dismantling of the dictatorship the implementation of lukashenka and these people who went to the protests came out in such a way that in order to overthrow lukashenkas should be held, but this consciousness is the national belarusian identity, it was born at these protests, people will become belarusian historical flags and white-red-white became the belarusian language is popular, however, tikhanovskaya began to speak belarusian, after all, this process was launched in the 20th year, then everything was only about internal affairs, but the war catalyzed the processes of establishing the belarusian nation, and now it is very important to hide it. it's a pity that the elite intelligentsia were forced out of the country, and many were imprisoned, and that's why now the presentation of democratic forces is for us to hide er and culture and identity to lead all this development of developments, well, what kind of bonfire is er national even if it will be expensive yes yes to return later, as soon as there is an opportunity to return to belarus, many countries that were under soviet occupation passed through it. well, maybe belarus will also have to pas

lukashenka lukashenka , there is a question again, will this be all? precisely in january, maybe february, and in general, all these are the constant maneuvers of the belarusian russian army, the deployment of the union group of troops, and also today's check of the combat readiness of the belarusian army. they claim that minsk continues to act in the kremlin's scenario, eh, yesterday there was information that the 38th airborne assault brigade and the 130th brigade of special operations forces were looking towards the ukrainian border, and the fact that minsk , eh, minsky eh caused great alarm russian mega 31s have arrived at the minsk airfield of mochulishche - these are sphere sound fighters, and 76s are also arriving, which can bring missiles for these moments of the 31s, and there are threats that they will continue again from the territory of belarus. the obstreevoy rockets of ukrainian cities will continue. there was already an air alert that affected three regions of kyiv, zhytomyr, vinnytsia, and it was shahe. as i understand it, they were also directed from the territory of belarus. 11 were shot down over kyiv, in particular, there was a small amount of damage by debris to administrative buildings. but well, it also continues, the same story is actually one well, as far as i understand, the secret if you say no to popularity, then at least uh, long duration of lukashenkaways says look at these countries, at these countries, everywhere is restless, everywhere there are wars. but in our country, everyone works calmly , men go to work and so on and so on, but if it does come to mobilization, if it does come to war, or whether lukashenko in such a case will not will break this contract, and how will the belarusians perceive it? well, belarusians are generally opposed to the war, it is natural that the belarusian war is a narrow one as a part of society, and they also do not want to fight in ukraine, and i am sure that this is the case if he touches them they will send to ukraine absolutely one of them, er, he surrendered to captivity, they will go over to the side of the ukrainian army , lukashenko understands this very well, so while there is no outbreak, there is no er sending of the belarusian army to ukraine, but i think that if it is necessary for putin, and we we see that the russian army is now suffering huge losses, they are trying to mobilize eve

democratic diplomatic side, we see the deterioration of lukashenka's and putin's relations 5 days have not passed since lukashenka's last visit putin to lukashenkae again he flies well usually in recent years there have been no such signs, as can be seen in recent years, yes, meetings are a great pity, especially in the last year, putin lukashenko - it is approximately worth two or three weeks, unfortunately, and if we talk about what russia will try to do as of today, on the one hand , she will gradually try to turn the belarusian regime into an absolutely toxic regime , because in fact, in order to make it impossible for any fraction of the official minsk from moscow to be impossible, what we know in history is the maneuver-menergame, remember that from the textbooks the 44th year of history, when nazi germany began to suffer defeat, to suffer defeat, what did the energy engineer do, and accordingly, it is necessary to make sure that any belarusian factor is beaten as much as possible, we do not shake hands with any common robber what in the west, what in the east, because the question is not only about the protection of the issues that over t

what did the meeting between putin and lukashenka lead to? lukashenka supports putin politically and in general. but like franco, the spanish dictator of the second world war, he is not quite ready to undertake to support someone else's aggressive war. i cannot to give you an answer. will belarus enter the war on the side of russia, and i cannot say what will happen if it does try to do so, i do not think that the belarusian army and the belarusian people are delighted with this idea, because the belarusian democratic opposition is in a certain sense fighting the same struggle as the ukrainian people struggle for independence and freedom, but i can not and will not predict whether putin will try to launch a new offensive on the territory of belarus. russian resources are limited, putinism is a system based on lies and robbery, total lies and robbery have weakened the russian army as well as russia as a whole, but it doesn't matter that i think putin may try new attacks and we in the west should be ready to continue our support ukraine, russia, in partic

and tell me, please, i don't really believe that putin will pressure lukashenka so much because lukashenkaong cards in his hands and he can always say that what you said now he always said volodymyr volodymyrovych and if we lose, and if there is an attack by the ukrainian army on minsk, what will we do next, it is very unprofitable for you, not only for me lukashenko, it is not profitable for you, volodymyr volodymyrovych, there are problems and i always think that, well, no , they are not that stupid. it's simple. let's open a front. it's a problem, but you think , uh, from a logical point of view. that is, you're making this mistake that we made until february 24. we also thought that it was not profitable for the russians to start a full-scale war against ukraine . them from this pluses useful well, there aren't any and what and they attacked like that because they just think differently and it must be remembered that they are clearly so let's look at the logs from a logical point of view so why are the belarusians attacking how many armies are there well a small number and they i don't

lukashenka insists on the creation of such an insurance body so that belarus without lukashenka will go downhill for me, and the system will become a dictatorship with a strong leader. or to be honest, rather a reasonable authoritarian regime, even in theory, can not work without lukashenka him, because the cornerstone of our current system is the figure of a strong leader in the presidency, strong as a politician, as a person and the emergence in this system of a second strong leader of the same assistant, the incumbent president. a priori impossible. a priori, it is impossible to educate in our system with a strong leader a second strong leader to replace the first.

lukashenka. and now we look at the political situation in belarus. lukashenka holds power at the expense of bayonets at the expense of the security forces, to whom he pays a large salary, who are ready according to his command of phases beat any protestors and as they say and do what he says, let's put into the meat grinder of war these power structures of his that serve him there faith and truth no of course he doesn't want to because his government can move but lukashenko is not making the decision today because to belarus, which they signed there and keep there after lukashenka'se event of lukashenka's death, all power goes to the leadership of their national security and defense council, which you just mentioned, and the leadership of their security council, so to speak, of belarus is is completely under the control of a puppet of the russian federation and he will give the order to introduce troops into ukraine, putin's lawsuit, so all the light of the river for the health of lukashenko so that this does not happen, and on the other hand, we perfectly understand that there is no difference who among them will give orders to the security forces belarus is getting ready, it is giving ammunition to russian snipers, they are feeding them, feeding them, giving them equipment, they are conducting a covert mobilization under the guise of checking possible future soldiers of belarus they tell the country, that is, they prepare the smell, it can happen, well, it’s only a matter of time or we will die sooner and they don’t collect well, i kind of counted 40,000 plus i

to put pressure on lukashenka by the way, poroshenko is coming to russia this time tomorrow and why couldn't he somehow? in order to pressure lukashenka to go somewhere when lukashenkalready been to russia seven times they met with putin in samarkand they met with putin in bishkek they met with putin in yerevan we me i think i'm all no it's 7 times in russia plus 3 times outside of russia, this is the 11th time in a year and it will be the 12th . i i don't think that putin was trying to pressure them, they play as a couple, they play such a show, it is very beneficial for putin that lukashenko does not look like a vassal, does not look like a puppet, but looks like a real and independent sovereign, then it is more serious, it is not only russia that attacked ukraine, but it is already the whole coalition and they are selling it both to the russian society and to the belarusian audience, as well as to the third world countries of africa, central latin america, which then vote at the geno assembly either neutral or in support of russia and for it is very important for putin to support lukashenka to him, it is cheap for him, it is profitable, he has no one to replace l

lukashenka insists on the creation of such an insurer body so that belarus without lukashenka does not go downhill, and the system is a strong dictatorship leader. or to be honest, rather a reasonable authoritarian regime, even in theory, can not work as effectively without lukashenkahe cornerstone of our current system is the figure of a strong leader on the presidency is strong as a politician, as a person, and the emergence in this system of a second strong leader, such an assistant, is the current president. a priori impossible. a priori, it is impossible to educate in our system with a strong leader a second strong leader to replace the first. this is possible, because in order to educate such a person, the possibility of manifesting this strength and gaining experience is important, which is essentially impossible with a colossally strong incumbent president. this is not good. this is not bad. it's just a fact no one is capable also effectively take over all the functionality of alexander grigorievich as president of such people. with all due respect. to every strong personality in the country in the country does not exist and cannot exist, and vns. we need perhaps as a temporary tool for the concentration of power. until after one strong leader. we will not

lukashenka is not to encourage lukashenka to actively participate in the war against ukraine, and the main thing is the economy. they were advanced, uh, the integration regime was found, that's why no one is forcing anyone, in general, they are taking such steps, which , again, are very much in line with the interests of our peoples, as it would be interesting for our union state, mr. ambassador, literally over the past six months, we have been very actively discussing, or at least in the information field, the topic of whether belarus will go to ukraine or not, whether our northern border is protected from belarus and russia, or unprotected, what do you think still holds lukashenka from full-scale participation in russia's war against ukraine, namely, by the troops directly of the republic of belarus, well, look, i am not in favor of full-scale participation in belarus and the military crossing of the border, another attempt to cross the border of ukrainian-belarusian, these are different things, er, why, i will explain, er, the konkreshenko can really try to have all of belarus involved, not because he doesn't want it, he just understands that then he will lose power in belarus, because the attitude is different in belarus after all from russian, although it has been getting closer for a month, but a lot of people obviously do not want to die, it is not clear why, and on the territory of ukraine, that is why putin does not need the word of lukashenko, he went the other way, they twisted the hands of the belarusian belarusian chief and this otverhiv woman, did you see when when the document on joint formations was finally signed and when osta? well, everyone shu

