they were walking in the food steps of 1776, that is to say that 1176 was an attempt to escape the logic of abolition of slavery in november 1965 in southern africa was an attempt to escape the logic of decolonization and one person one vote and african majority rules. therefore you cannot begin to understand the tribulations, they fought against the formation of the united states of may recollect, they sided with london in the attempt to crush the slave rebellion just like the african did not accept the establishment of the new state of in november 1965 and when you fight a war in -- and lose, you can expect to be penalized until you are able to turn to tables against oppressors and one of the ways that we were able to turn the tables against oppressors was through haitian revolution which follows quickly upon the footsteps of the formation of the u.s. constitution and the first convening of congress, in some ways it was a rebute and why i start with george washington expressing reservation of the haitian revolution. in any case, what happens is that that the africans then known as espa

there's a lot of political logic, there's a lot of political logic to dealing with the situation more locally. >> i'm going to ask one last question that will open up to the q&a. my last question is returning to the idea that this represents more of a normative crisis to the system than to just the idea that it can be addressed through including processing and some so on. the idea that the model of refugee was at the end of world war ii and what we're talking about now in terms of preparation displacement certainly these are populations extremely vulnerable that face near certainty of harm and potentially torturing the the countries they are fleeing. but the numbers that profile and so on begins to blur the line between refugee and migrant. in ways that at least somewhat argue required number to every thinking of whether or not we have to commit ourselves to the very narrow way of thinking of refugees or whether viewing the impending changes that you talked about and the fact of state failure, the unraveling of a system that held together sort of appellation controls combined with glo

rishaad: is there any industrial logic for softbank in this? don't believe convoluted logic. if it's simple, it's simple. soundingake it work like with the chip design, it can help with the phone companies which will help you get better deals. and we see this is the main reason they are highlighting. again, this is someone who has made things work in a long-term. when he invested in alibaba, it took 15 years. on a long-term horizon, it could make sense of but in the near term, it doesn't seem to make much sense. rishaad: sprint also looks a bit of a strange one as well. you could say that made some we willt does this mean get into actually designing computer chips at the end of the fit in how does that with the rest of the units? >> don't ask me. it's a good question. [laughter] some of the devices he's talking about, refrigerators and smart houses, also require steel, iron requires iron and requires iron mills so you can stretch the logic any which way but in simple terms, it doesn't fit the investment logic, strategy they have defined so far.

regime but they said they were walking in the footsteps of 1776 s that was an attempt to escape the the logic of decolonization of one person one vote therefore you cannot begin to understand the tribulations of people of african descent unless you understand they fought against the formation and sided with london just like the africans did not accept the establishment of a new stage of rhodesia and when you fight a war in the loose you can expect to be penalized unless and until you can turn the tables against your oppressors and one of the way we could turn the tables was through the haitian revolution which follows quickly upon the footsteps of the first convening of congress that is why start the book with george washington with the haitian revolution and in any case the africans could succeed against the french military one of the most powerful examples of fortitude known to history through this point to establish the independent black republic but there was grave consternation in the slave holding republic of the victory of the haitian revolution and you may recall if you look at many o

it to see the logic of guns. is looking at it from the business calculator but he wrote about the moral effect and how that would affect the person who had that rifle? and they were looking at it to be equal to a troop and then to develop the commercial market to talk very provocative plea with individuals traveling through the wild country. very much the mystique of the rifle. with those circumstances. >> and then before the civil war but his comment is about the sunshine. >> you mention in advertising there is a part of your book that totally amazed me. i'd like you to explain what this is. picture a redheaded boy at the movies on the edge of his seat. with the star speakers what will he say? winchester of course, . but you know, that your son wants a gun but you don't know how much. he can't tell you it is beyond words. what is that and who wrote that and what does that signify in the history of the business? >> that is a very provocative'' those go from the early 1900's in the second to is from 1921. change h

