lukashenka and narysh also spoke about this. the most important, which annoys me the most.e have already detained more than 30 accomplices. they are past and present. uh, bastards who live in our society, our uh, i can’t name the abomination that commits uh, help commit illegal acts. moreover, you are on your own land. and already at a meeting on wednesday , alexander grigoryevich and vladimir vladimirovich also spoke about intelligence, in fact. it was the economy, but it concerns intelligence directly , we will overcome all this and the one who predicted that we would collapse, we do not collapsed. yes, it won't be easy. well, when it was just that we didn’t collapse in the economy, among other things, because we had information in what areas they would put economic pressure on us in order to gain time and reorganize , of course, it didn’t work out perfectly and not without problems, but nevertheless the fact that anti-russian and anti-belarusian sanctions hit harder on those who impose them is a colossal merit of the intelligence of the allied state. naturally. there are

putin lukashenka say, of course, isolated trust. yes, in recent years, everything has happened in a relationship, but the course has always remained unchanged, and many statements from the beginning of the zero. today they are generally perceived as prophetic. the president goes to a meeting of the security council, and the countries of the west have been making noise for a week about putin's interview of the situation with security after the decision of great britain to transfer ammunition with united uranium to ukraine, the head of belarus spoke, he said that in response to russia , alexander grigoryevich lukashenko could put tactical nuclear weapons in belarus for a long time raising the question of deploying russian tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus rights. he says, well, listen. we are your closest allies. why are the americans doing this as their ally on their territory , they are teaching, by the way, their crews pilots. we agreed that we did the same without violating our obligations. i would like to empha

lukashenka was also talking about this in the market.ost important thing is what annoys me the most. we have already detained more than 30 accomplices. where are they from , past and present. uh, bastards who live in our society i can’t name which one commits helps to commit illegal acts, and even more so terrorist attacks. the boys of the earth and already meeting on wednesday, alexander grigorievich and vladimir vladimirovich also spoke about intelligence, in fact. it was the economy, but this concerns intelligence directly, we will overcome all this, and the one who predicted that we would collapse did not collapse. yes, it won't be easy. well, when it was just in what directions they would economically put pressure on us in order to gain time and reorganize , it turned out, of course, not anti-belarusian sanctions hit harder on those who introduce them, there is a colossal merit of the intelligence of the allied state. naturally, if people working for our intelligence at the headquarters of chikhanovskaya, near the lettuce, there is

lukashenka has always said that sooner or later the war will fly pushylin.lso, of course, because if belarus , for example, built facilities in the olympic sochi, it would cost 100 times cheaper, with the same quality, and this is just one obvious example, because minsk exports not only goods and services minsk exports decency and put on our direct cooperation with the russian regions. this is lukashenka's chip, which is correct and, as time has shown, effective, but which everyone fully appreciated only now, when we are together under sanctions. so, we still have a lot of work on the union state . unfortunately, not much moscow, but this is our own fault, so we would like to work in two capitals, we will supply the highest quality products to your markets. you know what we have saved. uh, our guests we get from this a decent effect over the past year only on food products. we have traded more than 8 billion dollars, not a single one. that's not as much income as it brought us, and this is due to the quality of our products in russia. well, probably we do no

it doesn't matter who will be the moderator cr-dagan or lukashenka.ukraine then the minsk agreements would not have had so many deaths and devastation. yes, and the crimean ones, after all , the issue could be resolved, otherwise the president reminded, but we return to the truce on 20-23. the main thing is people. well, the ukrainians do not want to take weapons on the battlefield, the commanders themselves are negotiating, the ukrainians warn the russians, they say, today at such and such a square will arrive. and vice versa, the gag people are talking about something, or that everything is for the sake of russia , the president did not specify which of the parties the appeal was addressed to , vinogradov, head of the st. the conditions for the violation are ironclad, that is, a complete halt of fire throughout territory. ukraine can not be armed redeployed any weapons. the visionary channel calls alexander lukashenko a unique insider, i would like to add. and what president people should know the truth that's why about nuclear weapons. the belarusi

we have a whole coalition with lukashenka and a whole plan here.think that specifically this meeting, they talked about nuclear weapons , because there is also this story with the nuclear deployment of nuclear missiles on the territory of belarus, there is a military component, but i think it is informational and psychological, because they are creating pressure on the west and on ukraine, and i i think that this was the main conversation and putin simply informed lukashenko about his plans, but definitely did not ask his opinion about what is happening on the border with the baltic countries. today there were various news this week, in particular, latvia is going to completely complete the fence that will completely separate it from belarus. as far as i understand there is something almost 70 km, and instead, lukashenka and the belarusian army moved dozens of tanks to the border with lithuania, yes, yes, well , let's remember that it all started in the 21st year, when the lukashenko regime organized migration during the crisis, people from lebanon