lukashenka, but the mood of lukashenka, but the mood of the citizens , well, they have some energy, the energy of resistance, the energy, perhaps, of silent resistance, the energy of not loving lukashenko , the energy of suspicion of russia. this is always belarus was famous for the fact that oh, we have older brothers, they are russians, we love them very much. this is still happening, mr. andriy, mr. pasok , please. have a good day, once again . this is everyone's holiday, and it's christmas, which is also celebrated in poland, but of course they don't forget about the issue of security, and i have to say that i didn't quite understand whose mood you are asking or asking about the mood of the poles in relation to belarus or - the mood of belarusians are in belarus regarding what is happening, yes, mr. ambassador, we are talking about belarusians, because we are talking about belarus, because about poles, i would know everything thanks to you and thanks to the many-faceted relations between ukrainians and poles in recent times, especially about belarusians this is tera incognita of some kind, well, look. well, belarusians have become quite active in poland. they still believe that it will be possible to change lukashenka'sme to poland after the 20th elections with nadia. what is it? it 's temporary that it will be resolved quickly, but how we see that not everything is so simple. nevertheless, activists operating in poland and belarusian activists are becoming more active on the territory of belarus, organizing various kinds of protests. they are going to create a belarusian house. leaders of the belarusian opposition are often there not everything oh no, it’s just me, i just connected on the phone, i called , and because of that i think the opposite, oh, we’ll wait again, yes, nothing, i’m already there, if i already see it, yes, please continue, but focus on relations with the russian federations or these belarusians, do they understand that for belarusians russia is absolutely an enemy, these belarusians who left for poland, who emigrated to poland, this is political emigration and they are fine to hello hello hello i hear you but i did not see and okay oh now i hear and see perfectly that russia is

lukashenka a return visit putin lukashenka held negotiations in minsk during which they discussed economic integration and the creation of a common defense space in 2019. vladimir vladimirovich that i'm already starting to think that he, well, made the decision that together the same way. times are such that allied leaders are already toxic, you know , it is very difficult to deny themselves the pleasure of ruffling the nerves and causing migraines in ukraine, the eu and nato putin said that business relations with many colleagues, including macron , are preserved. here let the macron now and explains to his european colleagues. what kind of business relationship he has maintained with russia despite nine packages of sanctions. also , the leaders of russia and belarus confirmed joint plans to send belarusian cosmonauts into space next year, finally, russian cosmonauts will try potato pancakes from a tube in orbit, because if you are friends with russia, then the russian rocket will put your cosmonaut into orbit but if against russia fight, then the russian missile will disable your power plant. about, how this week in minsk the president expanded, strengthened, deepened and sent into space in the report of our random correspondent and the joy of the cheater. it was a difficult day in the air, the aromas of something soviet with something allied were in the air, minsk met the chief with new year 's frost and bright friendly sun, as if hinting that everything is clear in relations between the two fraternal countries, in order to make the chief pleasant especially for his arrival over belarus dispersed all the clouds, and to make it twice as pleasant they were dispersed to the side poland is my youth. by tradition, the chiefs were greeted with bread and salt by the first beauties. judging by the bearing, the bearing was definitely not lower than the rank of major, but according to the protocol , it was only possible to hug the first person. they handed the bouquet to the boss, because it is much better to give the boss a rose. how to get geraniums and geocents from russia. vladimir vladimirovich 3 years you waited three years is not a period, i understand, now less than a dozen. add me the path of the volga peskov habitually denoted questions that have not yet been asked. from the friendly and belarusian air, even his mustache became silky and velvety, the head of rosatom figured. is it possible to rotate western sanctions like electrons around the atomic nucleus? lukashenka came in with trump cards and acyclized , minsk greeted you all russian colleagues of the hospitable belarusian capital and reminded you that, apart from potato broth, there are other proven means of adversity, only together you can overcome any pandemic crises or sanctions of the world are no longer impressive, but the head in his heart told the economy anti-russian. and joked that work is not wolf, but he is not little red riding hood and offered to continue in a less formal setting for a working dinner. there will also be something to talk about. the president of belarus hinted that for a normal soviet person, living under sanctions is much more familiar and comfortable than without them. as it always was with us, and the secret was revealed that on the basis of the belarus tractor, you can make a computer or a museum. we, together with russian scientists, uh, designers, will create such samples that the world has not seen grigory explained that the reorganization of the world is a

lukashenka is not to encourage lukashenka to actively participate in the war against ukraine, and that the main thing is the economy the union state, we will hear some joint plans. piskov was exposed as absolutely stupid nonsense without founding ideas. the nature of our relations. belarus has become an ally. does not force everyone to take such steps, which, again, best correspond to the interests of our peoples and were interesting to our union state, mr. ambassador, we literally during the last for six months, we have been very actively discussing, or at least in the information field, we have heard the topic of whether belarus will go to ukraine or not , whether our northern border is protected from belarus and russia, respectively, or whether it is not protected . in the war of russia against ukraine already well, directly by the troops of the republic of belarus, well, look, i am not akin to full-scale participation in belarus and military crossing of the border, another attempt to cross the ukrainian-belarusian border, these are different things i will explain why. lukashenko can still really try to get all of belarus involved, not because he doesn't want it, he just understands that then he will lose power in belarus, because the attitude in belarus is still different from russia, although it has been getting closer for a month month, but a lot of people obviously don't want to die, it's not clear why, and on the territory of ukraine, that's why putin doesn't need lukashenko's word, he went another way, they twisted the hands of the belarusian belarusian leader, and you saw this open-minded woman when when they finally signed the document on joint formations and when osta well, everyone shut their mouths when mccain became mccain's death so suddenly the minister of foreign affairs in belarus died under incomprehensible circumstances, a situation when he was just the person who tried to reconcile with the west some uh other contacts than with putin, so everything is already clear. lukashenko does not control the situation there, the units are mixed with belarus, there are some who will hire the russians for money, there are such people, and only one thing holds back they don't have enough strength for this, and that's why there is a high probability. but i would say a guarantee that they will go back here very quickly, about 200 and in such quantities as now we hear that our armed forces are knocking out the russian invaders 500-600 a day do you understand what this means for belarusians? that is , i don’t think that the government there will feel strongly about these belarusians who died. but everything will still be more sensitive than in russia . tribunals and to expel them around the world they have not yet they want to be in belarus somehow they want to check now the only question is whether they will still be able to do it we will see, but what are the russian troops or there with a small number of which nationalities in the belarusians will these plans most likely already be clearly formed cross the border of ukraine once again well, although in order to completely take control of belarus with completely annoying wars of aggression in belarus and so on . i don't know who else will be sent there, well, it will most likely be someone already in the ranks of the fsb-shnik, and they have this, they want to implement it and are preparing for it. it was quite serious, well, advancing all the way to kyiv in the first case. i think categorically not. and i rely on the opinion of our military experts and those people who, in principle, have already done a lot of things around kyiv and not only kyiv, and nuclear plants there and everything else that is from belarus directly the threat was no longer so serious even when crossing the border, the only thing that of course it will cure the distractions were and that's why it's so undesirable for us later. it understands perfectly well and they're still trying to push their own well, we'll see what belarus can do, but you know we don't care what's there will withstand belarus, belarus, bilashenko, they have already shown us what it is, now we just need to take this factor into account when planning military operations and defense and offensive, and in general , well, the whole country in order to take into account this possible direction - threats or challenges for ukraine the state secretary of the security council of the republic of belarus stated that the command keeps the units and military units of the armed forces in constant readiness. meanwhile, yesterday president zelenskyi stated that one of the permanent priorities of border protection is the protection of the border with the republic of belarus, and we are ready for any what scenarios did the supreme commander of the armed forces of ukraine say, we will hear from zelensky also at the pond, they discussed in detail the border, border protection with both russia and belarus, this too a permanent priority, we are preparing for all possible defense scenarios. no matter what minsk inclines to, it will not help them either. like all other sick ideas in this war against ukraine and ukrainians, valery, well, obviously the question was and remains relevant, the diplomatic relations of kyiv and minsk, i already i once asked you about this, but since this question can be asked in the development of the situation in ukrainian-belarusian relations, i will ask myself this question again at the end of 2023. what is preventing ukraine should sever diplomatic relations with the republic of belarus because it is an accomplice of russia in the current aggression and what consequences this may have for the ukrainian state in particular. we may have missed the moment that was... my opinion is nothing. belarus is participating in the war. by the way, iran is supplying, er, well, the aggressor is training on the territory of belarus, so it really should have been done yesterday, that is, i think from the point of view of justice, it should be done moreover, it is necessary to ban the entry of citizens of belarus into ukraine, which means that it can be done simultaneously with the europeans now lithuania latvia estonia in lithuania an initiative has been passed not to sell weapons to belarusians to russians well, they are still looking at whether to extend the ban on entry to belarus in them too for now, there is still entry. i think our partners should look at this issue synchronously, it's not about how we treat belarusians, there are belarusians who fight for the freedom of yanovsky, the freedom of belarus for ukraine, there are belarusians there, for example cyber parties are belarusians, well, the political position is that they do not fight much there, but somewhere there they make statements, somewhere they drive around the village, but no matter what, we must understand that those belarusians who are now in the territory of belarus are citizens, they can use reversal operations and you do not you will figure out who is good belarus, bad belarus we must ban well, i say this question once again, we must synchronize with our partner, ban entry well, at least well, at least look at the more meticulous procedure for registering such an entry for citizens of conscription age there are men, i know that in our country, in principle, de facto, such measures are taken well, but with a gap, let's look at the statements now. i think it would be the right opportunity if lukashenka'statements are again aggressively contemptuous of the president of ukraine and the statement that we are here from russia, the further you are from the whole run-up, then you have to tear it immediately, they tear it apart, if only to show that we do not pass these statements on the back of lukashenka's meeting with putin and shoigu. the chairman of the security council of moldova , oleksandr mustya, blamed the russian federation in preparation of aggression against his country for 2023, the question is not what it foresees, uh, well, the new offensive of the russian federation on the territory of moldova, but when it will happen, he said, "mustyasya" and this statement was made today. what do you think, uh, putin already said goodbye to his idea of ​​passing through the southern regions of ukraine and entering moldova. does the current statement of the head of the security council of moldova indicate that they have some additional data that testify to putin's plans in 2023 to start som

