lois lerner, found in contempt of congress also zero days in jail. hunter biden refused to comply with an initial house subpoena and sent lawmakers on a wild goose chase taunting them every step of the way. hunter biden will phase no jail time for contempt of congress and is now complying after asking for a brand-new subpoena. by the way, naturally, two former advisers not so lucky. i wonder why. joe biden's department of justice is trying to lock up steve bannon and peter navarro. navarro was only sentenced to four months in prison this week and peter navarro will join us and tell his story exclusively here tonight. but first, breaking tonight. as reported by bill melugin, quote, "in friday news dump, customs and border patrol officials report 302,034 migrants which would be illegal immigrant encounters in december. the highest month ever recorded and cbp also reports the border patrol arrested 19 more people on the fbi terrorist watchlist in december bringing the total to 50 arrests for the fiscal year 2024 so far. as john solomon first reported on

lois d differ lerner, hunter biden, and even people involved in this particular case. they were not treated the same way. eated th not equal justice.that that's not equal application of our laws. i'll give you the last's equal u peter, and i'm sorry that you going through this. >> wel al i appreciate your sympathy and your sorrow, but that's not what i want right now, sean. what i wani wat is justice from the american people. i want trump in the whitwae house, not in prison. and i want my case to go to th e supreme court and settled. good.la i want that for you on one oftii the most important constitutional issues. >> sonssues.o i'm here. find any time you want to talk, you know where to find me. we do have to stop meeting like. this in a way, but keep doing what you're doing, sir. all right. peter navarr o, we're goingsely and to follow it very closely and watch your appeals go forward. appeyou for being with us. we appreciate it. all right. up next, taylor swift reportedlyit considering takingi legal action. why a i generatengald photon pt circulating on the internet

me move a little bit backwards and ask, you know, what about all of these people, eric holder, lois lerner, got prosecuted.s lerner, >> now, i know initiallyy you were hesitanwet to give a nw subpoena to hunter biden, but you thought was in the best interest of getting to the facts that you would. all right. you have a second subpoena. you didn't have to do that. he could have been charged with the contempt of congress. merrick garland wouldn't do it, though. i don'h t he would ever do that to hunter biden. >> well, we don't know. we is going to jail. >> yeah. into the peter navarro issue. never forget about the jurors. i think this is real important. the abilit iy to cross-examine is fundamental to our system of justice, to our system of getting to the facts, fact finding. >> thifacts was the first commic in history where there wasn'tom that elementmitt. there was no cross-examination. it was all partisan. aminatioanthis is as old.you this principle is as old as it gets. you can go in scriptur e to thego in scriptur first to present his case seems right until another is able to ask unt qu

. >> sean: what about eric holder, lois lerner, they were never prosecuted. you were hesitant to give a new subpoena to hunter biden. you would give a second subpoena. he could have been charged with contempt of congress. >> to the peter navaro issue, this is real important h. ability to cross exam is fundamental to our system of justice and fact finding. this was the first committee in history there was no cross-examination. all partisan. this principle is as old as you get. in scripture, firsts to present case seems right until another is able to ask questions. it is the ability to cross exam. i can't blame peter navaro not wanting to go in front of this, executive privilege. they came after him full till. eric holder and others, doesn't seem to be the case. >> sean: your committee judiciary looking into doj and if they are web weaponized. >> on the other side you have someone who said if we were back in office we how old weaponize the department of justice, someone who has openly applauded insurrectionist as patriots. someone said they will go after their