the problem we have here, which is the same problem as with the litvinenko case and the poisoning, is that. so there is a legal impasse. given that, then, explain the significance of holding the trail anyway, in absentia. well, the significance to the victims, the families of the victims, i should say, and to the criminal justice system victims, i should say, and to the criminaljustice system as a whole is that you can still hold people accountable. you can still show that the evidence is there. that evidence can be properly tested, a verdict can be properly tested, a verdict can be properly tested, a verdict can be returned, and the public can see that a fair process was followed. and if the suspects and the state that protects them doesn't engage in that process, then they can still be held accountable. u nfortu nately can still be held accountable. unfortunately they can't be punished. yes, that is the big problem here, isn't it? is there... what kind of pressure might be put behind the scenes on the russians to try to yield on this? although it is probably likely it is not going t