lukashenka insists on the creation of such an insurer body so that belarus without lukashenka does not go downhill, and the system is a strong dictatorship leader. or to be honest, rather a reasonable authoritarian regime, even in theory, cannot work without lukashenka as effectively as with him, because the cornerstone of our current system is the figure of a strong leader in the presidency, strong as a politician, as a person and the emergence in this system of a second strong leader, such an assistant, the current president. a priori impossible. a priori, it is impossible to educate in our system with a strong leader a second strong leader to replace the first one, because in order to educate such a person, the possibility of manifesting this strength and gaining experience is important, which is essentially impossible with a colossally strong incumbent president. this is not good. this and not bad. it's just a fact. no one is able to effectively take on all the functionality of alexander grigoryevich as president of such people. with all due respect. to every strong personality in the country in the country does not exist and cannot exist, and vns. we need perhaps as a temporary tool for the concentration of power. until after one strong leader.

the republic of belarus. by the air defense forces of the chief of aviation well, lukashenka well, why not quote lukashenka, well, why not publicly appoint such people, that's why i invited you so that it really happened how is it established in our country? well, lukashenko has now discussed with the newly appointed characters, so to speak, all the nuances of their future activities in new posts. it's time to look a little from abroad, so to speak, at the balkans, approximately in the north of kosovo, local serbs are blocking the main roads for the second day in a row, the police kosovo reported shelling of their positions by unknown persons, the situation in that region is worsening again, and in contact with the studio, nataliya ishchenko, head of the balkan observer project ms. natalya, congratulations slava i believe in ukraine glory good day what do you think is coming now are we on the eve of an escalation that could lead to an open fire conflict that literally the night from sunday to monday will be the most difficult in his political career, but so far nothing terrible has happened, there are no h

lukashenka, belarusians have always looked for a compromise, uh, mentally, always if they were looking for peace, and that's why now it's about a machine and putin's lukashenka machine that will try to convince that ukrainians are enemies . this war will be the biggest failure of putin lukashenko because these people will turn their weapons against lukashenka if they lay down their weapons or will go over to the side of the ukrainian army. i will of course speak freely. let's say that with alternative access to information in belarus, where do belarusians get information when they want to know the truth, or do most people only watch official channels where, for example, they say that putin , i understand, will only come to solve economic issues. there is a group of people who watch the official propaganda of the russian lukashenka channels, they do not understand why they are still not on the sanctions lists of the european union, which affects 20-30% of belarusians prove that it is the nazis in kyiv and that it is necessary to defend belarus is surrounded by enemies from all sides and that is why it is necessary to mobilize but after the 20th year, when the people's revolution began, the revolution of the dignity of belarus, they, the majority of belarusians stopped believing in propaganda, and that is why now the putinists are also bowin

lukashenka's regime, we will talk further valery kalinovsky, a journalist of the belarusian service of radio svoboda, we are in touch with us valery, congratulations dobry day, congratulations, what did lukashenka persuade him to invade ukraine or threaten annexation of me about such actions of the minister of defense of russia, said a representative of our main intelligence agency ah, andriyusov, on the air of the telethon, and actually according to his words, the president of russia does not stop trying to involve the lukashenko regime in a full-fledged military enterprise, but today, according to the opinion of the main administration of our intelligence, this pressure has not yielded results. anyway, lukashenko does not agree to such threats from putin. well, you know this visit that he made to minsk, his meeting with lukashenko and the minister of defense of belarus with whom he signed an addendum to the 1997 agreement, there is simply some kind of joint cooperation and nothing is known what specifically and still no message. this is quite a threatening event, uh, regarding the future relations between belarusians and ukraine, maybe we can’t say exactly what they agreed on, what they signed, and why there was such an urgent visit on the weekend of the meeting with lukashenkahe probably conveyed what putin wanted to say to lukashenka, all this can of course be considered as one of the manifestations of the kremlin's further pressure on lukashenka on belarus to intervene, to further provide support to russian soldiers, including and not only territorially or there in the physical plan, but also in personnel, so that the belarusian soldiers actually invaded and i say so, we do not know the direct signs of this, we all this is happening now, let's say in closed mode, here we can only draw conclusions and analyze what is going on next i.e. that this pressure is taking place, that belarus is interfering. i think that in general this is that now in belarus, russian soldiers are again around ten thousand, including those who are mobilized, training somewhere on the training grounds, preparing. this is a small the group is not yet a strike group, but all this is also not very desirable to the belarusian regions to repeat what happened in february, for example yes

lukashenka yesterday for the first time in three years and since the beginning of the great aggression, and in february 22, lukashenko flew to russia seven times, and only once did putin fly to lukashenka in order to conduct certain certain uh, dialogues, we are now, well, there, i wanted for three summers, in fact, putin was on one of them, the others, i understand that they tried to confuse the hypothetical nato air defense, it is obvious that they confused something . lukashenkautin did not fly home but went to lukashenka's residence and everyone says that putin has obviously already overcome the tourist syndrome and may have stopped being afraid of the coronavirus. because somehow he drove carefully so easily, or maybe he was about to disinfect lukashenka's residence here, if it's hard to say well and now, first of all, we will start with the fact that i will ask mr. victor, in your opinion, this was lukashenka's inclination towards the war, the official participation of belarus in the war in the ground operation. was it to a greater extent the previous century from the creation of the soviet union and the solution to the question of whether belarus will be at least a little bit independent. will belarus still become part of the great new russia or some new union, please, this is not an investigation of the question, because the withdrawal will be able to become part of the new russia if there is not even the old eh now for putin, the question of the existen

lukashenka for the first time in three years and since the aggression. in february 22, lukashenko flew to russia seven times, and only once did putin fly to lukashenka in order to hold certain dialogues. others i understand they tried to confuse the hypothetical in nato, it is obvious that they confused something. well, this is what happened, and what is interesting is that after the official meeting between putin and lukashenka lukashenka's residence, and everyone says that putin has obviously already overcome the tourist syndrome and may have stopped being afraid of the coronavirus because somehow he went very recklessly, er, or maybe he was disinfected . in your opinion, it was lukashenka's inclination towards the war, the official participation of belarus in the war in the ground operation. was this more likely a century before the creation of the soviet union ? a part of a great new russia or a new union of some kind, please, this is not an investigation of the question, because in biological terms it will not be possible to say that it is a part of the new russia. if there is not even an old one, now for putin, the question of the existence of not only his regime is being resolved here of this geopolitical concept that he must have built for himself in this other person that he carved out of what was, and if russia loses this war, it seems to me that it is about something other than the retention of the

lukashenka was that sweet and wonderful lukashenka, whom we know him now, who survived the journey and survived the deception of these american allies. he survived all this wonderful multi-vector, which he also played. just like that, and now he's all i understood how he was set up, how they wanted to overthrow, and what was in store for him, in the end, the fate of gaddafi was his. the real uh, so with all the cruelties, that's all it was. and not only lukashenkaby the way, now putin is collecting bishkek, yes, uh. uh, this one . hmm, so to speak, a very friendly atmosphere. uh, very large, rather standing countries. uh, i'm npp and well , others so to speak, well, who will be observers here are yes and i think there will be good results here. and so hmm cunning, of course, all this from the side of the measure, that she deceived us. we also clearly understood that america would become weaker in the coming years, because this process, it has been weakening america for a long time, and we know that time is working for us, and ours will not leave us. not only kharkov will not leave, and kiev will not leave and much that will not leave yet. i'm afraid to look far, well, that's right , there is no russian border, so it will not go anywhere. we are only stronger, what is called become, so everything is in order here? what about agreements? i'll tell dima more here. you rightly said, they are completely untrustworthy people to talk to them about not

well, we will see the main thing for us now, so of course lukashenka will not be pressed on lukashenkause after all, this is putin's territory in order to force him into a ground operation . what else would i like to say now? biden signed a record defense budget of 800 million dollars for ukraine. in addition, we will receive other aid. how do you evaluate such a move? such a budget. and what does this mean in light of the current position of the united states? to finish off the enemy next year or to give ukraine the opportunity to continue fighting, but without giving , there are indisputable advantages, please, in fact, it is very interesting, the position is emerging in the official rhetoric of washington, we see that on the one hand, support is only growing after president zelensky's visit to washington, we saw that the congressional budget , which was previously planned at the level of 35-39 billion dollars, has now grown to more than 40, that is, by some parameters, this is a very significant increase, and in fact, this visit made the expected impression. and this visit really ga

we are for independence, we are here for lukashenka's sovereignty and we see that under lukashenka ,reignty is really being strengthened, listen, what kind of independence sovereignty, they say these people who proclaim this, working for foreign money on the order and under the protection of foreign special services, who reproduce the status of heroes as mercenaries fighting under the banner of the kiev regime people who set the goal of joining the european union joining nato where there is no sovereignty, where it is completely limited . we see what is happening, what the president of poland knows. how many soldiers of other states pass through its territory to support zelensky there. he knows what weapons placed in the same and so on. no, of course not, these people. uh, here they are worried about the independence of sovereignty. they understand him only as an element of russophobia. they believe in it, they can't believe it. i'm not saying that they're just not there for the money, but they do not fulfill the order of the people. yes, and those who place this order with them have

