♪ ♪ i can call you eddie and when you call me you can call me al ♪ ♪ call me al >>> listen to a little paulthe latest rock star to say he's giving up the road. that's right. simon says his upcoming homeward bound tour in the spring will be his last. he'll visit canada, the u.s. and europe. >> the 76-year-old says the travel takes away from the joy of playing. he first shot to fame for simon and garfunkel for which simon wrote the songs. >> i like. ♪ oh, cecilia, you're breaking my heart ♪ >> so many college bars and that's on your mind? >> that's not where i know it from of course. >>> award winning john mahoney who played the cranky father on "frazier" has died in hospice in chicago. he had reportedly been suffering from cancer. he carved out a niche for himself playing gruff older characters. >> you want me to dry that sponge? i'll dry that sponge. >> give it about a minute. >> that's mature. >> he was born in britain. he was 77 years old. >> he started his acting career, which is a young man's business, when he was 37. he said i want to be an actor. not bad. >> and he made it happen. >>>

go fight they don't go fight senators sons don't go fight living's little boys could you imagine little paul the royal dressing up and leading the charge maybe obama will be beyond them. so let the people vote blocked change democracy no you won't hack into our systems these things it might man the biggest banks in the world are using them like rypple for bank transfers so we could vote online if you could block change online this could be the beginning of a new real new democracy because anybody over the age of six years old knows that we don't have a representative democracy the only people that the mcconnells the ryans the nancy pelosi as the dianne feinstein's represent are the people that give the money adults call them bribes and payoffs in school they call them campaign contributions. and so how does a block chain make it democratic because it's more of an open source platform anyone can we vote that we vote on the issues we vote or you want to go to war in syria we'll vote you want to do it we'll vote you want to increase the budget deficit hey you like that tax plan we'll vote oh no

chris paul, a little cat and mouse here. goodness. ain't stopping that. houston wins 120-102 half a a game uppen oh the dubs. sharks lost in the narcissistic. sparky open for better in chi. turning over in the their own zone bad np nick sh malts shoots and scores on the 22nd birthday 2-0. team omeyer how does it get through? he beats jenny frans oi. 90 second left pull the goalie. brent burns trying to keep them from scoring but the puck

i can call you and eddie when you call me you can call me al ♪ ♪ call me al >>> listening to a little paulst rock star to say he's giving up the road. his upcoming homeward bound tour will be the last. he'll visit canada, u.s. and europe. >> the travel takes away from the joy of playing. he first sthut fame of course as simon and garfunkel for which simon wrote the songs. other rockers wrapping up their touring include neal diamond and elton john. so many college bars in that song came on. >> i mean that's not where i know it from. >> so this morning we're remembering an actor from one of the biggest sitcoms of all time. >> played the cranky father on "frazier" has died in hospice in his adopted city of chicago. muhoney came to acting later in life carving out a niche for himself playing gruf older character. >> you want me to dry that sponge, i'll dry that sponge. give it about a minute. >> and john mahoney was born in britain. he was 77. >> and if you ever think you're too threat to start a career, he started his acting business at 37. >> and he made it happen. >> we turn now to what wou

policy is not what motivates him, it's personality a little more. >>paulow do you think he did on framing the immigration issue? he needs democratic votes as the president said. they thought he was a little too much speaking to his own base. he had that jive in there, americans are dreamers too. the point is that dreamers want to become americans. full-fledged americans and trump is offering them that but he kind of spoke to his base and didn't bring in democrats enough. that's the criticism from the left. what do you think? >> as somebody who is dedicated to this issue and remains in my heart.george w. bush, proud to be an immigration reform republican. i believe in immigrants and i'm the son of an immigranti actual think i'll donald trump - - [indiscernible]. he can because the democrats know they have to compromise with him if they want to get something done. i actually think this is much more an issue of how will the democrats behave and how will president trump behave. one thing i would have done, at the state of the union i would've looked the republ

