location and the deal st. location will be withdrawn and there'll be no applications for those, then the remaining locations are ok. >> there are five locations. i think we are having a hearing. >> my suggestion would be, as the vice-president mentioned, we will call the appellants from all of these appeals and they may choose not to testify given the stipulation. >> the thing that is right, but the permit holder might not feel like withdrawing 101 california at 25 via live we are going to have a whole hearing. >> with some frustration, i would say that we would not. it would require us to either go through the public hearing -- and i suggest we continue the matter for us to present those forms and we proceed to seek our permits if that is what the appellants would prefer to see happening. president goh: i tend to agree that if we need to continue. commissioner garcia: we might have a change of heart. >> i feel at this time, that you know, we are obviously upset about the other two locations that are right in

what is critical about this legislation is location, location, location. is it fair to brick-and-mortar businesses? it would be hard to say that the board of supervisors intended for brick-and-mortar businesses to take a backseat to mobile food trucks. it is weighing the factors and weighing the benefits and arms. it was intended to be the job of dpw. i appreciate that dpw is overwhelmed by this. it is a large program they are not used to. it has been in the city before. the police department had it. it is not completely new for them to implement it. they have failed to implement it and consider the factors that they have heard. have you all heard what the officers told you tonight and as you have noted, we do not have a record of the hearing officer, what she did, and how she weighed things. another interesting thing that was mentioned is that we should allow this conditionally approved a permit to go for because we can always revoke it. it is not the purpose of issuing permits and going through a process where you involve the public and have a protest he

i was just curious due to the location. >> that's one location. and the other location is 2305, 2315 mission. is all legal, according to your rules, somebody in the system then punch the button and we have so much technique now it bothers me. mr. kwan is a very great guy -- vice president hwang: i have a follow-up question to commissioner fung. the permit you have at 2800 mission street, when was that issued? yes, you. you have a permit for a cart at 2800 mission street, correct? >> 19 and mission, yes, we have. vice president hwang: i thought you said 24th and mission. >> that's another permit, bart station. it has nothing to do with this one. vice president hwang: when was that permit issued? >> it was in 2009 something. i have here. vice president hwang: and did you renew that within the 90-day period? >> no, the department -- it's standing, it's bart station. vice president hwang: there's no city related requirement? >> the city don't have no authorization but the police does. vice president hwang: and you have one on 19th street is what you s

no locations were ever discussed. there is nothing in the record that talks about specific locations. in fact, most of the discussion was off the grid. let me tell you -- the financial district is not off the grid. it is the heart of the grid. the approval of these permits will destroy the people who are in this grid and it will create an impact that ripples throughout the grid. the one other thing i found amusing in the permit-holders testimony is that there is going to be all of this new business. a new vitality that is going to come for us. i do not know where this is coming from. people are not going to be driving in from the east bay to go to a food truck. they're not want to be landing from another planet. we have the people that we have. there is a fixed economy here. the notion that there is going to be a task force that is going to straighten some of these issues out -- by the time that task force makes any conclusions, many of these businesses will be dead. i am urging you to deny these permits. >> ladies an

what is critical about this legislation is location, location, location. is it fair to brick-and-mortar businesses? it would be hard to say that the board of supervisors intended for brick-and-mortar businesses to take a backseat to mobile food trucks. it is weighing the factors and weighing the benefits and arms.

third street in order to facility the location of the center for -- to facilitate the location of the center for youth wellness and advocacy. it's a partnership with the mayor's office, the district attorney's office, the child adolescent support advocacy and resource center, the city attorney's office, department of public health, human services agency, and the police department. all with the goal of providing integrated pediatric, mental and psychological health services to youth and their families who are experiencing trauma. as many of you know, district 10 not only has a high concentration of youth and families but historically suffered from lack of access to adequate medical care and wraparound mental health services. the supervisor believes and our office strongly believes that this project is desperately needed in order to support the growing population in the district, and also not only to serve the growing youth and children population but the population of youth and children as the city as a whole. so dr. burke and katie are here who can walk through the project with you in

