perceives ukraine as exceptional vulnerable, regardless of how he feels about individual leaders such as luluzhnysyrsky. and i don't think it matters because he sees the system as a whole, the system is weak on the ground. and he 's going to throw in... what he has now to break her. ukraine should increase its capabilities in the field of drones, attracting more drones of various types from the population and as many volunteers as possible for their production, procurement, etc. drones will be critical, especially in places like avdiyivka where supplies are ammunition is limited. until sufficient artillery ammunition arrives, drones will be the primary weapon, both offensively and defensively. i hope. that ukrainian engineers will work tirelessly to continuously improve drone technology, it is critical that the ministry of defense promptly allocates funds to strengthen these efforts once the drones are manufactured. on the other hand, we understand that they are constantly increasing their resources, yes, but there is also a certain ceiling, russian resourcefulness rests on the ceiling of their o

november, the month of the 23rd year, he says that there are two armies, two armies, the army of the luluzhny army of the syrian, this such an eloquent explanation of what is happening and... well, once again, we'll see, i always try to be somehow positive, to give people the opportunity to express themselves, to show, maybe there will be a little different style, but... here's what you mentioned, and they correspond to what i know, what i read, see, in principle, well, there are not so many hopes, that is, it seems that the classic soviet style of management will dominate, well, with all the resulting consequences, i just tried to summarize all the fears that are connected with the appointment of mr. syrskyi, the general syrskyi to the position of commander -in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine, they can be reduced to the first, that is, that syrskyi, from the main, to what syrskyi considered... it is fair or not, but after the resignation of the brave man, which was not, i think it is good spoken, unless there was some kind of closed meeting of journalists yesterday, as far as we know, t

society largely did not know who yushchenko was, and society largely did not know who luluzhny was. due to objective and subjective factors, on the one hand, due to the fact that we have the media restrictions that we have now, on the other hand, due to the fact that the peculiarity of the actual army figures is that they are less public, but the consequence is that people project their expectations on this figure, and then, as happened with yushchenko, when at a certain moment the expectations did not come true, they actually led. to his crushing defeat in the elections in 2010, and the similarity of archetypes does not mean that we necessarily have to move in this canvas, that is, history can in some cases follow precedents, in some cases set precedents, but it would be much better for society , if society understood what is happening and in general what we see and what is disturbing is this that there is... some built-in desire within the state apparatus to objectify people, to objectify society, and it manifests itself in many factors, 30 sbushniks who monitor journalists, this is a