, almostt mocking and laughing that loretta lynch was making all of the decisions. they were all democrats in the department of justice. and there was no way hillaryf would get anything but cleared in all of this. it never was an investigation. it was rigged from the get-go. >> yeah, you had the lawyer working with hillary clinton -- clinton's lawyer working with the fbi on documents to help her for the campaign. we also have another set of documents. all of this is a result of lawsuits filed at least a year plusnt ago. so it's been slow rolled out of the doj and fbi. other sets of documents showing the lawyers for the clinton campaign and the dnc were also talking to the fbi. about russia and donald trump. so they were protecting hillary on e-mail, working with hillary on going after trump. i tell you, you can't get a better example of the radically different approaches the fbi and doj took to two key issues, whether to prosecute hillaryey clinton and the targeting of president trump. >> they're all in on it. remember, it was strzok that said, sara, we only have a

strzok and page also say that, oh, loretta lynch rigged hillary's investigation.ribly flawed and injustice and if we want to save this great democratic republic that we inherited, that so many sacrificed and i for, we must have equal justice under the law, equal application of our laws, and we must be ever so vigilant be a constitutional republic. after clinton lost, then the insurance policy kicked in. all roads lead back to the dirty russian dossier bought and paid for by hillary clinton, the dnc, with funneled money through a law firm into an oppo research firm, and then, yeah, i guy, a foreign national that put these russian lies together. then those russian lies, bulk of information, as the grassley grandpa memo says , to literally fight, not only on carter page, but a backdoor to spy on all things campaign trump. all things transition trump, all things president trump. put together by christopher steele, who doesn't even stand by his own work. in an interrogatory, great britain said, i have no idea if any of this is true. he was also being paid by fusion gps

it was signed by loretta lynch. some of the same people involved in the phoney russian collusion probe. and to the case of thenv attorney general. what happened on the tarmac in phoenix, arizona, when she said he was talking to bill clinton for 45 minutes about grand kid just days she is supposed to make a decision whether to indict his wife or night. cross fire hurricaned. hillary clinton's exoneration withoutth an investigation. expanding accession to this intelligence committee material meant it was harder to trace the information and weed out the leakers and harderer to hold anyone in the deep state accountable. they knew exactly what they were doing. they were trying to put the intelligence on the radar of as many people as possible so they would not be able to find the people who knew what they did was an abuse of power. it was corruption at the worstt level. but is still being exposed anyway. look at how urgent these messages are. they had two weeks to get this done. really? is this what they cared about was

where were andrew mccabe and james comey and loretta lynch and sally yates and andrew wiseman.at i with are is thes allowed to break the law but when you're a republican you got the grand jury thrown at you. it still hasn't changed and bill barr is going to clean it up. it has to be done because the fbi and doj remain today politically corrupt organizations. lou: and the obama era intelligence community, the fbi, the cia relying on, it turns out, three redacted reports marked as draft from crowd strike which was their investigative arm in this instance to see who had hacked the dnc. i mean this stuff gets worse by the day. >> let's really look at that, lou. remember obama's talking points, 17 intelligence agencies have confirmed that this is a russian hacking job. no. only two had. the mapping organization doesn't quite do that kind of work. only two. and guess what two they were. the ci airks ay and cia and the. mike rogers from the nsa didn't go along with it. think of this as a former prosecutor and investigator, the fbi relies on technical information from a third party tha

including fbi director andrew mccabe, former fbi director james comey, and former attorney general, loretta lynch. some have expressed concern that it is somehow inappropriate for committee staff to question a sitting attorney general. there is ample house precedent for committee staff to question cabinet level and senate -confirmed officials during a hearing. the most salient president occurred in the -- the most occurred inedent 1987, during the hearings on the iran-contra scandal, where the committee questioned the sitting attorney general ed meese. i would also note that in 1997, under a republican majority, in a hearing with attorney general janet reno, the judiciary committee agreed to proceed with the rules to permit "the chairman and ranking member to allocate time for counsel as they deemed appropriate for questioning." on a final note, there's a report saying that the attorney general may refuse to appear tomorrow. in spite of all the precedent i have cited, i note that congress does not need to have to justify to the attorney general, to the department of justice, or to any other part

loathsome and hillary they decided 100000000-0 and of course, oh, struck and page laughing that loretta lynch put the fix and on the investigation to begin with and never me -- never mind the tarmac meeting and exoneration of being written may 2016, and not interviewed until july 2nd, but exonerated by comey july 25th, 2016. what do we know when that particular case? they never looked at real evidence and all popular regular procedure in the fbi was cast aside. they didn't tape it, they didn't record it, there is no three oh two's and she was allowed to bring in a witness and one other person to give her comfort while the fbi was supposedly interrogating her. >> john: that is right. listen in one day jerry nadler issued 80 subpoenas but the clinton campaign, or to mrs. quentin, you can see the difference in justice even in the way the republicans and the democrats on the house house have treated investigations at some point you need compel answers to get to the truth. >> sean: thank you, and move on and now, multiple investigations under wacom attorney general barr is working hard for the gov

