. >> item 18 litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus county of alameda. 19, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 20, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 21 existing grid laying pacific gas and electric. item 22, existing litigation, pacific gas and electric. 23 exiting litigation pacific gas and electric. and item 24, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> do we have any public comments on items that will be heard during closed session? ok. >> we need a motion. >> i will move to assert. >> second. >> all in favor. >> aye. >> t

. >> item 18 litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus county of alameda. 19, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 20, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 21 existing grid laying pacific gas and electric. item 22, existing litigation, pacific gas and electric. 23 exiting litigation pacific gas and electric. and item 24, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> do we have any public comments on items that will be heard during closed session? ok. >> we need a motion. >> i will move to assert. >> second. >> all in favor. >> aye. >> t time. >> all right. any other new business, commissioners? all right. this meeting is adjourned; thank you for your time. >> so what brought you out here for the bike ride today? >> i grew up in san francisco but i have been living in new york. i wanted to see what san francisco is doing with infrastructure. >> cities are where people are living these days. the bay area is doing a lot with construction and the way to change the world starts here. >> we are about to take a bike

. >> item 18 litigation city and council tee of san francisco versus county of alameda. 19, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 20, existing litigation pacific gas and electric. 21 existing grid laying pacific gas and electric. item 22, existing litigation, pacific gas and electric. 23 exiting litigation pacific gas and electric. and item 24, existing litigation, city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> do we have any public comments on items that will be heard during closed session? ok. >> we need a motion. >> i will move to assert. >> second. >> all in favor. >> aye. >> t time. >> all right. any other new business, commissioners? all right. this meeting is adjourned; thank you for your time. . >> hi my name is jason jones a xaefrp and communication capture at the san francisco water department i hnlt a high volume of calls and radio communications i enjoy coming to work i still find it challenging i still learn everyday and i'm going to have the level of activity if zero to 60 in a matter of minutes i take bride pride in handling the emergencie

litigation, city and county of san francisco versus pacific gas and electric. >> do we have any public comments on items that will be heard during closed session? ok. >> we need a motion. >> i will move to assert. >> second. >> all in favor. >> aye. >> t time. >> all right. any other new business, commissioners? all right. this meeting is adjourned; thank you for your time. it. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challenges resident to do their shop & dine in the 49 within the 49 square miles of san francisco by supporting local services in the neighborhood we help san francisco remain unique successful and vibrant so we're will you shop & dine in the 49 chinatown has to be one the best unique shopping areas in san francisco that is color fulfill and safe each vegetation and seafood and find everything in chinatown the walk shop in chinatown welcome to jason dessert i'm the fifth generation of candy in san francisco still that serves 2000 district in the chinatown in the past it was the tradition and my family was the royal chef in the pot pals that's why we learned

actually think it's wiser to keep this in here to make sure it's consistent with the litigation position that the city and county is taking in its litigation against the trump administration. >> next speaker, please. >> good evening, commissioners. i my name is saira, and i'm an attorney on the working group, and i want to thank commissioners dejesus and hing on bringing this policy along. like my colleague mentioned, the acceptance of federal and state law within 3-b, section three talks about providing emergency response to ice or cbp, and emergency members appears twice under this code, and it doesn't really make sense to put it under part of this code? the context is a little bit different, so to put it under this particular piece when we're talking about ice and cbp, aurlocal law enforcement not working with ice and cbp, it does seem out of place here, quite frankly? so i don't think it should be in here. the second part that i want to talk about is we did address during the working group is joint drill operations, and i understand that sfpd's position is they have to work with ice. what really c

city across the entire nation, including those that agree completely with our position and support us and don't want this relief. what possible interest does chicago have in such a sweeping relief? the litigants for the city of chicago, they have an interest in their grant, but they are not empowered to represent parties around the country that don't want their representation. what possible interest do they have in this? chicago's only plausible interest is its grant money. that would have been completely vindicated if protections would have been vindicated by ruling involving chicago and that district judge. meanwhile, other judges are considering the same question. a judge in san francisco recently denied a preliminary injunction to that city, but it does not matter because the judge in chicago has already decided to give relief to every city, including san francisco and it trumps their decision. by not acting as a district court of limited jurisdiction, the chicago judge has halted the grant process for the entire country. these cities and counties are getting anxious. months are going by and money not expected to receive is going out. we now are trying to seek expedited relief to the seve

