three years after lukashenka could have been overthrown in belarus, but he did not give it. three years later, putin needs belarus as a dependent state as a training ground for the russian military, or is it still possible? putin is looking at belarus there and thinking that at some point it will join great russia , or is it possible for you to have some kind of option? well, you know, i can’t look through putin ’s eyes. very consistently, back in the 20s, in the early 2000s, he stated that he would like to see russia in the belarusian stage with six provinces, even without the status of a crooked republic, and then, when he was preparing for an attack on ukraine, he also used belarus if there was no such opportunity. would he probably didn't go to kyiv so that he didn't have such an opportunity. well, we continue to see that he ties and ties in his plans, there was probably some kind of revival of the empire. it's clear that he didn't see it without belarus, eh, but you see , let's say it is not so easy to restore the soviet union or the russian empire as he wants, these ar

not do to putin, lukashenko will scream that it was done by ukrainians or poles, i was fat for lukashenka is a special trauma for ukraine because, in fact , the national belarusian military units that are now defending ukraine as part of the armed forces promise to return to belarus. for him, it is simply a disaster because the belarusian opposition, in addition to these three military units that are on the territory of ukraine, ethnic belarusians, they have built a system of sports clubs in europe and they are already several well , somewhere, a few tens of thousands of young people are preparing military and sportsmen of this style for the possibility of gaining power in that's why belarusians scare lukashenka with this, he is really now pathologically dependent on putin, although he still has another lozivka - china and he is in the chinese hierarchy, he is a more valuable cadre than putin, i want to say that russia is not china - this is only transit. and the sales market, and the belarusian one, what is its opportunity to export some groups of goods at chinese prices to europe? well,

i don't want to elaborate on lukashenka. as i already said, what lukashenka says is more cunning in putin's mouth, or what is on lukashenko's tongue and what is on putin's mind, but regarding these statements that if you do not sit down at the negotiating table now, putin will grind you down and there will be a part of ukraine it is not known what in n- it is still unknown how it will be perceived as well or another psu russian simply in the use of a vip-agitator with belarus that is p sergey, dear viewers, i think that you have noticed that a-a in the last week somewhere around er-e about one and a half dozen news such emissions were at different levels in different regions of the planet earth, on different continents, in different states with the idea of ​​peace, and from such absurd ones that were attributed to the head of the staff of the secretary general of nato to those in quotation marks of genius that always keep us and you in the dictator of belarus lukashenko is happy with his feet, all this belongs to the next wave carried out by moscow, and the essence of the information attack

this is the end of lukashenka's quote.more, grigoryovych also told journalists about this last week on friday, which it turns out he did not give guarantees of prigozhin's safety, when i tried to convince him to stop his trip to moscow and did not allow, did not invite them . to do this, i went to the territory of belarus, i shopped on the internet, it was very easy to do, just a few months ago, look at the telegram channel, which is linked to self-proclaimed oleksandr lukashenko and there on june 27. here's what oleksandr lukashenko said about what he is, that is, now on friday, he said that he did not give a security guarantee , beauty, listen to what he said on june 27 , listen, i said, i'm coming. well, this is a guarantee what's next, i'm telling someone that i'll take you to belarus, i'm guaranteeing full safety for your guys who have advanced here with this column. yes, i believe you. i believe we 'll do well in this direction. when he saw this, that is, on the one hand , a person who calls himself the president of

war crimes, along with russia itself , that's why considering how much oil refining is key for lukashenkahas two oil refineries and a belarusian t2 company that they really feed him, well, they allow him to receive this entire apparatus, everything else is unprofitable, you can imagine when ukrainian politicians are slapping the devil here, but how fair is belarus and the lukashenko regime, all of them , i want to provide that 70% of the economy in belarus is controlled by the lukashenka regime, all state enterprises are unprofitable except for three two oil refineries and er belarus , but for lukashenka these are such important plants, he is studying them. by the way , ukrainian intelligence has warned several times so not directly that, god forbid, there will be strikes on the territory of ukraine from the territory of belarus, er, the mozol plant will fly, so er, i think that er, lukashenka was simply confused by putin in such a er network of dependencies that if he did not do to putin, lukashenko would scream that ukrainians or poles did it, i was fat for lukashenka - this is a specia

three years after lukashenka could have been overthrown in belarus , but he did not give it. later, putin needs belarus as a state dependent on him as a training ground for russian of the military, is it possible that putin is looking at belarus there and is thinking that at some point it will join great russia , is it possible that you have some option? well, you know, i can’t look through putin’s eyes. i don’t know, you don’t know what’s in his head but also his policy towards belarus is very consistent, he once declared in the early 2000s that he would like to see in the belarusian stage russia with six provinces, even without the status of a crooked republic, and then he made preparations for an attack on ukraine he also used belarus, if there was no such opportunity, he would certainly not have gone to kyiv if he had not had such an opportunity. well , we continue to see that he ties and ties in his plans, it was probably like some kind of revival of the empire, it is clear that he did not i saw it without belarus, but you see, let’s say it is not so easy to restore the