but the intent of the board is to overturn the other two locations. ok, do you want to specify a date? commissioner garcia: miss paul, it would be your client -- how much time do you need to get that certificate? it will be up and down the issue. >> i might recommend on if it would comment for him to reissue the other permits for the third location. it might save time and effort. >> of the half year of prohibition? >> said the board has adopted findings do not have that applied. >> one permit can be at multiple locations. as they are suggesting here, there might be four or five locations where to our objectives are appeal. and the other two are not. we issue a new permit, i assume this is denied. the notification requirement will be considering a new permit, or are we just modifying the permanent and the specific case? third, one applicant is allowing a maximum of seven permits. there become the issues where the of the applicant is asking for several different locations in several different permits. there are nuances as this legislation is established

we have retail, wells fargo is located in this location. there branch. we have to other retail spaces on the ground level and there is a number of other retail tenants in that corridor. that it also impacts. and so the crowd control, i brought some pictures to reference. >> you can swing the mike to make it more comfortable for yourself. >> this is kind of foggy. this is the san bueno, one of the food trucks that has a permit there. right outside the wells for aerospace. you can -- wells fargo space. the krona blocks the sidewalk access. we have also seen where people with disabilities have trouble getting around this crowd which creates issues for us. it is a path of travel for us. that is sampson, this is bush in front of our building. this is directly in front of our building. we colored this curb white to make this a 15 minute parking because this was in front of the entryway. they have moved to this corner. it blocks the access. president goh: can erase the projector so that the fuller picture shows? is there anyway -- >> the other thing would be, t

these businesses can locate and have submitted permits for other locations in san francisco.t is fine. the financial district does not need new vitality of food trucks down there. my office is in the financial district. i am walking down the streets and we do not need additional activity there. i want to point out -- i am here opposing beals street and california street, those two locations. beale street, besides the violations that exist, just a pragmatic look at the existing conditions, you will see reported four construction activities on the street. there is construction activity proposed until december 2014. permits being allowed for that. this is also the block that goes directly to the transit terminals. where buses and everything else goes every day. one of the locations are want to

alter to withdraw those locations, it might simplify the matter. and we come back with a bathroom for a mock, a restaurant forum for the second street location. >> he will land at the same place anyway. president goh: given that the permit is under suspension, there is no action does allow that the department a level at this time. i think we are ready for the rule now. >> the motion is to continue to january 11. on that motion to continue. commissioner fung: aye. >> commissioner hwang is absent. president goh: aye. >> the vote is 3-0. president goh: we need a break. commissioner garcia: thank you.

located in the basement.it is a preference 5 location, as stated, and outlined in the materials, at&t conducted an alternative site analysis where would look at nine different sites because this is a preference by location. there were -- this was the best one that we found that met the needs within the search range. i just want to end today by again thanking rick crawford for his work and the department's staff were helping us design and direct the site. we ask for your support as we continue to upgrade our network in the city. thank you. commissioner miguel: thank you. is there public comment on this item? if not, public comment is closed. commissioner sugaya: move to approve with the standard condition we are now imposing for independent review. commissioner antonini: second. commissioner moore: i just wanted to say that a letter was written that the owner does not provide mailboxes can knock affect our decision. the only thing is there are other venues in public comment, the item can be brought forward as

location. 3899. there is no reason they rejected that when verizon already has a cell tower there. if you look at the format, it is clear they need to consider co- location facilities. what did they not consider that what they have to work with verizon? what is the reason? when you look at the evidence, everything has not been explored. ask them to come back with a better plan for the city. thank you. [applause] president chiu: we do have role in the board chamber that prohibits applause or other expression of support or opposition. if i could ask you to approve -- appreciate that -- respect that i would appreciate that. >> i want to echo what suzanne said. you have seen this before. this is our first time in this documentary. there things that are unique about this situation and things it has in common that we would like you to listen to. people took time off from work to talk to you and i appreciate all the respect you have given us here. [bell] my name is theresa, i lived at this location fo