lukashenka always, what is called a mountain there is no such term natural milk, everyone understands perfectly well that both russia and belarus mutually uh dries. this milk removes water and when the peak of milk falls russia orders in belarus we often buy this milk in russia. we dilute it, that is, by adding water and we get normalized milk. it's not beer. why did giant belaz trucks dilute your elbow? the joint pride of belarus and russia 35% of the components of these world-famous cars are produced at russian enterprises. a joint forum of the regions of the two countries, an exhibition of achievements of the national economy, belarus will start buying. we have not been able to for 5 years. they put one combine harvester, we put the combines all german, they are american russian and ours. who wins yes, with pleasure there was a lot of controversy. you know that there was a lot to hide all this in the press, but we must give him his due on integration issues, he takes a consistent position. eh, there are problems too. let's say the single currency, but it's so serious for every tast

it doesn't matter who will be the moderator of cr-dagan or lukashenka.ugh , honestly, after 2015 we have more trust. and in general, get to the bottom of ukraine then observe the minsk agreements. there would not have been so many deaths and devastation. yes, and the crimean ones, after all , the issue could be resolved, otherwise the president reminded, but we return to the truce on 20-23. main people. well, the ukrainians themselves do not want to take weapons on the battlefield.

we don’t need it either, or do we need the power of lukashenka, no matter how strange it sounds, butesn’t need it either, because the box will be in moscow and he gets another military base on its territory but this is no longer just a base, a base with nuclear weapons , er. could er, lukashenko and putin talk about this, too? i thought that this was one of the important topics er, in the negotiations putin lukashenko, but er for putin now steals important in principle to capitalize on all the economic washing that russia has done to belarus is already a new horror story for the european union and a long horror story for nato, so i think that as of this year, there is no answer to this question, the probability is actually, unfortunately, very high on the part of e-e, there is very high confidence that nuclear weapons can be placed on the territory of belarus, then there is one more question . and why are these nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus for putin if he has nuclear weapons on the territory of the kaliningrad region, which is such an enclave within independent europe

i overthrew lukashenka and recently published a book in moscow in minsk.ith such a name, you did not dare to publish in this literary business, the speed of acceptance is very important. decisions are, of course, private moscow publishing house despite the fact that this is the publishing house of the writers' union of russia, of course, it works much faster. i was very quickly edited everything, corrected it, and put it into print with them. eh, hmm, there was just a window for this seal. eh, i didn’t know, but it turns out that everything on the belarusian market is scheduled for the year ahead, there is a special plan. uh, it means for the publication of publications, therefore, it's just so scandalous. you won't get in. and i wanted this book to be published as soon as possible. bye. first, i did not forget, very important details. and secondly, this is the agenda. it seems to me that after it turns 3 years, and in august it will be 3 years since these significant events of 2020. it seems to me to lose interest altogether, so i was in a hurry to note t

lukashenka was also talking about this in the market.t thing is what annoys me the most. we have already detained more than 30 accomplices. where are they from , past and present. uh, the bastards that live in our society i can’t name which commits help commit illegal acts. and even more so terrorist attacks on their own land and already

such a bandit er boyish approach to which lukashenko is pushing putin, do you think he himself lukashenkafraid uh, nato and the countries of the european union, his army is this. well, this is a comedy, they are an army, but they will certainly push him to these provocations. vladimir putin why does he go to work there ? we understand that it's all so, um, he's fueled by these characteristic statements about the fact that nato countries , specifically poland and lithuania, want to conquer belarus, and he talks about it like this in his characteristic style , um, how they uh -th axis of threats is now selected by the belarusian society because well, we understand that if you look at it like this from the point of view, well, even somehow entertainment, then it is so, it is funny, it looks like that because he incites something like that from the other side , does anyone believe it at all, well, there is probably a part of society about zombirovannoe a-a it is not very big there, but it is there, of course, but people who visit poland visit lithuania or have relatives and connections there,

it doesn't matter who will be the moderator cr-dagan or lukashenka.hough, after 2015, there is more trust in us. and in general, delve into the essence of compliance. ukraine then the minsk agreements would not have had so many deaths and devastation. yes, and the crimean issue could have been resolved, otherwise the president reminded, but we return to the truce on 20-23. the main thing is people. well, the ukrainians do not want to take weapons on the battlefield, commanders the ukrainians themselves are negotiating, the ukrainians are warning the russians, they say, today at such and such a square will arrive and vice versa, what are you talking about, people are ready and want a truce. under what conditions did lukashenka propose a truce on favorable terms and no matter how they say that everything is for the sake of russia, the president did not specify which of the parties the appeal was addressed to , vinogradov , head of the st. just believe the president insists you need to try the conditions for the violation are ironclad, that is, a complet

