in light of what we have seen on loweruse side in terms of spending, the lower targets for defense spending, it will be interesting to who on the democratic side steps forward and argues this may be an excessive bill. maybe the house side is more in favor of it. it is always a tricky balance. you don't want to be seen as someone who is opposing key money and priorities for the troops. at the same token, it is a lot of money. you have to to find a way to balance those priorities. host: the senate working on the policy side of things. the house working on the spending side. as the house takes up its measure, the natural defense authorization act, it did not go committee as it did in the senate. the house side close to a party line vote and a nearly 21 hour session. you have mentioned some of the differences. what are some of the differences you can think of between the house and senate versions? leo: a lot of what we saw in the 21 hour debate were the kind of things we are going to see when the house and senate versions come together. a largely over low yield tactical nukes, whether the arsen