intelligence is listening to phone calls and reading emails.ut snowden has provide nod hard evidence of that so talking points is suspicious of snowden. that being said, mr. obama is now on the record and if, if, evidence is produced, that any u.s. intelligence agency is reading emails without a specific warrant, mr. obama could very well be impeached. that's how important his statement to mr. rose really is there is no going back now. president obama says flat out no one is listening to phone calls or reading emails without a specific warrant to do so. today the same question was asked of the director of the nsa general keith alexander. >> does the nsa have the ability to listen to americans' phone calls or read emails under these two programs. >> no. we do not have that authority. >> does the technology exist at the nsa to flip a switch by some analysts to listen to americans' phone calls or read their emails? >> no. >> bill: without snowden or another whistleblower producing hard evidence to contradict the general and the president, the snoo

listen. at some point we should get something more than just a memo from the nsa telling them wat they did. we deserve answers. if there's sensitive things, that's one thg. i thin it's an affront. i think these guys have contempt for the amecan people, contempt for the constitution. i think they just don't ca. >> i think it's a delicate balance when you're dealing with national security. and i would rather these briefings b behind closed doors. and if it means that i don't know some things about it, that's a good thing because it means the terroris don't know some things about it. i do't have a problem wi them. >> what doou ma of it? some argue the terrorists are finding other ways around this thanks to the lea. what do you think? >> we know that terrorists are finding other ways around it. all we have toay is bton or london to know that. it is aery delice balanc and of course, we don't ever want another 9/11 or anything remotely close to it. he could listen to phone calls and se the e-mails

maybe that is the step before you do start listening to the calls. so people, these are piled on somebody's desk. next step is that. >> i remember when in 2003, they broke the story. it is a great scoop, but i will tell you this, i wrote a book based on that stuff. when they talk about things you have to go to a judge and all that stuff. those are rubber stamped decisions. >> neil: ben stein? >> and last week. i think charles payne said 170 million calls to yemen? the second thing is, does anyone really seriously believe they are going to get the record of other phone numbers and phone number of the call and not listen into the calls. >> i do believe they are running algorithms on them and vast amounts of data and looking for patterns. >> and they listen to the phone calls? >> i think to go through the proper channel and there are checks and balances in place. >> this is where i agree with what dagen is trying to argue. it's not as this is being swept under the carpet. we do want it investigated. it is being investigated, but it's not something that

stop listening when they pick up an american conversation. the protocol says listen to the coersation as los you ed to to determine ift is impoant. is stiil collected, the phone call is still collected and held for five years. charles: everyone can agree a lot of phone calls coming into my house fm yemen or the mountains of afghanistan i should ba target maybe you want to delve a little deeper into what i am doing but if i call my cousin a coue of times in the phone call is picked up, there should be a distinction, it shouldn't beo hard to understand americans want safety and we care about this but there should be a line in the sand as well. >> to ople who say it shouldn't matter to you or you don't care, there are a couple of obvious good rsponses. the federal government in congress have been adding an new crime per week to the code for the last several decades. there is ahanceou are a criminal charles: that is atat ve never heard before. we got the house over criminalization committee loing at rolling back deral law. basically said at a hea

listen. he has the best of everything if we'll follow him. how do we follow him? we obey him. or we don't obey him. for example, somebody says, what is a carnal christian? well a carnal christian if we put it in terms of what we're talking about is a person saved by the grace of god. who has reserved certain parts of their life to do what they want to do. they go to church. they give. they read their bible and pray. but there's some things over here. in other words, what is it? and carnality is that part of us that something within us that does not want to be obedient to god. so we obey him in things which is convenient, things that are not convenient, we don't. and we think we are obeying god. and we wonder oftentimes why doesn't god bless me? people say i can't figure out why god doesn't blessed me. why doesn't he do this? why doesn't he do that? first place to look is within yourself. ask yourself the question, am i really and truly living an obedient life? when i think about the number on

