. >> finally, the communist atrekked ideal logical penetration.o into this penetration into the free world. >> before we talk about eye dee logical penetration itself, let's take a look at the reasons why this form of penetration is so pornt to the communists. for one thing, communist aggression has alarmed many free nations and produced their united will to resist. these nations have implemented their will to resist all other forms of soviet penetration through a number of trade agreements. the united states and other industrially strong nations of the free world are actively promoting better living conditions all over the world. this has the effect not only of helping these countries to improve their industrial and economic position, but also of providing a defense against communist entry which flourishes in depressed economic areas. the military potential of the free world has been revived by such mutual defense pacts as a north atlantic treaty on summation in europe. the southeast asia treaty organization. the real treaty to provide hemisphere

and today when the resolution was vetoed i repeated the same, we do not want to see new cold war logic rising in our region. what did i mean? i mention inside the region, new polarizati ons, such as shiite and suni countries. there was rejectionist camps, we do not want that type of separation. or pro west anti-west countries. in our region today, there's one single difference, those who are trying to keep cold war structures and those who are trying to understand the flow, the logic of the flow of history. and try to respond to the demands of the people accordingly. what do i mean, this? mubarak was pro west, assad was pro soviet, in cold war and anti-west afterwards, mubarak and gadhafi was shiite, or close to shiite approach. our attitude against mubarak, gadhafi and assad is same and the demands of the young people and today of the people of homs is the same, they is a society, they had a same demand. what people in the square, young people wanted, is free and fair election, transparency accountability and what people in homs today want is same. rule of law, accountability, free an

that is assuming that the iranians will be of logically and rationally. -- behave logically and rationally. anybody who buys read history books -- anybody who reads the history book knows that your opponents often behave rationally -- irrationally. if it was just a contained israel strikes iran, iran launched missiles into israel, not great, but the recent the united states opposes this is they fear the fallout. war has a way of unintended consequences, all wars. what is it going to do to the economy of europe, the united states? terrorism. testified just a week that iranians are thinking about operating inside the united states. >> iranian oil has already been cut off. the europeans are not importing it . saudis are determined to see the iranian nuclear program wiped out. the saudis have pledged replacement for any iran oil. if it was just iranian oil, it would not have any affect the question is do they close the strait of hormuz, which, as evan says, is a suicidal. if you kill a single american, he will bring the americans and europe into the war. evan is right, the national iranian res

keep using this logic to accuse my new business logic. my new business logo is not similar at all. it is just a job. i have never gotten any approval. it is never published. mentioning quickly, the truth is quickly -- highly respected commissioners, today i am here to apply for a change of use permit. it is not related to any of my other businesses. i hope that my business will be able to expand to four miller retail. president miguel: thank you. your time is up. speakers in favor of the project sponsor? >> a good friend of mine, [unintelligible] and also due to limited investment.

(sot teacher edna emmet)27 49and that's very logical. it also teaches logic, problem solving, and common sense.a very low tech aaproach.... aimed at sparking a child's imagination.(soo edna emmet teacher)27 02to give the kids there are more than 100 o it. - waldorf schools in the united states.they've been around for almost a century.....but in our increasingly high tech world... this old school approach, is getting new life. at waldorf, the focus is on hands on learning....(sot noris friedman)16 58with the younger child, it's very important because they learn through doing, and through imitation, on movement..... (sot noris friedman/eurythmya teacher)17 05and they learn more with their body, then they learn sitting.on stories... and humann interaction.....(sot gail)36 42 imagine if we went strait to computers this morning. theyy said, oh that wouldn't work. we wouldn't have the opportunity to have the conversations to do the art that goes along with it. to listen to a story and share with each other our thinking on it. there are no computers in the classroom here... untii high school.(s