terminal scenario, in particular , it's about the possible physical removal of lukashenka from office if this model of lukashenkafunctioning , and we understand that the mysterious death of makey is actually was not so mysterious. that is, this is an extremely powerful signal. and accordingly, in what way can lukashenko insure himself against direct physical elimination? so on. well, in general, there is a so-called medical diagnosis of a heart attack. what is the matter? the fact is that the belarusian political regime is based on the personality of lukashenko. lukashenko himself is the backbone of this regime . the power and the disappearance of this main figure of the main dictator most often causes political problems, that is, he eliminated lukashenko, and russia is creating a political situation in belarus with its own hands, which it cannot fully manage the background of which she will not be able to control, because then other political forces will enter the game, the position of the belarusian society is possible and the west is a very risky game, so i do not think that moscow seriously expects that brot

lukashenka in minsk for talks in belarus putin may try to convince lukashenka to use the belarusian military together with russian forces for a joint attack on ukraine, some believe so analysts and military officials, others say that the russian leader may be trying to distract the military leadership of ukraine and draw its forces away from the fierce fighting in the east to the border with belarus in the north. the negotiations in minsk will be the first in more than three years when it is putin who is going to lukashenkan the contrary well, against the background of the talks between putin and lukashenka, the ministry of defense of russia announced battalion-tactical training in belarus. and yesterday it became known that russia could transfer at least 50 ural vehicles to belarus, which can be used for the military and in the armed forces of the russian federation, the monitoring group of the belarusian forest informed about it, vladimir putin said that the growth of trade between russia and belarus last year and this year has increased, and alexander lukashenko said that he expects an equal treatment of belarus from the european union, let's listen, we hope that in the near future they will listen to the voice together and we will proceed to a constructive discussion of both issues related to security and the future of peace joint training with russia near the ukrainian border and visas to belarus from the first minister of defense of the russian federation shoigu to now and vladimir putin will russi

lukashenka on ukraine, because it is not lukashenka it is not beneficial for putin and it was absolutely correct that the previous speakers said that if there is a defeat of the belarusian front, and it is possible given the strength of the ukrainian army, then this breakthrough of this front will lead to the collapse of the russian federation, it is not beneficial for putin either. if we are rational yes, if we are irrational, we cannot understand anything. what is your point of view from a rational point of view, we will try to assess the situation and, er , predict money. in february, no one believed in the rationality of this food. this is an unnecessary war, first of all, lukashenko, because he is also afraid of the explosion of the opinion of the belarusian community , because i believe that his parents, his supporters, will oppose this war. they came back from ukraine in black bags. in general, a prominent woman leads the way, as you rightly said, belarusian independent mass media can no longer work in belarus, and independent mass media are blocked in belarus because it is a telegram channel. of an independent seven-year-old , one of the detained belarusians is on the phone, they give him additional prison terms, but the information still reaches the belarusians, and they give out how the russians are returning, not mobs, and not only mobs. and so to speak, professional soldiers from ukraine in in black packages, no one wants such a return of their brothers-in-law from belarus. well, at the same time, one second, one second, an important question. i want it to be clarified. so, the belarusians know the real picture. or they can find out because we know that the belarusian mass media are also in belarus, that is, lukashenko's and putin's, which are not very different. and then the question arises whether true information reaches the belarusians, who can somehow find out what is really happening in ukraine on the battlefield in the rear of the russian federation in the rear of ukraine and so on and so on and so on tell me, please well, you definitely understand uh, what's next, a man wants when a man is interesting to a person, and he goes to vseode zno for information, and uh, look, listen to the independent honey of belarus, and here it is меды с Украины and those other media that give true information, you can, and you can talk about the broken ones, you can’t download to your phone , uh, uh, telegram channels or youtube, uh, so-called uh, extremist ones, because in general, independent belarusian families are recognized as extremists lukashenka'sther matter. well, the taste of people, and in this sense, they are lazy in the informational sense, and this is what happens to belarusians and ukrainians and russians and a lot of other things. and that is why, unfortunately, the belarusian propaganda and even more so the russian propaganda that dominates the information space of belarus does not necessarily work for everyone, but it works none the less , still true information in one way or another it doesn't reach everyone, but it will now be like this. i would say it's not a professional question , it's an unprofessional question, but the question is, let's imagine that an attack from belarus on ukraine begins. some large part of the russian army, a small part of the belarusian army suddenly take part in this attack. this happens, although for me it does not happen suddenly that the ukrainians, having received the first blow , go into a counteroffensive and begin an offensive on the belarusian territories on minsk, for example, wh

lukashenka . to recognize her as a representative more legitimate than lukashenka. do you or we not have the feeling that we are being quite careful, and here the politicians seem to be afraid to push lukashenkao putin's arms and somehow provoke him to this attack from the north? is it really true? do we follow such a cautious policy? well, if you could briefly start with your opinion, i would just like to respond. you just talked about mr. danilov's interview. you know, i know. with all due respect. -3 this is what he says is left for two or three launches. i heard this somewhere about 2-3 weeks and i would generally call on all ukrainians, especially representatives of the authorities. one thing is that some experts are unknown, they can basically say anything when it comes to the secretary of the national council security and defense it seems to me that we need to be more realistic and respect the citizens of our citizens here. well, because this is a little bit of a locker room, i trust general zabrodskyi, a former commando, that is cheap. russia, unfortunately, has missiles and there is no need to deceive yourself with this. and they will be able to make two, three, four or more launches

lukashenka join the fighting? will lukashenka join the fighting? lukashenkal republic is not planned, and there it is really grandiose in scale, whatever one may say, they are pulling the vushniks from the front line in view of the fact that they are forced to fix the belarusian-ukrainian border, please, i will continue, no matter how, uh by and large in the presence of the a50 aircraft, no, nothing. and what western countries would not do, which actually constantly monitor. uh, our entire southern facade, literally, clinging to the territorial inputs of the russian federation in the black sea and in fact constantly supplying intelligence to the ukrainian side, while it is clear that the activity of the e-e of the ukrainian side and the activity that is aimed precisely at strikes in the direction of such airfields as engels as e, shebekino undercutting. it just has to be stopped in some way, and including the deployment of this kind of detection equipment in belarus, allied to us, is, well, just a fact, otherwise, in fact , just like these attacks were carrie

lukashenka can count on if moscow decides to get rid of him. i just don't know, i don't have an answer to this question. by the way, regarding putin's visit to lukashenka put pressure on lukashenko, he can invite him to sochi , moscow, lukashenko travels to russia more often than any foreign leader, so that he is not even perceived as a foreigner, he meets putin more regularly than it seems to me that the sticker books of the subjects of the russian federation combined. did you ever hear that putin met with the head of some region of the russian republic in the last decentralization as such, as it is correct? yes, he has nothing to talk about with them , and lukashenko we talk all the time, it seems to me that he talks to lukashenkaore often than you ever develop with your own wife ludmila, because when he and ludmila came on some foreign visits , it was a protocol requirement that they see each other only at the moment when they need to hold hands and go to another presidential couple or a married couple. and so they didn't see each other, then i couldn't stand the friendship at all and i didn't want to see her in principle. well, i'm more glad to see us, we know, in general, i have the impression that i don't want to see anyone except lukashenka. they they talk there, they do something there, they rest together, when lukashenka comes, it means they have despite all the difficulties, there are opportunities to talk about what to go for. you know, i will come to minsk now and there will be pressure on you or something. i think that this is to some extent a special operation, that is, such a sign of respect. lukashenko does not agree to anything, but he really wants to be considered that he is the real president,

yeltsin's russia, which was terribly jealous of lukashenka and did everything that was not, there were not always relations so no. i'm telling you lukashenkanance, who was not given a single redeem ruble and so on correctly, that once again on today's day. so you showed everything showed this lithuanian, because you always have enemies, for some reason you have enemies mmm some strange you had no enemies in the west before. they were all here is a reaction to show, so he i here so. he did n't work for me. no, he was here, including, he performed in many chairs, and how many of them tried to work now did not pass the ability. but i'll remind you, they are ashamed of this, not nazism. in germany it started with arson. so in our history, from the burning of the reichstag, the soloists of the demy, the grass of the communist, and the communists, were dragged much earlier, of course, i say earlier in our history. so it's so uh historiography, for me nazism. uh, ukraine also started a long time ago or in lithuania where the ss men in this uniform went, but for europe it didn’t start, that is, until now , but there was also arson there, i remembe

we are for independence we are for sovereignty lukashenka surrenders, and we see that under lukashenkaty are they talking about? these people who proclaim this, working for foreign money on the order and under the protection of foreign special services, who reproduce in the status of heroes mercenaries fighting under the banner of the kiev regime, people who set the goal of joining the european union to join nato where there is no sovereignty, where it is completely limited. we see what is happening, what the president of poland knows. how many soldiers of other states pass through it territory to support zelensky there. he knows what weapons are placed in that and so on. no, of course not, these people. uh, here they are worried about the independence of sovereignty. they understand him only as an element of russophobia. they believe in it, they can't believe it. i'm not saying that they're just not there for the money, but they do not fulfill the order of the people. and those who place an order with them. and alexander lukashenko, along with all the people, has a completely differen