well, before moving on to advertising, which must be on television, a little more about lukashenka, yescould not do this, the self-proclaimed president of belarus, alexander lukashenko, commented on the history and downing of the private plane of the founder of the private military campaign, wagner yevgenia prigozhina , he emphasized that the president of the erefiya, vladimir putin, is a prudent and very calm person , and then the quote is self-proclaimed. i can't even assume that he did it putin and what is putin's fault? lukashenko continues too rough, too unprofessional work for that matter. this is the end of lukashenko's quote. told the journalists that it was last week on friday that it turns out that he did not give security guarantees to prigozhyn. and when i tried to convince him to stop his trip to moscow and did not allow it, he did not invite them. for this purpose , i went to the territory of belarus to shop on the internet, it was very easy to do, just - just a few months ago , look at the telegram channel that is associated with the self-proclaimed oleksandr lukashenko a

experts, solidarity lukashenka talks. we need it without any conditions, whether there are narratives with the message not to kill in the western coordinate system. the big question is that the west does not like the prospect of a multipolar world so much that the bank gave the order to try on a balaclava. terrorist cells and erase the ukrainian gene pool, and the states in the person of glinkin and co. look at it as a big show, but you can’t feed it, biden’s electorate, the postulate of bread and circuses. there may not be the first element of questions where do taxes go ? there are too many yuan for everything. there is no green paper here, turning countries to their side. stopping the de-dalarization of latin america, for example, is no longer possible with you maksim ugolinitsa. and polina shuba look on the main broadcast. in the dialogue, the red line is negotiations about what ukraine will be if we postpone the world of interviews of the first in the trends was disassembled into quotes, they rub their hands , pushin

we are with lukashenka or lukashenka, e-e gave an interview to the russian propagandist diana panchenko, who once worked in the medvedchuk field, but how she was still remains a russian propagandist gave a staged interview, i won't tell you everything, the only thing i will say is that lukashenko said that ukraine may lose all its territories if it continues to enter hostilities, and to put it simply, the self-proclaimed president of the republic of belarus offers zelenskiy and the ukrainians to surrender. let's hear it what lukashenko said, because usually what is on lukashenko's tongue is what is on putin's mind. they will grind you here and then do what the leadership fears most. they will cut you off to moldova and transnistria. you will be cut off, what will you do later, but here they cut you, this piece will remain if it remains, this is what will happen to you, and the state like ukraine, our state will not be the native land of yours , and the history of mine is already that you will not stop now это будет если сейчас вы сейчасте вы сейчать на геговоровов Россия проеведь you do

experts, solidarity lukashenka talks. it is necessary without any conditions whether there are narratives in the western system of coordinates with the message not to kill the big question; the prospect of a multipolar world is so disliked by the west that the bank gave the command to try on a terrorist cell balaclava and erase the ukrainian gene pool, and the states represented by glinkin and co. they look at it as a big show, but you can’t feed the biden electorate in the postulate of bread and circuses. there may not be the first element of questions where do taxes go ? there are too many yuan for everything. there is no green paper here, turning countries to their side. stopping the de-dalarization of latin america, for example, is no longer possible with you maksim ugolinitsa. and polina shuba look on the main broadcast. in the dialogue , the red line is negotiations about what will be ukraine if the world is postponed. americans, they will cut off the west from you, you will be left with this piece, if kiev has no v

here is the whole answer to the question why lukashenka at all. for the west, these are simple words, no provocation , but if you respond to a nuclear strike , you will not be able to avoid it, i will initiate it myself. lack of income, they say, the number of mercenaries is decreasing, and from now on, well, this is official information from the national resistance center, but then , vitaly, our thesis with you is that there will be provocations . maybe they have already canceled their intentions , this is already a dynamic situation, it changes if they really hesitate will leave belarus, it will be possible to bend calmly this does not mean that there will be no provocations at all well, there were no provocations at the border with the participation of migrants, it’s just that they will be provocations by another headquarters. and everything is also absolutely probable. i also want to talk to you about the aggravation of ukrainian-israeli relations. ukraine proposes to exclude israel altogether from the ramshtei and cancel the visa-free regime between the two countries, supposedly