on how litigation costs are budgeted currently, the city maintains a litigation reserve in the general fund outside of department budgets for large loss cases. we do that -- our office estimates every year working with the city attorney's office and every year as part of the budget, the board authorizes depositing those large reserves. those tend to be bigger cases with payouts over a million dollars that we know are coming due, et cetera. and then there's a couple of small departments that maintain smaller budgets for more recurring smaller but still significant lit -- litigation that might be paid out. the department retains some reserve, but often a large loss case that might involve the police department, like all other large departments, will get paid out of the verb -- >> supervisor fewer: according to a report in 2017, it outlines the cost of municipalities around the use of tasers. it says that actually it's documented at 172 million in publicly fund payouts to resolve litigation around tasers and absent, municipalities are pretty much left on their own because police were warn

. >> ongoing litigation that the city is reluctant to talk about in specifics.here is one group of people that would be more than happy to talk about this lawsuit.>> so this lawsuit you know, i approve it 100%. >> reporter: the whole story comes down to medallion buyers like juan mack noley. for him it's a lot more about regulatory history. >> $100 million is worthless. >> reporter: getting tossed out and going to trial, a settlement perhaps? lawyers are getting started on all of this so we probably won't see much more movement for at least a couple of months but we will keep you posted. >>> lawyers for stormy daniels can't interview the president under oath at least not yet. a federal judge says that they can't take a deposition with the president because their demand for a jury trial is premature. daniels claims that she had an affair with mister trump in 2006. she is suing to get a nondisclosure agreement thrown out.>>> the man fire does mac the man fired as secretary veterans affairs is speaking out. he said that he was pushed out by people who wanted privat

city attorney, mr. givner. thank you. okay. mr. givner, hi. good morning. so just a couple questions for you. are we still in active litigation with the sfpoa over the use of force -- use of force policy? >> deputy city attorney jon givner. yes, there is current litigation. the status of this case is it's on appeal in the california court of appeal has been mostly fully briefed, and we expect oral argument in that case probably in the next six to nine months. >> supervisor cohen: okay. and so what are some of the outstanding issues being litigated? >> the lawsuit arises out of the use of force policy adopted by the commission in december 2016. in june or so 2016, the commission adopted a draft use of force policy which was subject to -- which would then engaged in meet and confer with the p.o.a. at the conclusion of meet and confer, the commission adopted a final use of force policy which i believe is now in the department's general orders. the p.o.a. filed suit challenging two aspects of that policy: the proceed hibition on shooting at moving vehicles, and the prohibition on the use of carotid artery hold. the p.o.a. alleged

i mean he saw -- he has a long history in new york city, in litigation where he believes that you can stonewall, you can play things out for as long as you go and ultimately he believes he can win on his own terms. >> let me ask you, did he see it as a witch hunt or is that how he wants to? >> i think the framing -- i think he sees it as that, certainly. he sees it as this. but it is also his frame. think about his taxes, don. he spent so long sort of saying, you know, i'm going to release my taxes. once the irs audit, he believes in the strategy of stringing things out for as long as possible and you can believe that he sees himself and has for decades as someone who is not going to sit down, you know, under oath and have to answer questions that he doesn't believe he should have to. and that is -- goes to his mindset. >> and he believes he's above the law then if he thinks he doesn't have to answer. >> he believes that he has -- for decades has seen himself as someone who has been unfairly targeted either by the media, by enemies in court. this is his mindset. and that if you have,

because if we have a city and county that designated the southeast due to litigation to support the needs of the community, yet the city and county and the developers and l planning commission for that matter, if you are not standing aside, circumventing the system, that comes into question. so, why is that happening, right? who is the planning commission or the mayor working for? is it not for the people? not for the people in the bayview? not for the people in san francisco? or is it just facility for a small packet of people, the developers. all right? so, i will submit to you to review this document, to really focus on the needs and the wants from the community because all the process that we came together month after month, year after year, to survey the community, to get the best use of that faith in partnership with p.u.c., i think the planning commission and the mayor's office should honor that. thank you very much. >> president hillis: thank you. next speaker, please. >> dorothy kelly, a resident of the bayview and part of the hunters view resident council. 1550 is public land th