lukashenka, he continues to exist after lukashenka and yes, i have such taxes. i think about it all the time. so, when we were choosing a place for a nuclear power plant, we were looking for a geological one. a slab that was large was not subject to an earthquake. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is the same plate, strong, not subject to earthquakes, which is at the heart of the state. after all, we know that hierarchical systems are vertically vertical systems. they are subject. e in due time of the crash. we remember the collapse of the monarchy, we remember the collapse of the soviet union where there was also a vertical and it is necessary to build a system that would rely on popular representation and would not depend on incidents that can occur in power verticality. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here horizontal. history of vns. this is about what exactly, if she is a nationality? yes, the second topic is still, which was discussed honestly, of course. sns is a political party. that's where it sounded clearly in the political field and said the president. only those parties should work in my country's political field. of which it corresponds to the basic principles of domestic and foreign policy to act on behalf of citizens, and i, oleg sergeevich, assume that some of the opponents are already writing in this vein, trying to distort what, yeah, this means a green corridor is being created exclusively for pro-government parties, but every person who will read. this is careful. he will understand that there is not a word about the government's compliance with domestic foreign policy. this is patriotism, but it does not determine whether a liberal democrat is a socialist or a communist. yes , but how do you see it for yourself? why is this not right. those who are trying to distort, i 'll tell you. so there are no people from a country where everyone has the same opinion. it's true, and that's what political parties are for. they can be criticized and should be criticized, which they are not perfect, but a person can express his point of view either through legal politics or on the street. god forbid the street, the only legal political way. further, that the street can also be legal, if we are talking about the street, when, uh, yes, chaos and destruction, so now we go further. did someone say either in the new law or the president yesterday at a meeting said that one cannot criticize one can criticize one can have a different point of view one can not oppose an empty state. this means you are yielding against the people, which we are talking about now. we say once there is in some country in the world that teach everyone about democracy allow political parties to exist that will come out and say i am against the existing constitution we want to destroy everything and start acting. let me give you a simple example first. how can there be a party in the country that opposes the state symbols under which we live and which has been accepted by all the people. and you had such parties, and some that have not yet been liquidated. how can there be a party that speaks openly. we we will completely change the geopolitical vector of the country's development, we will destroy all ties, we will destroy it, therefore i am translating and explaining. you can criticize, you can and should argue this development of the country, but within the framework of the constitution and above all of us, the russian assembly will stand in itself. like this slab, where we will know that the people at the vsevolozhsk meeting determined the course such and such, and we will argue how to come to these decisions, how to make people live better, so that health care would be better educated, the economy, but the country will not destroys. and this normal civilized way. we will adopt a law on political parties. uh, soon in parliament yesterday. after that, he will now go to parliament. we will discuss it. there will be more discussion and in the end all this will strengthen our state. that is, i am convinced that they won, but he says, in fact, we see, if we look at the oldest, probably such a party system in the political uk, then we will see conservatives and baristas there, and they are fighting hard with each other. we see this, they have a culture of behavior in parliament in general. absolutely wild for us, but it has developed historically, that is, the tours are not chaos, they have it there and despite the fact that they seem to be radically different, while both of them are patriots, both of them know the limits, having gone beyond which they will be considered traitors to the motherland and relevant legislation will work in relation to them. that is, such a mechanism is proposed now. yes, of course, i absolutely agree with you that this exists in all countries. uh, we really need a dialogue between the parties, probably, at some critical moments we need a strategic sport, but what is being done here, it seems to me, is, uh, such a belarusian experience to teach parties to talk to each other, because we do not have much experience in party building. and the parties are not very popular among the population and it will be quite difficult to explain which party to choose, because they will have to learn how to talk not only among themselves, but also with the population to make ordinary advertising to attract voters. in the party it is such a very complex mechanism, a and e vns. eh, it seems to me, yes, it will be the platform that will allow. uh, to unite all these multidirectional currents, but e parties e should not rely only on the nss, they must learn to create their own political culture, their own political field in which they will work vns - these are not proportions. it 's a little. this is a little different, we should have two two platforms. these are political parties. this is vns. and vns, after all, this is not the answer. and for some external pressure, this is what we were going for. we have had it for a long time from the very beginning and we are just completing this process. today instead of starting it. let's continue with a few more important topics that need to be discussed. i think that one way or another, because we have already touched upon, we will continue to talk about sovereignty. this is indeed one of the main features of the state. we see that today hail has been knocked down for the whole time, just these days there is a powerful roll, tension around serbia is cosmic, on the night of december 12, president vučić called the worst night of his life, the aggravation began after prime minister sembo, publicized by the republic of kosovo kurti said that the contingent takes to the floor from the roads in the north of the barricade built by the kosovo serfs. that is, he actually put forward an ultimatum if the serbs are not dispersed by nato, then the local police will go into action. vučić held an emergency meeting of the security council and accused the united states and, above all, of non-compliance with the agreements reached earlier on outer space. germany considers serbia's plans to ask nato to deploy its armed forces in kosovo unacceptable. this is a statement by the head of the german medberg, it is noteworthy that a new round of tension happened literally a week after historical. as the participants in the eu summit called the western balkans in iran, and here is borisovich himself. what kind of partners turned out to be a week ago? or here's another on the shoulder and said. there is the balkans, we are one family here, and today this is it. well, everything, the fact is that the balkans are full of contradictions even between fraternal countries that have one language, one religion, and they are even ethnically the same nation, take the serbs, take the croats, take the montenegrins. you see, it means that montenegro is the last to break away from serbia and before that there were slovenia and croatia, the contradiction is great. and these contradictions are played by the countries of the west, which do not want a stable coalition of slavic countries to form, er, which are the allied russia of the pre-war confrontation. here you go now. well, i think that teaching understands that from a military point of view. uh, serbi can’t oppose anything to a bloc with nato, and given that the largest military base of the united states is located on the territory of kosovo. pre-war actions will not come. unless there's some kind of spontaneous wildfire. understandably interesting americans. everything is clear here. you have already said about this one base. what is it worth, and, besides, this factor of destabilization in the european union, but why do europeans need it? it would seem that this is not necessary, but we eat ber god, we see a barrel, which is clearly on the side. here in this conflict, on the side, they also undermine and undermine little ukraine and little tension of turkey and greece with small grants, they need to blow up more the balkans will sink faster than food. i just want to say that we are somewhat, perhaps misleadingly, misplaced stocks, please, all this policy is determined, united states of america. it's just that all these policies are managed , it's obvious that i think at all. these waterings are compromising evidence of the united states, see the statement of mother merkel which in general, according to such a mother to whom her stepmother undermined her political career after such statements, there are experts who believe that compromising evidence has merkel's connections with the stasi, which allows the united states of america to manipulate it. and this is her and her statement that the minsk agreements were just a gain of time to strengthen, e, the army of ukraine is a demonstration for russia that in europe it is impossible to negotiate with anyone, it is necessary to negotiate, only with the united states it was worth the macron to declare that he is ready there for the negotiation we ensure the interests of russia cost schwaltz. there is someone else, as a statement immediately followed, which was supposed to show putin what is not in europe there are no people in europe with whom we should understand, serbia is in a very difficult situation, that is, and they have extremely limited maneuver for action. remember they imposed sanctions against belarus. they didn’t want to, in relation to russia, they didn’t introduce it yet , they forced them to introduce it in relation to belarus. we understand very well, although by and large they should remember, how lukashenkander bombardments. i remember remember, and so we are somewhere, despite the fact that this decision was unpleasant. well, we understand, but the second point yet here you are asking whether there will be a military confrontation or there will not be a struggle. why does such statements fight to defend the interests of not europe, all of his statements over the past year, they are destroying the european union, and this, among other things, if the americans need a military conflict, it will be and they will keep this conflict smoldering on purpose, for which they the worst thing is a strong, powerful europe without splits, which can really become a competitor for the usa. it is not necessary. ukraine will start to lose even more. they understand that ukraine ukraine will never lose in this conflict will not win. what else do they have? they also have transnistria moldova, where you can play around, you can play around in central asia, they will try around russia, but in europe itself ,

lukashenka then won't there be on the other hand for lukashenka as a single person and for his regime, it is a death sentence that he will refuse what putin offers him, so what is more frightening for him to refuse the offensive or to refuse putin's ultimatums, well , putin has already given these ultimatums to lukashenko, and lukashenko has always deceived him. he didn't look at the fact that we all consider him to be a collective farmer, but he is very very cunning, he is very cunning and that's why he will twist to the last, he will talk about the fact that it is necessary to rumble with caterpillars there near brest, about the fact that lithuania wants to harvest the bunch he will tell any fairy tales, but at the same time, he will not send his army anywhere, because his power in general rests on the militia and the armies that support him. ah, well, so that she is together with the putins she came here with the troops. well, it’s clear that they are all dead. ugh, but there can’t be, for example , a situation where putin offers him his military as a guard that will keep his regime. yeah, not because it’s understandable, but because it’s understandable. today they are guarding and tomorrow they simply tied him up and took him wherever he needed to go , and i think that putin is asking lukashenko to simply stir up the situation on the border so that ukraine constantly keeps a certain group of troops and therefore, these troops could not help , let's say, at the zaporozhye administration or at the bank. this is what putin is asking. i guess i suspect that this is a meeting in order to look even harder at this situation . look at the situation. missile launches from belarus do not occur, that is, gradually gradually gradually yes, he gives there training grounds for troops yes, he gives eh for these mobilized downs, he gives eh some eh, well, opportunities for them to live on the territory of belarus to train, he needs shells there technique, but he is not, well, he is everything more and more people understand what will happen to him when this war is won like this. by the way, what is your opinion on how to change lukashenka'sin belarus before the victory of ukraine, and is it possible? i think that yes if people rise up if there will be such a protestant life as it was in the 20th year, when lukashenko supported the elections. yes, i think that yes. yes, a lot of people are imprisoned for a day and for children the administration there will paint that color there, you speak in your native language and for that, too , you can get 15 days and that's why eh now belarus is such a big concentration camp but eh we know everything ourselves that eh any jug can always be full the last drops and something can be such a trigger from which just such people will start to rise . in any case, i wish belarus a bright democratic future as soon as possible. thank you very much once again for your support, support us in this struggle . please take care of yourself. we will win together. there was mark, the commander of the headquarters of the vlad battalion of kostya kalinovsky's regiment, these are the fighters who help de

