what i would like to do is go through some of our out line and invite louise dawson to comment as wemove along. we will try to go fast and in a half-hour charlie salter one of the city or nation's leading acoustical exerts will talk about noise issues related to restaurants patron noise, employee issues, fixed source noise and neighbor issues. we will briefly talk about those in 20 minutes to half an hour. >> agnus thanks, when is the spur stuff released 124 >> we are vetting it with the various departments now and wanting to test it out with a few restaurants and also our commission of take a look. it will probably be released sometime in the next couple of amongs. i think right now we would like to be that it works before we distribute it to all of you. if it isn't useful information obviously we are not getting the right information from the folks. >> thank you. >> as most restaurants or small businesses, i passed along to the small business commission onof my occurrence the fragility of businesses to either quake hazards. you need to be concerned about closures to either quakes,

. >> i'm louise dawson, the lead restaurant consultant for the san francisco small business development center. >> lead restaurant consultant for the small business development center. the free resource girl. [laughter]. >> yes , sir. >> [inaudible]. >> there are and charlie can speak to that. >> there are minimum code requirements. state building code. but then you need to pay attention to complaints. what we do in mixed use project system we specify that commercial tenants have to submit their plans for ventilation, plumbing equipment attached to the residential ceiling construction above. as part of the leasing provision to avoid problems because as i say, once you have the restaurant or other type of establishment below the residents they can care less about the residents. they are doing business and the people upstairs are annoyed by the noise vibration. so, the mixed use developer is interested in having it be a lease arrangement rather than something that's over looked. and they get stuck with this continuous problem. >> building code is strict in california 74, i think that cali