luke's campus. but there is already dead -- already that type of facility planned for mission bay, so it was not needed. when cna came back with our alternative and said let's look at other types of special services concentrated in st. luke's, the response was, sorry, we already analyzed our reasonable range. it was limited. at and this should have had a good faith look. it did not. the anr raises all sorts of objections about why alternatives to the -- the eir raises all sorts of objections. one thing it says is we cannot increase construction at st. luke's because there is a continuum of care issue. so we cannot meet our richer for it time requirements for needed construction at the california and pacific campuses. what the eir does not say is there have been literally hundreds of extensions granted to retrofit requirements all across the state. therefore, this continuum of care concerns need not be a barrier to adoption of alternative 3a. at every level, project objectives, a reasonable range of

luke's is part of the plan before you. together with the new building and the new campus, it makes the future of health care look brighter for the whole of our city. i have lived for 37 years within a block and a half of two separate cpmc campuses. i was in my current home during the rebuilding in the 1980's. i've always found the hospital campus is to be good neighbors. not only am i a volunteer, but also have been blessed with the care of cpmc's physicians and will always be grateful that they were there for me. without them, i would not be standing here speaking to you today. thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i am a registered nurse at the california campus. nurses have spoken out to you and other elected officials before and informed you of cpmc's failure to bart -- barter in good faith. nurses have been without contracts for almost five years. local 39, the stationary engineers, are in the fifth week of the strike. the national union of health- care workers, their members have also been working without a ne

luke's move. i don't know if that would get us close enough. >> what he identified in the rotation were three, relatively-speaking approximately 800 populations. that is the puzzle move. >> no. chairman mcdonnell: thank you. mrs. mondejar. -- m's melara. i am not interested in changing our decision we made last time, primarily we made it very deliberately. when the community comes tonight and says you took away this piece, they were not taking into consideration what it would cost elsewhere in their district. we moved something in their district, and next week the people will come back saying you shouldn't have done that. so let's leave it where it is. so no, no, no. chairman mcdonnell: thank you. that's clear. mr. leigh? >> can i ask a question? does the second move require moving st. luke's? chairman mcdonnell: no. the intent is to keep st. luke's in district nine. it has no -- nothing to do with st. luke's present site at all, period. >> i would actually be open to looking at it. chairman mcdon

luke's. i have been there for 45 years. i in there because i like working with the patience that we serve. many of them are under insured to or very poor. however, some of the best people i know. i do not -- i really do realize that both campuses need to be rebuilt. they need to be brought up to standards. however, putting all of the carrot in one facility does not make sense -- all of the care in one facility does not make sense. actually, i know the doctors said -- if you look at the days we have plenty of patiencts, sometimes you're holding patients in icu. they are waiting in the emergency room. this is not going to go away because you build a brand-new hospital. we still need the beds to take care of these patients. we do need a new hospital. however, it needs to be an appropriate size to service the community that we are in charge of. that is all the way south of market. a great deal of the city. i just think they're being left behind. it is wonderful to have a state of the art facility

luke's and three born at cpmc. i can say nothing greater than than they were a great hospital then and i hope they continue toon

luke's and one at van ness. these projects will not only provide the promise of jobs and world-renown health care, but will actually deliver on the promise for now and the future. a promise of jobs in the area of construction, medicine, administration, and more. your legacies, the building of a strong center cisco economic future and the economic future of all future residents who will be employed. we ask that you see your role as voting yes as so important because it would not only help move us through the economic downturn that we find ourselves in the midst of, but actually passed that downturn and into an economic boom of jobs, income, and the ability to spend those salaries in our great city. in our work admission hiring hall, with san francisco residents, in order to help them become more job ready, we encourage them to let no opportunity go by, which could have made a major difference in their futures. i asked this of each of you. please consider this to be such a major opportunity to make such a differen

luke's and dvds. -- davis. it will integrate four separate campuses into a modern health care system with community hospitals that are widely accessible. it will respond to a state seismic mandate by doubling the number earthquake state beds here in the city. we will deliver unprecedented community benefits for our great city, and those benefits have been achieved through extensive input and years of hard work with the planning commission, health commission, and the city family, many of whom are sitting here today. the project will inject $2.5 billion into the local economy and keep our trades working, as well as retaining and growing permanent well-paying jobs in the city's largest economic sector, health care. we will partner with dph in community clinics to serve a third of the patients come about 10,000 patients, who joined the plan as a result of health care reform, and provide critical capacity with the community partners to care for the poor -- to care for the patients. we are where this plan has its cri