when it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls. that's not what this program's about. as was indicate d what the intelligence community is doing is looking at phone numbers and durations of calls. they are not looking at people's names. and they're not looking at content. but by sifting through this so-called metadata, they may identify potential leads with respect to folks who might engage in terrorism. if these folks -- if the intelligence community then actually wants to listen to a phone call, they've got to go back to a federal judge. just like they would in a criminal investigation. so i want to be very clear, some of the hype that we've been hearing over the last day or so, nobody's listening to the content of people's phone calls. this program, by the way, is fully overseen not just by congress but by the fiza court. a court specially put together to evaluate classified programs to make sure that the executive branch or government generally is not abusing them and that it's being carried out consistent with the constitution

listen, i'm gonna show you what to do when your kid is disrespectful. i'm gonna show you what to do when your kid doesn't want to do his chores or if your kid doesn't want to do his homework. i'm gonna show you what to say specifically, and i'm gonna show you what to do about that, and it'll all be geared toward getting that kid to take responsibility for himself. we want to stop-- i want to stop the fighting in your house. i want to stop the yelling, i want to stop the screaming. i'm gonna show you how to stop that stuff and to start a program where kids are taking more responsibility and solving their own problems appropriately. you're gonna be the person who helps them solve their problem. you're not gonna be the person that takes that problem on your shoulders and then you have to live with it. it's their job to learn how to solve problems. i'm gonna show you exactly how to get them to do that. you know, the parents that i work with find the total transformation program to be a very exciting experience for them because they stop asking themselves, "

do you, sir, have the ability to listen to or read our -- listen to our phone calls or read our emails, no, we do not have that authority. >> my courtroom or any courtroom in the united states of america, the response would be general, answer the question. answer the question that was asked of you, which is not what he did. i don't know what's in his head so i don't know if it's a lie but it's a material misleading, giving the impression that they don't have the ability -- because he starts out by saying no, they don't have the ability to read emails and listen to phone calls. he modifies that saying we don't have the authority. we know they don't have the authority to. we know the statute doesn't give them the authority. our concern is that they have grabbed the phone calls and grabbed the emails and have the temptation to listen to them and read them whether they have the authority to or not. >> shepard: or they're there for some other person who may be in a position of authority or some other person who might get ahold of this stuff. would that person have the authority -- wouldn't

skip ahead if you don't like what you are listening to.fox business exclusive, the ceo and co-founder of the app being dubbed "the pandora of news" is going to be joining us. ♪ ♪ at od, wtever business you're in, that's the business we're in wi premium service like one of the best on-time delivery records and a low claimsatio, we do whatever it takes to make your business our business. >> time to look at the market drivers, a mixed day on wall street with the nasdaq, the only major index to post gains, all embedsed the month of june lower, but close to second quarter in positive territory. financials, consumer discretionary, and health care the top performers in the second quarter. gold posted the largest quarterly loss ever on concern the fed will scale back the bond buying program soon. the precious metal ended down 23%, and at 1223.7 # an ounce. consumer sentiment fellower as americans grew positive about the economic outlook falling from a near six-year high in may dropping to 84.1. david? >> okay. from pandora to this streaming news a

have thehe nsa ability to listen to americans' phone calls or read their e- mails under these programs? >> we do not have the authority. >> does the technology exists to flip a switch and have an analyst listen? >> no. >> the technology does not exist for individuals at the nsa to listen to americans' phone calls or read their e-mails? >> that is correct. >> help us understand that.

they're not listening on your phone calls, they're listening to all of this data the human mind can't do. i would rather have this program where they look for some anomaly. human beings aren't able to do this, we have to use the machines. >> let's take a listen to what type of access mr. snowden had. he was nothing more than a contractor for the u.s. government. listen. >> i had access to, you know, the full rosters of everyone working at nsa, the entire intelligence community and undercover assets all around the world, the locations of every station we have, what their missions are. if i just wanted to harm the u.s., then you could shut down the surveillance system in an afternoon. but that's not my intention. >> so go ahead. >> so i'm saying if i'm a terrorist, i say you and i are going to meet soon and i would take him and torture him, get all of the information and access to any files. say i will do something to your family unless you cooperate and give us everything. he is bragging, saying he can get key strokes of admirals, all these things that put our national security and int