located out of frankfurt, germany. i am here today to protest the issuance of the permits to the company. at one bush. despite the fact that this is not our building where the permit is being issued, this is the reason i brought this poteau. to show you -- it is hard to see because it is small. this corner right here is the corner where the permit has been here. president goh: a wonder if you could slide the picture over because you are off the screen. >> the other building is -- that is where it will be located? >> i believe so. we have two mobile food trucks. permits have been issued for our building. the other is right here. we speak from our concern we have. we speak from firsthand experience at the adverse effects we feel the mobile food trucks create in this corridor. we have concerns about our building. we have to trucks there currently. this permits have already been issued but

location, location, location is critical for the success of centers that have the most vulnerable successthe city. i also see that there is transit along third street. a. davidson stopped at another stop. i hope that the parking and other issues can be worked out. a number of the people with concerns from the neighborhood raised issues that i feel passionate about. from the environment to when development happens, making sure that we are falling the protections for the neighborhoods that are the most polluted. but, i know that this is a zoning issue that will create a person -- first in the nation spot that will help children, that many of the activists are committed to. it is an issue of being the right location. i know that the doctor said that there were several different locations. you will have strong air quality filters and monitors within the facility. every protection will be made as they come to the clinic. i am going to weigh this in favor to the benefits in the neighborhood and children and families who have spoken out. i know that many of the environmental justice groups are n

the second location in the guidelines, co-location sites and encourages at installation on buildings with -- that already have wireless facilities. >> next speaker, please. >> i am a proud member of st. mary's park. i have been living in st. mary's park for about five years. i would like to speak about the devalueing of our community. the st. mary's park has been in existence for many years. we plan events for our neighborhood. we talk about how important community events are. we have a newspaper that we put together. this has been put together by people in our neighborhood. i am really concerned about the devalueing of our neighborhood. this could affect the property tax revenues. if our homes are devalued by the cell tower and we have to close, it is a big concern to me. why would we have to deserve that. if we do have to disclose this, it is going to affect our property values. it will affect the property tax revenues that the city can obtain from us as residents. they go hand in hand. i am hoping that you will vote in favor of us, the community and residents instead of voting in

i'm not against him but he wants that location because it's a beautiful location and i have a permit for bart, also, an asset, a tourist attraction. it's a beautiful site. it's a joy of the health department, best hot dog cart because it has three compartles but i suggest four families, they get all the money. i don't get 50 cents. i don't eat. god has given me enough and i always help people in need. i even donate my houses to benefits which house my living room and dining room, sitting capacities, hundred people for dinners. i've been doing that for a long time. but the gentleman, maybe he wants the location. and i did have really problem with the 875 stevenson a few years ago when i was building two houses, four units up in the hills and when i applied for a permit one of the guys told me in six months come back we're going to look at your plans and i said, sir, you get $85 an hour and you're going to pay $85 for me, $170. can you just do your job properly? don't take me wrong, i run three times for mayor maybe to correct those problems we have in the city. and this mistake is wit

, both technical and physical location.that carriers have existing sites nearby and an engineer's analysis is required to determine whether these can be upgraded to provide coverage and capacity instead of just installing entirely new sites at a different location. we would also like to request the fcc report submitted with the application be reviewed by the independent evaluators. in our case, we hired an independent evaluator and what he reviewed the reports, the application for the conditional use, there were more antennas in the application due to the location of the antenna, and that is more accessible to the general public, including possible exposure to public workers. no medicaid -- no mitigating measures were included to be in the guidelines. there is no way we can assess a affirmation provided is correct. it requires a technical person or expert in the field to act -- to assess the bullet -- to assess the below it -- to assess the validity of the claims. >> of her -- i am here to make sure this is done in a public