intent in saying that flipping [laughter] >> just randomly with a little pen. paul: again, try to be faithful to their theory, they draw a distention between people knowing the effect of what they are doing and having the punitive retaliatory intent. amy: is there evidence as opposed to just best paul: it's not even disputed they tried to make a democratic district. 7 the democrats don't have a lot of gerrymanders anywhere else in the country. trying to seize the opportunity they had available. >> it seems to me, doing some moves in advances, the gill argument and looking at the oral argument transcript, one of the challenges is what kind of proof will be necessary, how you can scrutinize this. do you happen to know if they built into their theory the idea that there is a safe harbor? if you have an independent commission set up the districts ou automatically are ok? that might be a way to make the rules more paul: i don't know. we have taken the view in the gill case that the intent prompt will never be satisfied if it is drawn by a real bipartisan or nonpartisan c

policy is not what motivates him, it's personality a little more. >>paulnk he did on framing the immigration issue? he needs democratic votes. they thought it was too much speaking to his own base. he had that jibe in there, americans are dreamers too. the point here is, the dreamers want to become americans. full-fledged americans and trump is offering that but he kinda spoke to his base and didn't try to bring in democrats enough. that is at least the criticism from the left.towhat do you think? >> as someone who's dedicated to this issue in my heart and policy wise. proud to be a comprehensive immigration reform republican. i believe in immigrants. i am the son of an immigrant. i is the only guy that can do it. george bush tried, barack obama didn't really try. trump can because the democrats know they have to compromise if they want to get something done. i actually think this is much more an issue of how the democrats behave then donald trump will behave.ll one thing i would have done, at the state of the union i would have looked the republicans in t

i think what pelosi and chuck and the president and maybe a little bit of paul ryan who is probably abit more skittish about this, they are looking to look at their left and right and go, we can't cut a deal with them. so let's just pish them to the sidelines -- push them to the sidelines. president comes out the day after and goes, on the daca thing, i'm on the way to pathway to citizenship and it blue -ble up the right. and so now everybody is worried about the kind of deal she will cut and who is worried about it? the far left. and now we're ready to go to the middle to get the deal. >> and democrats are fine with this caps deal. >> the budget deal -- >> it is a deal. >> everybody got what they -- >> $165 billion in higher military funding for the republicans and $130 billion in defense funding. >> not one to one but closer than they thought. >> and it is an on litderation of president trump's budget proposal the nondomestic defense spending so democrats do have things to be happy about. but the daca fight, it is clever politics for sure for nancy pelosi to be on floor an elevate a

paul you little. i get you all the eat more spam moshe you must hold a muslim on me you don't know because i mean these photos you have a minute but still no qualms at all she spoke. in as. it shocks even more that one must meet with you all the more equal to all. the other more than money earmarked to the whim of our problem and you know them to motivate you further and you call for us to fight when you consider themselves an islam reach him a question the last one question. the threat was so serious that that you know one of one of the days that we were we were we were shooting afghan star they actually . blew up one of our cars and they killed about nine of our colleagues who were working with us at the t.v. station for toilet t.v. i get threats and my inbox saying go on went but asad your face or you deserve to die all we can remember is war i was about eight years old my father decided to take us outside the country because our life was in danger and when we got to the border i remember there was

i want to specifically talk about peter and paul a little bit. among the various texts in wartime, there was a lot of old testament narrative. and that could make sense. there's a lot of war in the old testament, a will tlot of battl. in so doing, people drew on these texts over and over and over, they had something that was ripe for the pickings. but passivists tended to point that out. and not only passivists but those particularly opposed to a certain war. they would say, sure, you can find a lot of war in the hebrew bible or the old testament, but what about the new testament? this is also the case in the civil war, i find. more and more arguing over testaments. how rev lant rel lant is war for the new testament. there were several ways people who wanted to argue against war could make that move. and one we mentioned is the sermon on the mount, where jesus says turn the other cheek. which is nonresistance. could be read as passivispassiv. and because it gets quoted so much, it's one of the top ten cited texts in the revolutionary era. so thos