nobody phone's are listened to. if nobody's phones are listened to, then what is the point?hat is going on if they are not listening. what is the point. >> there is an easy answer to tha there is an easy answer to that. >> julian, you are fgetting th is the first step to get the probably cause to listen to your phone. that is theay the f.b.i. work. they get -- >> so why don't we point out that the court orderses are never -- >> [ overlk ] >> the position that the publicans have taken. if you have us a spected terrorist inemen, speaking to somebody inside the united states, i want to know the phone number of that person. i wab the court to authorize this -- >> this is not what the president sai what we're talking about here is preventing another 9/11 attack. >> that's what george bush said before -- >> neil: all right. >> we are combining even. here is what i think. maybe you can help me with this. fact of the matter is this is not an isolated incident. collecting phone records on millions of americans is one thing. saying you are going after conservative groups and then it's

you can listen to congressman rogers. these are the folks who are getting the information and they say it's worked it. >> right. you can also listen to senator wyden and senator udall who have said in the last couple of days that even though they sit on the senate intelligence committee, they haven't seen the evidence. you know, the other question is, could we also catch these sorts of terrorists threats through far less intrusive methods? this is really only one tool that the government has. there are many ways for the government to get the same sort of information, but do it on a way that is suspicion-based. that goes through courts. that gets meaningful review and doesn't sweep up a lot of innocent americans in the meantime. really that's the problem here. not that the government is spying on suspected terrorists, but they're spying on the rest of us in the meantime. >> michael o'hanlon, is the concern where this might lead as compared to where we are with this particular program or this particular pair of programs? bu

let's listen.e is about to begin his statement. >> to serve as a director of the national security agency and commander of u.s. cyber command. as you noted, we have extraordinary people doing great work to protect this country and to protect our civil liberties and privacy. over the past few weeks, unauthorized disclosures of classified information have resulted in considerable debate in the press about these pro programs. the debate, as you noted, was fueled by incomplete and inaccurate information by little contact on the purpose of the programs, will have u to our national security and that of our allies and protections in place to preserve our privacy and civil liberties. today, we will provide additional detail in context on these pro programs to help inform that debate. these were approved by the administration, congress and the courts. from my perspective, a sound legal process that we all work together as a government to protect our nation and our civil liberties in privacy. ironically, the

do you want to listen to them?nd that new state would be the state of northern colorado. >> some we'll call extreme, maybe aggressive, and i would say absolutely. i think extreme times call for extreme actions. >> what i would say to those folks in denver, this doesn't have any chance, we're not going to take this seriously, beware. >> if it did come to fruition, though, it would be the least populated state in the country and among the red edest. next, the republican nominee for virginia's lieutenant governor has been a sideshow regular these past couple of weeks. bischoff e.w. jackson compares planned parenthood to the kkk calling gay people icky and it was comments from his 2008 book that took the cake. the subject? yoga. quote, the purpose of such meditation is to empty oneself. satan is happy to invade the empty vacuum of your soul and possess it. that's why people serve satan without ever knowing it or deciding to. that didn't sit so well with the founder of a yoga franchise in washington who responded we hav

and listen carefully to what you have to say and bring those into our decision-making in government and hopefully when we reflected in the budget you will have trusted us to have this incredible opportunity to represent the greatest city , in united states the city of san francisco. thank you very much. >> thank you mayor lee for the opening comments and let me take these seconds to talk about how to they will run. we asked the budget director for the city, kate howard to do a brief presentation on the overview of the budget as well as what the audit process entails and introduce the men and women who helped to run the city government who stand behind me. will then proceed to hear from the community. we are first asking a couple of members from both district two and district 3 to make brief presentations on issues and budget priorities as they see them and then we will jump on what is the heart of today's meeting which is to hear from all of you get public comments from anyone who wants to provide public comment to us and we will be asking folks to speak for up to two minutes and co