. >> well for me there's no logic behind it. because you know that if you throw fire into a box, it's going to set it on fire. there's no logic for me in this situation. in my opinion it's negligence. >>> majestic, regal. but enough about me. how about this humpback whale. >> sweet. le. >> dude -- >> look. the people who signed up for jet ski tours in the great barrier reef got a bit of this. their tour guide spotted a whale way off in the distance and he told everybody turn off your engine and when they did this humpback whale popped up right in the middle of them. and the guy who is shooting the video says he was a little bit scared. >> come on it's different watching whales from a boat than being on a jet ski. >> it stayed and hung around for an hour. >> oh. >> enrique da silva out on a fishing boat with his buddy. he's normally a security guard and let's just say he failed at keeping the dolphins out of the adventure. he's okay with that. they see this dolphins, about 30 of them. it's really cool until the dolphins are like,

so the logic of making guns in a private industry was very different than the logic of guns used in war. so they looked at it from a business calculus. interestingly, oliver winchester wrote somewhat frequently about what he called the moral effect of his rifle, how would it affect the person who had that rifle. and he commented on the coolness that it could impart to the gun owner. and he looked at it as a weapon that could multiply the power of one individual and make him equal to a troop or equal to a group of men. toward the end of his life when he was really developing the u.s. commercial market in the 1870s, he talked very provocatively about his weapon as perfect for single individuals traveling through a wild country. he was beginning to develop very much the mystique of the rifle as one of self-defense against violent conditions and circumstances. but in terms of regrets, no, i don't think that they expressed -- samuel colt sold guns up until the very last minute to the south before the civil war and was called a base trader by all of the new york papers and was certainly excor

so logically, it should be pence, right?ive you a state that you can use, help you in the midwest. charles: right. >> but, you know, that's logic and intellectual, and that's not really where donald -- charles: well, you know, listen, he's come a long way. he's done everything his way. i want to ask you about hillary clinton, because she's been kind of criticized for her by-the-numbers approach to this. apparently, she is also considering a military person. james, commander james stavridis, he was the 16th supreme allied commander, a nato guy. i'm not sure completely about his record, but i know from what i remember, held in very high regard. >> yeah. i mean, i think one with thing if you look at the electoral map, and this is how i think she's looking at it, she believes that she's got an electoral advantage on donald. like, she can maybe win virginia. she can, you know, she's -- he's competitive, but she's competitive -- charles: so does that mean kaine? >> well, if you think you can win virginia on your own, why go for on

there's no logic. this is second.third, tens of journalists working for the government and supported by the government has been killed. did we kill them? we didn't. so this is war. have you heard about good war? i don't think anyone has. it's a war. you always have innocent people being killed and no one can tell how. >> the impression you give is of a man who bears no responsibility for the terrible things that are done in his name, to the syrian people. you have an air of oh, well, it really doesn't matter. >> you only bear responsibility of the decisions that you take. you don't bear responsibility of the decisions that you didn't take. >> some of the decisions you've taken have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people. >> like? like? >> attacking certain areas, launching campaigns, air strikes, release of certain weapons. >> the only decisions we've taken, to defend our country against the terrorists ask, that's correct decision. the second one is to make dialogue with everyone. we make dialogue w

>> as you said, it has turned logic on its head. any people would not have been able to predict this coming a year or two ago. ways there is an aspirational quality to melania's marriage with donald trump. she is a stunningly beautiful woman. people who are trump voters look at him and her as this power couple. will i will win voters on board, it might be trickery or. needs to get a warmer personality. she is not all that comfortable in front of the camera. it can be an awkward conversation for her. she can get called out as being hypocritical. that is a tough thing for her to do. whatll see, but logic -- we know has been turned on its head, but i think there is an element of relate ability that people want to see in a presidential spouse. >> when you were talking about the significant role that ivanka trump has played, it is important to point out chelsea clinton. >> it is interesting that the two of them are friend. see howteresting to this has evolved and this campaign has had an impact on this friendship. it will be fascinating

