reporting from beijing in china on just some different aspects of the story . law specialist lucien bologna believes the way the case has played out over the week, is an indication of what potentially to come here. it's not really about the doping case as such because these will be dealt later on and we do not even know if there is a positive the sample test. i think there is not yet because the information was given on the very late, i must say. and that means it has to have the right to request to be simple. so if there is a confused, positive test is not yet even decided. that means the court duration force board can only assess what will be perhaps the likelihood in their mind. what will happen with this case, which day will not be able to decide themselves the only thing they can decide ease suspension for the next event, which will be the 15th december rent or not. and i think given, given the heart tension and the big effects that we have, such as suspension, they should be very careful in determining this. and while the doping case investigation was still ongoing, important point th

well sports law specialist doctor lucien bologna believes that cas ruling is an important step despite the case being far from over. this is the only road position to work that was to be made because nobody knows what in the end will happen, but to not allow have would have been the worst. all depends what the explanation is, but it seems that rose out already lifted the suspension that there must be a good reason. now costs need also follow the rules are clear. it must be waiting 20 days and the stay wait. it's so long. and the explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we call beach related delay. i don't believe that i think the b test must, must produce the results. and then the whole case will, will be decided. and of course, it's not over, but i think an important step was for all the latest reaction and analysis, running the valley of a case and much more. you can head to r t dot com on sure you're abusing the comments. always good to hear what you're thinking. you know, there's been quite a stir in the media over the image of a machine gun toting reli, who's report

and we catch up with a sports lawyer doctor lucien bologna. he explained why he supports the court's decision. this is the only right position to work that was to be made because nobody knows what in the end will happen, but to not allow have would have been the worst. all depends what the explanation is, but it seems that rose out already lifted the suspension that there must be a good reason. now costs need also follow rules. it's the rules are clear, it must be waiting 20 days and the stay waived. so long and the explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we khatri koby relate to delay. i don't believe that i think the b test must, must produce the results. and then the whole case will, will be decided. and of course, it's not over, but i think an important step was the legacy reaction. that analysis surrounding the value of a case just head over to watch. you don't call them you can get involved and share your comment with united states. i can't seem to make up its mind when a russia is supposedly going to invade ukraine. joe

sports law specialist doctor lucien bologna told us the cath ruling is an important step but says the case is far from obo. this is the only route decision to work that was to be made because nobody knows what will happen, but to not allow her would have been the worst. all depends what the explanation is, but it seems that rose out already lifted the suspension that there must be a good reason. now costs need also follow rules. the rules are clear. it must be wishing 20 days and the stay wait. it's so long. and the explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we could call beat relate to delay. i don't believe that i think the b test must, must produce results. and then the whole case will, will be decided. and of course, it's not over, but i think an important step was the full, the latest reaction on analysis surrounding the believe a case and much more besides dot com, where you can also share, you'll use in the common letting a put in has approved a draft response to washington date and ongoing back and forth. the russia security dom up. the 10 page document was presen

in the systemic and pervasive disregard for clean sport by russia. 4th floor, especially dr. lucien bologna told us this year yes, rolling as an important step but says the case isn't finished. this is the only route position to work that was to be made because nobody knows what will happen, but to not allow her would have been the worst. all depends what the explanation is, but it seems that rose out already lifted the suspension. that must be a good reason. now, cos need also follow rules. the rules are clear, it must be within 20 days of the stay. wait. it's so long. entity explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we could call beat relate to delay. i don't believe that i seem to be test must, must produce results in the whole case. we will be decided and of course it's not over. but i think an important step was the rule related to reaction analysis surrounding the believe a case much more beside 10 to all the dot com, where you can also share your views in the color letting approach and as approve the draft of rushes response to washington. his comments about moscow secu

we discuss developments with international sports lawyer lucien bologna who's on several high profile cases of the quote above attraction for sport . it was very boards in the decision itself. they did not want to harm these minor more than necessary. it was clear based on the fact that it was a very, very low concentration that is the 1st on which is very important to mention. and that makes it likely. and they, they were clearing that he makes make is very likely that something that was not the intentional happened. there are a lot of mistakes, but the i o. c of course, meets the biggest mistake of all of them. because they didn't like say, reschedule or, or not scheduled. so when he thought t me went and that was that rumors came out of the case and then the 2nd mistake, they read the name. and what is also to be said these that lot of who shoot protect correct application of the code of the water code did try to support that these while the code was not correctly applied. and disease also had very bad behavior a while ago to not help athletes even leave the code is not correctly a

busy i spoke with dr. lucien bologna, a sports lawyer who supports the course decision. this is the only route position to work that was to be made because nobody knows what in the end will happen, but to not allow her would have been the worst. all depends what the explanation is, but it seems that rose out already lifted the suspension. that must be a good reason. now, cos need also follow rules. the rules are clear, it must be within 20 days of the stay. wait. it's so long. and the explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we heard khatri x, co beach related delay. i don't believe that i seen the b test must, must produce the results. and then the whole case will, will be decided. and of course, it's not over, but i think it's an important step. but for all the very latest reaction and analysis surrounding the value of a case, you can just head over walkie dot com. it's also where you can share your views in the comment section. ah, well, the united states can't seem to make up its mind when a russia is supposedly invading ukraine. joe barton claimed a c

and we discussed the issue with international law lucien bologna . it was very important in the decision itself. they did not want to harm these minor more than necessary. it was clear based on the fact that it was a very, very low concentration that just to 1st on which is very important to mention. and that makes it likely, and they were clearing that it makes it very likely that something that was not intentional happened. there are a lot of mistakes, but the i o. c, of course, made the biggest mistake of all of them because they the and let's say reschedule or or not scheduled the ceremony for team you went. and that was that rumors came out of the case. and then the 2nd day, they read the name. and what is also to be said is that the who should protect correct application of the code of the code. the try to support that these while the code was not correctly applied. and he's also a very bad behavioral law to not have at least even leave the code is not correctly applied earlier. the russian olympic committee team on going to women's figure skat

clean sport by russia. among the reaction we got to this was from sports law specialist doctor lucien bologna who told us the cas ruling. it's an important step, but the cases and finish is the only right decision to work that was to be made because nobody knows what in the end will. ready happen, but to not allow her would have been the worst. all dependence. what the explanation is, but it seems that rosara already lifted the suspension. that must be a good reason. now, cos need also follow rosa, eat the rules or clear it must be within 20 days. and the staying waited so long and the explanation for the delay was not very convincing. what we, her khatri is koby relate to the late i don't believe that i think the d test must produce results. and then the whole case, we will be decided, and of course it's not over, but i think it's an important step bar control related reaction on analysis surrounding natalie of a case and much more besides of course, head to r t dot com, where you can also share your views with a comment not letting me put in has approved a draft of russia's response to wash

back in december, let's draw a live now it's, it's an actual la doctor lucien and bologna for some expert insight on this. so dr . maloney, thanks for coming on the program. appreciate your time here today. first of all, this document what the you make of the course explanation on how do you think it's going to impact the value of a case in the long run? because this case really is far from over, isn't it? yes, of course the transfer all worried, it was only a decision about the suspension and the court clearly decided that the mind must be protected and that there are doubts about the way that the case was handled. it, for example, that the sample was so long in the laboratory, and then that report was given so late and really in a bad time. and badge timing that was very crucial. so for that decision, they were not very satisfied with that. and of course they were not satisfied with them as well because they, they were trying to blend say, how these lab and aids not so unusual, but it's not ok. it was really bad timing it. they had taken too long. and what he's also interesting to menti