we need to start locking them up and proceeding with civil litigati litigati litigation and show every city and state has the duty to uphold and honor the law. >> sandra: we've heard from the director of ice making it clear it puts their officers in jeopardy. their lives in jeopardy. the d.o.j. said it makes it impossible for our federal immigration officials to do their jobs. but still, richard, this is what the attorney general of the state of california is saying, no matter what happens in washington, #california will stay the course and enforce our laws and protect our people. that's how we keep our communities safe #immigration. richard. >> here's my problem with the lawsuit put on by the justice department. the republicans have the majority in the house and senate and have the white house. if they were really concerned about our broken immigration they would do everything in their power to pass laws to fix the broken immigration system. instead what you see is a political p.r. stunt being put on by the justice department -- >> sandra: you don't sake seriously what we hear from ice and

the litigation committee referred this project to the city attorney and two or three months ago the planning department was supporting the project before the planning commission. this makes no sense. one of the fundamental differences between d.b.i. and the planning department is planning's belief that they are not responsible for planning code enforcement. when i sunshined the planning department regarding the penalties assessed when they issued a notice of enforcement for the unpermitted removal of a three storey bay at 2,517th avenue, the planning department responded that they work with violators versus issuing penalties and fines. this says a lot about the planning department's notice of enforcement process. i would suggest that the planning department removed word "enforcement" from their process. the planning department's lack of enforcement is one of the root causes of unpermitted demolition in san francisco. can you imagine what parking in san francisco would look like if the parking control officers did not believe in enforcement, but -- and did not issue tickets with fines, but wo

. >> i think the state of california i'm presuming in this litigation will show the large percentage within their sanctuary citiesl.a. and saying what are you talking about? you're already making california your number one target i'm sure the court will take judicial notice of it. >> thank you for being with us. we'll be right back with today's big picture. in no hurry to make anything happen. neutrogena® rapid wrinkle repair® works in just one week. with the fastest retinol formula available. it's clinically proven to work on fine lines and wrinkles. one week? that definitely works! rapid wrinkle repair®. and for dark spots, rapid tone repair. neutrogena®. see what's possible. (gasp) (singsong) budget meeting! sweet. if you compare last quarter to this quarter... various: mmm. it's no wonder everything seems a little better with the creamy taste of philly, made with fresh milk and real cream. let's take a look at some numbers: with the creamy taste of philly, 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom... is a stroke. 80 percent of all strokes and heart disease? preventable. and 149 dollars is all i

a spokesperson says the city solicitor has told employees not to speak about the situation because of pending litigation. >> they gave him a position and a badge to go around doing this. >> reporter: reporting in chester for investigators, george spencer, nbc 10 news. >> in january a magistrate judge ruled there is sufficient evidence for the cases against ross to move forward. his first pretrial conference is set for this coming monday. >>> new at 11:00, women accusing a delaware county lawmaker of sexual assault and domestic violence. two women have filed a complaint against republican state representative nick nick rely. he denies the allegations and says he had consensual relationships with his accusers. >>> right now chief meteorologist tammy sousa tracking strong winds. we're going to time it out for you in just four mints. but first let's go to nbc 10's drew smith in wildwood to show how people are getting ready for this storm. >> reporter: these bulk head walls are the first line of defense, but by the way things are shaping up, the water could be pouring over at high tide. so tonight officials

like california and there are variants that have been enacted by states and cities around the country, i think there's litigationfor ongoing, with respect to a number of them, they exists and they -underscore that california is not alone in concluding that it's critically important that pregnant women be fully informed about rights and services that are available to them under a law. on the flipside, on the other side that's designed to discourage women from getting abortion, i think it's important to be clear about what some of those laws do and of course there's lots of variations because there's lots of laws across the different states. what some of these laws do is they go beyond informing women about the risks of an abortion procedure because that would be provided under most states informed consent law anyway. it's a medical procedure and all medical procedures involve some risk. what these do is require individuals to give misinformation about risks that don't really exist. or, to be given information in an emotional environment that brings with it emotional responses. these laws, some of them are very di