he was a logical choice to head the second core, the second call was probably the logical choice to go into the valley in 1864. he would not send the first corps. he is recovering from his wilderness wins. then what is interesting -- and this, you must understand -- in mid-august, robert e. lee decides to up the ante in the valley. he commits joseph kershaw and the calvary division to the valley. so he is sending them there to reinforce early and at the same time, expecting something. just got to tell you something. i guess he was short -- even shorter. i read the best description of a short man i had ever read in the civil war. this officer wrote that he could eat up all of soup off of lee's head when he was standing down and he was standing up, so evidently he was a short man -- but we don't picture these men as short, right? but he was about 5'4" -- anyhow. so, early acts aggressively. from the early weeks of august, august 7, an officer called it mimic war. sheridan advances south, a here comes fitfully, sheridan retreats back to harpers ferry but eventually he will move down. don'

i replied, in your logic, she could. not. we should stop judging the victims by our own logic. we need to rid ourselves f our prejudices. let us understand them and place ourselves in their situation. only then can we truly help. thank you. >> thank you, you have a truly fitting name for a hero. in the dark world of human trafficking, these brave men and women are arrays of light, and thank you for shopping on us oday. they are a source of hope for trafficking victims and a source of inspiration for all who strive to make the world a more humane place. that is why i am honored to share the stage with these individuals. and just as our heroes come from diverse regions and professions, the world needs antitrafficking solutions that cross borders and agency sectors. none of us can end human trafficking alone. we need each other. partnerships between ngos come international institutions and religious organizations, all of which are here today galvanize the fight to end human trafficking. in my time as ambassador, i have witnessed the power of collaboration and these actions. i rece

i replied, in your logic she could. in hers, she could not. judging thetop victims by our own logic. we need to rid ourselves of our prejudices. let's try and understand them in place ourselves in their situations. only then can we truly help. thank you. [applause] >> thank you. the dark world of human trafficking, these brave men and brave.re thank you for signing on us today. shining on us today. they are a source of hope for countless trafficking victims and a source of inspiration for all who strive to make the world a more humane place. why i'm honored to share the stage with these individuals. just as our heroes come from diverse regions and professions, the world needs anti-trafficking solutions across borders and industry sectors. none of us can and human trafficking alone. we need each other. ,artnership between ngos international institutions and religious organizations all of which are here today galvanized the fight to end human trafficking. as my time as ambassador, eyewitness the power of collaboration. i recently participated in

that was part of the logic for mormons taking it. thought it could be isolated from other mac and settlers so they wouldn't run -- other american settlers so they wouldn't run into the ideas of the east. only does the gold rush bring 30,000 non-mormons through utah in the first three years of settlement, first five years of settlement, but 20,000 or so , theseamericans here stories became as difficult as the ones the mormons had experienced before. misunderstanding, cultural alienation, violent conflict. case, native americans are pushed out of their historical homeland. it becomes a difficult story to tell. human beings have been here for a very long time. provo wins -- when the first anglo-american settlers arrived with the intent to stay in 1849, there were already lots of people here. native americans called this area home for hundreds, even thousands of years. the site of the largest concentration of native americans in what is now utah, .n fact the tip and get band of the utes were not far from where we are. they made their hom

>> who knows -- >> i hear the logic but i kind of doubt it to be honest with you. >> any idea who you that will be for her? >> it's interesting. each of these people goes off. elizabeth warren we were all talking about a week ago. earlier you were talking about the fact that she's going to be speaking on monday night at the convention. it doesn't seem like you would put your vp choice monday night. you'd rather hold that for a little drama later. so i got to tell you, ask me in ten minutes and i'll have a different view. >> it's like the weather in texas. all right so meanwhile trump is having a war of words with security justice ruth bader ginsburg. did he go to far saying her mind is shot, resign? that's pretty harsh. >> ouch. yes, that was a little tough. here's the thing, though, maybe a little bit. but she was pretty harsh to him to be honest. >> true. >> saying she and her husband are going to have to move to new zealand if he gets elected. they seem pretty evenly matched to me. >> we'll see how this one plays out. i have a feeling it's not over yet. thank you, ellis. just ahead