that lukashenka's path will be further delayed, and that the intervention of belarus after nine months of this war, let's say, is not very positive for russia, that belarus should also go, no, lukashenkanot go, and above all, that is why that neither the belarusian people nor the belarusian army nor the soldiers want this well, the belarusian president lukashenko how dependent he is on putin today, today he is super dependent on putin, he is dependent politically, he is dependent economically, he is in isolation, he needs support because he is actually not supported by the belarusian people, we know that this crisis of legitimacy in the 20th year has not yet been exhausted and lukashenko is holding on thanks to force and violence, and economically belarus is still in the 20th year and the 21st in economic isolation under sanctions and is very necessary and russian in energy and russian loans and russian markets and therefore without an onion - to russia lukashenko said that belarus did not live in this quote well, today, on the day of putin's visit, the belarusian ministry of defense announced the end of of a sudden check of the combat readiness of the armed forces, do you know what e

grigorievich there they went out with the same headings lukashenka is completely under putin belarus has completely surrendered putin absolutely controls lukashenka, but people who are reading this. no, well, here, as if without hesitation, do not agree yes, they are worried. this is national debauchery, right, on which they are correct and but they write it not only for us, but also for their transfer of the dash dot changed places. yes, but for us today it is fundamental that we should work not so much for their society. first, we will not get through to society. they cut off. secondly, society does not make decisions . and we must work today as western elites. yeah, this is a fundamentally important thing, so to speak, roughly speaking, we should go out. no, we owe them ideas, they should doubt their positions. well, uh, what they wrote about belarusism. well, it's hard to imagine what they write, belarus who hello, as i don't know, the last prostitutes in a brothel cry out for morality. why are they dishonest? they have nowhere to put a test on this europe, well, yes then the phenomenon is very interesting to me. what is happening in europe a

lukashenka, and many people said that putin would try to sway lukashenka, to try to introduce the army of the republic of belarus into the territory of ukraine, and one of the directions is, well , this is still the most likely the direction under consideration is kyiv region, but another direction is volyn, and here the logic of the aggressors is easy to understand, the cutting of the supply routes of western weapons to volyn is further to lviv region, but we have a representative of volyn, mr. myrka, in our studio, as a general situation in volyn after this meetings because well, in fact, about the entry, the potential entry of the belarusian army, er, this war, where are we talking about how long this war continues, full-scale, what has changed this week, how do the residents of your region feel about it in general, and what would expect and expect if lukashenko and a good man dare to try to cross the ukrainian state border i would probably divide my dialogue with you into three small parts: the first part is the moral part, the second part is the truth, and the third part is the wrongdoing, all in this big one each of us, for example, has a very good idea of ​​volyn, the north, let's say belarus is a place where a large number of ukrainians live. not a resident of the city who can go to another city for a week just to sleep peacefully for at least a week, if you remember back then when the war was at the height of the occupation, people from those parts of the poltava region were not yet from unoccupied signs. they were traveling in transcarpathia to the frankish region and to volhynia in order to feel at least a little bit safer, and the moral aspect of this matter is that today we have looked enough at what atrocities were committed by the army of these russians and non-russians so that our citizens, including those who live in the border guards clearly realized the horror of death, the horror of violent death, rape, torture, and people realized this very clearly, and they are very worried, and when they go through those telegram channels, those text messages, those hundreds of something, the belarusians have already run or jumped there or there did they climb or just fall out, it really shakes the heart of those people, people left several times, came back several times, and they have their housekeeper there, and you know, it's not just water covered, cows, pigs, there are families with a large number of children, older people and they think about it all the time, this is the moral aspect of this case, because they saw what happened in the same kyiv region or chernihiv region or wherever they came, the abomination came to us. they will realize this, can you imagine when they every time or in on any broadcast, they hear it all. so if the moral side of this issue. the second question is the truth, the truth is that how we look at volhynia. and there is a sign to the old man of three states, by the way. in which i participated in the installation of this sign between poland and belarus and ukraine, and there is yagodin, it is the largest transport port in ukraine, through which all transport goes today, there are no planes, all transport went there, they carry all grain, gasoline , any goods that were previously possible and never went there in such quantities this is a railway point because there. in addition, there is kovel, a big node that connects central ukraine, which also connects galicia and the south. this is the goal. this is the goal. of course, if we move a little to the right. - is this a nuclear power plant, is it a goal, it is also a goal, and if we move further away , we will see our capital, it will surely be the main goal that our eternal enemy dreams of, that is why we are watching from our side. well, they will go aside kovel yes. that is to say, we saw that the brest region is being accumulated. now all the equipment is being transported by wagons. somewhere there, baranovichi is flying, sitting down. people are worried about it because they understand that kovel is a target, but somewhere there is an awareness that varash is a target. that is why this is a whole question. and when we are watching volhynia and when our military is watching, they are watching intelligence. we fully understand the priority of these goals. after attacking kovel, putin will seize ukraine, well, how long will he stay there? will he reach him or lyubomlya by blocking this route. it seems that he will not get the effect by seizing the varash power plant. will there be an effect? ​​well, it will be much more effective if they will unlock the rivne nuclear power plant. well, we can only imagine what will happen in this large part. lighting with industry, if shoes for our soldiers are produced in lutsk today, military, high-quality, inexpensive, and they cannot provide it, for example, production, then this will be the case in all other industries. that is, this is the goal. well , of course, we are talking about kyiv about the same the main goal is where they want to plant their vassal and say well, that's all, that's why we look at it, this is the second aspect of it, with such a situation that, well, priorities are not exactly the same , this is where this attack on volyn is taking place, and from the third side, we understand that our enemy absolutely crazy and if there is an order these serfs janissaries or mercenaries or regulars some circumstances they will go they will go and it will be hard and it will be a continuation of the war it will be a horror of horrors of war horrors of death and in the end it will be the end including dictatorial belarus this is how we see on this is the question. and in conclusion, i would like to say that until the day of the ukrainian army, we drove through those northern regions, stopped by our boys, friends, relatives, brought as usual everything that we saved from all people. and the most important thing that we should all do is to support our troops completely without compromising almost all of our resources, which only we have. what to strengthen, what we are doing by helping all battalions, units, and directly and through the commanders and through the central command to do everything that depends on us so that anyone whether he will come to volyn or to the great volyn. where is the rivnenshchyna or zhytomyr region, the factors are that he simply did not have the opportunity not just to look at the sky there, that he did not have time to breathe, when he was destroyed, this is our vision of what putin did there, and he also went back. program performances and i offer to all our guests somewhere already somewhere in such a format of summarization and not only of our today's broadcast, it is at the end of the year, this is the penultimate broadcast of the project, it speaks volumes for its 22nd year and we have such a remarkable date , it is definitely not the one we would like to talk about talk about it, but we must talk about it on saturday , december 24, not only the catholic christmas, many lviv residents will celebrate and it will be exactly 10 uh, 10 months of time for the new large-scale invasion of the russian federation, which she wanted to complete in uh, a few days, but here is the situation it is changing, and already russian regions are under attack. and judging by everything , a serious turning point is taking place in this war. let's try to summarize this year, these 10 months of confrontation, already in this way, you know, in the format of the new year's programs. probably not a festive one, but nevertheless we all understood how strong the nation is in this 22nd year and it is also important in lviv, melnychuk, your results are actually an incredibly difficult year, a year in which the ukrainian nation is born, the ukrainian nation is reborn , and you know everyone who is here in whether christmas will be celebrated in the rear, whether on the 20th of the sixth or on the ninth, it does not matter much, what matters is that we at that table , first of all, should remember those who at that time are in the trenches under the direct threat of enemy bullets and understand at what cost we are succeeding and the victory today a lot of people talked about the successes in it are obvious, but we must understand the price of those successes that for each liberated settlement, not one family did not wait for the father of the brother, everything is on and therefore, in fact, the awareness of the great order of the entire ukrainian nation, the understanding of the importance to celebrate this christmas because the christian holiday, god, is what ukrainians count on, because we are a christian nation and we respect our traditions , these are the feelings i think that every ukrainian will celebrate christmas with conclusion, you know, today we talked a lot about geopolitics, about how everything was changing dynamically, you don't understand that these various plans that were changing in relation to the civilized world in relation to ukraine, they happened primarily thanks to the ukrainian nation and the armed forces of ukraine, because the first plan was to give javeline to the ukrainians, then evacuate the president, then stop the enemy at any cost, and what we are doing now in this studio. practically everyone is talking about more realistic plans, more optimistic plans about what our main the goal is the collapse of the soviet union, in principle , the remnants of the soviet union, the collapse of the russian empire, this is the blood of the ukrainian defenders of all defense forces, all ukrainians who are fighting, and we must understand why the world was so cautious. it is not because they are so bad, it is because of the fact that well, when we talk, for example, about the connection of the united states of america, their previous operation ended in support of afghanistan ended in a total fiasco, all the weapons that they provided to the army went to teliga, they had there is a lot of skepticism about whether, i don’t know, some part of ukrainians will really support russia, whether ukrainians will be able to enjoy these weapons or whether there will be political unity, but it all happened and ukrainians are showing their strength every day, and because of that , the support of the entire civilized world is growing. therefore this visit is, as for me, the culmination of this whole struggle, which has lasted for more than 300 days, and it is undeniably historic, it is undeniably very important, and i am convinced that ukraine will win, russia, moscow will fall, and we we will still be able to calmly understand that this war ended with our victory, because this will be a victory for us, please . well, in fact, on the eve of christmas and the new year, well, we can say that even during december , a number of circumstances appeared that may indicate that it is approaching or is happening because it the process is a certain turning point in the situation in the russian-ukrainian war in the direction of ukraine, and indeed zelensky’s visit to washington is one of the signs of such a turn, because remember the whole of november we were groped for negotiations with russia here and selly to you everyone else came too, and in december there was already an invitation to washington and an article for an alkaline who, without any pretensions, said clearly and clearly what was needed to take melitopol and putin's desperate attempts to persuade lukashenkaar and weapons that he is begging now already in north korea and his fables about the fact that the patriots turn out to be missiles that are even worse than the s300, well, this does not fit into a healthy head, that is, it is a certain despair and, er, most likely, most likely. i still deeply believe that uh in the near future to the united states america will make a decision and go to us. practically everything it wants, because this decision will depend on a change in strategy in the war, and therefore i believe that the more clearly the ukrainian leadership formulates the goals of ukraine in this war, the better and the sooner this war will end . in favor of ukraine, so i just want to agree with those who in this studio said that the real goal , the real goal and the real victory of ukraine in this war and of the west will also be the termination of the existence of russia as an empire because of the simple exit at the borders of the first year if we will leave russia, even if it