deceitfully and curseth he who hold back from doing the work of thespecifical about peter and paul a little bit. among the various texts in wartime, there was a lot of old testament narrative and we can make -- that makes sense because there's a lot of war in the oldestment. -- old testament. there's a lot of battles, a lot of armies. and in so doing, people drew upon these texts over and over and over. they had something ripe for the pickings. but pacifists tended to point that out and not only pacifists but those particularly opposed to a certain war and they would say, well, sure you can find a lot of war in the hebrew bible or theold testament, but what about the new testament? and this is the case in the civil war, i find. how relevant is war for the new testament? so there were several ways in which people who wanted to argue against war could make that move, and one we've mentioned is the sermon on the mount where jesus says "turn the other cheek." someone slaps you on one cheek, turn the other, which seems to be non-resistance, could be read as pacifism. that gets quoted over and ov

paul specifically writing to the romans, he was dealing with christians who were just taking a little too literally, the idea that christ kingdom is not of this world. sometimes christians take that literally. not of this world, doesn't mean this world is gone. it means you still have to live in the world but live in a different way. so paul is saying, the key to understand this is one specific verse and section of a verse that people tend to overlook. the ruler is the minister of god to thee for good. so if the ruler is not acting in the people's best interest, if the ruler is not god's minister for the people's good, then christians should resist. christians should rebel against that minister or king. part of this then means the patriots said, we have to have some common sense when it comes to approaching scripture. these commands for hon nooring king, they are basic command for authority. the bible tells children to obey parents, does that mean to obey the parent who throws a fit and tries to cut their throats. so the idea is respect the king but based on how the king performs the

i think the stock reaction is a little overdone today. >> paul, who's story should you really believee? i mean if you believe the walmart turn around story as daniel mentioned, they're projecting 40% e-commerce growth going out. they're switching to just annual guidance which suggests to me that maybe they're going to do some more investment in a way that they can plan out over longer periods of time if you believed in walmart last week, shouldn't you buy here >> look, i think that there's undoubtedly a lot of success in terms of execution that we've seen from the walmart team over the past few years and i think that the majority of the issues today are very transitory regarding the guidance and regarding the margin factors you brought up like transportation and wages. those are transitory issues and that is frankly not our concern. we adamantly believe that investors focus today is on e-commerce growth. walmart cited that the jet.com asset of the business is slowing a little bit they're pulling back on some of the marketing dollars related to jet. and in addition, there is also the f

economy, the way people are getting more money in the paychecks, that's going to make it a little tougher for paul's friends on the left to get the lefties all whipped up when the economy is doing really good. >> jason miller, ron brownstein, i appreciate it. we have our eyes on washington in just a few short minutes, a former key aide to the trump campaign goes to court. could he be close to striking a deal with a special counsel? we're live at the courthouse. breathe freely fast with vicks sinex. my congestion's gone. i can breathe again! i can breathe again! vicks sinex... breathe on. >>> any moment now, former campaign aide rick gates will appear in a d.c. court for a hearing on a change of counsel. he's changing lawyers. his attorneys are expected to layout their reasons for withdrawing from the case. this is interesting, we'll be watching this closely. jessica schneider joins us with the details. >> reporter: well, this hearing scheduled to start in just a few minutes here. this is a closed door hearing. it will be protected by attorney-client privilege. we're not sure what's going to happen i

once they wrap this up, they will understand the course of the night, whether or not rand paul will speak a littlee might hear from mitch mcconnell, the majority leader. and then at some point in the next hour or two, maybe three at the very most, they would have a vote to approve this. this is going to be a problem the senate. if you got 72 yeas and about where you needed 60, it's fine. you only need 51 to pass the bill itself. that is not going to be a problem in the senate. the big question market continues to be in the house of representatives, if they can get the vote mixture between republicans and democrats to give the lights on the federal government in the morning at 9:00 when most federal workers will report to the job. >> sean: >> is this a full shut? for anyone wondering what is going on, if you work for the government, what does this all mean? is this an actual shutdown of the government? >> according to the office of management and budget, the omb, yes, it is a shutdown. they sent on a notice at midnight saying the federal government does not have funding, they have not gotten direct