alyaksandr lukashenka was speaking in church the day before. you see what is being done and we need to make tremendous efforts to preserve this peace. if we do our own thing, as i say, we will keep our own business, we will do something incredible in this situation. we will save the world when everything is around bubbling noise. and many do not know, do not understand. they do not plan any long-term prospects. i don't know what will happen tomorrow. tomorrow will be all right. be sure of it. live peacefully health to you, especially your children and the church now, unfortunately, i say, even i am not the most religious person, i am at the epicenter of the policy of military confrontation. perhaps this is a horror for christianity. there is one god. and the one christ is orthodoxy , there is a church and patriarchy, people in kiev who come to church come, because they don’t in putin's temple, not in the moscow diocese and not to the russian christ, they come to god, one for all christians. this is the only important one. everything else is all

lukashenka was not afraid of such words.an their materials in 1999 , the young president of belarus flew to yugoslavia despite the actual threats of nato even under the bombardment of democratic missiles. the first was ready to support the people close to us, if only the senseless war would end. it is interesting that nato military representatives were the first to clean up belarus, not only to journalists, who arrived in serbia in hope. to bring closer the onset of peace in the country, but it is better to destroy yugoslavia the united states did not stop june 3 , 2006 montenegro was divided in 2008, kosovo was playing with fire , minsk said a unique combination of factors that developed around kosovo, the collapse of yugoslavia was an ethnic cleansing crime. against civilians can be seen as a precedent for any other situation in today's world classic - it's different after a few months, when russia is recognized. george w. bush called abkhazia and ossetia a violation of international norms. already in 2010, when it became

every time lukashenka brings him to negotiations. then they began to hold joint matches with lukashenkar on the ice in one team called tigers lukashenka putin's son kolya grew up over the years in front of both countries and he also began to play hockey with a score of 16:1. this is why that team played so badly, no? that team played well, we just played fabulous. moreover, we played two presidents in the team. in such an informal setting, i regularly discuss and difficult issues need to be, to be honest, we have a discussion going on enough. uh , energetic in general, even the island of the belarusian economy, we try from our own, after all, your main disagreements with president lukashenko regarding construction are. union of belarus and russia, how acute are these disagreements? yes, we disagree. no as strange as it may seem, in general, the russian belarusian people are so close peoples in in the full sense of the word, brotherly people in the literal sense, and at one time this division into two states was in my opinion. not only is it unreasonably harmful, and it is detrimental to

lukashenka has a brilliant political instinct. well, you can't take that away. and now his and our whole desire suggests that now the next year or two is the most important issue for us that is on our public political agenda - this is peace, the world is still the world , we won’t get involved in any way, uh, in any military operations, but this they did not rule . hallelujah tonight on assignment head of state started sudden exam for the belarusian army checking the combat readiness of one of the formations of the armed forces of belarus is exclusively planned general leadership is entrusted to the secretary of state from the security council of our country and, as alexander volfomet noted after setting the tasks for the servicemen, by calling up those liable for military service, supplying weapons, entering the training grounds to perform assignment tasks. i would like to immediately warn all kinds of fakes that will be associated, uh, with the mobilization in country does not, this check is exclusively planned . the issues of transferring exactly one of the f

lukashenka is wild for any before our belarus and the people, just don’t tear off for belarus at onceo the message of our president in a very simple and understandable way alexander grigoryevich spoke about what is happening in the world now, about how we belarusians and russians are experiencing. god forbid nuclear war , our president is the best. thank you for peace and tranquility in our country for many years to you alexander grigoriev hiv as we see social networks and the blogosphere, the signals of the first have also reached every corner of our motherland, everyone who listened emphasized something for themselves correspondents were shared by residents of the regions for me, as well as for the president. preservation of historical memory is very important. i would like to appeal to the youth to honor and respect everything that was achieved at the high cost of our grandfathers and great-grandfathers, help to improve, mass graves , and to carry out various patriotic actions, the head of state stressed. e that it is necessary to preserve family values. oh, which means a lot to me

and who besides lukashenka believes that belarus will be attacked well, yes now the second 44 nightsi will allow myself to say the word game. who, besides him and putin, has a skin that flows oto? what is even thicker than this? well , maybe their governments believe in it , well , if you take russian citizens there they can believe whatever they want, and if it concerns belarusians, no one has believed lukashenko for a long time. no, he did not carry any kind of military invasion. regarding the prospects of belarus under his leadership, people expressed their distrust openly publicly in the 20th year , and at the moment, nothing has changed therefore, all his messages are probably only to his closest associates, that part of society that is drugged by russian propaganda. well, to the security forces, in order to mobilize in some way, in addition to showing that horns have not only internal legs, but also external ones , so they must always be ready to carry out any order of this ruler but regarding lukashenka's phrase that belarus needs a full guarantee of security from brotherly ru