the original question is can you listen to america's phone calls. he was asked again, it was do you know the phone calls. they say that is not something we do. is not someing we areor. everybody seems to be dodging th fact this is something they are capable of and something they do. the documents into the guardian, basilly what they said was casionally nsa analysts listen to american phone calls and they don't just, they pick up a conversation, they lisn to americans, they don't just stop listening when they pick up an american conversation. the protocol says listen to the conversation as long as you need to to determine if it is importt. the data is stiil collected, the phone call is still collected and held for five yes. charles: everyone can agree a lot of phone calls coming into my house from yemen or the mountains of afghanistan i should be a target. maybe you want to delve a little deeper into what i am doing but if i call my cousin a couple of times in the phone call is picked up, there should ba distinction, it shouldn't be so hard to unders

babe, listen. no. listen. no, no, no. >> shut up. >> no. no. >> shut up. >> i'm the boss. you said that i could be-- >> shut up. >> ...the boss. >> ooh. wow. well. so, i...see -- i see the renovation has brought you two closer together. >> yeah. um, we're not quite sure how we're gonna finish in a month. >> well, i got a call from tracie's mom, and she said that the custody court date has been moved up to next week. >> are you serious? >> no. she -- she can't do that. >> she can, and she did. >> we're supposed to have a month, here. >> i know, baby. don't shoot the messenger. >> well, i'm not, but i don't know what to do. the place is a mess, i can't see my son. everything is just terrible. >> okay, you know what? you know what? baby, it's okay. we have been dragging our feet on this renovation. i'm gonna buckle down and get it done. >> what do you mean? >> i mean that if our court date is in a week, then this condo will be ready in a week. >> how? >> oh, so you don't know that you were dealing with a force of nature that can bend time and make things happen right here? >>

try dance like nobody is listening. >> wow!his is a way better way to go to the club if everybody had earphones on, they could listen to what they wanted, but everybody at the tables could talk to each other without having to scream. >> this is a new trend called silent disco, and that is what is going on in the videos. people with their own headsets with their own music dancing awa away. >> they are listening to different songs and people were singing with each other, so it sounds like they were listening to the same songs. >> well, different events, it is the same things, and for the most part, they can listen to what they want to, but if you go to the sponsored events, you get a head set with three options, and three different types of music. >> so you are really dancing to a beat of a different channel especially from the person next to you. >> and this is great if you don't want to listen to the loud house, you don't have to. this is becoming a trend, and spreading throughout the u.s., europe, australia, and there are vide

they are listening. they are watching. they are reading.ning information. it's not a secret any more if it ever really was. what does it mean to companies that have been helping and what does it mean for the ways that we communicate? and a serious storm is nutritioning its way up the east coast.

in your opinion is -- >> the administration hasn't listened at all.or the rulings of the fisa court, the foreign intelligence surveillance act court about how it interprets the laws that congress passes to be declassified. so we can have a conversation with the american people about that for example, how is scooping up your cell phone data, related to an investigation? that's the plain lang laj of the law. treated to an investigation. certainly anyone would hear that and think that's a certain crime or potential crime or potential national security threat that justifies your information and my administration, clearly the administration has not followed what an ordinary person would consider the standardç of the w and is not willing to release to the fisa court about how they're interpreting that language. despite repeated requests from congress to do so there are many pieces of this the president glossed over. he took lightly a detailed collecti collection, he took very lightly the fact that that information involves where you are, when. the tracking

you and get on with less features and more about listening to you. thank you. (applause) >> welcome, good morning, buenos dias. welcome to district 9. let's give the mayor a big round of applause. apl (applause) i thank my colleagues, supervisor scott wiener - apl (applause)and of course our budget chair from district two, supervisor mark farrell. also want to acknowledge all the department heads and their staff who are here; they work for all of us. they work for you. it is important to see the faces of the people who make the city run. out also want to acknowledge in my office -- where is she -- stephanie ashley. where is stephanie? i want to identify her because if there are specific issues you want us to know please make sure you get stephanie the information. you were talking about kids and to the extent that we are describing departments and agencies as kids and children, i want to know that there are no spoiled children in san francisco. let me say this. as the mayor indicated, the budget is the most important policy document we have. it reall