and so what lukashenka said, it turns out that we can do everything.e went through the most difficult when they offered me not to do my own, we don’t need to buy from her in germany our woodlands, and there were those very combines bought in germany. class every combiner. each machine operator, the head of the collective farm of the district and region, any official today will definitely say, especially to the president, that the gomselmash combine is no worse than the german class, but by this we mean how i lived and mercedes, the combination of quality, price and cost of ownership in this case gomselmashn. the truth is better, but if for some reason close your eyes to prices and cost of ownership , the class is better than gomselmash. it's stupid to deny it. with all my love for domestic combines. if there were no classes, it would be better if enterprises would not buy them with their earned money. we have in the union state. two brands of harvesters, these are gomselmash and rostselmash, they once started from a very low level. it is too obviously

here is the whole answer to the question why lukashenka at all.is saying this , he is not saying this for the belarusians, he is saying this for the west, these are simple words, we can do no a provocation, but if you respond to a nuclear attack, you cannot avoid it , i will initiate it myself. that's all. by the way, the center of national resistance writes that pvt. wagner is leaving belarus due to lack of income. national resistance, but then vitaly, our thesis with you is that there will be provocations. perhaps they have already canceled their intentions, the dynamic situation is changing , if they hesitate, they can really leave belarus. will bend calmly this does not mean that there will be no provocations at all well, there were no quarrels, there were provocations at the border with the participation of migrants, it’s just that they will be provocations from another headquarters. so everything is also absolutely likely, and i also want to talk with you about the aggravation of ukrainian-israeli relations. ukraine proposes to exclude israe

this is what lukashenka tried to find out, andrei ivanets did not directly attack andrei king, although situation clearly favored this, and the president thought about it and asked the audience for the second time. maybe someone wants to speak. the second time everyone was silent. i encourage you in such a frank conversation. e. well, i hope if you are real, then you are frankly calm. express your opinions, wishes for critical remarks , there were no questions, perhaps for another reason, when alexander lukashenko brought a devastating report on bsu, then the first decision of the president. belarusian state university had nothing to do with the logic of the head of state. i think it was. if they say that this university is bad. let's check how well everyone else and checked individual rectors soil on their laurels, delegating their managerial functions to a deputy who is engaged in journalism , performs exclusively representative functions, if there are problems with bsu - firstly, i communicate with bsu students yes, there is a problem, except that when i studied at bsu and graduated

old man president of his people from the country says it all to the point for all 100 lukashenka titanf politics , you need to listen to what he says. like it or not, but there are a lot of facts from his mouth. i am russian. my heart hurts on both sides. and i am ukrainian and my soul hurts for both sides. everyone must understand that this is the murder of the slavic people. that's all, you're right, dad, as they look at dad everywhere. if only our dad would stay with us longer. god grant him health experts key message noted by journalists and political scientists more for the settlement of the ukrainian conflict than all the western politicians of the total lukashenka in the fourteenth year followed the events of mediators for the purpose of regulation, because i think in many ways for him ukraine is an urban country, like russia, so he would not want this conflict to continue. why the west does not like it, the role of not a negotiator. lukashenka yes , because they are simply against the negotiations themselves , they are for the continuation of the conflict, therefore they do not

that is, this is a testimony that essentially makes lukashenka's guilt indisputable. putin is playing on this because, well , putin needs to preserve the quasi-statehood of belarus, because after all, belarus is one of the founders of the un along with ukraine. let's say lukashenka was recorded in such a way that he can't even bring anything against putin. the whole history of his advocacy in relation to this wagner pvk finally cemented him as a co-defendant for the crimes of self-incrimination here. because lukashenko doesn't even exist. well, let's put it this way, resistance against the concentration of the russian military on the territory of belarus. i myself saw in the kyiv region, for example , an armored personnel carrier in white camouflage. already in march, it was clear that the equipment that was killed by the ukrainian military was replaced by the aggressor. belarusian technique, which without even repainting it, therefore , it can be said that it looks like this chain of provocation is connected with the fact that lukashenko is essentially immobilized pe

, and sometimes, on the contrary, someone seems to show off where it doesn’t exist, on thursday lukashenkaad lunch with combiners. let's see treat two spoons. well, in general, it's okay. well, nothing guys, thank you really, soup is good, when i was little, then in the village of vmyatilsky district. grandfather and grandmother took me to the field to show how small round harvesters work in the field, of course, they fed me and i still remember how tasty and plentiful it was. i couldn’t understand at all how one person could eat so much of his pre-pool era of journalism. i made reports from the harvest, where already young, the tour was also fed. in the same way, very tasty and a lot and in both of these cases the president or just an official was not around. that is, it was not a show. so someone's sarcasm they say they were fed like that, because lukashenka's sarcasm is also incapacitated. though probably a cook. they tried very hard, but i don’t see any crime in the field in this, they say combiners go out somewhere at 9:00 in the morning, but the day before and at night the field was

