well, mark farrell, when he was a supervisor back in 2016, he ran for the local democratic party committee to be a member of that committee, and he had about $56,000 left over in the campaign account. and so he was still a supervisor. and at that time he started to use the money to go to some of the fanciest restaurants. and bars in san francisco. uh- spruce swig, balboa cafe. the list just keeps going and going. and so he started spending thousands of dollars on these meals and saying that he was meeting with d, triple c constituents, which is basically any democrat in san francisco. no other person who ran for supervisor. excuse me, who ran for the democratic party and is running for mayor now, had anything like that and really just all d triple c candidates, democratic party officials were like, this is an unusual pattern. and it carried on actually, after he was appointed mayor following the death of ed lee. >> all right, what is the implication of that? >> well, the implication is we should know who our elected officials are meeting with. there's actually pretty strict rules about lob

an independent was because the local islington north labour party were denied their democratic right to choose their own candidate after the national executive committee them for the past 40 ears. , , ., , been with them for the past 40 ears. ,, years. is usually successful politician — years. is usually successful politician and _ years. is usually successful politician and a _ years. is usually successful politician and a candidate, | years. is usually successful - politician and a candidate, winning a seat for labour at any general election since 1983 but the problem was, he could not translate that success in his constituency into success in his constituency into success in his constituency into success in downing street in the party suffering its worst defeat under him in 2019.1�*0111 party suffering its worst defeat under him in 2019.— under him in 2019. you would robabl under him in 2019. you would probably say _ under him in 2019. you would probably say that _ under him in 2019. you would probably say that he - under him in 2019. you would probably say that he got - under him in 2019. you would probably say that he got a - under him in 2019. y

local committee who had been about. but this tells you is what you were getting. the republican party knows it's a killer issue for democrats, and they don't want to go near it even though we know what they are for. they proved it time and time again but the whitewashing, trying to pull something over it. you can put all the lipstick on a pig and it still a pig. >> chuck, the platform calls for the largest deportation operation in american history. that's not a surprise. it includes a new vetting system, are you ready? to keep out christian haters. what do you make of this? >> we have known as a latino who grew up in texas, it's another one of the dog whistles they are using to rile up folks around some of the craziest things i have ever seen. how are you going to know this? you go to this platform and it talks about going out and monitoring women that are pregnant are believed to be pregnant. there's nothing in this platform which is one of the craziest things i've seen, i've been involved in platform committees going back to 1996 with the democrats. this may be the craziest thing i've ever laid my eyes on. >> president bi