lisa h.: that is the problem. until the market can coalesce around when the risk rate belongs, how can we decide on a path for riskier assets? you need some stability in that rate forecast. i do not know how you want me to measure the volatility question. i think the answer is more volatility, continued volatility , until we get certainteed these inflation readings will trend downward. lisa: if someone were listening to this program they would've heard christian bitterly make the argument you do not want to be in cash. if you miss a couple days you miss 10% return. what is the argument against that in your quest for liquidity? lisa h.: it depends who you are managing money for and what asset class you are managing what your targets are. at the end of the day we manage fixed income portfolios and these are meant to be the ballast, the sleep at night portfolios. we have a different risk budget and target than christian does, but you cannot have all liquidity, which is why i suggested decent portion of your exposure

h from 62 to 64 or 65. and that is now all up in the air. now, lisa, does a micron have to govern in this situation? for the next 5 years? he has a choice between trying to govern, or he can also actually solve the national assembly. now, there is a discussion on going between constitutional experts. if he has to wait a year or a k, he can actually solve the national assembly right away. but to solving it also bears the risk that at the result might actually even be worse for him. so he might in the 1st place, and that's what i'm hearing here. try to find a solution with the current result. possibly form a governing block with the center right party the center, right? partially because it's going to split a regarding this question, but i think the government is trying to find a solution to set up a stable majority. nonetheless, in parliament, in the coming days. lisa, are we going to see any change, of course, with regards to foreign affairs, foreign policies actually normally at the president's domain, he can decide by himself unless a law is needed. and that is the case if he, for example, wants t

he hadad a lot of bad decisionsy by judge cooper who by the way,h has a relationship with lisa page ine regard. also conce so that's also concerning. let's notrn forget that never mind the jury. sosohe the key for us and in fat for donald trump's case againsts all these individuals is i that we got the connection b between hillary clinton toin robbie moakes testimony and we got the connectionn between the fbi, comey, mccabe, all of them peter sturrock and how they hid his identity from agents whenro they asked to fine out who the close hold source was. theseasas are all critical and prove the collusion. that's collu what frankly i gott of this , which is more important to me than sussmannhind behind bars. and you know, devin, the whole time you got it right, your counterpart, the general liar, got it wrong, repeatedly lied to the american people. what did you take away from this trial? what do you think durham isem actually headed here? it seems like he understandsiker this was more than an octoberisi surprise. this was an outright liee and a hoax and many people knew it>> well, i thin

matches determiners to and their future no matter that different lisa wrapper and his fiance, a student and a politician as they tackle h l t. issues with that powerful before he sees the fight for greenland and witness documentary on al jazeera. ah, hello, darren jordan della with a quick reminder of the top stories here on al jazeera nato, as announced plans to bolster its forces across europe in the alliance is biggest overhaul since the cold war. at a summit, leaders promised unwavering support for ukraine and designated russia as a direct security threat. i did my to get at the james base was at the summit, military plans for the future in the coming months and years and for the next 10 years because he's also announced something called the strategic concept, which is nato's strategy plan going forward. designating rusher is that principle threat, but also interestingly saying that there are many challenges that nato potentially faces and nato nations face from china. but in terms of the immediate threat with the war in the ukraine, they are putting more forces into the eastern flank of nato. into those countries c

h 5. and people in favor of e membership, lots of ukrainians, basically joined the youth by migration and family lynx already there are millions of cranes working in poland in spanish. lisa, there's a lot of connection there, but it's definitely about a morale boost right now. we've seen of disappointment from ukraine, from ordering ukrainians, and it's political class in terms of the weapons deliveries coming from most european countries. basically, only the u. s. has matched expectations so far, and there's been lots of visits and decorations solidarity, but nothing very concrete so far. so this is deaf in the 1st kind of step that ukraine's when he said this is something we can build on to this something we can imagine our future in europe are going through. let's have a listen to ukraine's about the e. he put it very succinctly what this means for the country is very important for the whole ukrainian society for the army. and they have a clear reason to fight for our soldiers. they're called going home and asking from the front line, what is happening with our candidate status? it's amazing how important it is for, for ukrainian people. so it's a matter of dignity it