luke's. the argument that you cannot pull all of your police stations or fire departments north of market remains as valid now as it did when the blue ribbon panel concluded the need to rebuild st. luke's. the bay area is due for major earthquake. we must have redundancy of health care access points. please strike out the prerogative in determining the operating commitments based upon two consecutive years of less than 1% operating margin revenue. st. luke's provides emergency services for orthopedic injuries without the ability of a cast cart orcas technician to facilitate the care. this would easily -- this would be easy to remedy the administrators if the administrators have the will. if you break your arm and go to st. luke's, they can give you a splint, but no cast. without a nearby skilled nursing community, care by physicians and needed family contact with the patient is sacrificed. this must adequately be addressed. finally, psychiatric illnesses is an enormous problem in our society.

luke's hospital. on the motion to recommend approval to the board of supervisors for the planning code text and map amendments for the st. luke's commissioner antonini: campus antoniniaywe. commissioner borden: aye. commissioner miguel: aye. commissioner moore: aye. commissioner sugaya: aye. president fong: aye. >> that passes unanimously. item 2f, the request for a conditional use authorization with amended conditions to include demand management. this one is for st. luke's hospital. on that motion -- commissioner antonini: aye. commissioner borden: aye. commissioner miguel: aye. commissioner moore: aye. commissioner sugaya: aye. president fong: aye. >> that motion passes unanimously. item 2g, request for development authorization for the st. luke's hospital campus. commissioner antonini: aye. commissioner borden: aye. commissioner miguel: aye. commissioner moore: aye. commissioner sugaya: aye. president fong: aye. >> that motion passed unanimously. item 2h, consideration of a motion for the general

luke's operating commitment. just to wrap up the development agreement portion of our presentation, this slide goes over -- as you know, we have given you suggested changes in the development agreement. most of those are clean-up. a couple that rise slightly above the level of clean-up but in general are not major changes are noted here. in health care, we have made it clear that the innovation fund can be used to provide for the type of mental health services that you heard about. we also made it clear that we reached an agreement that includes in and out-of-network limits for the health service system. under housing, we clarified that there is a 5% homeowner down payment contribution in that program to make is similar to the existing program. the maximum loan is a $200,000 or 45% of the purchase price. everything else is just clean-up on the language. that is the end of our development agreement presentation. i believe someone will not go through the project approvals with you. >> thank you. planning department

luke's. it must guarantee that the jobs, wages and benefits of its current employees and guarantee a reasonable number of permanent jobs for san francisco residents. cpmc must limit its prices to city health plans and pay the full cost of its development proje project, affordable housing, traffic and neighborhood impact. we are very concerned about the proposed plans around cpmc's new hospital downtown and cuts to st. luke's. the city and needs to be fixed to address many concerns. we are also suggesting funding a training and placement program to trade new people to enter in the healthcare field and find real career jobs. above and beyond the hospital issue, we need to set aside funding for youth services via auditing to close corporate tax loopholes in the city. no cuts to education or healthcare, period. m.t.a. needs to put its money where if is needed for youth passes, better housing programs and we need to be a sanctuary city that doesn't have homelessness. a city that has easy food acce

luke's. two at cathedrals. and one at the davies campus. st. luke's campus, cpmc proposes to construct a new five-story, 80 bed full-service acute-care hospital. located to the west of the existing hospital tower, over the surface parking lot, and a portion of san jose avenue. the existing hospital will be able to remain in operation during construction. adjacent, there will be a new pedestrian pathway and plaza connecting 27 to cesar chavez, a portion shown on the graphic. once the new hospital is operating, the existing hospital will be demolished. after is demolished, cpmc will construct a new five-story medical office building at the corner of cesar chavez and valencia. on the west side of the van ness, between geary and post, cpmc proposes construction of a new 555 bed full-service acute- care hospital. 15 stories and approximately 265 feet tall. across the street, the east side of the van ness, cmc proposes construction of a new nine- story, approximately 130-foot tall medical office building. the two new buildings will be connected under

luke's. on thursday, there was a presentation before the planning commission. the talk about st. luke's can secure the future of st. luke's, but they only offer a events at st. luke's, and they think that is a future for us. st. luke's covers district 9, 10, and 11. if i can just say come if we picture in one of our family members has a heart attack. now we end up putting at risk and not just our members at risk, but although the paramedics. the driver to the ambulance and the one attending to our loved ones as they raced across town to try to get them to the hospital. it is outrageous all they can think of is offering 80 beds at st. luke's. cpmc should be rebuilt, but rebuilt the white -- the right way, not leaving us out in the cold. they should make sure they know that they need to take care of st. luke's, and 80 beds is not sufficient and not enough. [applause] >> hello, my dear, supervisors. my name is carl kramer with the san francisco living wage coalition. i would like to open my comm