including fbi director andrew mccabe, former fbi director james comey, and former attorney general, loretta lynch. some have expressed concern that it is appropriate for committee staff to question a sitting attorney general. there is ample precedent for committee staff to question cabinet level and senate confirmed officials. the most recent occurred in the 1987 during the hearings on the iran-contra scandal, where the committee questioned the sitting attorney general aned meece. 1997ld also note that in under a republican majority,, without hearing with attorney general janet reno, the judiciary committee agreed to proceed with the roles permitting the chairman and ranking member to allocate time for counsel questioning. is a report that the attorney general may refuse to appear tomorrow. in spite of all the president i have cited, i note that congress does not need to have to justify to the attorney general, to the department of justice the matter for ways that it would choose is conduct its own proceedings. is an obstruction of congress. no witness can dictate to the committee the manner in w

with all the investigations going on, it seems like bill clinton getting on the airplane with loretta lynch, acting like it is going to be covered up, and never rought up. to me, that was the biggest crime. there was nothing to investigate, he committed a crime. and i don't understand why he s not being prosecuted for it. it is beyond me. host: republicans on capitol hill have asked for investigations into that. can they walk into the general counsel's office and say, hey, you need to look into this? guest: they wouldn't walk into the general counsel's office. they would try to encourage a particular committee in the house to encourage that or encourage the d.o.j. to investigate. i think it goes to, it brings up what is a challenging issue in that -- we had a chance during the trump campaign, to "lock her up," when he was referring to hillary clinton. and now, you heard speaker pelosi say something on the order of she would like or he wouldn't paying her to see -- or it wouldn't pain her to see donald trump behind bars one day. if we have public officials committing crimes, sure, nobody sho

sand if this were eric holder or loretta lynch, i don't have any doubt they would not have let you have any of the report if it pertained to their administration. so i thought the attorney general bent over backwards to present what he did. and now he's going to be met with a vote of contempt, it just i guess this is the rule. no good deed goes unpunished. the attorney general barr, maybe by a vote of contempt today by this committee, will learn the lesson that my late mama used to just say, there's some folks you can't help. and with that, i will yield back. >> for what purpose does the gentle lady from texas seek recognition? >> i have a lot of good friends, mr. chairman, including yourself. a lot of good friends on the other side of the aisle and i'm simply trying to clarify the consistency of the false narrative that has continued as a theme of my friends on the other side of the aisle. chairman nadler has been consistent and we've been consistent. we've had three elements to our request. it has been modified to the extent of the two committees, republicans and democrats of the inte

type of announcement that we heard in the past 48 hours to come out of the eric holder or the loretta lyncho the bill barr doj? it's a facade. >> what i'm hearing is it is going to be carol's point more of the regulatory part under the fcc taking the lead as opposed to the antitrust part. >> carol's point is well taken. how many times did mark zuckerberg say we welcome regulation? yes, as long as he can be the regulator. >> yeah. >> look at the 737 max, who is the regulator there? the government or -- david: big companies can afford the lawyers and all of the lobbyists inside the beltway. >> correct. >> you have in some ways it would be interesting to hear what marc says. i mean this is a bit of a nationalist and populist approach with the antitrust. >> there you go with the populist again. >> 35% with trump side. 35% with the populist left and it kind of fits to what the narrative is. >> when i say to the government oh the free market, they would say to me the barriers to entry are so extraordinary. facebook is so huge, nobody can compete with it. guess what? they got big by delivering a s

find out what happened both of the e-mails and with the comey investigation, what happened with loretta lynchree. >> if impeachment the way to go for the democrats? nancy pelosi reluctant and appear. >> i really think this is a big mistake for the democrats. there is no way they can remove donald trump, the senate will never vote for, i think it's a mistake. >> were out of time. thank you so much. not on the beach in florida but in the desert in arizona. the breaking details from dominican republic following a handful of american tourist there. what you need to know before traveling. we will have much more from the u.s. open right melissa? >> we are bringing you back to pebble beach, imes taking with tom fazio the golf course designer behind some of the most famous and fabulous around the world. you do not want to miss this. ♪ ♪ and i recently had hi, ia heart attack. it changed my life. but i'm a survivor. after my heart attack, my doctor prescribed brilinta. it's for people who have been hospitalized for a heart attack. brilinta is taken with a low-dose aspirin. no more than 100 milligrams