, lukashenka gave an interview to a girl who he himself called ukrainian , it must have been unpleasanter, because she always emphasized that she may be ukrainian by nationality, but spiritually she is russian , and he said a lot of interesting things about these propagandists, in particular my question to you, mr. yura, is if you were to receive a call from the presidential administration or the ministry from the ministry of foreign affairs of ukraine and ask: lukashenka says that he wants to participate in the negotiations between ukraine and the russian federation regarding peaceful negotiations, because we are co-aggressors, he said to this girl, the question of taking him to these negotiations is if you strain your imagination and imagine that such negotiations will begin one day , and then and there lukashenka will be standing somewhere behind the door saying take me too also a co-perpetrator, should lukashenko be considered in any capacity at all in any possible negotiations, look and i would look at it differently, i took into account the interview of some girl and i took into a

poland and lithuania are preparing for provocations by the mercenaries of the wagner fc, whom the lukashenka regime gave shelter in belarus without opposition with the russian military with russian weapons, is europe threatened by a new hybrid war, this time from belarus in various european countries in these days of solidarity actions with belarusians to the anniversary of the mass protests against the falsification of the results of the presidential elections three years ago , svitlana tykhanovskaya spoke at a large-scale rally in warsaw, who is believed to won those elections, however, the belarusian authorities declared the winner of the long-term ruler of the country, oleksandr lukashenko, the regime brutally suppressed protests about this a little later, and first about the actions of the belarusian opponents of the natalka goncharova regime , the people are so free, they can go out on the streets of warsaw, not minsk, because it is a pain, because because we are here we are not in our homeland but there and there is a concentration camp august 16, 2020, a week after the presidential e

later the president will say something of such a public format dissuaded, but few will dissuade lukashenkae has a clear plan and motive to figure it out, and now the head of state arrives and outlines the essence of his visit, the government carried away the radical proposal. although it is yet to emphasize the display of the offer of dismissal. he does not agree that not everything is perfect at bsu and it is far from the first day that various information has come to me and about the processes taking place recently at the university they are alarming me, especially since i remember the twenties, where you showed yourself brilliant after alyaksandr lukashenka gave a water speech to the minister of education, although frankly speaking the plan of this meeting. and each meeting has a plan drawn up was different, but the president managed the process. minister in manual mode. andrey ivanets, it seems, criticized bsu, but on the other hand, he emphasized the successes, the universities of which are also quite a lot from that, after his report, the head of state could not get a clear answer, h

well, we do not recognize lukashenka himself since his pseudo-election, but what is holding us back,n the event of a break in diplomatic relations , what can we lose? of the large-scale invasion, we had diplomatic relations with the russian federation, and representatives of the authorities explained to us that there was no need to break diplomatic relations, because then we would not be able to protect the rights and interests of the ukrainian natural persons and legal entities, although this was absolutely untrue, because diplomats can only use the legal field of ukraine, which institutions are there in order to protect some interests. but russia is not a legal democratic state, and accordingly, our consul diplomacy could not protect the interests of our cooperation you perfectly remember how they did not allow all our consuls to access the rights of the kremlin, this was a big problem , this is the first, second point, until we can be invested, they said that the break in diplomatic relations relations means that access to the this is a very strange situation. why do we need, well

lukashenka said that putin was worried. for all events, i am sure that this is the way it is.was not the warriors, if another, vladimir, also experienced. here is my first conversation, when zelensky spoke on the phone the first days of the war. we talked with him for a long time, he was dusting there, he was dusting something. i say, you know, we all would not argue on the phone, but remember the war in your state. not today, tomorrow they will ask you, why is it going on in your land your nations, to understand the situation, it is worth adding that another vladimir is already inside russia. of course, there are those who criticize him for the deaths of people in ukraine, but there would be even more critics . had it not started with a war in his country and he would have been responsible for it, and this dramatically increases the likelihood of the biggest problem. both for russia and for any post-soviet country , it is customary to say that in russia there are two troubles, this fools are expensive in politics. i think two the main troubles in russia are the following is t

lukashenka simply does not care.done belaya rus, who is comfortable with the option for a boss. yes , but the whole belarusian society is correct. today, this objectively questions have been consolidated. swipe around the leader, because first he provided peace in our land. second in period. such here a-a. a serious geopolitical rift, and conversations provide our viewers with such i didn't get the impression that we now have political parties. we have included yes in the constitution and they are the only ones who will shape the political trip in the country and everything will be signed by the political platforms of the political parties. i would like to draw your attention to the fact that the vns is just the body above, it is represented by the body of people's power, which forms strategic directions and implements the strategic directions for the development of the state society in the medium and long term and adopts policy documents. yes, the basics, but domestic and foreign policy , the concept of national sec