have a pool hall at the location. thank you. >> good evening orrin hatch i live at 195 west gate drive. i am just what -- i am just west of where the pool hall would be. we are in neighborhood of about 750 homes, about 500 single- family dwellings, and 300 duplex or condominiums that are down on the ocean avenue area. i am known for running an e-mail crime thing for you. if you have a break in or something, you let me know and i zuma out to everyone in the neighborhood. i have about 400 in my e-mail list. when i came across this bill your situation, which not everyone was aware of in our area, i am for blocks west and two blocks north of this location. i will not be affected technically by the noise well, even though it closes at 2:00 a.m. people loiter till 3:00 a.m. is not something that will close and everyone will leave. i send our requests to accept or reject to the people i e-mail out to. i have that here, if you would like to take it all. it reiterates pretty much what you have heard from the other associated n

a preferred location as to whether is a desirable location is another question. that is yet to be determined by you. >> was there any question whether there were about four sites in the area at? was there consideration about whether or not upgrading those sites would allow for the same enhancement in coverage? >> no. >> all right. thank you very much. supervisor cohen: i have a couple of questions for you. what guidelines does the planning department used to determine which site -- what guidelines do you use to establish? >> the wireless sighting guidelines established by the commission. >> how old are the guidelines? >> those were created in 1996. the board recommended some modifications. they amended them in 2003. >> we're working off of guidelines established in 1996. you could imagine the if we were still utilizing technology are browned in 1996, we would not be where we are today. how can we as a board help the planning department established better planning guidelines? >> this board as a legislative body could legislate new guidelines and planning codes or

what is critical about this legislation is location, location, location. is it fair to brick-and-mortar businesses? it would be hard to say that the board of supervisors intended for brick-and-mortar businesses to take a backseat to mobile food trucks. it is weighing the factors and weighing the benefits and arms. it was intended to be the job of dpw. i appreciate that dpw is overwhelmed by this. it is a large program they are not used to. it has been in the city before. the police department had it. it is not completely new for

for your information, our car is located on the yellow commercial. it is not located on the commercial parking zone, and also, in the letter, there is concern about a food truck. we do not operate a food truck. no. 3, and now the concern about additional cleaning and cost of the sidewalk, i believe our operation will be supplied by the trash can and also the recycle bin, and also, the city requires a cleanup of about 100 feet from the business. we have a permit for that, too, and the last concern about the food smile, -- foods now. now we pack everything. i do not think they are going to smell anything, especially if we clean up after business hours. one more concern, the diagram sees concern. it is about half a block away from the entrance, and i feel there is nothing to be concerned about, especially across the street from the building. merry-go-round our business area and -- we go around the business area asking for a supportive letter. in less than three days we get more than 100 people supporting us, so it might be closed based on all the inform

you have a situation of a location selling specific food. then you have a commercial enterprise. i am going to sell similar food and then turn it around and require the department to revoke it. >> thank you. >> the matter is submitted. >> if i can ask the woman who spoke in public testimony to come up, thank you for coming back. i am confused as to the chronology. you started operating, or you applied to operate in november of 2011? >> we started to operate december 12 of 2011. we signed police -- the lease on november 1. >> when did the other one ceased to operate? >> my understanding is they were granted a permit on october 28. >> you took over a spot, and someone was operating there. when did they cease to operate? >> october 31. >> you think they anticipated they were going to cease to operate? did they negotiate a lease before they cease to operate? >> they were subleased, so they do not want to do the business. that is how they came in. >> they said, you want to operate here. >> yes. >> the operation that was here before with not know? there was no disclosure teo -- now is

but the location is important for family access.ervisor cohen: when you make your comments, can you address one thing, the helalth node and the undesirable in the uprising this facility inside the health node? and can you tell me how many pieces of property you looked at? >> it would be my pleasure to comment on that. my name is dr. nadine burke harris, founding position of the cpuc bayview help center. it was not until august of last year, the medical director. that i am here in my role as the ceo of the center for youth wellness. the reason i transitioned out of my previous role and into this role is based on the experiences that i have had in caring for children of the bayview-hunters point community for the past five years. in have done a wonderful job at the clinic in reducing hospitalizations and improving immunization rates for the kids in the community. in my experience, the number one health threat to kids in the community is exposure to violence and trauma. there is a tremendous amount of research that has emerged over the