little bit? i know you have so many products. jean-paul: and a few secrets.ine: but you can tell us. we are amongst friends. ♪ francine: we were talking about what the next four years will bring, and it is a lot more e-commerce. how do i choose my makeup online? it must be difficult to choose the right coloring. jean-paul: now technologies are amazing. you can test online, on your cell phone for example, simulate the application of the makeup on your face. and you see yourself with the lips covered with the lipstick you want, the shade you need, the powder, the mascaras. you know i did a demonstration of that to my board completely made up. it was, they were ecstatic. francine: was that for the launch of the app? jean-paul: yeah. francine: so they said, yes, fantastic. jean-paul: i wanted to share with the board the fantastic progress of technology. it is amazing. ♪ >> oh, it looks pure red. wow. the lipstick is moving with my mouth, and i know i don't have any on. >> it is like amy winehouse. i can't help looking at myself. francine: this is amazing because

in the senate and in the house in the 5:00 hour today, bette midler tweeted out after rand paul had his little> what a class act. first of all, has bette midler been relevant since quote beaches" in 1988 when i was four? i best she was in hello dolly or something. rand paul on substance is exactly correct. the fact republicans spent years railing against obama deficits and democratic deficits. they have power again. they spent enormous sum of money. they wanted to remove sequestration on the military. touted sequestration in big win in 2011. it was a big win. i remember it. so do you. the idea we have to blow out a budget with republican majority in both houses demonstrates once again the american people are really inconsistent about spending. on one hand they want cuts to spending. but on other hand they start to oppose some spending and they buckle to the american public. pete: a lot of people wanted military spending that that was hit by sequestration, but what it comes to debt and deficits what is it going to mean? >> continuation of deficits out to the end of time. we'll look at 30 trilli

. >> and josh, of course, this changes the calculus a little bit for paul manafort and does this put pressure on him to cooperate with robert mueller? >> well, he is clearly frustrated with the statement yesterday that he said that he is disappointed in the former business partner robert gates for pleading, and he was explicitt with the first statement released by the team. the two of them were almost interchangeable, and they were together in all of the business ventu venture, and often accompanied each other on the campaign, and he was his deputy and he knows everything that mr. manafort has been doing, and the meetings and the transactions and the document s documents as we saw in the indictment, so it is not a good sign for mr. manafort that mr. gates has plead guilty. and with that said, mr. gates has information on how the trump campaign work and he was in the white house for meetings, so he was not a small bit player in the campaign, and even after the administration began, he was a frequent visitor to 1600 pennsylvania, so particularly in the early months, so it is significan

paul you burn little you don't need i mean. i get you all the eat more spam moshe you must hold a muslim on me don't know because i meet these from them and the net but small enough for most of the system. to know is that it shall see them all at once and much more will you or them only call them to honest on. the all that more than one family to the us will know more fact although none of you know them too much did you found it cool fast and. thank you but when you consider themselves unlimited stump. commission it was asked what the question. the threat was so serious that that you know one of one of the days that we were we were we were shooting afghan star they actually. blew up one of our cars and they killed about nine of our colleagues who were working with us at the t.v. station for toller t.v. i get threats in my inbox saying go on when to put us in the paste or you deserve to die all we could remember is war i was about eight years old my father decided to take us outside the country because our life was in danger and

little bit. >> clearly rand paul was unpopular with his senate colleagu colleagues. >> this didn't go over well rand paul but many senators acknowledge this is his right for a senator where anyone can slow things down at his or her own discretion to make this point and he underscored this deep division that exists within the republican party who especially for the last eight years of the obama administration decried deficit spending, set debt was the biggest existential threat to the united states and now has been continually adding to that same debt under a republican control of both houses. so uncomfortable truths from rand paul directed at his party but not changing the votes in the senate or house. >> and it wasn't a filibuster, it was just that he was going to keep them until midnight and that would mean another day had elapsed before they could proceed to the vote so it was procedural and therefore a lot of them were angry, they had flights to go home, it being a thursday night/friday morning. there were those other personal issues? play. >> and rand paul set during one of his speeches, a