she communicated with lukashenka. lukashenko doesn't give interviews to anyone, as we all know.s people whom he trusts, and apparently this person is the one he trusts. lukashenko wants to participate in the negotiations between ukraine and russia , because he is a co-aggressor in this case, as he said on the other hand, russia will never return the crimea to ukraine. this is what he also said to ms. diana he said a lot, but what is interesting in general, it seems to me that more and more people like putin lukashenko are the servants of putin and lug or lukashenko , psychiatrists should be invited together with journalists because mr. lukashenko well, he is such a bright uncle in this sense, he he lies all the time and it seems to me that he just needs to sleep with a psychiatrist, he forgets what he said yesterday or does he remember what he said yesterday green and today he says white and the day after tomorrow yellow and after three days another one and this is so to speak and to the extent that he hears he is like that, at the same time, his eyes are honest, what is the imp

also obvious in gomel at the request of alexander lukashenka at the time.took the difficult path of developing our own production base. for each technique there is what is called the level of localization. this is the percentage of its parts and assemblies, in general, the volume of creating your own prototype before being introduced into mass production is hard. it's expensive and long. this is definitely associated with some failures, breakdowns of its new parts and failure of the entire combine, but step by step, year after year, our combine became and becomes better, and its internals became and becomes more and more ours, and not imported in rostov-on-don. no offense, as in many other industries in russia. why, they went the other way, contracts are made for a lot of money by foreign suppliers of components and assemblies ; . better, but there is a nuance , it is that after the imposition of sanctions, imports were cut off and rostselmash became, and now they have two long and difficult paths, the one by which gomuselmash has been developing its own pr

i will support lukashenka in many issues. voter coming to the so electoral supporting lukashenka does not mean that everyone will vote only for belarus or only for the communists or only for the tcp he will speak, so i am for the president, but i like the program of the communists. i like the white russia program. that's what i invented. we must correctly and competently conduct an electoral campaign and approach the twenty -fifth day to form people's opinions no longer just there in a week, which is during the period and before the campaign, that is, the practical work of our work through various forums of the world. this is all the same position one gets the feeling that we will have only political representatives in deputies, in fact. so, how is our system, will it change or not? we have a non-partisan can in the deputies. damn, i'm just saying it right, yes, because in fact it turns out that we have four parties now practically from them and choose. who do we have. maybe according to the new law, of course, the fact is th

i will support lukashenka in many issues.oter, coming to the polling station, supporting lukashenka, does not mean that everyone will vote only for belarus, not only for the communists. or only from the russian orthodox church, he will say so i am for the president, but i like the program of the communists. i like the program of belarus i invented this we must correctly and competently conduct an electoral campaign and approach the twenty -fifth number to form people’s opinions no longer just there in a week, which is during the period and before the campaign, that is, by practical work through various forums of statements from the world. this is also a position. there is a feeling that we will have only political representatives of the party in our deputies. in fact, they agree. here is how our system is built there, will it change or not? we have a non-partisan can in the deputies. damn why am i just talking about this and i say yes, because in fact it turns out that we have four parties. now practically from them and to ch

about diana kupanchenko, we actually talked about it in our clip pornhub and this is about lukashenkain the light of the new term, because it was the proclaimed dictator who said we are co-aggressors, what is this new international term, and what should be behind it when there is an aggressor , then there is the hague tribunal. now, let's give some kind of assessment to lukashenko, but in principle, i did not watch this interview in its entirety, but some fragments caught my eye, so i think that this is a tool, so to speak, which is once again thrown at lukashenka in reliable space in the political discourse not only in western countries, but also in countries of a different geography, the issue that russia is pushing, i.e. yes to consultations, the search for some kind of situational alliances in order to argue and convince the western countries of the united states of america that, in other words, on the conditions, so to speak , lay aggression. actually , lukashenko tried to say about it in such a veiled way that he said, well, i understand certain patterns to be put into a somewha

will be able to betray putin if he is subject to the first er-e, there was no independence in lukashenka'sns, there is none, and in principle there will be none. and now it is necessary to divide him and the actual troops, the infrastructure, the state system, and so on, it is completely autonomously subordinated to moscow , let's say the troops are managed by the general staff of the russian federation, the security system manages the fsb, in fact, to this day, if you look at the agreements within the state of the republic of belarus , the republic of belarus, the russian federation, then there is one center in them, this is moscow. next what it is also necessary to understand that even the military doctrine absolutely clearly states that the management of these security spheres is located in moscow; moreover, if you touch on the issue of finances, taxes, tax collection, let’s say value added tax, then this is exactly how everything is collected in moscow and then distributed within the framework of the so -called cast union, see to talk about the fact that lukashenko has the right to som