for their logical reasons we have we do. observe and one of their how the situation stands in the united states and some other countries we do. i would lie on certain issues which they have and they do have certain certain problems. we and it's very important we be using ourselves not just on some conjectures we're basing l. cells on the assessments given by pretty much authority if international is admitted of but a rush as we remember it the foreign ministry for one has reacted pretty angrily every time we were sharply criticized in reports of this kind of specially in the united states report for the situation in brighton russia we did give them and they're angry reaction so what kind of reaction do you expect it to your report which is also pretty critical. well of the wall. you mentioned. and your reaction well we do react in a negative sense sometimes media you can say angrily when criticism of our foreign policy will come to see you know our practices and situation in russia or in the field of human rights ease a bias

so yeah, it is true if you take the same logic that would go into the same of heavy will change with regard to prompt automatic consideration of all nominees parsing logic may have vote and consideration by the house was that legislation and vice versa. >> i [chanting] at me now will get to final question if you attempt to give us five more minutes. >> thank you, senator. gentleman from arizona, dr. azar. >> thank you very much. this brings a point of reference that this isn't the only thing that you may have seen because it seems that we've seen these rules when they want them and then we disdain them when we choose to avoid them. are there any other thing seriously in this this administration do besides his appointment at the congress do, dilation of the constitution was in regulation? >> i've added number disagreement with this administration on matters of policy and constitutional interpretation. images focus on two or three. went out with the president's decision to engage the united states and something i consider a war it would be a without a declaration of war from congress h

are the american are repeating the situation the mistake they have done in the past today and the logic there is no logic to it and the world have to stop this madness because you have to remember that american propaganda and the west propaganda sometimes it's superior to other media outlets about american wake up finding that the middle east is actually with these terrorist organizations and to that and not these congressmen or senators there where they are short sighted in policy they will actually rectify the situation in syria or in the middle east why from a route that was political analyst kamel thank you you. thank. on the way here in r t embracing the bogey man. the chinese aren't going to get. the economy is. going to. get. this comfortably in bed with beijing despite a rising wave of china phobia across the u.s. . and it was deja vu for protesters in bahrain as the anniversary of the country's uprising was met with a brutal crackdown by police. iran is stepping up its nuclear program at an underground site near the city of home by installing thousands of new generation center

out the precedents but reaches a conclusion at odds with the very precedents you referred and the logical positions you referred. responding to that i'd like to respond simultaneously to congressman connolly's point. i think they kind of lead to the same conclusion here. i understand and i share the frustration so many americans expressed over the fact there are delays at times. sometimes long delays. sometimes delays that don't get resolved until after that congress is over or that president is no longer in power. that is frustrating especially those whose names are on the line to be confirmed. as frustrating as this is, constitutional government is necessarily, by its very nature, frustrating. it was designed to be frustrating in the sense it was designed to make sure it wasn't so efficient we just passed laws really quick lip. efficiency doesn't always lead to liberty and frequently it leads to the opposite position. so the fact this process is frustrating, the fact there are at times delays, the fact the delay has at so it's the prerogative of the senate to do justify circumventing th

keep using this logic to accuse my new business logic. my new business logo is not similar at all. it is just a job. i have never gotten any approval. it is never published. mentioning quickly, the truth is quickly -- highly respected commissioners, today i am here to apply for a change of use permit. it is not related to any of my other businesses. i hope that my business will be able to expand to four miller retail. president miguel: thank you. your time is up. speakers in favor of the project sponsor? >> a good friend of mine, [unintelligible] and also due to limited investment. please, commissioners, this is for my knowledge and thank you for your valuable time. president miguel: additional speakers in favor of the project sponsor? >> there is an argument that they are a chain store, but there are already chain stores in japan town mall, the japanese bookstore is an international chain. kabuki hotel is owned by a corporation that owns a chain of hotels. there is the emerson bakery. where is the problem in having a store open when they are loosely affiliated. thank you. presiden

first it's a crazy price of course now is gone was and then a great value with diamonds here is a logical basis movements will have an all same less construction from 8794 is a chronograph any time if you ever go unanswered watch before a tiny see my show the reason why is this has be some movement the amex seats and the construction for a 2 mm case construction its individually and for final meters in thickness we also the solace in the steel class the the plane class for design construction's stainless steel this is a really good price and more into the design of the lodge you have mandrake quality guaranteed feels like a solid there's a god of watches that it's been a case is so brittle 14% of with andriod watches were not talking of the dialer time of accents inside the green and orange again as is talking about this love this that the second hands it is the court's time peace it's really great because as i activate this year and then as the second hand sweeps like an automatic you open up that day window which is up airplanes the present date we're soc boy of $87 for swiss all done w

