was sitting on the supreme judicial tort, i always enjoyed looking at what other course who lookingfunctioningnd at what our system was doing. it was not helpful before 1980 seven in canada to the but the parliamentary system was doing. it was helpful to me to look at them, of, but i follow course they were helpful, yes cap they were helpful, and i think it always will be. this room is as capable of answering one question as i am, which is the headline is, supreme court gayikes down the anti-hal marriage law as unconstitutional, and and people react to that all over the world. if you're asked again the question how the lawyers will react, the lawyers read the decision. decision is interpreting the massachusetts constitution and whether they have to have to treat the gays the same as respect to marriage as the heterosexual system. our question is a different question. our question was is a federal area ofthis marriage, which goes to a thousand statutes and deprives people who are lawfully married who are gay, of federal benefits , such as $300,000 in tax deductions to him is that consistent wit