with respect to the laws like california's and variants enacted by states and cities around the country i think there's litigation still ongoing with respect to a number of them texas existence of the other laws underscores that california's not alone in concluding that it's critically important that pregnant women, in particular low income pregnant women be fully informed of rights and services available to them under law. you know, on the flip side, these laws on the other side that are designed to discourage women from getting abortion, i think it's important to be clear about what some of those laws do. of course, there's lots of variations and laws across the states and some laws go beyond simply informing women of the risks of an abortion procedure because that would be provided under most states of informed consent laws. abortion is a medical procedure and entail some risks and some require misinformation about, you know, risks that don't really exist. or to be given information in an emotional environment to elicit emotional responses. so, these laws, some of them, are very distinct and of course subject

litigation. >> and significantly harmed south carolina and its citizens. >> reporter: there are now hundreds of cityases brought by at least 15 states so far. >> our lawsuit -- >> reporter: including one of the biggest, ohio, one of moore's clients. >> we knew when we filed the lawsuit we weren't going to get them to the table to negotiate until we had some sort of critical mass with other states filing lawsuits. we think if we get enough states in there the drug companies will have no choice but to come to the table and start talking with us. >> reporter: that's mike dewine, ohio's attorney general, who's also running for governor. >> so you're not looking at this as much as punishing the drug companies as you are holding them accountable? >> we believe that 80% of the people who are addicts today, 80% of the people we've lost in ohio, started with pain meds. >> you think it's their fault, no one else's? >> look, i think a great deal of the fault lies at the feet of the drug companies and you have to go back to these drug companies because they're the ones who misled the physicians. we firmly belie

litigation. now of course, the state legislatures and city councils can always change the ordinances and change the state flaws enough pressure is brought to bear. i anticipate that certainly at the state and perhaps local levels around the country, you're going to have litigation to test some of these actions. >> you know, the president seems to have rattled some in that the second amendment community, those who are big supporters of that say, if that, we're going to take your gun away now, and that raised concerns that he was violating due process, something that's engrained in the way we go about this whole business. what do you think of that? >> i can't speak to what the president was actually speaking about, and perhaps he misspoke -- >> no, he said it again, again, general. he kept saying it. >> when you go to a judge get some kind of warrant or order from a judges based upon certain evidence, probable cause, whatever, whatever the standard may be to make it more difficult for someone who is mentally ill, endanger himself or others, acquire from obtaining a weapon. that is certainly possible

the city is taking a stand ensuring the rights of those with disabilities are upheld. it is seen as compliance litigation we aim to tie our messaging to making sure individuals with disabilities that their civil rights are upheld. that will conclude my presentation. i am happy to answer any questions you may have. >> thanks for the presentation. question about the timeline when the outreach and all of that is going to start. what the timeline of outreach is going to start. >> our timeline we are now reaching out to business organizations. we are putting together materials and we are slated to do presentations mid-march, mid to end of march for the workshop. >>ra the certified professionals do they have to be privately higher or is the city supporting through those individuals as well? >> for the certified access specialists if you are referring to that step two where the property owner needs to consult with the cast. that would be done between the property owner and the certified access specialists on their own. we do have at our office some guidance that we have put together, resources on how profit own

litigation. >> i must tell you, bill, i see this quickly -- the sanctuary city law is clear.e federal preemption but for the census we count all persons. i don't see any benefit in asking citizenship. in fact i think it will retard the count. i think these issues can and should be decided issue by issue rather than with a political litmus test. >> bill: thank you both. thank you, doug. thank you, brad. patient it. >> sandra: democrats vowing to fight the trump investigation over the inclusion of a new census question on citizenship status. do the democrats have a legal leg to stand on? that is the question. >> bill: and roseanne's back on tv and proudly displaying her support of president trump. >> jackie think every girl should grow up and be president even if they're a liar, liar, pantsuit on fire. >> i think we know who's liar and who's on fire, roseanne. >> how to for making america great again. >> how could you have voted for him, roseanne? >> he talked about jobs, jackie. >> have you looked at the news? now things are worse. >> not on the real news. >> sandra: that's a