lukashenka summing up the meeting. power engineering, report evgeniy resolute putin meets lukashenka at the end of the year, this is a kind of summing up of what has been done on the path of integration. it is known to apply to all areas, including the military is already in effect. the s -400 iskander systems have been delivered to belarus, and the ground-based joint group is constantly undergoing combat coordination and another step towards strengthening security has also been taken. i consider it possible to continue the implementation of the proposals of the president of belarus on the training of crews of combat aircraft of the belarusian army, which have already been converted for possible use of air-launched munitions with a special warhead back in june, lukashenka a proposal to modernize belarusian aircraft so that they could carry nuclear warheads. as a response to an aggressive action. the west is not a threat to anyone. i have met you several times both in st. petersburg and in sochi and informed you that we have great concerns. uh, as you said , tension along the perimeter of the borders of the union state, primarily in the west, and we would need to secure the belarusian state. you have made a decisive and very important step in supporting belarus. you spoke a lot about the economy. this was, after all, the main theme of the negotiations. therefore, such a large delegation of the russian government. members of the cabinet of ministers of the two countries arrived in minsk in the first row at a press conference on one of the most sensitive issues of pricing in the gas sector. today, thanks to the meeting of the two presidents, it was decided. we discussed price parameters in the energy sector. e. i think that we are now e together, when we

the republic of belarus that happened in all the years after lukashenka came to power, now as you know the regime of the potato teacher lukashenkas the official publicist of the military aggression of the russian federation against ukraine ms. svitlana tsykhanovska, like many other representatives of the belarusian opposition, civil society remains out of bounds, but we must not forget the hundreds of patriots of belarus of them, at least a more correct number is known only in the general staff, er, let's say well, er, i know approximately the number, let's call it like this, maybe a few hundred a minimum of belarusian volunteers are fighting as part of the armed forces of ukraine, units of special operations forces of other e-e military formations against russian aggression, belarusian volunteers are also part of my first separate special brigade named after ivan bohun, their motivation and professional training deserve the highest e- e words of thanks. so, we are listening to the video message of svitlana tsikhanovska. of ukraine and we carry it between our peoples for me etogoner and rejection first of all allow me to praise

lukashenka in minsk, whoever it was, the russian president tried to pressure lukashenka to send his army to ukraine, but he didn't like it the analyst of the american institute for the study of war managed to believe that this is really the case and what happened in minsk volodymyr zelenskyi calls on the georgian government to send the prisoner mikheil saakashvili for treatment to ukraine or another country in europe or the usa, will the georgian government go to the meeting and is saakashvili really in i know putin, as he himself claims it, look at svoboda life. congratulations, this is svoboda life. my name is vlasta lazur. we pray live on the air of the espresso tv channel, as well as on the pages of radio svoboda on facebook and youtube. volodymyr zelenskyi visited today in the city of bakhmut in donetsk region, this was first reported by deputy minister of defense hanna malyar, later confirmed by the president's press service , later photos appeared. according to reports, in bakhmut, volodymyr zelenskyi met with the ukrainian military and presented them with state awards, the president's trip to the city was not announced ahead of time and i will remind you that the bakhmut direction is considered one of the hottest spots on the front, intense fighting has been going on on the outskirts of the city for several months at the same time, bakhmut, which has no water supply, heat, or light , civilians continue to live in the city, and it is about that and exactly how people live in the city of bakhmut. why don't they leave there ? serhiy horbatenko's report, people returned with humanitarian aid, this is visible. and in short, here i covered them, a man killed one, a woman with splinters was taken to the intensive care unit, and one man was concussed by the prices of residents, they are residents who received humanitarian aid and took them home and here to the wing. and this is boiled this is the second time you are leaving bakhmut, the first time. i left in november from the dnipro to kiev without money , without anything, i arrived in kiev, i registered that i do not receive refugee money, not 2000 refugee money, nothing . well, i worked for him for 9 days on the farm, he paid me uah 1,100, and i went back here, and i will be whole. well, it’s cold in the refrigerator, green christmas trees, i’m just not running from the war, i’m running now from the cold, you see, i think you’ll live on, they promise you will they arrange it somehow? обецает меня volya i don't know there этот как его будут смотреть нет между быть циганим as the saying goes, i'll roam the earth come on, people have evacuation to our army, there's a casting, no , no, it doesn't work out. why didn't we get together? well, we didn't have time, what do you need ? do you have a warm evening? you can find a passport . he doesn’t want to go, but where is papa? our army is the best. i think we will still win. why our family, our ukraine? well, what do you think ? victory is a dream, but it’s better to leave because you fly in and fly in. of course, we will see how it flies very strongly, well, it’s scary. so let’s go with us, there’s a wood stove, look at you, everything is destroyed around, well, nothing will remain. because the humanitarian aid they bring here is cereal and vermicelli , but potato soup is nicer, well , we arrived, we decided to do so . they got dressed and took the documents but they had already arrived they had already changed their minds but grandfather would not mind going but he will not go without children we will try next time commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine valery zaluzhnyi asks president volodymyr zelenskyi to sign the law on strengthening the responsibility of military personnel this bill was recently adopted by the verkhovna rada and literally immediately, a petition was registered on the president’s website. as of now, it has already received almost 34,000 votes, in which zelenskyi urge not to sign this bill and to prepare it; the authors of the petition believe that in the event of the law entering into force, the military command will, as it were, receive unprecedented leverage of blackmail and punishing military personnel with prison practically for any criticism of their decisions, even if these decisions are incompetent and based on unsuccessful combat management valery zaluzhny stated that he supports the relevant changes to the legislation, adding that this law provides for increased criminal liability for the military, in particular for arbitrarily leaving a military unit at a place of service or a battlefield, or even desertion , disobedience and failure to comply with combat orders. i support the relevant amendments to the legislation adopted by the verkhovna rada of ukraine and ask the president to sign the law. my opinion clearly reflects the position of the commander of the group of the commander of the military units who demanded a systematic solution to this set of issues, the army stands on discipline and if the gaps in the legislation do not ensure compliance, and restorers can pay a fine in the amount of up to tens percent of combat pay or receive a sentence with probation, is it unfair or is it really a bill, which live broadcast joins myroslav gaia, officer, volunteer, military journalist, i am very sorry because of problems with phone communication, but nevertheless i am glad to welcome you to svoboda life good evening good evening myroslava what do you say about this draft law, you would say which one on whose side, on the side of those who ask to cook, or on the side of the industrious one who says that it must be signed, i am sure that directly, the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine publicly appeals to the president with a request to sign this bill, and the commander-in-chief has all the information that is happening in particular in the troops and in the country, so i think that he has serious reasons for this in our country, over the past 9 months, a large number of people have been mobilized, they are different people, some of them are professional soldiers, there are some who have never served in the army before, except for the emergency service there once upon a time. of course, this is all connected precisely with the fact that we have the fact that we have the fact of armed aggression of the russian federation and it is in the full-scale full-scale conditions in the form that we have created various new units new the actual types of forces, such as the territorial defense forces, let me remind you that people signed up there and often they were people without military service experience at all, but the circumstances are such that they are all forced to be either on the front line or in the area of ​​responsibility of our brigades and battalions to perform military duties the task is the same, er, myself, for the law - the bills regarding the modern passing of service in the armed forces of ukraine, and they have not been reviewed for a long time, the last such bill was signed, i am not mistaken , in the 21st year, it concerned the center of the territorial centers of recruitment and passing service in the reserve and there except there there except e-e improvement of service conditions that is, all the laws considered the improvement of the possibility of improving service conditions and the modernization of e-e standards of passing the service in the armed forces of ukraine, but there it was also considered increasing responsibility for, for example, certain actions that a serviceman could do to cause harm, for example, since soviet times, we have not reviewed such a simple elementary issue as the loss of, for example , military documents . contact us , miroslav, this is a question, see human rights defenders are actually also very critical of this law, for example just the other day, the coordinator of the media initiative for human rights, olga reshetilova , said that i will quote her, she says that the bill contains a lot of nonsense, but the biggest one from her point of view is the strengthening of the criminal liability of military personnel for committing war crimes and depriving them of the right to a fair trial do you understand the fears of human rights defenders, what are they based on? i don’t quite understand what deprivation of the right to court means. i will tell you that at the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, of a separate legal group that deals with the protection of the rights of military personnel, in particular, and those who have committed certain actions there. it is a crime, and there they make sure that their rights are preserved. more than 700,000 people were mobilized there, these are completely different people, they were issued weapons , these people are not only in combat conditions, well, this is the growth of society, that is, there are people , er, more or less hardy and psychologically, who are minorities, there are various incidents especially often there are incidents with metal handling of weapons, for example, or the occurrence of skirmishes or conflicts on some uh, tax, on the household level, everything is the same as in the ordinary life of a ukrainian household, so only at the same time, military personnel have weapons in their hands , various cases occur and uh, believe me in our units, not only investigations are carried out in such cases, but if , for example, a military serviceman was detained, for example, by the military service of law and order , then our lawyers, for example, guys, in particular in me in the brigade is trying to provide all kinds of legal assistance so that the rights of a serviceman are preserved, you understand. that is why this issue is urgent, but i am sure that if the commander-in-chief decided to publicly appeal for support for this bill, it means that he has reasons to do so. that's what i wanted i would also like to ask you whether you personally fear that the signing of this draft law will lead to some kind of total discontent of the military and, for example, somehow affect the wishes of ukrainians go to the army well, for example, if we talk about the same volunteers, because you know, not every petition collects 25,000 in a few days, agree no, i don't think that uh, i don't think that uh, that it will somehow affect the majority of people who wanted to go volunteers went to the front in the 14th year, and after february 24, 2022, all the others are mobilized people who are mobilized in accordance with the current legislation by our military commissariats, which are now called recruitment and social support centers. believe me, the armed forces are a cut society and there are different things, it happens that people end up in the army, people who have, for example, some criminal inclinations, yes, there are cases when accidents happen, unfortunately, tragic and different, and all of them are cases when a person, for example, is not morally stable, throws at his comrades, for example and he avoids er er er performance of his official duties, there are different cases, on the contrary , cases of heroism, so those cases when a person heroically defends ukraine, then takes a breath, should not be awarded, they are awarded, for example, by state with awards and those cases when a person from one or another circumstances committed crimes and did not fulfill their official duties they must be punished otherwise there really won't be discipline, these are quite clear things, you understand that way thank you, unfortunately, it's already time thank you very much myroslav gai , officer-volunteer a military journalist, we talked - we discussed a bill on increasing responsibility for military personnel, thank you words of thanks, showing off alleged economic successes, and a home dinner about this, the meeting was like the meetings of vladimir putin and oleksandr lukashenko lukashenko has already escorted his russian guest, who, by the way, for the first time in three years personally went to the belarusians, why and with what putin left minsk, we will talk further, but first we will remind you of the chronology of this visit. bouquet at the negotiations, despite the recently completed military exercises near the ukrainian border, the leaders of the two countries assure that their main goal is the development of the economy, energy projects, science and even the space sphere putin is gassed by the trade between russia and belarus, in particular after the invasion of ukraine, our currency goods i want to underline this for any events e-e within the framework of a special military operation grew by three and reached 38.5 billion dollars well in 9 months of the current year in 10 grew by another 10 er by 10%. polukashinka invites the world to join russia belarus russia belarus is open for dialogue with other states, including the european one i hope that soon there will be heard voices together defense of democracy and progress with the help of restrictions and military force in relation to our states no longer impresses even local voters who fulfill the shortcomings of such a police . we fixed our price, it's a good deal, eh. for us, russia helps a lot in this regard , so no details for the public. special thanks to you, and not only yours, for that вы программы свое обечание мы сегодня, we put on combat duty the s400 complex that you handed over to belarus and the most importantly the iskander complex, instead, putin announces that he is not interested in absorbing other countries, previously military analysts stated that he would try to persuade lukashenkas simple. there is no purpose of imagery, it's theses from our fugitives. but not a couple of thousand ran away there, money has to be earned, and they just don't pay anything. that's what we throw in, they don't even write them in front of the cameras. lukashenko still mentions joint training with russia and military capabilities , the emphasis is on soviet aircraft. and the training of our crews capable of carrying special anti-aircraft weapons and special ammunition , i owe you the fact that we have prepared aircraft, it turned out that we have soviet-era aircraft - we tested them in russia Федерации мы сейчас вместе с россиянымы готовим крепей capable of operating these planes carrying specific ammunition hours of communication accompanied by a delegation putin and lukashenko held a personal meeting, what remained behind the scenes is unknown however, analysts of the institute for the study of war believe that putin was not able to pressure lukashenko, according to their data, luka

