. ♪ when they ♪ my grandmother and my aunt remembers here at long branch church.ps up, goes down there to the front of the church and we would start singing and they would be just, clapping their hands and some singing along with us. and i heard my grandma say. "tear it all to pieces". ♪ misery ♪ ♪ oh have you ever ♪ ♪ a man like you is a misery ♪ ♪ a misery ♪ ♪ oh have you ever ♪ ♪ a man like you is a misery ♪ - [lena ] is that your senior? - [mae] senior class picture. - [lena] okay. - [mae] i loved school. i really loved to go to school. and that is lena mae bennett, valedictorian class of 1957. [mae laughing] - lena mae bennett valedictorian. - [lena] yes. - we rehearsed in daddy's corn patch and we start singing this little song that my granddad had taught us. something like ♪ we are rolling ♪ ♪ we are rolling now. ♪ little bitty children. ♪ we are rolling in this unfriendly world ♪ ♪ we are rolling ♪ ♪ we are rolling ♪ when we got ready to get in daddy's car, we knew exactly where we were supposed to sit to make that harmony. ♪ we are rolling ♪ coming on hig

church in its place as a branch of the russian orthodox church. you know, it seems to me that the answer is somewhere the same, why. the processes around the lavra take so long, why are the processes of expropriation of property and property of the moscow church slowed down in the regions, why does it depend a lot on the personality of the officials, how actively are the transitions going, when the communities want to their church community has switched to the orthodox church of ukraine, and local officials, where they take a statist position, it happens quite quickly , otherwise it also drags on for months and years, it seems to me that a lot of people in power think that somehow they they will still get along with the moscow church, convince them to support the order of things and the status quo, and therefore try not to overdo it. the second story, probably sociologists tell them that quite a lot of those who support the current government, they at one time voted for what the difference is, it is not necessary to interfere because this is still the ukrainian church, sorry for such broken russian on the air, but unfortunately, this is the way, the convicti

you about this for a long time, but it is already clear that what needs to be done with this network, such as transferring it from the regime of a branch of the russian orthodox church to some other church, or at least to make sure that those who work openly in the kremlin do not work in ukraine. well, i think that this whole story will end in the near future, you know the situation in the verkhovna rada, despite the opposition of a certain number of deputies, including from the pro-government party, still gathered the necessary number of votes and demonstrated that there are 226 votes in the hall that can put this structure in place. what does this say? this suggests that certain legislative acts will be adopted in the near future that will regulate the stay of these people wearing incomprehensible clothes in the territory of ukraine, this is a time, that is, they will not exactly have a legal status if they want somewhere get together one by one in the apartments, well, let's see, how they will do it is another matter, it is with those people who are around them, spinning, yes, there, whether, or those who consider themselves leaders of public opinion, then i thin

activity as such a branch of the russian orthodox church, it will just be a ban on every parish, relatively speaking, and it can last there for decades, right? 50, 100 years, i don't know how longt can last, of course, it's this, it's, well , actually, it's not a ban, but an imitation of a ban, for patriotic performances, for everyone to applaud and praise themselves, but together however, this is a positive step because he essentially opens the door and shows the political will of the parliament to move in this direction, so from this point of view, it is even revolutionary, but it will not have a result, maybe we will be able to achieve a result if, together with our colleagues, we will be able to conduct and submit amendments that will it is more effective, although the very... approach to the formation of this project, it is wrong from the very beginning, because it is not the court that should ban religious organizations, but the state that should show its will, and that is why our project 8221 provides precisely this, that according to the convention on human rights, according to the decision of the european court of human rights, this organization, if it supports all the

activity as such a branch of the russian orthodox church, it will simply be a ban on each parish, relatively speaking, and it can last there for decades, right? 50, 100 years, i don't know how longt can last, uh, sure, it's, it's, it's, well , actually, it's, not a ban, but a mock ban, for patriotic speeches, for that everyone applauds and praises themselves, but at the same time, it is a positive step because it essentially opens the door and shows the political will of the parliament to move in this direction, so from this point of view, it is even revolutionary, but it will not to have a result, maybe we will be able to achieve a result if, together with our colleagues, we can conduct and submit amendments that will make it more effective. although the very approach to the formation of this project, it is wrong from the very beginning, because it is not the court that should ban religious organizations, but the state has to show the will, and that's why our draft 8221 is just that and it provides that according to the human rights convention, according to the decision of the european court of human rights, uh, this organization, if it supports, all their organizations, if the