i said a logical person could infer that.eople i represent in ohio think there are two standards at work. one for regular folks and one for the politically connected. here is the secretary of state, former senator, former first lady, nominee of a major party running for president. and oh, by the way, her husband just met with the attorney general five days ago on a tarmac in arizona. you don't people will look at it and say, what's going on hear? >> here. >> i hear from the same people and you're right. the perception is what i think the public is seeing. the question is, at what point do you feel like you're satisfied that even if it looks bad, boy, the fbi did their job? >> if mr. comey would have looked at those statements that she made that are now proven to be false, if he -- but he didn't look at that. so you have to look at that. because that would be what would happen to any other american who comes in front of congress and makes false statements, false testimony to congress. >> i'll leave it there. congressman of ohi

hatch because of the bio logic. it is a surprising way to smooth the way on the hill. certainly, provisions as they came out did nothing to strengthen the republicans support for the agreement. financial services problem appears to stem from the administration wrapping up the negotiations before the negotiations were really finished. financial services pivoted against the united states against the united states. u.s. tr verses treasury. u.s. tr played a high priority of ttp and had no doubts of requirement force any sector. the treasury very much wished to maintain ability to the regulatory agencies to have u.s. access to data. and frankly, treasury won that dispute and u.s. chair was left in the rather uncomfortable position coming back with the agreement that accomplished data flows and not others. so subsequently, treasury and the regulatory agency thought about this issue more and as ambassador mentioned they have a py paradigm that goes forward and they can still regulate the data on the other side of the border. frankly, it would have been nice to see administrat

i'm not sure what his logic was there. but that was his thinking, right? and so there were a lot of people in south side, virginia, where prince edward county is located, that supported that logic. and so they -- and in prince edward county and other locations, they formed this group called the defenders of state sovereignty and individual liberties. and in farmville that group suggested -- just six months after the brown hearings, the brown decision -- that perhaps closing the schools was something they should do to avoid desegregation if push came to shove. and i found in my research that the local are newspaper also suggested this within six months of the decision. and the pages of this newspaper that were shaping public opinion said, you know, we're going to refuse to desegregate our schools, and if we have to, we will close the schools rather than do so. so they put this idea out there very early after the brown decision. i think for me working on research, that was a real turning point, to realize that a court did not require prince edward to desegre

all of which is logical, to me, in retrospect. in the midst of it it wasn't very logical. >> were you like how is this happening? what did you think in the midst of it? >> you trauk to people and no wise person said this is what's going to happen, not a single person, i know. >> nobody thought it was going to happen. >> kudos for the guy for his, you know, i think he plays by his gut. he sensed an opening, this deep disaffection and he played it like a violin. >> i wonder if you replay trumps' insults against mexicans calling them rapists and murders in the context of your wife, do you ever think if i slugged him in the jaw maybe i would have gone down but maybe i would have done my party and service. i live in fear of -- i mean, he cyber bullied you, he billionlied you -- >> that's so irrelevant. >> i mean, what he did in the context as a candidate would get any kid kicked out of any school in america. >> it didn't bother me a bit. it was disparaging hispanics, women, p.o.w.s. i found it deeply troubling. i think if you checked t

i think he would have been better off with bernie because it's so i will logical. everybody getting a pot of gold and a rainbow. it would have been unbelievable. kennedy: there was a moment when i thought it would be trump-sanders. i was praying to every deity. you say trump is a bad campaigner? >> bernie sanders has better favorable ratings than hillary clinton because people have no idea who he is, and they like the sound of free stuff. but presumably throughout a campaign the debates happen and he gets hammered. his favorability ratings go down. that's what you would expect in a normal campaign. but with donald trump, it's like unforced error over unforced error. so he clearly is incapable of capitalizing on the opportunities. he has done a good job of capitalizing on things in the past. the fact that we are still talking about some of his missteps shows that the guy has some work to do. he was able to raise $51 million. and bernie sanders, i will say this in his defense. bernie sanders -- i interviewed him a couple times on this show and the previous show. he's

