i also have luis martinez here from mobility who actually prepared these mailings, and you can answer any questions you -- and he can answer any questions you might have. thank you. >> clerk: thank you. we will now hear from the appellant. >> thank you. good evening, vice president swig and commissioners honda, lazarus, and tanner. there were a number of failures to provide proper public notice in this case. the content of the notice is important to that, as well. we talked about some of the serious misleading topography in the notice that went out to the public. we talked about the scale that was shown and what was trying to depict on the sides of the poles. i'd also like to draw your attention to the exhibit that they're talking about. this is -- this is exhibit f that mobility did their distribution to. this clearly shows that these are not the neighborhood associations that are relevant to this case. they sent them to the south of market neighborhood associations, and that is part of the requirement. so when the important notice went out, it went to the wrong agency -- it went to