lukashenka told that to put sticks in the wheels of the west. it's not some newfangled. we always did, and this ended up with a belarusian who could already lead excursions around moscow , the boss went to meet with those who, for the time being, had difficulty distinguishing novoslobodskaya from the owner at the ceremony , the boss went with the air of a man who can both send far and exile lavrov for a long time with which of the newcomers you can cooperate, and to whom are they a sin in a harmful credential? hand over a note of protest among the logged in with trump cards and sent an ambassador named bashar to moscow, the ambassador of iraq dreamed that the double-headed eagle would fly off the rostrum of the chief and shit a war on the head of an american woman, not a portion of the aman ambassador looked a little poorer than the decor of the door. there, it would be clear to the garden from brunei that he graduated from the diplomatic academy not with a gold medal, but with a golden skirt he thought that if the wrong country was called honduras, then what is the righ

earlier , and then we would have really been convinced that the political decisions of president lukashenka were really right , there would not have been massive disobedience in belarus, we would not have caught it, but certainly other factors were added to the mind, which i list this is the activity of the sleepers - this is also and that means new political faces, who seemed to be presented from the authorities, were walking being in power, for example, the same tenacious, right? and, of course, our work. more precisely, the flaw in the individual services of the organization of departments that were responsible for making sure this doesn't happen. i can't shut up and it's not in my principles, er, to say that black is white or vice versa. i say, as it was at that very moment, especially this section here, especially this section about mistakes. yes , not only ideologists, but also a number of departments got a lot of people. yes, you should at least read it, because i absolutely agree that sometimes we have discussed this before. believe me, until the twentieth year, when managerial deci

i know that you know lukashenka very well, since you were the ambassador of ukraine in belarus today topics of all countries where where did you work as a diplomat and do you know the leaders of these countries what does lukashenko want in this situation i will tell you that lukashenko always voices his plans and i really spent more than one hour when i was sent i had the opportunity to communicate with him then it is you it was 2006, 2007 and later , when there was no russian aggression and he expressed a rather positive attitude towards ukraine, then he talked a lot and it was always such things that were important for ukrainian-belarusian relations and for our common border but now the situation has changed fundamentally, lukashenko finally decided for himself and provided all the infrastructure to belarus for russian aggression for putin , that 's why those times have passed. why? in order to cement one's power in belarus itself , in order for this power to last for another 5-10 years , in order to later transfer this power over time , transfer it only not in elections, but trans

, putin's decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus , and lukashenka'sttempt to act as peacemaker, how do you perceive what lukashenko says, is it worth listening to him at all and reflecting on something, or is there in principle only one person in this situation, putin? well , sit-and-pin, who obviously also fully owns the situation, what putin is doing is not for what he is doing putin well, i don't see a peacemaker here at all since lukashenko said that no one from belarus would enter ukraine , he spoke publicly and not publicly about russian days, what russian troops were there in general, that he will not allow this , they will only trade tractors in ukraine by the way, they supply the same tractors as they appear. now that’s the way it is. despite this, he is still somehow maneuvering there . it is clear that he is no peacekeeper . it is clear to me that he is finished as a political figure. and he is an enemy. he is an enemy of ukraine. he is now fully under putin. that is, he is helping putin in this war by the fact that he still has money left

lukashenka , a similar story today.y fly to sizingin because he is the master of the kremlin, he is the master of putin, he took away sovereignty. yes, he gave money for cheap natu , which is cheaper than in the world. cheap gas, which is five times cheaper than in europe. putin once sold the average price of russian gas contracts to china for $200 in the worst days before the war, in the worst days , they sold thousands of the best at $3,000 per cubic meter. now they sell $200 to china, but these bell pin when he came and took away independence, he took away russia - russia became a colony, this is the phrase he said that i am not against putin running for office, so that people support him, it looked humiliating, so all these pins determine who will run for office, but all the calls can also change their minds, you understand on the second tsin pin meets with the leader of the communist party, zyukhanov, not with united russia, he met for sisinpin, the ruling party in russia . they fly just to talk to a person who acc

i am not more interested in this nuclear rhetoric of lukashenka , because you will understand that evenacility is built there, this issue of transporting these nuclear charges will take quite a lot of time a long period of time is another question, if it will still happen, another question is why all this was announced and the proposals regarding the so-called peace plan and this story with tactical nuclear weapons, why this was announced after putin’s talks and sizenpin and lukashenka came separately to this is actually the most interesting if you will look at that plan. the peace plan , the so-called peace proposal of lukashenka to ukraine, by and large, it is very similar to what was written in the chinese plan. i just think that through the mouths of lukashenko and the chinese and the russians announced what they allegedly agreed on in moscow, this is interesting. that is, it is all a joint joint scenario agreed with china . yes, because what is happening in ukraine is destabilizing the west, because what putin is deploying or even talking about deploying nuclear tactical weapons on