has no use for rigorous logic and not interested in ideas like marksism was it is opposite of that and extremely flexible. and in the end, truth, reality, freedom anything that you come up with are only defined and only defined by those who are in charge because if you have natural u law and don't have any outside reference then everything is truly relative. if you happen to get in charge you can enforce the conformity because there's no external way to challenge you because culture doesn't recognize anything outside of the terms of reference of the philosophy that is now orthodoxy. so u now let me conclude by making appeal this is where i think jim says to me don't be all darkness. you know. you have to have some hope here. so let me conclude by making an appeal. furs is progressives in my opinion have not always been -- multiculture lateral you won't find him denouncing -- that was a americanist actually. the ideology of the identity politics would have puzzled fdr, jfk, and even john dewily who by times of his day was a big radical. progressives may think that they are merely updati

so this ideology is flexible, it is what, it has no use of her rigorous logic. it is not interested in other ideas like marxism was. this opposite of that. it's extremely flexible. in flexible. in the end truth, reality, freedom, anything you come up with are only defined, they are defined only only by those who are in charge. if you have no natural law, if you don't have any outside reference everything is truly relative. you can get force the conformity because there is no external way to challenge you because the culture doesn't recognize anything outside in terms of reference of the philosophy and the orthodoxy. so now let making clue by making an appeal this is where i think jim says to me don't feel -- you have to have some hope here. so let me make an appeal, first is progressives in my opinion have not always been multicultural radicals, if you look at herbert croley, you will night never find him denouncing the family, or denouncing restaurant civilization. but he was an american nationalist actually. the isogenic ideology of the identity politics would

important because in many ways it's the trial that got the logic of genocide right. that is it understood, it, it went back to the point that benson had me when you talk a number of people made the same point earlier, but german courts had for decades treated the holocaust as if it were a garden variety act of murder, just multiplied millions of times over. and the great achievement of this trial that took place in 2009 - 2011 is it really understood that genocide is not like murder. when you are dealing with states sponsored mass criminology does not criminology it does not matter someone is particularly cruel. it doesn't matter if they are a sociopath or status. if someone works in the factory of death, they were an accessory to murder because that was their job. that was a simple yet historic breakthrough of the german court. it took them 6060 years to frame that relatively simple conclusion but the critical conclusion not only for making sense of the holocaust but also making sense of mother instances of state-sponsored atrocity and that is why we still have thes

of abolition of slavery in southern africa was an attempt to escape the logic of colonization of one person one vote so therefore you cannot begin to understand the travails and tribulations experienced by people of african descent of north america unless you understand from the orders of magnitude they fought against the formation day sided with london in the attempt to crush the slaveholders rebellion just like the africans did not accept the establishment of the new states of rhodesia and when you fight a war and lose you can expect to be pulverized unless and and tell you can turn the tables against your oppressors in one way we could turn the tables was through the haitian revolution of 1791 through 18 '04 that follows quickly upon the footsteps of the formation of the u.s. constitution in the first convening of congress that it was the of reputation of this new slave holding republic which is why start the book with president george washington discussing his reservations of the haitian revolution and in any case what happened is is the africans could succeed against the french

you are talking about a logic free zone. my friend mentioned, boy we have got one in the last half hour here. we do have a new normal here and it's not a good new normal. take for example defense. demo paint democrats as weak on defense. he cites democrats is going against perceived appropriation bill before we have a budget deal so let me remind the american people and let me remind the republican leader lisa the democrats blocking the defense appropriation bill last year. we had a budget agreement for national security of $33.5 billion over the sequestet it was their sequester level. they wanted to cut it even more. and that is the truth. the further truth is that the defense of our country and the security part country depends more on the pentagon. we have every democrat is just as patriotic as any republican. we secure this nation just as much as we do. they look at it differentlyep though in the sense, security of this nation is more than bombs and bullets. it's also making sure we haven't fbi that works and is adequate