we want to listen in to a little bit more of the hearing. but i want to get your take on it as well. so stay with me as we listen in. >> just the phone number pops back up. >> just the phone number. >> what comes back if you queerry the data base and again another information would indicate when the call occurred and the duration would be. >> i want to be clear, there are no names or addresses. >> there are not. >> why less than 300 queerries. >> there might be some number greater than that of actual queerryis against the data bait. the court determined there is a very narrow purpose for this use. it can't be to prosecute and greater understanding after simply domestic plot. it cannot be used to do anything other than terrorism, so there must be very well defined, describable, written determinations that this is a suspicion of a connect between a foreign plot and domestic nexus. if it doesn't meet the standard -- >> are those reported to the court? >> they are all reported to the debt of justice, reviewed to the department of justice, number

time out of his credibly busy schedule to come and meet with the community in our neighborhood to listen to our concerns and i want to introduce you to our mayor ed lee. >> mayor lee: thank you supervisor farrell, supervisor chiu, thank you for the department heads being here, listening for the hour, hour and a half. i a give a to the department of public affairs. i want to primarily thank all of you, a sunny day, a lot of other reasons to be elsewhere. but, you are here to join us on one of the most important things that we do in government, that is setting our budget to reflect the needs of every neighborhood in the city. and you've heard that the economy looks a lot better; there's a lot of other companies that want to move here. unemployment rate has dropped to 5.4%, we are on a good roll in terms of employing more people. resources are up. we are not completely over the deficit that we're facing with the next two years so we have to do some decision-making. the other thing that the board of supervisors is doing with as is, the reason why we hold these meetings out here is because we

president obama: when it comes to telephone calls nobody's listening to your telepho calls. that is not for this program is about. charles: tonight the proof the government i listening in and that's exactly what the nsa ogram is all about. welcome, everybody, i'm charles payne in for neil cavuto. the documents show the nsa is listening in on phone calls and collecting e-mails from ornary americans and worse yet it is holding onto these recordings for five years. reason magazine says it is tough to trust the government saying one thing and doing another. it seems like every day some new news comes out that sttotay bees wt weear om t present. >> ablute. areot lteni to one lls isnctuay th origal awer therigil esti. thorigal qstiois c you steno amica'phoncall he was asked again, it was do you know the phone call they say that is not something we do. it is not something we are for. everyby seems to be dodging th fact this is something they are capable of and something they do. the documents into the guardian, basically what they said was occasionally nsa analysts listen to americ

>> listen, everybody.n stop talking like that now. >> ok. >> we are hard-working folk. ok? we don't put on airs... >> we don't need to. >> and we accept people for who they are! >> even you jive suckers. >> now, if that's not the kind of folk that you want living with you, then i guess we don't belong here. >> toodle-oo! >> now, wait. wait. i think we should give them a chance. >> yeah. my pops is a good man. >> thank you, son...s. >> you know, i think bianca is right. i think we do need to get rid of the undesirables. >> that's the spirit! very good. >> do you realize what you're saying? >> i do. bianca needs to go. >> i second that. >> oh! well, i never! >> ha! i knew that the first time i met you! >> oh, george! >> baby, please stop. rooooooooooar!!! oh! you got me! what does a little monster take? a potty break! take the scare out of potty training with pull-ups training pants. now with monsters u designs. good job! ♪ i'm a big kid now. ♪ it gets more and more entertaining every day. and once you've go

listen, verse four of psalm 42 says something wonderful. listen, listen, listen!hat kind of season with god where i tell you, everywhere you looked it seemed like he appeared? and just for somebody new to christ, i'm not talking about a real live vision of him. i'm just talking about where he reveals himself continually, where you're just alive in him. where you can read the word and it will just jump off the page. when was your last season? so what i want to ask you is, would you like rewind just prior to it? because here's what we do. we just go, "wasn't that a great season?" and then we have to go, "what got me there?" i have to ask you, was it good because most of the time it wasn't. when we look back the season was but i'm saying, what was right before it that hurled you into a season of personal revival? listen, for me, without exception i was down for whatever reason, whether it was in sin and oh, man, i have been in heaps and pits of sin. or whether it was just destruction, whether it was addiction, whatever it may have been but it would always be that pla