lukashenka's mustache that do not fly out from under mr. and you well, i understand that you didn't watch these three hours completely and you read his speech i just read the diagonals look you see and i read carefully as they say with a red pencil that's why i don't agree with the first one so it's uh we uh i'll say that both quotes are the embodiment of messages of russian propaganda why because they have to convey to belarusians and to the whole world. well, lukashenko, in general, if you see him speaking from the position of such a great dictator to whom the whole world submits, in fact, this is not the case, and he says things that are absolutely well, they do not correspond to reality, because uh, lukashenko why is he afraid? well, he is promoting the thesis that the ukrainian counteroffensive will not be missed. by the way, he returned to the fact that negotiations are needed twice in his speech. this is a revealing fact , because russia is interested in there being no counterattack, so that russia maintains control over the occupied

putin meets lukashenka. those who see the look of the belarusian leader go together to the official photo, but it is immediately noticeable. i would like to complete the protocol formalities as soon as possible and start talking. in the hall, everything is ready for the start of the meeting, but the leader does not go there, step aside and communicate for quite a long time, only the two of them serve the protocol of both countries. approached the main doors, you can understand, by gestures and fragments of phrases, the presidents asks to change sides, so that at the entrance everyone immediately went exactly to their place. then in the afternoon there was another working lunch, and given the night negotiations. putin and lukashenko have many hours of face-to-face communication. on these two days, by chance, the footage that got into the body of the broadcast was after the end of the part of the meeting open to journalists. well, i didn’t say swear words there, firstly, the confidential nature of communicatio

to be honest, i am not interested in that lukashenka because he is not independent in what decisions being already on the territory of ukraine in february, raked in and they understand what is here and the fact is the fact, well, there is nothing to refute it, but the main as they say, the lion's share of the armed forces of belarus is not moving anywhere, they are intended to protect the lukashenko regime, when they enter ukraine , they are simply raking in, and lukashenko , god forbid, in this situation, he will lose everything that brings him in the first day dividends yes, we are talking about the mozersk plant, er, the oil refinery, are there also ammonia processing plants there, this is all in the zone of destruction of our troops, and if a belarusian soldier decides to cross our border, i think that the answer should be already an indisputable question of independence for the whole of europe, and let the whole of europe will also hear about the visit of the president of ukraine. poland turned out to be a truly fraternal country. the seven achievements of the past year are not

this is lukashenka 's statement. dolphin regarding the deployment of nuclear weapons outside the borders of the countries that possess them, that this is unacceptable, said macron and emphasized that russia must adhere to its international obligations, what lukashenko said, i agree with him, that is why it is necessary to withdraw all nuclear weapons to the americans from the five or six countries where they are located , period . destroy that's all, i hope it's not on public territory, or the wind, the clothes on the barakhovka, or that it would look like being a billionaire, that in endelbert she couldn't look like a billionaire, that she was the modest wife of a soviet employee without money, palaces at all, no private property, nothing, and russians in general remind me of such a galician cannibal . i think that these authors, well, by the way, they were from odesa, that they understood russian well in general, all these complexes that they are through petrov. they accurately described the image of the real russi

lukashenka's speech sounded unconditional and the counteroffensive of ukraine is possible, and it isis given from across the ocean. do not spare russian blood. do not regret in a word from slavic blood do not spare for the united states in the struggle to maintain global hegemony and russian and ukrainians and belarusians. in general, all the peoples of eastern europe are pure, and these are pawns in the geostrategic game they are playing a and here uh our task is a and russians and belarusians, to play e in this game, and according to their own rules, and to overcome in the fight against the cruel strong and, e, superior to us. eh, in any case, in terms of the number of indicators to the opponents. we are joined by experts in the studio, political scientist alexei belyaev and deputy sergei klishevich, we will discuss with them the theses of the message, which some are trying to turn upside down or hide certain nuances. a huge wave of publications in the wake of yesterday's message from the president, but i would suggest to focus on some of those where the topic of peace negotiations

awarded the judges of the supreme court of belarus, which turned 100 years old, and in his speech lukashenka spoke about the priority of national interests and the interests of the citizens of his country. renounced attempts to break something crumble. we are aware that we are standing on the shoulders of giants before we have done a lot in judicial construction. we went this way to improve , we did everything thoughtfully without total adoption of foreign experience that we did not need. with all our dictatorship with you in this regard out of five, two and four thousand inmates at the beginning of my presidency today, 20. 24 that's the whole dictatorship, this is a two-fold reduction in the period that we have gone through. this suggests that without excessive humanization it is somehow customary for you to say we have made a humane country and humane our justice , you know, if we talk about the dialogue platforms to which i am periodically invited there, sometimes they try to blame me for what i so i stand for the current government, because i am somewhere near the government. and in gene

