i think - is for having me. lthink this is —~ ~ , ~ . eighth consecutive the eighth consecutive electioner of reasons.sthese .,. .. s... . . - are number of reasons.i.h.ese ---. ,-. . ,--- are to be elections are going to be somehow determining the future democracy. democra7cy. if the of 2071 -7 to be reconfirmed and the ggigg to be reconfirmedand the is party is self—determination winning again, that floats to make by �*alone at winning again, that floats to make by �* alone at the roake by itself alone at the ~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ that this is not government that this is not to be healthy for the going to be healthy for the pluralism of kosovo for the multiparty system.77 and for the multiparty system was set, it that was already set, but it was somehow shaken in 2021 with self—determination was somehow shaken in 2021 with self— already|ation was somehow shaken in 2021 with self— already won1 was somehow shaken in 2021 with self— already won more than =-= the votes and made the law. this is also governmentilaw. this is also to be a very going to be a very important election for the state of ko

and thinktheresa fea7r77 lthink. there's a fear that, 3 3 3 . investment a astuatty i3333tm333'3'33f3333in in7e us defence to invest in in the us is offered arms to is offered european arms to and i european help and i think european countries will reinvest in their economies and we will see jump i.n.3 3353333333 jump in those particular jum; but hose particular jum; but of se particular jum; but of course, ular jum; but of course, european stocks but of course, european fragmented and defence remains fragmented and a lot of work to done on 776m? 7 7 7 77766 the operational 7 7 7 777or717t7h7e7 op7erati7onal7side in terms of 7 77”; te7rms7of7bu7il7di7ng7 77 7in terms of building real but in terms of building real resilience with defence across in terms of the continent inter-ms of how adherence of equipment will allow europe to get the really allow europe to get the most out of its defence spending and not spending 77— -7': 7 silos for national countries are on european countries are on of opinions different, kind of opinions this different. kind of opinions this fjfg some about this and

valdo care workers that that valdo calocane was the next neighbour of their ithink of their parent, lthinked. i am concerned about the i differently informed. i am cor thinking jout the i differently informed. i am cor thinking and the i differently informed. i am cor thinking and ti course i differently informed. i am cor thinking and ti course risk i am thinking and of course risk assessment, i there is =§ laziness, i think all of this contributes to the that contributes to the fact that on an is essential. �* levgl is $4. . — the mm— level is essential 7 the day, it is individuals of the day, it is individuals who make up the so don't 7 77d7o7n't7hold7 7 7 77 7 77 don�*t7hold7in7di7v7idu7al7s 7 7 7 you don't hold individuals responsible, this system will never change. to your question neyer change. to your question changing systems, i about ehanging systems; l " " f ' only about ehanging systems; l " " w ' only way about ohanging ayateroag l " " w ' only way of about ohanging ayateroag l ,, ,, w ' only way of doing is 777 is by ' isbyholding 7 5 7 ' is by holding individuals aroma—tab“;

context of this bill, it has been used and is sufficiently used for people to withdraw 7: = -z 7 lthinkcision, it person making the decision, it is i loved _ person making the decision, it is loved one. it is not the is the lovedeonec illenelthe -m— is the lovedeonec it is not the receiving life—saving person receiving life—saving wei; life—support machine. what i'm trying to understand is, according to what — understand is, according to what we _ understand is, according to what we heard this morning, if what we heard this morningrif - _ what we heard this morningrif - m_ what we heard this morning, if have the mental you have the mental capacity, and we — you have the mental capacity, and we are using this app to withdraw— and we are using this app to withdraw treatment itself for a that law then lead condition, that law then lead to a — condition, that law then lead to a diagnosis of terminal it to a diagnosisofctefmtnat - it kill toadiagnosiso .. :' s. -it kill if refuse to take i refuse to take insulin - refuse to take insulin and é refuse to take insulin and i i refuse to take ins

. | comes terljslcahinaalthinie -w_ comes to—ljs— china. lthink going on here is comes to—ljs— china.hat's going on hereisltump im— what's going on hereisltump i trying to what's going on hereis trump trying to say, "i have is trying to say, "i have leverage. i want to make a deal you 7 legerage. luenlta—makaaa-aal - you on legerage. irwent to mata a dea'. you on migrants and with you. on migrants—and— 7”. when with you. on migrants—and ———— when it with you. on migrants—and— 7”. when it comes to fentanyl when it comes to mexico _ fentanyl when it comes to mexico and canada." and when it comes— mexico and canada." and when it comes to — mexico and canada." and when it comes to china, a broader level of the _ comes to china, a broader level of the playing field _ we i of the playing field i _ we will of the playing field we will have to tumm=rtieimtfm ..= .= e - whether tumm=meuy tw'e wi�*d heee to whether trump the see whether trump the prevails and he's dqqo . u - -v ”7.17.7747-7 to gggotiator prevails and if he's to agreement with gggotiator prevails and if he's to agrs that nt with

i think now administration- lthink. now back and he's sort of he's back and he's sort of superchargeduntries, i think were other countries, i think it'd push straight into it'd push them straight into the arms of the chinese. in a sense, donald trump's very lucky that panama's a very pro—american country, pro—american country. and mulino himself — even e the raised it his inau-ural his inaugural speech — no mistake about it - we relationship with china. have a relationship with china. but our primary security have a relationship with china. but our is imary security have a relationship with china. but our is the ry security have a relationship with china. but our is the united �*ity have a relationship with china. but our is the united states, partner is the united states, as it has been since 1977 when the treaties were signed, and then in 1999 when the canal was turned over. a turned over. it's a relationship that works." and if i were to speculate, i would say that rubio hegseth and say that rubio and hegseth and maybe mike the national security have kind of security advisor, have