portion of