in the traditionally structured and clear message of lukashenka , a special place is always assigned to the world of security , when militaristic scissors are chopping the planet more and more sharply . one must be on the alert to defend one's land and any attacks on independence. a soldier or a foreigner is not friendly. we are set to cross our border. if it follows, we will react symmetrically adequately. well, why use nuclear weapons if our fugitive banners are ahead of them, and behind them, that the first division that i said, where they have already set a goal in belarus , will go into our territory , we have enough other weapons to resist this. but, if we see that behind this lies the destruction of our country, we will apply everything that we have questions that we conducted throughout the country on the eve of the message also showed people are seriously concerned about the issue of peace and our security, which is more, which is logical against the backdrop of an unprecedented increase in military threats, if it’s blazing around, it’s hard to think about something else bel

this is the abomination that defended lukashenka, they become at a price. lukashenka's score and they are hanging portraits of putin, they are already looking at putin as their new master. these people no longer have anything sacred, neither their homeland nor any patriotic obligations. they are not belarusians, in fact they are ordinary employees of the occupation regime, so this regime was created by lukashenko. he is simply a gauleiter in this regime. putin is now showing everyone who works for lukashenka that he will not provide a better life, and lukashenko, too, when he talks about some security guarantees, he thinks that he is in this pyramid, you know, the government is kept as some there is the former first warehouse company of belarus to verdun transfer, an idiot. i have a boss there in moscow, but i manage this territory here and ensure loyalty . so, they are going to deploy strategic nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus, and they say they are preparing for this site, that is, for this may day, but eh, the belarusians somehow will they rea

what lukashenka said behind the podium was not only for belarusians, and some theses were rather not so much for us. how many? well, for whom let's start with the people of ukraine, i will explain my logic on the example of the loudest topic and message and in general the last weeks and this, of course, the peacekeeping initiative of alexander grigorievich, which was the next one, will stop, it is necessary to declare a truce without the right to move in front of the groupings troops on both sides without the right to transfer weapons and ammunition live strength and technology. and if the west, by deceit , russia is obliged to use the full power of the military-industrial complex and the army to prevent the escalation of the conflict. i understand well why in russia whose guys are dying on the battlefield, whose territories are being attacked by the armed forces of ukraine and somewhere preparing, then carrying out terrorist attacks on the order of not even kiev pineapple, the idea of ​​​​a truce with the zelensky regime was not welcomed by everyone . i understand well the logic of

in any case , lukashenka is sure of this.in said that once the mutual trade turnover increased by 12%, and reached almost thou billions of dollars. after these words, the leaders retired for dinner, but after dessert they continued the conversation. earlier , defense minister shoigu said that nato was strengthening anti-russian courses, increasing its combat readiness at the border and russia in belarus this of course leads to an escalation. in this regard, the minister of defense. he said that the belarusian military had already begun training on the operation of iskander tactical missile systems capable of carrying nuclear warheads. president of belarus alexander lukashenko again came to visit moscow. what is the essence of this step? this is yet another visit by russia's most loyal ally speaks to the very warm and friendly relations between these countries . president putin does not hide his desire to reform some semblance of the soviet union the problem is that the baltic countries are now part of nato, so it is impossibl

anything, then raising this topic once again is politically correct it is also unprofitable for lukashenka for putin, not from the point of view of foreign policy , but from the point of view, including internal, in the end , let's remember that putin and putin emphasized that the beginning of the war against ukraine was caused precisely by the expansion of nato. ok, he wanted to restrain nato, he restrained finland, now it is part of the alliance, and at the same time, now the border of nato and russia has doubled, it has become twice as long and there is no reaction from putin here , here are other questions that a-a finland's entry into nato will destroy it this is another step towards the destruction of russia's status as a superpower. let's recall the history that the conditions for finland's independence after the second world war were neutral status and not joining nato, and this was exactly what was supported and respected, including by the european states that since these are rice zones at the beginning of the soviet union, after that of the russian federation, this topic was not

president lukashenka raised the stakes at that moment. he offered to exchange honors for a piece of latin with his grief-stricken team. and thus he drove the polish ruling circles into a zutzwank stalemate . a stalemate because you were offered a polish citizen. and how much is a person with a polish passport in exchange for some representatives of the marginalized public , some of which for a quarter of a century, uh, were fed from the hands of the president. i mean palm. and, of course, the polish public thought, and it will put pressure on polish politicians. and uh lukashenka brilliantly planted them. hey, very interesting case. i will say more next monday. i am invited to the polish embassy, ​​and we will discuss this situation, therefore, in place of e, an ironic lettuce. i would think and think very seriously, but really. here is the proposal, it is m-m on the one hand sounded. perhaps jokingly, but on the other hand, all the president's words have a sacred meaning and character. he offered absolutely concrete. well, if not a roadm

