it's about us lookg of person t to date, whether we choose to make you a friend or a partner.his malibu is a best buy. i heard that from consumers digest. it offers better highway mileage than a comparable camry or accord. estimated 33 highway. i saw that on the epa site. so how come the malibu costs so little. it's a chevy. you have cop hair. the award-winning chevy malibu. compare it to anyone and may the best car win. bu and toyota camry received 5 star crash safety ratings. but on malibu has onstar. big deal. i'll just use my phone. let's say we crashed. whoops, you lost your phone and you're disoriented. i'm not disoriented. now you are. onstar automatic crash response can call to see if you're ok. onstar emergency. is everything ok howie? you don't answer, they can automatically send help to your exact location. i think i'll ride with you. the award-winning malibu. from chevy. ha ha ha! i present to you algebra ii... [radio static] foreign languages... man: je m'appelle francois. un, deux, trois, quatre. ha ha ha! and finally, biology. who among you will step up to their

jean rodrig's faly is still lookg for remnants in the house. but for them, nothing wi be enough to reace the world the earthquake left behind. >> lehrer: margaret warnerpoke a short me ago to martin smith of our p.b.s partner, rontline." he is in port-au-pnce. >> warner: martin smit the two piecese saw from itn sugges it's a real patchwork down there now in terms of w is getting aid and who i't. is that at you're findin >> reporter: it is. it certainly is not coornated. people getting it e getting it in spite oefforts to coordinate the aid. i just came from aospital where everybody had been med into the couyard because of the lastarthquake, the tremors that happened sterday, afraid to stay the billion. d everybody there complained newborn babies had no rmula. nobody had the rig spliedz, and furthermore, it wa't coordinated. i was in refee camp where's there were complaints theyad no wer, they were drinking bad wateand getting disintery. downtown yesterday, thlooting was rampant. obviously, those people are stro enough and getting some water or

i'm lookg particularly at delaware, for example,here bowill be biden, the sonf vice president den, is considered a likely candidate for tha seat thatill be open in 2010. >> ifill: like martha coaky-- >>f course, a blue state! a great last name. >> ifill: is there a effort ing on tonight after the fir day of shell shock, ce? the president seemed to hi that thereas something that was being cobbled tother to salvage health care? >> interestology that abc interview today , kben, the prident used terms like let's coalesce around co elements sglaeneaning? >> sompeople reading tea leaves are thinking a much me modest, smaller, incrental approa to health care, and that's very much on the ble as an option right now, a much smaller approach. the difficult that in health care is kind of like one of those balloons, ifou do something one side, you can see more problems pop up or on the her side. sot's not that simple of saying let's just take iurance market reform, for instance or malpractice form or expabd mecaid. we just done or two little things because that will exacerbate other problem i thin

>> it ans that if the past decade was the dade of searching and fiing and lookg for stuff, this comingwill be the decade of filterinand going to your friends for recommendations. people areoing to have to create smartefaults so that other people still have a choice. but if they find it all too nfusing or they just want meone else to make a choice there's a default that works pretty well. this conpt of libertarian paternalis it's hdy. people nd to understand that the technology is for them. it's not to them it's notver them. people still setimes want to be led a little too much. th have to understand that th can reject it. they can turn f their cell phone. they can sp looking at their email. it's tre if they want it. it's not bei forced on them. seeing it as a tl not as an erwhelming obligation. i ju spent seven days answerinall my emails so i shouldt be talking. that's what yoshould do. suarez: professor saffo, is that the way is working out? doeople feel they can turn evything off or is it changing the w we live and interact with thtools and the machin we use? >> wl, what's really goi