chris paul, a little cat and mouse here. goodness. ain't stopping that. houston wins 120-102 half a a game uppen oh the dubs. sharks lost in the narcissistic. sparky open for better in chi. turning over in the their own zone bad np nick sh malts shoots and scores on the 22nd birthday 2-0. team omeyer how does it get through? he beats jenny frans oi. 90 second left pull the goalie. brent burns trying to keep them from scoring but the puck bounces out. and he slams it home. 3-1 black hawks the time. >>> all righty i've been doing this a while. never seen anything like this. i want to give you the warning, the woman in the video you're about to see was not seriously injured. don't worry about that. all right this is from the rodeo in hawaii. they have a contest called "hulabull." you got inside the hula hoop if the bull touches you it at all you're out. she is out too. out of here whoa! . i can't even believe this i've seen it a hundred times already. amazingly she suffered only a spraining ankle. the winner didn't even win. she is all right. the winner gets

some by paul you've done but little by. little i get you all the more suspect moshe you must put a muslim on me you don't know me cause i'm like these photos of them and i got a storm you know cause it was just me but all the dinners that it shall see them all at once only much more with you or them or you call them to understand. the all the more than. told us one more fact although you know them tomorrow would you fund equal for us are you confident that status and you need a strong part of the new confident that's that is and you need a storm that reached for you see it was just one question. the threat was so serious that that you know one of one of the days that we were we were shooting afghan star they actually. blew up one of our car. and they killed about nine of our colleagues who were working with us at the t.v. station for toilet t.v. i get threats in my inbox saying go on went but as if the face or you deserved to die all we can remember is war i was about eight years old my father decided to take us outside the

finale of the upside downtown event at the twin cities super bowl week. >> i worked in saint paul for a little bit. it -- when you grow up in california and at 9:00 in the morning you go out to go to work and there is snowflakes -- [ laughter ] snowflakes coming down, it is a revelation. then when you hit 70s in february, that too in its own way is unusual. its been weird and it will continue that way right through mid-month. high pressure is out in the eastern pacific. that strong high brings us more record temperatures right through tomorrow. record highs today in oakland, mountain view, livermore, san jose, san francisco, some of the numbers 16 degrees above where we normally this time of year. oakland 69. in santa hoe is a 69 degrees. we hit records tomorrow in a couple of instances. these are the standing records. 73 in the city. san jose 76. in napa 72. in oakland 69. in the case of napa and oakland tomorrow, the forecast is for them to -- set new records while failing to do that in san francisco and san jose. we shall see. in the meantime that high pressure simply will not go away. it m

. >> i want to play a sound bite from paul ryan a little bit earlier today in reaction to this. and get your reaction to paul ryan in a moment. let's play it. >> and i think, as public policy makers we don't just knee jerk before we have the facts and the data. he warns don't have a knee-jerk response to something like this. can you call it a knee jerk response? >> katy, we have the facts and the data for god's sake. the list i was thinking of before i came on, auer and sandy hook and columbine, las vegas, the pulse nightclub in orlando. i don't know the speaker and i don't know what point he's trying to make. we have the facts and the data. look, these are complicated public policy issues, but we know the steps we can take to make your kids safer, for god's sakes, we need to do that. >> wae have a scroll of all the students and teachers that have been killed since columbine. we'll show that periodically throughout the show when we're able to rerack that list. but it's dozens and dozens and dozens of people long. 1999, april 20th, and on and on and on and on. chuck, if you could

. >> we need to give a little more characterization there. paulanafort said in his letter to the president that he will work for free, but he wanted to have i think it was a letter to the president, a significant role in the -- in the campaign. so if he had a significant role, he could tell those russian oligarchs or others, look at the influence i have over the next potential president. >> bingo. >> ken, quickly, what's been the response from manafort and gates? >> manafort issued a statement asserting his innocence and proclaiming he will be vindicated. gates has not commented but there are multiple reports he is on his way to cooperating. there was a little kerfuffle yesterday about whether he fired his lawyer. green has a history of cutting deals with the justice department. and it's really looking like gates is about to flip and begin cooperating. and that is bad news for manafort. >> all right, right there, ken dilanian said lawyerly and kerfuffle. it is not the same tom green who was the 1990s comedian once married to drew barrymore, it's a