in lukashenka's traditionally structured and clear message to the world of security, global securityacking, you definitely can't hide your head in the sand. one must be on the alert to defend one's land and any attacks on independence, so that one does not make friends in the boots of a foreign soldier or a foreigner. we are set to cross our border. if this follows, we will respond symmetrically adequately. well, why use nuclear weapons if our fugitive banners are ahead of them, and behind them, that the first division that i said, where ours will already go as a target in belarus territory. we have enough other weapons to counter this. but, if we see that behind this lies the destruction of the world and our security, which is more than logical against the backdrop of an unprecedented increase in military threats, if it’s hard to think about something else around , belarusians are used to the world, and it’s still great even , if for someone it has become a kind of banal reality, belarus well, maybe the only or one of the very few examples of the post-soviet space, where in the post

he riding on god now , no, i think he is trying to convince him of something , the idea is that lukashenkatrol over the situation in his own country, it is wrong, he is losing control, but he is resisting, and that is exactly why he is resisting , and they are calling him to moscow regarding the war in ukraine, do they want to raise the issue of the war in ukraine again about the allied state , the most important and question and in any case they can use him as a diplomatic mediator already went to beijing before upon his arrival, everyone called dvinkin to moscow and then this story with nuclear weapons arose, he can go somewhere else to talk about weapons so that russian politicians do not do it where they can refuse, if in this regard he is a useful person for putin, besides, this whole mess with lukashenka has to show the russians that the union railway station is being built, if not from ukraine, although you understand from belarus, because belarus is actually a mirror of what they would like to do with ukraine, in fact, putin would like to sit next to lukashenko medvedchuk drove him

putin walked lukashenka to the car.conversation was very informative about economics or security. military-industry military defense issues in the development of cooperation topics of the meeting of the supreme state council in the focus of attention to strengthening the defense capabilities of the union state. in addition , the delegations, of course, are now paying special attention to the economy in the implementation of 28 integration programs against the backdrop of the sanctions. they are already implemented by 80% a unprecedented pressure from outside further pushed the process of rapprochement within the framework of the union state. i want to welcome you all to russia in moscow. all this is close to you. not someone else's, in fact. we are here only to record the result of your work. i want to thank you for this work and express the hope that, uh, if there are any issues, hmm, still not agreed upon. although i don’t see such people, but if something arises in the course of live communication and real work, we w

that there are no friends in the world, except for brotherly peoples who should help each other lukashenka has preserved modernity has preserved modernity has preserved the russian market, the industrial heart in russia, and the order is obtained. uh, gets the chance to replace those western brands that have left the territory of russia can be replaced quite effectively and profitably for themselves. that is, in this regard, the stakes worked and now lukashenka's preservation of modernity has been preserved, modern of course. it allows us to carry out this industrial breakthrough. union state , the number of trade operations for 27 years , the cost, but also the volume of this turnover increased by more than four and a half times. how the leaders of belarus and russia puzzled western opponents the talks in moscow are discussed by experts and guests of the club editors, why did nuclear weapons already work? what are the politicians of the world doing to avoid war and who is pushing hard to escalate the red buttons or not in the spotlight? the united states enjoys the laurels of the winner,

lukashenka does not hide from his people, but speaks openly with representatives of the belarusian society about all problematic issues in belarus, a true model of unity and people of power has been built. she gives the opportunity for us to participate in the process of formation and development of our economy , to promptly discuss and solve all the urgent problems of western corporations, their problems, overproduction and financial crises. they always decided by wars, armed conflicts restarted their economies, burned debts , an excess of old products and extra people. that's why the west is so important to them milita, the business model. we belarusians do not need a war to develop their economy. we are for creation, partnership for cooperation and good neighborliness, our president calls for peace. in our eastern european region , without any preconditions, the topic of peace and security is not alien to europeans, the simple working people of europe are not interested in war. here in spain, austria, germany and poland, a procession against nato and arms stands is taking place, kiev lu

well, he understood this perfectly, i think at least six months ago, but uh, lukashenka's position isbecause of this, especially after lukashenka's visit to beijing, that is, in this case and increasing the roles and roles of belarusians in china's diplomacy, so in this case he can only try and continue to keep him close to him. that is, there are some other things there , the transit of power, which was talked about a lot in belarus, that is, about lukashenka's changes about ... the involvement of the belarusian army in this war is nothing like that, in principle , i cannot force putin now, therefore, in this case, lukashenko has a strong enough negotiating position, and he is going to just continue gluing the fools, who is doing this for many years, especially last year, this undermining of the russian propagandist fomin, who went under the pseudonym vladlenta-tarsky, is such a demonstrative undermining of him in a cafe or in a coffee shop , which belongs to prigozhin in st. petersburg, and the responsibility for this seems to have been assumed by semi-mythical eyes er, russian part

