i want to ask you how lobachevsky's eucalyptus can the straight line e, a person who fasts in the church and for the sake of christ, and the second line, when a person does the same thing. the same austerity, the same love, also mercy, but without christ they can translate. i think they can, of course even. but this means that there is also a person. you may not be aware of it. well look good. and why at all is this all the pumping of certain qualities? he already has some kind of goal-setting for the sake of what the best version of you is better for. here, imagine that every next best version of you does not lead to the fact that the need for god, it decreases, on the contrary , it increases. you understand that, relatively speaking, you create beauty around you framing about the content, it stays the same as it was disagree, wait disagree. yes, with whom with engels or scouts with wallpaper, i disagree, it can’t cross, you know, it seems to me, why because there is a principle, a fundamental difference in these two situations in situations where a person does not think about god and t