. >> harris: i want to talk a little bit about what we are expecting at that hearing, and also paul manafort and how he figures into all this. as we were kind of reading this because these were sealed documents that we learned about a couple days ago, we've been waiting for the tick-tock and fax to fall in. now we are getting some details about the sort of stuff. paul manafort was a guy when you had done a lot before he was looked at for the campaign. i'm curious how this all comes together. do we know yet where he is concerned? >> just to recap, if they think back to last fall, rick gates and paul manafort were indicted together, if you will, for there lobbying activities, bank and tax fraud as well as money laundering. question since then have been if the special counsel would be able to peel away one of these individuals to testify against of the other. with the expected guilty plea in just an hour from now, it appears they have been able to peel away rick gates, and we will see his cooperation in the special counsel investigation. just for some more context, what we've seen in the last w

at least rand paul was trying to have a little bit of a semblance of a debate on one of the most massivehings the congress does. it is absolutely unbelievable to me. i can't even fathom the idea, if we had gone into the election saying we are going to raise spending. and we are going back to trillion dollar deficits. none of these republican would have gotten elected. we love our military but we are in the majority. the house, senate we have the presidency. we had this kind of deficit? unbelievable. >>chris: less than a minute left.let's talk about the elections. i brought this up with jim jordan.what impact does this have on the 2018 midterms? you have conservative voters that were promised on things if they elected a republican government and this what they get. >> i think there will be tea party republicans wondering where did the tea party go? and will emerge again when there's a democrat in the white house? if that's the case, will it be convincing? i think republicans have done themselves harm. >>chris: that's the interesting thing. people are saying the only way you get hard repub

those new indictments. 32-count indictment, along with his business partner paul manafort. so talk a little bit about how this plays into the broader calculation for paul manafort. pick up where pete left off. what could this mean for paul manafort? >> it's very bad news for paul manafort because as pete was saying, there's this massive indictment against paul manafort. it's mainly a document case, though. now what the prosecutors have is a witness who worked with paul manafort for years who was involved in this conduct and is admitting it. even though he's only pleasing guilty to two charges, the criminal information the mueller team filed lays out this vast scheme with a $75 million paid by this russian-backed ukrainian oligarch and alleged money laundering, bank fraud, tax fraud. you have gates prepared to testify against paul manafort. paul manafort already was facing 15 years in prison under federal sentencing guidelines in the first indictment. that does not include the latest charges. essentially he's facing a life term. he's 68 years old. it's putting enormous pressure on him to coo

presumably rick gates doesn't know anything that could hurt the president, but paul manafort was chairman for two months, there for a little longer, rick gates even longer. paul manafort was in that meeting with the russian lawyer who came promising incriminating information about hillary clinton on behalf of the russian government. you have to imagine that there's at least potential that they know things and certainly the special counsel seems to be acting like he thinks that they know things that will lead him to something of more consequence beyond their individual cases. >> matt miller, how significant do you think this would be if and when we get the outlines of gates' agreement and what he might be able to contribute to this case? >> it's likely incredibly significant. there are two questions we have to know the answer to that we obviously don't but bob mueller will know at least one. the first is what can rick gates say about paul manafort and his exposure. we know paul manafort obviously has a great deal of legal exposure. we have seen it now in two indictments. he's now looking at not just a paper case but a coope

paul specifically writing to the romans, was dealing with christians who are just taking a little too literally the idea bank ---- >> christ was not of the world. paul is saying the key to understand this is one specific section of a verse people tend to overlook. paul said the ruler was the minister of god to the for good. if the ruler is not acting in best interests, if the ruler is not god's minister for people of good, than christians should resist and rebel against the king. this means, the patriots said, that we have to have common sense when it comes to scripture. these commands for honoring the king and god's minister, they are basic commands that deal with authority. the bible tells children to obey parents. does it mean a bible is one children to obey a parent who cuts throats? speakers could be much more interesting back them with graphic details. the idea is respect the king but based on how the king performs duties, and not specifically for just because. .valuate leadership with the patriots are arguing is proof texting without understanding true context and you have to r