china is our second trading partner after russia and military-political cooperation alexander lukashenka emphasized her views on the world order. the prc of belarus completely coincides and the countries demonstrate. this has been going on for three decades. yes, and a lantern, we are absolutely supporters of a multipolar world. we are absolutely supporters of the territorial integrity and unity of the territory's borders established after the second world war. we are for non-interference in the internal affairs of states with the word sata palette, on which china's foreign policy activities inherent in our leadership are based. you should know that we always. again for over, we have supported china in all its aspirations for more than 30 years, because we consider the internal foreign policy of the people's republic of china absolutely fair, aimed at the peaceful resolution of all disputes and conflicts, but, unfortunately, the world is not our fault. today is absolutely unstable , powerful turbulent events are taking place in the world. and we have to be strong, because it so happened

what is the role of lukashenka in the whole process? what is his role? he influence now or does he think that lukashenka under goethe is putin's puppet? ah, and that's what we understand. his role is to fulfill the tasks that putin gives him . what are you? got involved in the process of uh-uh kapsupenit campaign of beautiful moscow not because he wanted to help putin but because he was helping himself because they both swim in the same boat together and when dirka is in the same boat , both putin and lukashenko drown he was offering guarantees from putin's estate for the beauty, but the peragan for the shaft obliged him more than putin allowed him, or he began to walk on the only field of russia when he began to say that only thanks to his pirogovnym with skills, it was possible to stop wagner with the campaign to moscow and the russian public began to react to goethe positively and the rating of lukashenko among russians in russia, the expression putin of course noticed it and for a month refused to communicate with lukashenko, but only recently did he

due to the fact that they seem to be against the head of state against lukashenka, but the same factoryring, this is the reason why i am angry. i'm angry that i'm not sorry i have to be careful. i'm still alive france uh and france ain't that good country now so i also have to be careful. if this comment gets on the internet, i need to i might be in trouble. so i have to be careful, but you know that i also know about the political situation in belarus and i chose to come. i need france to give me permission. but this is definitely not done for the benefit of people, and in the course, of course, no. this cannot be. i think a world in which we have sixty years of experience e sanctions for the benefit of the people, and we have seen we see the result and in in europe, after all, those who may have been are also suffering from the sanctions. eh, i don’t know who worked with him in components or who was waiting for this or that car, this or that equipment. that's it, because belarusian products are tied up like that, they don't come to belarusian technics today, uh, kalina fertilizers, be

while belarus is in the hands of lukashenka with the support of putin, it still threatens ukraine and europe. poland and lithuania moved additional military units to the border with the country andriy boris voice of america tent city to accommodate about 1,000 fighters of the wagner pvk, my colleague yuliya yarmolenko had the opportunity to talk with the deputy head of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, the head of the people's anti-crisis administration pavlo latushko about the threat of the location of the wagnerites in belarus, in particular near the border with ukraine, mr. pavlo, first of all, about information about the center of national resistance that a camp for wagner fighters is being created on the border with ukraine for thousands of fighters, what is known about the details of these actions and how threatening such and such a group and such information can be today, we see that wagner's mercenaries are located in different parts of belarus, first of all, this is a camp that was created in the mogilev region, in the osipov region, in the same area they were seen

uh, there is more, maybe even a technical implementation of these agreements, what is in it for lukashenkan fact, well, we perfectly understand that practically from at the very beginning of russia's full-scale war against ukraine, when the russians strategically poured everything in there and what i did in three days. even those 197,000 groups that they gathered on our borders were no longer enough, before the very beginning of this military operation of theirs . of the belarusian army and gave the order that the belarusian army also take part in this so-called his well, and we have been watching for more than a year, even and we continue to watch how lukashenko tries to sit on this tightrope, yes, that is, he perfectly understands that his the decision to send the belarusian army to war in ukraine will mean the political end of lukashenka himself inside belarus, and we saw how he tried to get out of this situation, he constantly talked about and continues to talk about the threat from nato. at the last meeting, when he came to putin , he also said that he had brought some maps, the duty