luke scott is on deck for the rays, who lead it 2-1 here in the top of the ninth inning. red sox will have the bottom third of their order coming up the bottom of the ninth against rodney. you would think it would be rodney, unless the rays get a bunch here. zobrist draws a one-out walk. here are the poll results from the twitter. who has the best ken rosenthal nerd outfit? it was easily bow tie price. you think it's because he towers over the other two? >> brian: i don't know, but that's a landslide victory. >> dick: speaking of victories, you wonder how luke scott feels. scott driving in the go-ahead run. there's ken rosenthal. you know, i personally don't think ken rosenthal is that much of a nerd. i don't know why they have to use that phrase in relation to ken. ken, i'm just kidding, you know that. >> ken: dick, my family thinks i'm a nerd. it's okay. i'm all good. >> dick: joe maddon, he couldn't wait. he paid homage to you, having his entire team wear bow ties. he knows how much you've done for charity in that respect. 1-0 the count to luke scott. and the throw act

he's a luke guy. reverend stowe, who we've met before and we'll meet in the next class, he's a mark guy - he's into, "hey, this world stinks. the apocalypse is coming; get yourself saved so the next life, you'll be in heaven." and i'm being a little crass here, but john's very gnostic; matthew was obviously to a jewish audience. and so even as we get the sacred text, which doesn't always have to happen because we talked to thomas drift, our native american, and he comes from traditions that were perfectly happy to find their world-view defined in a mythic and ritual dimension and didn't feel the need to concretize in the doctrinal dimension. but you know, there we have it- it's a wonderful look at how sacred texts also work in the doctrinal dimension as forms of interpretation. as you well know, different translations of the bible have different tones and can raise up different issues, and we go round and round on that also, so interesting point. let me shift gears here because we have some rather lon

luke's by saying secure the future for st. luke's. how is that possible with only 80 beds? we asked you revisit alternative 3a as the most appropriate basis for the project. it is also the best option to meet the whole city is in need -- city's need. thank you. commissioner fong: thank you. i called everyone's name here, right? >> commissioners, thank you for this chance for the community to address you. my name is alex, and i am here because i support 3a because st. luke's is so important to our community. i remember that six was the place to go if you had no option. many uninsured and underinsured people could go there if they had no other options. over the years, cpmc has been making it harder and harder to get care. i support expanding st. luke's is part of the plan for the vital services for low-income residents of the south side of the city. we have seen in our society what happens when people are underrepresented and they get affected by so many cuts. please, i am asking for you to see this side of the people in need. i, myself, have been going to general for service

luke's. why did they get $90 million in tax breaks each year if not to maintain charity care? they claim they will increase charity care, but how? they are downsizing at st. luke's, chasing a longstanding doctors out of practice or into the foundation model with exorbitant rent hikes and their foundation practices turn away patients from groups such as health the san francisco and medicale. one of our doctors, they refuse to show hurt the only empty office space they knew she could afford. that suite is still empty today. how is it that st. luke's provides more -- claims to be able to provide more charity care with your beds? -- fewer beds? even if they maintain the same level, their plan will provide care for 1000 fewer charity care patients per year. they use their abusive market monopoly to charge 37% higher rates across the board than other northern california hospitals. according to the uc hastings school of law, they still operate at an annual overall average profit of $148 million. yet

luke's. in the future, please help us with an prescription to analyze and restudy now -- how to replay with a process which is sadly missing four are heavily populated residential neighborhood whose resources are being shifted unequally to a single overbuild hospital. when there is a more equitable way to reduce the harm. >> the people whose names we have called, if they're not in the room, the president can start calling out names. quex have not called her name. i have 200 tricky cards here -- 250 cards here. i do not believe you received that. >> all the special accommodations with col. -- we have called. >> henry webb, angelita fisher, corandia guerro, telphonso -- have a call your name? -- have i called your name? ok. i will go to general public comment. why don't we let up on this side? i call your name, line up on your right side of the room and prepare to speak. marquez helton. mike -- scott, and other speakers. thank you. i am a student here on behalf of the city academy. i've the sup

luke's by saying secure the future for st. luke's. how is that possible with only 80 beds? we asked you revisit alternative 3a as the most appropriate basis for the project. it is also the best option to meet the whole city is in need -- city's need. thank you. commissioner fong: thank you. i called everyone's name here, right? >> commissioners, thank you for this chance for the community to address you. my name is alex, and i am here becausi