and approve the new construction at 203 los palmos as proposed. this concludes my presentation and i am happy to answer any questions. thank you. president miguel: thank you. project sponsor. excuse me. this is the d.r. d.r. requester. >> is there a clicker to the slide? i have short arms. >> i can make the other microphone work fow -- for you. >> thank you. my name's anita taylor and the three proposed new homes all adjoin my lot. and i wanted to discuss this project and oppose the project on the basis that the structures are inconsistent with the prevailing lot size and the home size within the neighborhood. the zoning exceptions for distance within a corner for substandard lots also states that the prevailing pattern of lots, etc., within the neighborhood be considered when granting exceptions for zoning. and in particular in this area, these represent the smallest lots, the largest homes, the smallest setbacks with virtually no yards, exploiting the existing green space, providing none, but exploiting the existing green space that's owned, mai

los palmos is one of three proposed buil

the fourth lot located on the corner of los palmos and forester street will contain the single existing family dwelling and will remain unaltered. on each of the vacant lots, one new single family dwelling will be constructed. the property is located at this house -- at the southwest corner of forester street in the rh-1 zoning district. the requester is the owner ever 785 forester street which is perpindicular to the subject property. her concerns include the legality of the size of the subdivided lot, the destabilization of the hill side that would result -- that would be caused by the project, the loss of property value and privacy resulting from the new construction and the destruction of the existing tree cover on the properties that would be caused by the project. since the case report was prepared, the department has received correspondent from 36 people in the form of one petition and two letters in response to the project. the petition states that the undersigned would not oppose the construction of one new single family dwelling but that the subdivision and construction of thr