putin walked lukashenka to the car. the conversation was very informative security economics. complex military issues of defense in the development of the theme of cooperation meetings of the supreme state council in the focus of attention strengthening the defense capability of the allied states and in addition, delegations, of course, now, against the backdrop of sanctions , are paying special attention to the economy in the implementation of 28 integration programs. they have already been implemented by 80%. and unprecedented outside pressure has further pushed the process of rapprochement within the framework of the union state to welcome russia in moscow. all this is close to you, not someone else 's, in fact. we are here only to record the result of your work. i want to thank you for this work and express the hope that if there are any questions, free movement of people goods and services. and knowing such a reverent attitude of the president of russia to this topic, he called specialists in this field, visited the planar, which manufactures equipment and machines for th

because such a request from lukashenka has been heard for many years. nuclear weapons that were there at one time in the 90s, as well as in ukraine yes, they moved to russia why because in the coordinate system lukashenka as an authoritarian leader, that is, in fact in his opinion you can be noticeable when you have nuclear potential even if it is small but it's just that he probably forgets and doesn't understand that even if such tactical nuclear weapons are placed on the territory of belarus, he is unlikely to get this button with the help of which he can in some way control this button will be in the kremlin er and thus belarus belarus once again passed into reality, it is even difficult to say in the current conditions, because it will be an additional bridgehead for russian paramilitary formations that will serve or, for example, optically nuclear weapons, and this means that there is more danger in the context of the deterioration of relations eh the maximum between there nato countries and already there russia in belarus p farant thank you for your time bohdan ferentz candidat

well, such a phrase was sounded by lukashenka. what guarantees can the americans give, but the americans can give guarantees that at least two or three or four or maybe even five or six years, therefore, they will roll eggs. this fantastic event is one of my favorites of the year. i 'm wondering mr. president, will you take part in the easter skating after 2024, but i plan to take part in at least three or four skating eggs, at least three or four, maybe five in five, maybe six, what the hell i don't know. you say that you plan to participate in the upcoming 2024 elections. you know i'll either roll the balls or be you know the guy who pushes them. help the guy. tell me some news. i'm about to balance, but i'm not ready to announce it yet. the guy who pushes the balls understand why it 's sorry, that is, and come to this person for any guarantees of safety. yes he at this moment, it may be, either to roll eggs, or to be there a guy who is pushed out, therefore it is not surprising that in the usa now with the doctrine of controlle

, because, well, russia now has no reasons for which i would be free to consult with lukashenka, who depend on 50% of the money there. last year's sociological survey of the british analytical center, is there chaos, shows that more than 80% of belarusians are against the placement of foreign nuclear weapons on the territory of the state , understanding what it can lead to. well , nuclear weapons are the installation of his regime , which is now even more closely intertwined with putin's regime, but for belarus, this can be called a nuclear hostage-taking, which now endangers the entire belarusian society so having received russian nuclear weapons on its territory, belarus actually becomes a target. in a potential confrontation between russia and nato , one of the first targets for strikes is now one of the first targets for strikes . it is they who will bring personal responsibility for the excavation , that is, russia is speaking from them, she will say that it is us , it is they, in the near future, this will at least threaten with the next sanctions against minsk, which have alre

therefore, it is actually a very sad situation , sad because behind lukashenka will be putin , and putinell, i do not fully share the well-known opinion of yuri feldshtynsky that there will definitely be an attack from the territory of belarus on poland and lithuania . a world war is not possible, that's why ukraine should intensify now, without waiting for july. i hope that these negotiations will be intensified in poland and volodymyr zelenskyi and duda may be invited to the seat of the president of lithuania for that to talk about it and say that guys, we have to act now and the ukrainian authorities should not wait for lukashenko to return to business as usual and should create the conditions for lukashenko to be the object of pressure and for this we need to talk to belarusian democratic forces of various i emphasize, i don't name names, it's a variety 15 seconds therefore , you need to be ready for different manifestations from this person that's all, and this is really mr. yevhen , one last question, but literally in your style, as you know how. please tell me describe, in your op

and we know that lukashenka just doesn't talk about anything so easily.is also a reason for our neighbors to think. let's say. so belarus is a real hysteria. the west is what the states and the company could survive from themselves, when it came to nuclear weapons , although in our case, this is a guarantee of the country's security of our sovereignty, let's say that europe is literally crammed with such types of weapons, and how opponents are trying to replay the news reason a reason to think and understand what immediate goals were pursued, for example, by warsaw or kiev . so, the significance of the nuclear modernization of our defensive shield is certainly great, not a single country that possessed or was, let's say, a custodian. the owner of nuclear weapons, no country has been subjected to aggression in the entire history. uh-huh this is the first very important point, secondly, let's look at our respected burghers, yes germany at 21. there has been a very strong anti-war movement aimed at withdrawing all nuclear weapons by 21 of the year all nuclea