that is my thinking, and i think you play at longside rather than short side. >> tony, you agree?is is where i am a little conflicted. i think you could make a case here for target to get back up to that 190, potentially even fill that to 10 level, the huge gap that is left unfilled, but i think what is concerning to me is the fact that despite the charges making what seems like the early innings of a more constructively to the upside, the relative performance to its sector remains quite poor and that is what i don't like to see going into an earnings announcement. from that perspective, i don't love the chart but the fundamentals are constructed. the fact that it is trading at 14 times next year's earnings and the eps growth we are expecting i think is a cheap valuation but i do like mike's trade structure. i would not risk my capital going long target but i would use a call spread risk reversal like this because you effectively have a 15% downside protection i selling that 150 put to finance the 175, 190 calls per that he has to the upside so he is effectively financing the upsi