that is why i want to thank andrew liveris. andrew is helping us do terrific work as part of our advanced manufacturing partnership. obviously, part of our job at the federal government is to make sure the r & d is being done and figure out how to create that and selling them around the world is going to be critical. thanks to new bipartisan trade agreements that i signed with panama and colombia and particularly south korea, we are on track to doubling the american exports over the next five years. the brt was helpful in making sure that happened. i think i have shown i will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for american goods. that is why we worked so hard to secure russia's invitation into the wto. that is why i asked congress to repeal jackson to make sure all of your companies and american companies across the country can take advantage of it. that is something that we're going to need some help on. this is about creating a level rules based playing field in the growing russian market. when it comes to competing

that's why i want to thank andrew liveris -- where's andrew? there he is. andrew is helping us to do some terrific work as part of our advanced manufacturing partnership. and obviously part of our job as the federal government is to make sure that the r&d, the basic research is continuing to be done, and figuring out how we commercialize that, create products here in america, and sell them all around the world is going to be absolutely critical. thanks to new bipartisan trade agreements that i've signed with panama, colombia, and, most significantly, south korea, we're on track to meet our goal of doubling american exports over the next five years. and i know the brt was very helpful in making sure that that happened. i think i've shown that i will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for american goods. that's why we worked so hard to secure russia's invitation into the wto. that's why i have asked congress to repeal jackson-vanik, to make sure that all your companies and american companies all across the country can take advantage of it. and that'

carry these thirty thousand pound bunker buster bombs late last year reportedly the air force to the livery of them many reports over the years have said maybe this would be a prelude to the u.s. attacking iran my question when you build up be to equip it with a thirty thousand pound bunker buster bomb that is maybe the only thing that can penetrate a deep nuclear facility does that give you an incentive to hate try it out on iran as it is that. well i'm not sure i'm not sure they certainly wouldn't build it if they didn't intend to use it they used very large weapons of that sort in afghanistan and they weren't terribly effective they dropped a couple i know some of them a lot but i think those are seven tons so these are these are quite a bit bigger but i think the point to look at here is is will work you have a lot of people in the difference the partner who build the toys and they want to try to use them and it's really irrelevant whether it works or not it's kind of really blow up and that's fine. the idea that you're going to compound the iranians into all into oblivion from the air

is so he and the man who drove him home, you know, cab driver or livery driver, they jiggle with the door. a neighbor says, calls up the place and says i don't know for sure whether there's a break-in going on, but there's two guys who look like they're, you know, just trying to jigger with the door to get in. i don't know what's going on. police officer goes over. by this time, henry louis gates is in his house. the police officer comes in, asks him for identification. professor gates is not too happy about that but, ultimately, shows him identification showing that he lives in the house, it's his house. they have words, the officer essentially lures him outside. professor gates is screaming at the officer, the officer arrests him l for disorderly conduct. now, in my view the officer was wrong in arresting professor gates. even if it was the case that professor gates was not being deferential to the officer, even if it was the case that professor gates was hollering at the officer. police officers carry around weapons, they should be very well trained. they should have discipline. t

so he and the man who drove him home, cabdriver or livery driver giggle with the door, a neighbor says -- called the police and says i don't know for sure whether it is a break in going on but these two guys who look like they're trying to jeter with the door to get in a don't know what is going on and a police officer goes over and henry louis gates is in his house and a police officer comes in and asks identification. professor gates was not too happy about that but shows an identification showing he lives in the house. it is his house. they have words. the officer essentially lowers him outside. professor gates is screaming at the officer and the officer arrests him for disorderly conduct. in my view the officer was wrong in arresting professor gates even if it was the case that professor gates was not being deferential to the officer, even if it was the case that professor gates was hollering at the officer. police officers carry around weapons. they should be very well trained. they should have discipline. they should have enough training so that they don't get unhinged simply bec