parallel at all i don't know why you're looking for logic i know you're against his point being that the muslims and the arab world is uncivilized savage and they're still in this war mentality whereas catholics are involved now and write letters but to quote many pipes but i guess no one ever expects the spanish inquisition so they did a lot of awful things to people to produce your picking i would winners in the religious ceremony with the times too considering this massive debate that we just had about contraception oh in the country maybe he should go hang out with your friend that you did it with michael to go all they have that they have and we should stop treating people are calling them barbarians for the fact that they might get angry that we've had a war in their country for ten years and people are dying anyway. let's move on to rich people apparently every now and then rich people do stuff like they lie they cheat when even steal i think you are this famous episode. writer seen here on surveillance tape charged to two thousand and two with felony for stealing some six tho

. >> the logic is as followed. to go to college, because unlike ever before, unless you have a college degree -- >> even if you have a degree, it doesn't help that much anymore. >> we have sold that narrative. more people are enrolling. public and private universities are not keeping their costs in check. it's outpacing health care costs at a dramatic degree. as our website says today in honor of valentine's day, a student loan is forever. we have taken more and more people and given them loans to pay for college. meanwhile, we're only throwing them more money to borrow to go to college. so what the president announced in his speech on monday, which is actually a major step in the right direction is saying we're not kboing to give you more federal money to get more students in your institution unless you keep costs in check. otherwise, we're going to go broke as a nation. >> and to that end, wouldn't the most ration way to keep costs in check for a university would be for them to disclose where they are spending th

perfectly logical expression of this vision. the president was equally -- to locate a permanent capital on the banks of the potomac. quote, that there is a diversity of interest in the union, no one has denied washington told a friend who warned him of regional animosity. this is the case also in every state is equally certain. but i ask again, which is most blameworthy, those who see and will steady pursue their interests or those who cannot see or seeing will not act wisely. here was a coded endorsement of the hamiltonian program combining a strong central government with a unified financial structure topped by a presidential cult of personality, bordering on adulation. at one point, for example, hamilton seriously suggested that washington's profile grace leon nation's coinage but the house of representatives rejected that idea as incompatible with the republican virtue. senator clay of pennsylvania went so far as to call washington a cat's paw in the hands of designing speculators, led of course, by the secretary of the trea

secondly, i would welcome this debate on the dual mandate, because with i think there's an ill logic in in way it was just stated. it's true that the federal reserve has more direct control of the monetary policy than it does over employment, but the point is that monetary policy, the level of interest rates has not effected unemployment, that notion that they are not kked is not the case. chairman did not say that but that is the implication. we had a debate on mortgages that were given that should not have been given. one argument was that we should have deflated the bubble by raising interest rates with a negative effect on unemployment and other things. many of us believe that the federal reserve under the previous -- should have prevented the bad mortgages, that is there should have been more targeted efforts to deal with it. we do have a serious employment problem, it's to bernanke's credit that he has taken seriously this dual mandate. i think that people forget that mr. better knarnanke whose work greatly admire was one of the top appointees for bush administration, he is an

but that is assuming that the iranians will be of logically and rationally. anybody who is bent in intelligence or has read a history book knows that your opponents often behave irrationally. israel strikes iran, iran launched missiles into israel -- not great, but ok. the reason the united states opposes this is they fear the fallout. or pass away of unintended consequences -- war has a way of unintended consequences, all wars. they just testified last week that iran is thinking of operating inside the united states. >> the iranian oil is already being cut off. europeans are not importing it. the saudis are determined to see the iranian nuclear program wiped out. they are very upset about this. the saudi pledge is to replace any iranian oil. the question is if they close the strait of hormuz, which, as evan indicated, is suicidal. the other question is if the they attack the united states base in bahrain, which is also so set up, because he would bring the americans and europe into the war. the iranian response would be to attack israel and nobody else. >> w