that is completely logical. that's not logic out the window. >> i just think that's not what's at stake here. the spirit in which that's offered is not the one in which you're naming. so in all fairness, where we are right now, is in a situation where emotions are high. we are also receiving threats. death threats. there's lots of emotions on either side, essentially saying you're the problem. >> no, you're right, alicia. i want to get to this. because this has also been something that you guys have been criticized for. and i want to get your reaction to it, whether you think it's fair or not, and that's rudy giuliani. you've heard his comments. let's listen in, and we'll discuss. >> it's inherently racist, because number one, it divides us. all lives matter. and when the presidential candidates, the governor of maryland made the statement that all lives matter, they intimidated him into changing it to black lives matter. all lives matter. white lives. black lives. all lives. number two, the black lives matter n

for michael, it is logical. >> there were people coming from this part and that part. you felt that new york belongs to new yorkers. new york along to the world. there are a tremendous amount of hires from china, north korea. there is no more a local buyer. michael shows us his apartment. original artwork from andy warhol. they have just become parents and they want to expand the living space. they bought the apartment next door. the view of the city is fantastic. it is a city that belong to the rich and no longer to new yorkers. >> now, we will meet a successful and impressive ethiopian -- this project has been financed by funds from the u.k.. she started up in 2013 -- they started up in 2013, singing about child marriage and lack of opportunities for ethiopian girls. many leave school without qualifications. 76% of the fans have been persuaded to take up education. 84% believe that the band makes them more confident. mission accomplished. >> the successful band's name means, "ours." they want to belong. >> our lyrics have deep meanings and they are affirmative. we ad

this was a trial that got the logic of genocide right. that is, it understood, kind of went back to the point that was made -- >> made the same point about -- >> number of people made the same point earlier, but german courts had for decades treated the holocaust as if it were a garden variety act of murder, just multiplied millions of times over. and the great achievement of the trial that took place between 2009 and 2011 is it really understood the genocide is not like murder. when you're dealing with state-sponsored mass criminality it doesn't matter if someone is particularly cruel. doesn't matter if someone is a sociopath or sadist, if sun worked in a factory of death they were an accessory to murder because that was their job. that was the simple and yet historic kind of breakthrough of the german court. took them 60 years to frame that relatively simple and straightforward conclusion, a critical conclusion not only for making sense of the holocaust but also making sense of other instances of state sponsored atrocity. >> that's why

has spent millions and millions. >> you can like someone personally and disagree on idealoloideal logical andrea mitchell joins me. for us we heard cheering. it seemed quite chaotic. >> a congresswoman from florida who has been enormously popular was booed by sanders responders. she finally gave up and was escorted out by security. she really should in the even do that. i think between now and 4:00 there will have to be a lot of soul reaching and political advising. i can't see how she can show up without multiplying there. >> what would the dnc's motivation be to continue to have her on that podium tonight at a night that's all about unity. you have sanders and warren, why still keep her? >> they probably figured they could have her dafl down. gavel down. i'm not sure they are still do it. whatever happens at 4:00 will be put out there on social media. picked up by the republicans and tweeted out by donald trump, it's not on a day they are try to go protect unity. >> and the people in the room who were protesting, they were sanders supporter. do you think they will put their pencils down

we have similar manufacturing technology, similar footprints so from an industrial perspective the logic is very much a hand and glove fit as it relates to how the businesses actually work, so very much aligned from a physical sof call perspective and how people think about the responsibilities and the consumer and highly aligned from an industrial perspective. >> david engle. frankly your shareholders could care less, they want cash as much as they can get. i think it is a pretty darn good multiple but there are some who feel you can do better. do you think you got the best price you can? >> what i tell you is i think we do the very best job we could in terms of creating value for our share shareholders. you report orn this every morning. our board will have an opportunity to maximize for our share hoerholder shareholders. this is a fantastic facility. i think this is a great deal for the balance of our shareholders. >> you seem to be leaving the door open to the possibility and there's been speculation of course the stock price traded above the actual deal or i should say the deal pric

