lunado. i think at the last hearing, it was misunderstood that what we were seeking was an extension of time before recording an abatement on the property. the son is the one that lives there, and the dad is the one that owns the property. we just want some additional time. as we know, there's no supplies and everything else, so they're just wanting an extension of time to get this finished off before the abatement is recorded on his property. >> clerk: is that the end of your presentation? >> oh, yeah, and we're asking for 90 days. >> clerk: okay. public comment on this item? >> i just want to interject at this moment, for the appellant, there's two requests for rehearing. does your presentation pertain to both of those requests? >> can you repeat that, please? >> yes. so there are two requests for rehearing pending before the board right now. is this presentation as to both or do you need another chance to present? >> no, that would be for both. >> thank you. >> there's no public comment or

our next item is item two, case number 6882: 5 lunado way.s of record and appellant duke nguyen and leona c. nguyen. action requested by appellant. >> this second case is connected to the first case. this case is 2017-10081 and it's connected to a violation in regards to the discrepancies under the facade changes that were supposed to be fully removed z. the photo shows evidence which were deviating from the approved plans. the building height and the excavation in the approved plans reflect the work under the original permit which was 2015-100081. and the subsequent 100216. the revised plan to reflect the actual condition of the site. revised plans are needed for roof framing, alternative to a lesser condition, and this one here, this is where planning department confirmed most of the findings as while requested, the revocation of all permits. as you can see with the permit history of this property, there was two permits revoked. and one of the 2021 permits to correct the violation was to increase the value of the work as it was undervalued