toas we lookn of the bay bridge, 38 santa rosa and 36 napa and it is pretty cool in livermore, 42 degreesgo roof camera, the flag is barely even blowing. you know it will be a cold night. the rain gets here tomorrow night. heavier rain for the thursday morning commute and a second storm is due in here. the latest computer models are painting a wet picture for everyone this weekend. it is not going to be just a north bay thing as we had earlier thought. here is a look at the storm. this is the first one and that storm will move in tomorrow night. as far as the timing of all of this, it has slowed down. it is going to bring more moisture. so 5:00 p.m. tomorrow night when some of you start your rush hour commute, it is actually looking just fine as we head toward 9:00 p.m. we see the rain beginning to approach the coast. by about midnight everyone is pretty much getting wet and then for 5:00 a.m. on thursday notice the pockets of yellow here. moderate to heavy rain shifting into the san mateo coast and into san jose. it will taper and we will see scattered showers for thursday evening. a few

when you lookned at this reduction in the labor force in terms of the impact of necessities that will cause some people to leave the workforce or work less hours? did i understand that correctly? who will that have a more disproportionate effect on, lower or higher wage workers? >> by lower wage workers because they are the people facing the largest change under the affordable care act. >> are you worried the incentives could have discouragement on upward mobility? if there is a relationship between the amount of subsidy that you receive and whether or not you continue working or seek higher employment, could that become a discouragement for upward mobility? to i take that promotion or don't i? we want to encourage more upward mobility. >> the provisions that we studied reduce the incentive to provide more labor. that can reduce the incentive to work harder in those hours or other things that would advance one's earnings. >> is it fair to say the structure of the law could reduce some incentives for upward mobility, people seeking to go up higher in the workforce, based on the structu

business of governing, so i do take optimism from a series of actions that show that, if you you you lookn issue like immigration reform i think it is good for our economy and there is a path forward still, i think more can happen this year. >> rose: you think there is a path forward on immigration reform in this congress? >> i actually do. >> rose: even though speaker boehner said it is impossible? >> well, i think -- >> rose: and blamed the president as the reason it was impossible? >> i think if you look at the substance of immigration reform, there is broad agreement that there is policy areas where there could be consensus. i think there is broad agreement on both sides that -- >> rose: one is immigration and one is getting ready to go into midterm elections is the political reality. >> i will leave it for others to make their own political decisions, i would personally argue there is a case where good policy and good politics ultimately come together which is why i am more optimistic. i am not saying it is a certainty but the conversation is by no means over, and the challenge of doi