lukashenka. and first of all, it is strange that he himself is going and not as usual, the gentleman invites lukashenka to him. does this mean that he is in a weak position? and secondly, all western analysts write that he will persuade lukashenkarectly participate in the war against ukraine . what arguments are there? putin i think the arguments are the same or lukashenko can exist as a dictator only because he is supported by russia so that putin can scare him that if you if you don't agree then we can find someone else in your place, we can probably be like that, well , that is, well, the documents will be like that, they will be the same strict. i would say that i hope that lukashenko is completely dependent on russia, on putin, on the support of putin . if until the 20th year, lukashenka somehow maneuvered there sometimes between russia and he tried to close eh with the west after to after the 20th year, after he lost the elections and seized power, he dealt with all the protests so that there were in belarus, he is much more i think it depends from putin, this is it, thank you, thank you. yes, we will now return to our place. after thanking the igorotsenko, we will take the ukrainian law student to new york university , a

lukashenka and first of all, it is strange that he himself is eating, and not as usual, the gentleman invites lukashenka to his place. does this mean that he is in a weak position? secondly, all western analysts write that he will persuade lukashenkactly participate in the war against ukraine. what are the arguments? is it only economic or what kind of political pressure can putin apply? i think that the arguments are also the same that lukashenko can exist as a dictator once again only thanks to er because he is supported by russia so that putin can scare him that if you, if you don't agree, then we can find someone else to take your place, we can probably be like that, well, that is, well, the documents will be like this, they will be the same strict i i would say that i hope that lukashenko, who is in the new independence, from russia, from putin, from putin's support, probably because until the 20th year, lukashenko somehow maneuvered sometimes between russia and he tried to close the e- eh with the event after before after the 20th year after he lost the elections eh seized power dealt with all the protests eh what happened in belarus it is much more i think it depends on putin it is really so thank you thank you we have now

uh, so that this one, as i call him collective lukashenka, he continued, uh, to exist after lukashenkato me. i think about it all the time. so, when we were choosing a place for a nuclear power plant, we were looking for a geological plate that was large and motionless to an earthquake. here i have such an association that the entire belarusian people's assembly is the same solid slab that is not subjected to earthquakes, which are at the heart of the state. we know that hierarchical systems vertical vertical systems. they are subject to destruction in due time. the collapse of the monarchy, we remember the collapse of the soviet union, where there was also a vertical, and it is necessary to build a system that would rely on popular representation and regardless of the incidents that can occur in the power vertical. if we simply say that the vertical is always, to one degree or another, about the elite. and here is the horizontal one. the history of vns is about the most. what exactly, if she is a nationality? yes, the second topic is still, which discussed on is closely connected with

lukashenka is going to visit the kremlin in belarus on the way, he even decided to stay and after the negotiations went to lukashenka's residence near minsk, they had a tête-à-tête there for about two hours, and only then did the russian board number one flew to russia again accompanied by a fighter jet oksana shnayder we are ukraine marathon single news andriy kureychyk member of the coordination council of the belarusian opposition is now joining our broadcast mr. andriy we congratulate you good night greetings mr. andriy a meeting between lukashenkatook place. putin went to belarus for the first time in three years . they spoke with rukashenka, and according to our minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleby. another meeting between lukashenka and putin will take place soon. what do you think will be discussed at the next meeting? did putin give lukashenko time to think, since no results were announced after this meeting, obviously it turned out to be completely unsuccessful for putin from a political point of view, that is, there was nothing say, like such a rare visit , indeed, everyone is celebrating lukashenko dozens of times. they talked about something, nothing, the prosil economy, about space , about um, i don’t know what about nuclear power plants, in general, they didn’t decide anything serious , not a single currency, not the integration of belarus into russia, not a referendum on this topic, not joint military operations, nothing this was not announced, that is, absolutely zero. zero, of course, i understand that putin g

between minsk and moscow, price believes that the lukashenka regime actually ceded the sovereignty and independence of belarus to russia. therefore , the lukashenka now subject to sanctions, we we will look for additional ways to bring belarus to justice if it continues to cooperate with the kremlin in this brutal war managed to get the boy back as a bundle but has a sister almost 8 months ago the occupiers took him from his native settlement near mariupol, the young man and many other children were taken first to donetsk , then to russia, the verkhovna rada commissioner for human rights, dmytro lubinets, said that the so-called new family did not treat the boy cruelly, but he constantly thought about what he had to return to the motherland, serhiy wrote in one of the chad bots that he wants to go from russia to ukraine, he received an answer that they would help him and now he is at home, the office of the ombudsman of ukraine will make sure that our patriot first of all receives the proper psychological help and an official guardian in the person of a sister. for now, this was all the news for this time. more than usual, you can read on our esp

, please tell me what to expect from putin's trip to lukashenka, what is he going for, and what can he get, please ? complete control over lukashenkactically have? maybe there will be additional threats to lukashenko, especially in the context of the death of the minister of foreign affairs maki er makeya yes, er, i think that there will be no fundamental changes, i hope so because well, i will not it is original here that the entry of the belarusians into the ground war will mean a total collapse for belarus itself and for the lukashenko regime, but we know that our command and our political leadership are paying great attention to the direction, i.e. to relax it is absolutely impossible to relax. although i hope that fundamental changes will not occur , that is, that belarus will not enter a ground war . our friend, you understand, he says that there will be such infusions as south korea and ukraine will take huge selfish steps forward well, but it is clear that this is not what we need, it is definitely not what we need oleksiy gran was with us a professor of political science who in scientific director of the mohyla academy of