, to what extent will the power structures of the republic of belarus be ready to protect lukashenkand if there are contracts, the army , if there is a national guard, if there is a kgb, it is possible to balance between these structures. well, in principle, it is absolutely logical. from the investigators that the middle son of lukashenka, dmytro , is involved in the deportation of ukrainian children and the adoption of illegals directly on the territory of... specifically to ap vitaly, can there be a real punishment for at least the lukashenko family, or do they also have immunity if they open proceedings against dmytro lukashenko and they don't happen abroad, eh, how is this authorization of the child's affairs well, if there is some order of arrest against him well, he is not will travel to which country they can familiarize themselves with the russian er, there are children of these officials and president putin himself, they are still abroad, and the belarusians are in the same closed environment as lukashenko. well, of course, that is not everyone has international sanctions f

lukashenka says that he will not make such a decision, but the president speaks about this again fromcials know that the head of state. against all the same, they propose. consequently , the stereotype imposed by the media experience is crumbling that everyone in the state administration is afraid to say something across the father, they offer only what he wants to hear. no, it's not. and alexander grigoryevich can and wants to hear the second counter opinion and alternative point of view, and if someone has a point of view different from the position of the president, but to the president, he doesn’t say it, but nods and agrees, then the problem is not with lukashenka. but this official on friday is already the ex-minister of agriculture and food. igor bryullov went to vitebsk as an assistant to the president, an inspector for the region. what was known even after that very conference call, if you perceive this as a link, here are your problems. you need to go through this stage. and if you hold on tight there, then the result will be for you personally will be a very useful result w

stop the war lukashenka is really a genius, the best ruler after the collapse of the ussr , the dad said not in an eyebrow, but in the eye it all started with the plundering of ukraine by lukashenka correctly. he says that the country should be built on human relations on the honesty of justice people. the most important most valuable concept interview is important for the west and the us gdp of belarus continues to grow , the ministry of economy said today, commenting on the results of the economy for 7 months in january july, gdp growth accelerated 102.9%. the main drivers of growth are retail trade, construction, agriculture. and, of course, industry. it scored the highest growth rate among the eu countries. as for agriculture, good indicators are associated, including with the outstripping pace of harvesting, which is important to grow and the real incomes of the population can already be said that not the growth of real incomes has just recovered, and it has already reached a certain sustainable pace. uh, that's almost 4%, uh, real disposable income. there is a salary to take wages

we don’t think that lukashenka is also the reason why i am, but the masses are also patronizing theselarusians. er, well, at first, for sure, faced with these sanctions. they could worry about their future, no one cared. this is in europe, here is your attitude to sanctions. due to the fact that they seem to be introduced against the head of state against lukashenka, but all the same workers suffer factories constructors these merman is the reason i'm angry. i'm evil, what's my they? sorry, i have to be careful. i still live in ah and france is not a very good country now so i also have to be careful. if this comment gets on the internet, i need to i might be in trouble. so i have to be careful, but you know that i also know about the political situation in belarus and i chose to come. i need france to give me permission. but it's definitely not good for people. is done, but in the course, of course, no. this cannot be. i think a world in which we have sixty years of experience of sanctions for the benefit of people, and we have seen the result, and in europe, those who may have been

lukashenka yesterday's conversation was no exception. it possible to avoid the war in ukraine, is it really possible to stop the bloodshed right now, this conversation is worth watching the tv version is available on the youtube channel of the agency or news, but ilona did not look at the reaction. the old man said, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye it all started with the plundering of ukraine, if there was such a president in ukraine as the old man, then imagine what strength the slavs would have alexander grigorievich how right you are in everything. we all need a world of prosperity and independence, and not be toys in raking paws of western puppeteers, ukrainians hear our dad. stop playing along with your worthless authorities and help them fill their money bags at your expense. stop the war. this is how netizens express themselves emotionally about the interview of our president with a ukrainian journalist posted on the youtube channel. panchenko got more than 600,000 views in just a couple of hours. lukashenka is right in saying

putin and is there any moment lukashenko will be able to betray putin if he obeys the first er, lukashenkad no independence in his actions and in principle will not . subordinated to the autonomous regime in moscow , let's say, the troops are managed by the general staff of the russian federation, the security system is managed by the fsb, in fact, to date, if you look at the a-a agreements within the state , the republic of belarus is a common state the republic of belarus, the russian federation, they have one center , this is moscow. next, what must also be understood, even the military doctrine absolutely clearly states that the management of these security spheres is in moscow; moreover, if you touch on the issue of finances, taxes, tax collection, let's say value added taxes, then this is exactly the case everything is gathered in moscow and then distributed within the framework of the so-called cast union, see talk about the fact that lukashenko has the right to some independence . but the situation he is in, he cannot take a single step without getting a team or agreeing it with th

