groups to merge in europe. they did a good job. but arguably others like iag and job. but arguably others like iag a nd luftha nsa job. but arguably others like iag and lufthansa klm never integrated, there is mistrust. air france specifically has not restructured as much as it has to. and the chief executive resigned and the decision for the new leader will set the tone of how the talks carry on? that is what i would say. the chairman has the choice, a typical air france choice of bringing somebody new in every two years, or deciding for restructuring candidates, arguably to deal with the situation effectively that is fairto the situation effectively that is fair to the plough use you would need a leader to be there for almost a decade to solve this issue. —— deal with the situation effectively ina way deal with the situation effectively in a way that is fair to the employees. the likes of british airways and lufthansa have adapted to this new markets, why have air france not been able to do the same? iag, ba and lufthansa went through a series of bad strikes, at the time everybody said this is the wrong strategy, you need to get out of it, you need a consist