they are gng to have to spend the next year lookg for a way to do delicate surgery toehe move that without hurting the ecomy furthe >> suarez: let'salk a little bit abo how that happen because during this ar we learned it to listen to conversations about the federal reserve, creing liquidity orithdrawing liquidity. at's the mechanism if you are gog to take out the trillion dlars that you put in, how do youo that? do y go to the bank and ask foit back? >> well, yes, in a sense t d has lots of tools it can use to te money out of the system it can sell secitys to bks, the banks give the cash to e fed and it not available r lending. and ey're coming up with wfangled securities as they experiment with gting rey for what they call the exit strategy. but i really think that's a ways off. i don't expect t fed to be draing credit or raising interest rates unt the end of theear at theoonest. becae the economy is, as jim said, still prty fragile. >> it would have to surprisingly strong, strong than anticipated before the fed srted to turn the spigot and drn some of the money out. >> srez: cathy, doou

painful, t real dconcerting part of this, it seems to me othe man side, is showing many more people lookg for work for longer periodsf time, and many, st giving up. yeah. and the official numbe even underate that because they don't count allhe pele who have have given up. many are just long-term employment. >> reporter: explain tha the quirk inhe jobs number. >> absutely. so to be consired officially unempyed you must have lookedor work in e last four weeks. there are a lot of people out of work who, particularly in high unemploymentreas, who would like to work butave not looked in the st four weeks. they are not considere officially unemployed ey are not countein the 10% number d so once you include those people, you really do have a large number long-terunemployed. and ousafety net systems e set up to deal with the way unemployment ud to be. they are set up deal with the manufacturinworker who is laid off for a feweeks or mon and goes back to work. >> repter: with the expectation that they will get a job fairly soon. >> that's right. they're not seup to deal with this moretructural unem

so i think there is an ang that is still lookg for a target. >> wdo know one thing that happened. we just n out of time. thanyou both very much. >> woouff: now, the debate over whe to hold the trials of suspects aused of mastminding the terror attacks on t world trade center and the pentagon. maaret warner has our report. >> tre are places that would less expensive for the taxpayers, andess disruptive fonew york city. warner: in a sharp reversal mayomichael bloomberg spoke t this week against holding thtrial of khalid sheikh mohammed, the allegeleader of the 9/ conspiracy, in lower manhattan. >> it would be phenomenall exnsive, and it is very disrtive to people who live in the ar and businesses in the ea, so that the economic imct is detrimental. and nody knows how big. and it would be bettero do it elwhere, if they could find a venue. >> warner: the tal for mohammed and four ofis co- conspirators was scheded take place here at a federa courthouse just blocks from where the world ade center oncetood. that announcement s made in novemb by u.s. attorney general ic holder. >> they wi

whether the world knows that you need to raise $35 billion, they say that for this court,ñr lookg atave to come forward with any proof that is specific to any bank. i think we just heard that they would change their argument again. >> so, it is the request by the bank of request to make a borrowing? is that what it is? >> as your honor has been feeling throughout this whole thing, nothing this is obtained from the person. you were focusing on this quite a bit. what we do not know is all about underlying collateral information, which the board has shifted throughout the litigation from its very detailed process to a rubber- stamp. çówhat we have is a result of government and what foia is designed to do is to allow the public to know what government is doing. this is not about the banks. this is about the federal reserve bank. it is a agency -- is an agency of the united states government. >> what about the bank's request for the money? is that information obtained from the borrower or is it a different thing? is it an application? >> it is simply an application. the facts in the recor

whether the world knows that you need to raise $35 billion, they say that for this court,ñr lookg at not have to come forward with any proof that is specific to any bank. i think we just heard that they would change their argument again. >> so, it is the request by the bank of request to make a borrowing? is that what it is? >> as your honor has been feeling throughout this whole thing, nothing this is obtained from the person. you were focusing on this quite a bit. what we do not know is all about underlying collateral information, which the board has shifted throughout the litigation from its very detailed process to a rubber- stamp. çówhat we have is a result of government and what foia is designed to do is to allow the public to know what government is doing. this is not about the banks. this is about the federal reserve bank. it is a agency -- is an agency of the united states government. >> what about the bank's request for the money? is that information obtained from the borrower or is it a different thing? is it an application? >> it is simply an application. the facts in the