, what the representative said of china and these peace-keeping e-e lavras hung up on oleksandr lukashenkath russia and belarus are still actively supported by china, particularly china's minister of defense, and they feel their impunity because behind them great china, is it so recently comrade gerasim came to the front line to inspect his red army eh and it didn’t give him anything then there were another defeat eh russians another retreat er chvk russia and a proxy and such a short-sighted er belarus it is interesting to watch how the evasive lukashenko looks at the minister of defense of china, he does not even look at putin like that, it is flattering, it is also very symbolic, very symbolic, but it also seems to me that china already realized that he lost at least maybe he didn't lose the chance but he lost the moment, suddenly the chinese feel horrified that the majority of his army, which is based on soviet technology, is not capable of defeating the west, that all those ephemeral things she told about millions of people they can send a million chinese and but this will not break t

well, alaverda from lukashenka , the minister of defense of china, put it in such a way that strengthways respected in our policy. we are based on a strong economy, powerful diplomacy, and i am very i am grateful to you for your support of all cooperation, in this regard we all rely on our friends, first of all, the russian federation and china, mr. volodymyr, what the representative of china said and these peacekeepers, e.e., lavry hung up on alexander lukashenko, which means that both russia and belarus are actively supported by china, in particular, the minister of defense of china, and they feel their impunity because they are being followed by great china, or is it? well, you know , comrade gerasimov recently came to the line of the front inspected his red army eh and it didn’t give him anything, then there were another defeat eh russians another retreat the chinese defense minister is doing the same now on behalf of the official deceased inspects his armies proxy eh chvk russia and proxy and such недочевыка eh belarus is interesting to watch how lukashenka looks at the minister

met with putin and what does the chinese service gift to lukashenka symbolize?a disputed territory between russia and china . will this visit affect the war in ukraine ? is it beneficial for china and will beijing decide to escalate with the event of moscow, a delegation from third world countries arrives at a security forum organized by the kremlin , even some members of the csto refused to participate in it, but the arrival of the chinese defense minister seems to add solidity. and why did beijing send the head of its defense department to russia, obviously not at the international weapons exhibition organized by moscow, where the largest expositions were from china and russia and india, but russian developments, such as an inflatable rubber chapel for the front or another replica of a chinese robot from the russians, it was hardly impressed, because even shoigu and the iron alyosha did not understand the exposition or the completion of his ego. there was a plastic weasel who praised soviet weapons as equipment even of soviet production . they are superior in

we must prepare for an escalation, the polish prime minister believes, especially considering lukashenka'se fact that the people of bachner are asking for a trip to the west, a year of psycho provocations more in the territory of lithuania - this can be seen in the territory of latvia and we know that this this is what is happening with us. this is what the intrigues and subterfuges on the part of putin and lukashenka are all about to destabilize, create unrest, chaos, uncertainty and at the same time show the weakness of nato's eastern flank to all our nato partners to send border guards and develop plans and defenses, discuss and the complete closure of the border and warn that wagner's provocations will be considered as part of russia's action. at that time, the attention of the belarusian military and helicopters were also attracted . the day before, they hit the polish air force nato, whose members include poland and the baltic states, also announced the strengthening of vigilance on the eastern border, but the alliance limited itself to this, emphasizing the application of the fifth

this last question looks a little strange from the tone of lukashenka, and mrs.he way, he publicly admitted that he is a co-aggressor and stated that he really sent russian troops from the territory of belarus for a full-scale invasion of ukraine, so i understand that we should expect the reaction of the international criminal court in the near future and the issuing of an arrest warrant, or rather for the arrest of lukashenka, not only putin, but first of all, i i think that this interview was intended for a russian audience, one of putin's listeners, and it was again , you know, an attempt to attract loyalty , because lukashenko is perfectly aware that this is life for him too it is important in his situation to swear infidelity there every day, but at the same time try to somehow avoid certain corners there . and as for the international criminal court , i want to remind you that, unfortunately, putin received an arrest warrant not for the full-scale invasion of ukraine, but specifically for of the episode, for everything, yes, children, yes, and you are absol

well, we don't recognize lukashenka himself since his pseudo-election, but what's holding back, for inhe event of a break in diplomatic relations, what can we lose, you know? let's take as an analogy what happened before the large-scale invasion, we had diplomatic relations with the russian federation, and representatives of the authorities explained to us that there was no need to develop diplomatic relations, because then we were not we will be able to protect the rights and interests of ukrainian natural persons and legal entities, although this was completely untrue, because diplomats can only use the legal field of ukraine, which institutions are there in order to protect some interests . could protect the interests of our cooperation, you remember very well how they did not allow all our consuls to access the rights of the kremlin, this was a big problem , this is the first, the second moment, until we can put the turrets said that the break of diplomatic relations means that broadcasting access to it is not true because there are several vienna diplomatic conventions on consular