a little earlier, my colleague shaun ley spoke to paul scully, the conservative mp for sutton and cheamf the commons international development committee. he said it was important to be sure the scandal was not part of a wider problem. we have to investigate this because we are spending millions of pounds with these partners, many of whom do fantastic work, but let's make sure that the safeguards are there and the policies are robust to make sure it doesn't happen again. and as oppose some sort of training to make sure that the people who go into this, who do such valuable work, don't have this weird disconnect, where on the one hand they're helping people and then hours later they're exploiting the same people. for sure and 99% of 0xfa m 0xfam workers are doing fantastic work edit what i don't want to do is tarnish them with the same brush as a few miscreants. penny mordaunt, the secretary of state for international development, according toa international development, according to a spokesperson in the department, has asked for a meeting, requested a meeting, with 0xfam's presumably ch

totally different animals, the senate passed the budget deal 71-28 very quickly after rand paul closing down a littlee was supposed to be more of a challenge. so far those gays are taking up, we just hit 70 eas for democrats. we should talk about what is in here when we get down a little bit. >> $165 billion for the military, $131 billion for domestic programs. on the republican side republicans were pushing for the increase in military spending but in order to get that they had to cave on domestic programs, $131 billion, the reason rand paul was filibustering long into the evening and delaying this vote until right now. we were expecting this earlier. carly: rand paul is one of the reasons we arguably missed that midnight deadline because he did slow things down. he released a statement saying tonight you can feel the frustration growing in congress as we expose the hypocrisy of republicans joining in an unholy alliance and spending free-for-all with democrats, he is very angry budget deal is so expensive. rob: let's hear little bit more. >> they are holding hands and only one bad guy standing in th

and paul ryan, i'm imagining, is a little less popular than the president and he's a much easier person>> paul ryan is saying we'll put a bill on the floor that the president supports. he needs the president's cover to protect him from the right wing of his own conference because that's really the only way to get something over the top. but to your point, john, the money for building the wall could be upwards of, say, $20 billion. that's not something that conservatives want. they want something much more than just giving the wall for the dream act. they want all these other things as well, chain migration, reversible lottery. that's something the democrats don't want. it's very difficult to navigate. what ryan wants is trump support to help him with the right. >> it is also a matter of pass the hot potato. president trump, as we just heard in this infrastructure meeting, saying, daca, i think we'll get it done, but it's really up to the democrats to get it done. but of course the republicans control both chambers of congress. all of this is fine. it's a nice rhetorical debate, but marc

talk through a little bit, is it legitimate? because paul ryan, other republicans have raised concerns. they have said, yeah, it's not about the special counsel, it really is about fisa surveillance and this program put in place to basically protect americans here. do they have legitimate concerns that could potentially be addressed by this memo? no, nick's mike is not working again. nick, we will come back to you, i swear. live television, guys. again, yamiche and shawna here to save the day. >> the ones without the law degrees. >> talk through a little bit the idea there could be legitimate concerns addressed in this. >> well, the issue is, of course, that as i said, the house intelligence committee has an oversight rule. that's great. the problem that was also explained to me by another lawyer was if it's a four-page memo, which we were told it is. there's a situation where a lot of people haven't read the underlying information for that memo. fisa warrants or all the information going into to get a fisa warrant is 50, 60, 70 pages. it go

the latest on this weather that is moving into the bay area, could get a little wild into the evening hours. allen, veronica and paul will be back in 30 minutes. captioning spo captioning sponsored by cbs >> glor: deadly storms strike the heart of the country. homes swallowed up by floodwaters were knocked down by a tornado. >> oh, my goodness. >> glor: also tonight, a former deputy defends his actions during the florida school shooting. the president escalates his criticism. d i really believe i'd run in there even if i didn't have a weapon. is glor: what monica lewinsky is now saying about her relationship with president clinton. an employee of the c.d.c. disappears without a trace. >> 55 strong! >> glor: every public school teacher in an entire state on strike and no end in sight. and stoneman douglas scores an upset win when it's needed most. >> this wasn't for us. this was for the 17 victims. we played for them.

little lies? former trump campaign manager paul manafort pleading not guilty today to dozens of new charges from robertller. also getting a trial date in september. while top