ways but some times the rule that is put on pakistan is a rule which is understandable which defies logic so to speak because if the first country to benefit from is stable understands pakistan and the first country to lose from in you know unstable understand is also pakistan so pakistan stick a very high and that is what is commonly believed that yes pakistan sticks are very high but pakistan sticks are very high in having stability and the one is not instability and one stan so we have maintained and we stated very clearly that it is really for the one people to determine what course of action they want to take in any way possible whether they want to have strategic alliance with a country a country b. it's a sovereign country we must respect them as that but pakistan's rule in any way can only be there to support of i think saying that pakistan is cause of the problem and is creating trouble is an imaginary solution it is an imaginary blame it is an imaginary looking for an answer but the real solutions to real problems have to be faced you know on the ground now as we all know that t

using ridicule where logic did not suffice, the secretary of treasury pointed out the inconsistences of strict constructionism. a government empowered to build lighthouses to promote commerce could hardly balk at a bank to collect its taxes or pay its salaries or service its deb salaries or service its debt. hamilton's plea for the bank did not convert washington, it reinforced his nationalistic outlook, all the same, it did not endear hamilton or washington to jefferson and his followers. by this time, the secretary of the state was imploring a poet named phillip chernotto make war on the government for which he reportedly worked as a state department translator. it is astonishing that members of the cabinet were conducting newspaper wars on each other. clearly right in front of the president, that these wars often spilled over into the cabinet meetings and that they were not above as in jefferson's case, hiring their own champions with taxpayer dollars to conduct these wars. he began by assailing washington for the supposedly royalist nature of his household, quote, a certain monar

perhaps was born here the hollowing out of progressivism was the logical outcome of its fate -- the creed that human rights must take precedence over property rights was to rest on the shoulders of the steward of the public welfare. that is a real beguiling phrase that i still struggle to understand. matt suggested that this commitment to a presidency centered, executive centered democracy, showed a commitment to expertise. i'm not so sure of that. knowing that such a modern executive presupposed, as crowley put it, administrative gran dizment, a kind of statism americans had not shunned and feared, t.r. insisted paradoxically the new state had to be connected vitally to public opinion. roosevelt's new nationalism, his dedication to state building, this distinguished him from his counterparts in western europe and great britain, he believed that state building had to go hand in hand, as he put it in the new nationalism speech, with more direct action by the people in their own affairs. the direct primary, he said, in kansas, would be a positive step in this directive. and during the 1912

you basically using that logic, you can force them to do all kinds of things. >> greta: and any word from the obama administration? >> only what i've seen in the press. >> greta: do you expect to see anything? >> maybe they say we overreached there. there are actually people in the administration vice president biden saying it's an overreach. so there is nothingening with changing your mind if you want public input. i think they are getting a lot of public input this is bad idea. there are plenty of other issues for us to debate. >> greta: do you think they will give in? >> i don't know. again, i don't talk to him every day or anything like. that i don't know where they are headed. they really should reconsider. implications are serious. this is not about women's rights or contraception, this is religious liberties that our country has cherished and to force religious to do things, you have crossed line. >> greta: and you said to a radio station, you said quite frankly, if you use the logic the obama administration used to arrive at their conclusion it could lead to scarier results.

the library a few miles from here on the boulevard, includes two tprepb logical volumes. one is something like marriage or a guide for choosing a life's mate. you were supposed to feel his or her head and look for the bump that had to do with love, sentiment, music. jackson presumably was concave for music since he was tone deaf. but the fact that it was in the american phrenology cal journal seems to be a footnote. when he launched his epic venture he had no cache whatsoever. just none. public mentioned of him in the valley. usually poked fun at him in the southern newspapers. not the northern ones. they ignored him, if they mentioned him at all. but in a period of 33 days revolutionized his image and the capacity of the confederate nation to fend for itself. those 33 days began on the 8th of may. when he won the battle of mcdowell after some clever countermarching and extended then through the second of the climactic two days of battle. so from may 8th to june 9th covers 33 days, he went from a virtual nonentity to pretty much a genuine legend. that explosive rise might

