and why can we say that gorky gave a second life to liskov, that is, liskov could have gotten lost androletarian writer, he needed to find a certain tradition in the 19th century, which he would seem to continue, yeah, by the way, this is an interesting fact, you see, then he says: look, this is the man who spoke to the people language, wrote about people's heroes, about people 's problems, about people's problems, moreover, he came up with a certain cruel merchant's wife, attention, exploiter of the working people, who is also a murderer, and also terrible, and so on, and that's all, i think. coincided with ideology, with state policy, so the 20th century directly helped him. well, note, andrei, that gorky himself is not as popular as liskov, that is, probably, if you compare now how much gorky’s legacy has fallen into oblivion, although it seemed if only he had existed in soviet times, well , he had the greatest power there, in the cultural layer, yes, but for some reason liskov remained and is still relevant. this is a question of linking to modernity, bitterly all his capital, all