let me-- >> logical best point. donald is not logic, if one thing we know.s ago you could have said that, but i think that the era has begun and yielding dividends in much better polling numbers and favorability numbers and mant afor sits in the room with him follow me and we're doing good keep it going. >> and mon manafort is saying pence. until the words come out of his mouth or you see the press release, say it's 99% sure. charles: are we overblowing how important it is? >> the vice-president? no. this is donald and this campaign is all donald, be assured of that. but the vice-president pick is important on the fringe. and the fringe matters, right? in a close election, you need every single advantage you can get and mike pence gives him that advantage. i think he's a very nice guy, which will help with donald's aggressiveness. charles: and donald trump wants a bull dog and mike pence laid it on and i don't know that he's going to feel comfortable in that role. >> well, donald trump is pretty good on his own, you called him the barn yard dog. >> junkyard

logic to me. >> no matter who you are -- >> yeah. go ahead. finish that. >> i was just going to say, no matter what sect of islam you are, blowing up the tomb of the prophet is beyond the pale. >> it's beyond the pale and also just unfathomable, too. you wrote this fantastic op-ed for cnn.com today and it's required reading if you are confounded as the rest of us as to why they keep killing muslims. we get it. they hate us in the west and we don't get it when they attack hundreds of muslims. we can almost get it when we hear that they were -- the rival speck, the shia, but in med sin that's a mix of everyone, shia, sunni, those people who subscribe to isis. why would they attack their own? >> look, everyone i've talked to is utterly stunned and hard to believe that someone would attack of prophet muhammad in medina. religion is like the force. you can use it for good or for evil. when people begin to prevert their religion and it starts slowly and leads them in a wrong direction and to very dark places. it starts with the maligning o

the logic ford consolidation but they set the price is not sufficient.vitable buts it is also small. so whether it is to get the monsanto board or shareholders to put pressure on the company will remain to be seen. it doesn't at the moment look like enough. we know anything about the enterprise value of this bid? ed: at the moment it is a three dollar a share bump. it is an all-cash bid. the other thing here is that there is a lack of alternatives for monsanto. as far as we know, they are talking to the other big german company but that is about something different. that is more like an acid deal where they would take on some of the chemicals businesses but it is not a straight sell. so if you are an investor, you want to think that this might be the only one. scarlet: i wanted to bring that up. the talk that has been reside -- that has been revised with monsanto. does that happen regardless of whether this bayer deal goes through? ed: i think it does. the executive of month-end and has been vocal about the fact that he wants to explore the possible opti

. >> stephen: no, we're very emotional. >> and he does not appeal to logic.'s not about policy. it's about a feeling. and that feeling is that you know who has gotten a raw break in america? white men. (laughter) that's what he is selling. always hillary is playing the woman card, that card the women always play by being born female. >> stephen: but it's going to be great for the women, like never before. he's going to be great for the women and the blacks love him and he is going to win the latinos. he's going to win everybody. >> but i do take your point that we have not quite figured out how to defeat donald trump yet. and i think what we have to do is what they do in serial killer movies. (laughter) in serial killer movies the cops can never filling out-- figure out how to defeat the serial killer. so they get another serial kill tore work with them to figure out how to-- and that's what we-- . >> stephen: who is the serial killer. >> we have to find another narcissistic billionaire. i'm thinking el chapo. (applause). >> stephen: more fafer, amigo. putin,

>> i think that's the old -- >> but that's their logic, isn't it?at's their old logic, the country is more populist right now, and tom harris could keep that base that the democratic party inspired, the 46% that voted for better thrnie sanders those who are towing the party line of hillary clirp. and tom harris is latino, he understands later, he's part of the administration, he's also in favor of tpp but coming at it from a different perspective. that's part of what she needs right now. >> are you all going to raise a ruckus up do something? >> i can't speak for the rest of the delegation, but i think the concern right now. >> are you going to protest in some way? >> i'm going to be a good delegate. i'll follow bernie sanders' lead. but i can't control the rest of the delegates, and none of the minority reports from the platform committee or the rules committee have been moved the forward, so they're not going to be able to debate. and i know these people want to have their voices heard. debbie wasserman schultz is not chairing, so there are going