are they listening to the local news? are they listening to national news? what stations do they watch? what newspapers and magazines do they read. here is an important question that you're hearing asked a lot. how did you hear about this case, and who did you hear it from? so if you're listening to your neighbors, friends, or church members, that has an influence on your ability to listen to the facts that are coming up soon in the case. >> now lisa, it's not only what you know about the case in terms of having heard of it, but is also whether or not you have heard specific parts of the evidence that may be presented, whether you heard it and may already have an opinion before you have seen it presented in court, and therefore may be biased, like the 911 call or the tape of screaming and all. would that have more of a bearing on whether you would want that person to serve on a jury whether than they just heard of the case? >> right there. is a big leap from hearing information and reaching a conclusion from that information. as this judge has said, we don't

listen, money knows no time.lege and college just isn't paying the bills and you need a new lot on life, or if you're a senior citizen and you never quite reached that financial potential that you knew. look, you did great with your kids, your family, but you never reached that financial potential, now is the time, because money-- when taught the right way-- knows no boundaries. listen, ray kroc of mcdonald's didn't get started with a mcdonald's until he was 50 years old. now is the time to get started when you come to my live event. check out these people and put yourself in their shoes of what it's like just a few months after attending my live event. so i'm out here with mike and mike attended one of our live events.d one of how you doin' mike? hey armando how's it going? it's going great. now i hear it's going fantastic for you. absolutely.or you. i want to let everyone know out there what you've experienced since i've you've experienced attended a live event i was able to get all that information and come ou

but they were also listening to her reaction, because she looked very upset.ent when the 911 call was played, everybody in the courtroom kind of quieted down, she was describing being shaken, terrified. and on the stand, the jury really looked at her and could feel in that moment what she felt, i think, just by looking at her, seeing her reaction to the 911 call being played again. >> all right, let's listen to the cross examination on her testimony. >> i'm talking about your assumption, though, as you explained later what you saw. as even as perhaps you were explaining to the 911 operator oh, my god, someone is dead. why would somebody do that? why wouldn't somebody help? i don't have a gun. all of that was based upon your assumption that it was the person on the ground who had died that was the one yelling for help? >> i thought from the voice that was the one yelling for the help. was the boy that was dead. >> yes. but you had never heard trayvon martin's voice before in your life? >> i heard it when i opened the window -- i heard it when i opened the windo

carrie, would you stop and listen to me? other night when you said you didn't want to go out and i told you i made all these great plans... i--i was lying. ok? i didn't make any. i was so worried about seeing my stupid ultimate fighting. i slapped this whole night together last minute. really? that wasn't very bilgistic of you-- that's not even a word! i made it up when i was writing your card in the drugstore. i mean, god, everything wrong with this night is my fault! me! listen, carrie, i'm so sorry for tonight. and i love you. i love you, too. happy birthday. happy birthday to you, too. come on, let's go. can we moon people out of the limo? of course. ok! can be a moment of delicious wonder. the latest -- new mccafé blueberry pomegranate smoothie. sweet blueberries, raspberries, and a splash of pomegranate juice. there's always something new to love from mccafé. to find out we filled this car with trash, attached a febreze car vent clip, and let in real people. it smells good. like clean laundry. i could sit in this all d

when it comes to telephone calls, nobody is listening to your telephone calls.t is not what is program is about. as indicated -- intelligence community is doing is looking at phone numbers and directions of calls. they are not looking at people's names and content. by sifting through the so-called data, they may identify potential leads with respect to folks who might engage in terrorism. if these folks, if the community wants to listen to a phone call, they have to go back to a federal judge just like in a criminal investigation. i want to be very clear. some of the hype we have been hearing over the last day or so, nobody is listening to the content of people's phone calls. this program by the way is fully overseen not just by congress but by the court. a court specially put together to evaluate classified programs to make sure that the executive branch is not abusing them and it isn't being carried out consistent with -- and it is being carried out consistent with the constitution and rule of law. not only does that court authorize the initial gathering of da