that's done legally at these schools, number one, and then number two, my question is if you are loretta lynchr felicity huffman what is going through your head? >> i think the first factor was certainly that he didn't benefit at all in terms of giving the money back into the program. number two, i think the judges do look at people who send letters. you had parents, students, other people, coaches, family members who spoke highly of him. in part of sentencing you evaluate the whole individual just not an isolated instance. number two, to your point about felicity huffman or lori loughlin, look, the point is felicity huffman accepted responsibility. that's big. i would not look at this particular case as the test case for everyone else. i think it's an outlier and it was predicated upon the facts here and this is not a broader issue so i don't think this sends a message to anyone, i think it isolates and evaluates the person who was standing before the court. >> i still am confused, paul, about how accepting the hundreds of thousands of dollars is better than a mom giving it. they're both -- i

the dni, the nsa, with the approval t of the attorney general, loretta lynch, they wanted raw intelligence into as many hands inside the deep state as possible. why? clearly to make it harder tord seek out the leakers, harder to trace the information, harder to find out who did what, when, and where? and the obama deep state cabal did not do this for eight years. they would never want to do that to themselves. e and the level of intensity, urgency, and decision to do this -- remember, this was barack obama's executive order, 12333, in the final moments, drastically expanding the sharing of this raw intel, signal intel, from three agencies to 17, just days before president trump is inaugurated. they were literally scrambling to get it done before -- we've got to get it done before january 20th. the day donald trump became president. using an executive order, as i said, 12333 -- well, as itsum basis, with no input from the incoming administration. of course, this just the latest evidence, now a big piece of the puzzle, of what is the biggest abuse of power, corruption scandal, and yes, abuse

maria: sitting attorney general loretta lynch just a few days before hillary was to be interviewed byalk about obstruction. dagen: tarmac meeting. >> they got together to talk about grandkids and golf stories. maria: i know that. [laughter] maria: when we come back merger with raytheon once again companies leaving because of high taxes, we will talk about that, technology giant setting sights on midwest now, where and why next, stay with us. incomparable design makes it beautiful. state-of-the-art technology makes it brilliant. the visionary lexus nx. lease the 2019 nx 300 for $359/month for 36 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. 2,000 fence posts. 900 acres. 48 bales. all before lunch, which we caught last saturday. we earn our scars. we wear our work ethic. we work until the work's done. and when it is, a few hours of shuteye to rest up for tomorrow, the day we'll finally get something done. ( ♪ ) maria: welcome back, headlines across america this morning, record reports vermont, republican governor vetoing a bill that would have established 24-hour waiting period to bu

the other would be former attorney general loretta lynch. think that either of those two candidates would make excellent presidential nominees. host: have either one of them announced desire to run for at this pointler: i think eric holder is thinking about it lynch, i don't think she has. host: what makes you think that they would be the best candidate for democrat? based on the work that they did as attorney general in the obama administration, they would both make excellent candidates. host: let's talk to rick, from jackson, missouri. good morning. caller: good morning, sir. host: who do you think should be the democratic nominee for president in 2020? caller: [indiscernible] i like her message. she's much were down to earth on all her promises. host: and do you think amy klobuchar -- who do you think she should pick as her vice presidential candidate? and do you intend to support the democratic candidate regardless of who gets the nomination? caller: i don't have an opinion on who the vice president should be. that is up to her. i am an

of course -- you think loretta lynch didn't know about it?e not known a lot of this stuff. steve: good point. all right. dan? dan: mr. speaker, of course, we also had mrs. clinton involved heavily in promoting this kosovo russian technology project where some of the russian companies were donating to the clinton foundation which we later found out according to reporting this technology project they may have actually been stealing sensitive american technology while some of the companies were donating to the clinton foundation. where is that in the investigation? >> well, and, again, remember how everyone was terribly shocked that the president -- president trump indicated that he might or might not be involved in reporting to the fbi about a foreign government trying to give him something. nobody then turned around said well, if foreigners aren't supposed to be involved in the american campaign. how come the clinton campaign because helping fund the steele dossier being written by a former british secret agent? now, somehow it's okay if you a

with all the investigations going on, it seems like bill clinton getting on the airplane with loretta lynch like it is going to be covered up, and never brought up. to me, that was the biggest crime. there was nothing to investigate, he committed a crime. and i don't understand why he is not being prosecuted for it. it is beyond me. republicans on capitol hill have asked for investigations into that. can they walk into the general counsel's office and say, hey, you need to look into this? guest: they wouldn't walk into the general counsel's office. they would try to encourage a particular committee in the house to encourage that or encourage the d.o.j. to investigate. uphink it goes to, it brings what is a challenging issue in had a chance during campaign, to "lock her up," when he was referring to hillary clinton. and now, you heard speaker pelosi say something on the order of she would like or he wouldn't paying her to see -- or pain her to see donald trump behind bars one day. if we have public officials committing crimes, sure, nobody should be above the law in our country. they should