sprague had known kirby smith and buckner from the old army and expected them to bend to the logic of events. ope's smith read peo message. he refused to respond immediately, explaining he was scheduled to meet with western confederate governors in marshall, texas, 20 miles west of shreveport. heed sprague to wait while consulted with authorities. before he left, corby smith -- prague saw as'rague benevolent desire to avoid -- "the infliction of needless suffering." when he returned a week later, kirby smith told sprague he could not surrender. in a lengthy memorandum, kirby smith articulated his reasoning. he argued that "my army was menaced only from a distance and it is large and well supplied and extensive country full of resources. and exhaustedorn army at appomattox, his force faced no immediate threat. considering the different circumstances, the appomattox arms "were not such that soldier could honorably except. an officer can honorably surrender his command when he is resisted to the utmost of his power. given the condition of his army he reasoned that it cannot be said the d

that's an absolutely logical solution to this problem. we are seeing it in detroit.ilbert is investing in stroit, mike ilitch is investing in detroit. that's the answer for america. >> let's start with the president. here's the president who he is coming to the end of eight years. and part of his legacy was many to be uniting the country. and there are republicans who say -- and you heard it from donald trump -- that race relations have gotten worse during his presidency. do you believe the president is partly responsible for that? >> look, i think he is certainly doing his best. and i think he is certainly doing his part. i think over the past week all americans have felt a lot of sadness, and a lot of grief, and a lot of frustration people don't -- we don't want to live in this kind of society. i think the difference between the violence of the last week and even the last couple of months and years is that there is two real things that have become present. one is normalizing hate speech. we have just accepted that it is part of the same conversation. i know that bo

the same logic that my colleagues used to vote against a prior amendment. they're using also now to not pass this one. we don't want to run-away candidate. the same gentlemen who have talked about the front loading problem are also the same people on our committee for a number of years who have talked about making all states matter, making as many states matter as possible. and this is what happens when we have proportional that goes a little longer than to march 15. march 31 is a pretty good date and if that does mean there are some regional primaries. that is a good thing. it allows it allows them to not be spread out all other the country. >> mr. evans. >> let me address my friend from louisiana, the past -- we have tools now available to solve the problems of the past in a very different way. i agree with him. listen, i ran the newt gingrich campaign, front end loading is a problem. but we have a tool available to solve that problem in a different way. that is the debate. what we did is, we had a debate schedule that permitted one debate per week so tha

where the supreme court without justification and text history or logic of the constitution decided that it would now have a hierarchy of rights. there would be some that were declared fundamental and others declared inferior. that the court would make that distinction and then invariably has it turns out economic liberty, the liberty for which we fought the civil war, would be an inferior and not a fundamental right. >> good evening, mr. will. my name is paul. i'm a second-year student at college of law and long admired your work. my question to you is about the passing of justice scalia, and particularly i found provocative about your talk of the movement especially in american conservative legal minds for judicial restraint and deference to popular majority legislature. as conservatives move away from this being that it is a progressive thought, who especially in the light of passing of justice scalia embodies a jurist thought? >> that's a good question. i'm wearing my federalist society necktie tonight founded in 1982. i assume there's a chapter at the university of illinois. scalia

he says things that are factually and logically untrue, and he gets a lot of publicity out of it. he's not the only -- he's not innocent of distracting from the message. >> we had the trade speech in pittsburgh -- >> why don't you answer my question? >> i'm going to answer you this way. that trade speech was scheduled months ago but kept getting pushed off the pages by these shootings and events in syria, this, that, the other thing. and so you just go to that. >> the presidency will be marked by events, as well as this campaign. >> this election will be decided on the economy, jobs, and trade. >> i hope so. >> and we will be talking about that repeatedly through november. >> last word? >> trump has to convince people that he's got the character and the focus to win. and not just accuse people of malfeasance. that's the key to it. if he can do it, he can win. >> i think the word clouds are more hillary than anything else. >> "lock her up," that's what came out of that for me. >> any way, thank you all. >>> our live coverage continues right after this. >> hillary clinton, as a fail