whereas for me it would be the end of the logical conclusion of abolitionism would be the 13th amendment. i think all of that difference between where he comes from and where i come from would shape the way we think about the sieve war, particularly origins of the civil war. that generation of the '60s and all the scholarship on abolitionism since then reversed a trend that had been going on since the 30s through the 1950s to focus, find anti-slavery origins of civil war and trace the movement of the abolitionist into politic, into the liberty party, free soil party into ultimately the republican party and see the continuities between those two party movements. whereas jim's generation tended to drive a wedge between aboliti abolitionism and i tend to see convergence over the course of those decades. that's probably where i would write a different kind of book from the one jim wrote. in battle cry, the origins of the civil war are not traced really to the anti-slavery movement. he traces a line from hamilton federalists anti-slavery to wiigs to republican answer. i would trace from aboli

for a logical reason we have we do. observe and one of the how the situation stands in the united states and some of the countries we do. i would lie on certain issues we have and we do have certain certain problems. we are and it's very important we be using ourselves not just on some conjectures will be using else fails on the assessments given by pretty much authority if international is a list of but russia as we remember it the foreign ministry for one has reacted pretty angrily every time we were sharply criticized in their reports of this crime especially in the united states report for the situation human rights in russia we did give them and they're angry reaction so what kind of reaction do you expect. it to europe for it which is also pretty critical well of the wall. you mentioned. and your reaction will we react in a negative sense and some famous media you can say angrily when criticism of our foreign policy you can this is more well a practices and situation in russia in the field of human rights these ar

comment on this because i don't want to give an impression that all these processes have a certain logic behind them we don't see any logic in them just as much we didn't understand the ferry decision to suspend the arab league observers mission to syria therefore i don't think that the ambassador's response helps create conditions favorable for implementing the league of arab states initiative there are also statements from the united states who are make it clear that they're not willing to see president bashar lock the to remain in power for much longer the u.s. ambassador to the united nations has said that his days are numbered also the white house has mentioned that to negotiate with also it is to is basically a way to fail or now the u.s. has said that they hire not planning on supplying arms to the syrian rebels but they have said that no option is off the table. reporting right there while in the light of the recent u.n. security council fallout so when moscow and beijing both blocked a draft resolution on syria we spoke to russia's ambassador to that body potentially churkin say

logically, there's no way we can do that without some doing some closures and realignments. i don't see where it's possible. i certainly have a large number of bases in my state and various degrees of vulnerability and i understand that, but it has to be done as far as i can see. i'll give you a minute or two to give you a pitch as to why we need to be more open into what in my mind is an absolutely necessary step. >> as we make reductions that will take place in some of the drawdowns in the wars we're engaged in. we're going to have units coming back that will be drawn down. that means that the force that we maintain will needless infrastructure to support it. that's just a reality. how do you make a decision as to what parts of that infrastructure ought to be reduced or changed or eliminated. that's been -- frankly, that's been a challenge, as long as i've been in this town. to try to make those decisions. and ultimately, what happened was that have someone developed the brac process as a way to effectively do that by putting all of these decisions in one package and havin

as it was it would seem logical to assume if there is a conflict let's not support arms there that we saw what happened in libya. imperfect world this would have meant the following surprise to the government the opposition armed groups would have gone anywhere that's what it would mean especially now that our colleagues in the security council refuse even to admit the presence of armed groups so they refused to condemn the armed groups and admit that they are being supplied with weapons then we say ok we'll break all our contracts and longstanding relations with syria but they will start supplying even more arms as they did in libya. so we're you know is there any sign of a break the deadlock over a u.n. resolution now for syria well built all parties agree to things that a ceasefire should be called in syria and that there should be dialogue between the opposition groups and by the syrian government that's where all parties agree where they differ is the fact that the draft resolution calls on the syrian president to step aside hand over his powers to his first deputy and allow room