litigated when he has been accused of something, he will just turn it around and accuse the other person. just trying to weasel his way out of things. 6 bankruptcies, i believe? and chaos in atlantic city. in new york and the united states, they wanted to stop dealing with him. they gave him a monthly stipend to live off of at some point. he cannot be trusted. say when youing to are talking about bernie, i am a bernie supporter, i voted for him. something that i noticed -- i don't know if i am accurate about this, but it seems that hillary won the south, bernie won the midwest. workers,e blue-collar he had a lot of talk about very uniting is a force in the senate. he was voted one of the most popular senators because of his bipartisanship. he is believed -- i believe the longest running independent. i just think his policies are wonderful. i am actually -- i consider myself a pro-life democrat, but i have my own opinion on that whole issue of like the hypocrisy of the pro-life yet very much pro-death penalty movement. i think a lot of it actually comes down to racism. i was in the neighborhood where mr. eric garner was killed. we are dealing with those kind of issues right here. i live

litigation department of a private law firm. he was a member of the national lbgt bar association. >> today new york city mayor bill deblasio released this statement on the death of and the other new york city firefighter. they are truly two of new york city's bravest running into danger to protect others both in new york city and in combat over seas. the crash that took zanetis's life is believed to be the first fatal helicopter crash in iraq cincinnati the u.s. began fighting isis there in 2014. >> kristen, thank you. >>> only on abc7 news the couple at the center of the kidnapping case. the voyage police department called a hoax is speaking publicly for the first time. >> aaron quinn and denise husk ips will be on "good morning america" tonight we have a sneak peek of that interview. the city of voyage just agreed to pay that couple $2.5 million, right. >> reporter: the settlement hopefully means that aaron quinn and denise huskins can focus on the rest of their lives. it also means after three years of standing by as they were attacked and called liars, they can now publicly share their truth. denise huskins is speaking out in h

litigation department of a private law firm. he was a member of the national lbgt bar association. >> today new york city mayor bill deblasio released this statement on the death of and the other new york city firefighter. they are truly two of new york city's bravest running into danger to protect others both in new york city and in combat over seas. the crash that took zanetis's life is believed to be the first fatal helicopter crash in iraq cincinnati the u.s. began fighting isis there in 2014. >> kristen, thank you. >>> only on abc7 news the couple at the center of the kidnapping case. the voyage police department called a hoax is speaking publicly for the first time. >> aaron quinn and denise husk ips will be on "good morning america" tonight we have a sneak peek of that interview. the city of voyage just agreed to pay that couple $2.5 million, right. >> reporter: the settlement hopefully means that aaron quinn and denise huskins can focus on the rest of their lives. it also means after three years of standing by as they were attacked and called liars, they can now publicly share their truth. denise huskins is speaking out in h

litigation department of a private law firm. he was a member of the lgbt bar association. they are truly two of the bravest running in to defend others in new york cityoverseas. the crash that took his life is believed to be the first fatal

litigation aside and focus on universal pre- k. with another issue all of us care deeply about. there are a lot of things going on in the city of philadelphia that we try to leave the city in better shape than we found it and i think the mayor is capitalizing on those things and has his on initiative. >> michael nutter in ten years. >> first, i would like to be here. i will be 70. i will be doing many of the same things i'm doing now, trying to work with candidates across the country to change the political landscape, stay involved in politics. i might slow down just a little bit, but i believe in being active. >> are you done running for office yourself? >> yes. part of that is why it is the title of the book because there is no other office i'm interested in. there is no other office you can have the impact because of the kind of things i talked about. there are certain things we are very proud of. i think we did in includes the ethical culture. there are not that many that can have that impact them and the family that i got to work with. >> it's one of the attractions and jobs in politics that you are free of some of the

litigation. they were crafted to present knowledge to employers, that's why it's a warning, not a dollar penalty. it's in line with other penalties with ordinances in the city. unbundling applications or allegations of violations will result in potentially hundreds of violations on a particular complaint when an application for a job is an error, there could be hundreds of period 'em that saw that application. that wasn't the intent of our ordinance to penalize employers. the intent of the ordinance in 2014 was to drive compliance to open up jobs for people that need jobs and shouldn't be penalized by prior spread past criminal history. so we urge you to amend this legislation beyond the lines -- >> supervisor safai: thank you. next speaker. >> good afternoon. i'm sharon wu, chief assistant for the d.a.'s office. d.a. gaston was an original supporter in 2014. we know working in criminal justice that access to employment and housing are key for men and women involved in the criminal justice system to get out. this legislation furthers public safety and it's important in order to ensure that there is successful participation outside of the criminal justice sy