actually know, society largely did not know who yushchenko was, and society largely did not know who luzhnuzh was, but because of objective and subjective objective factors, on the one hand due to the fact that we have the media restrictions that we have now, on the other hand due to the fact that the peculiarity of the actual army figures is that they are less public. but the consequence of this is that people project their expectations on this figure, and then, as happened with yushchenko, when at a certain moment the expectations were not fulfilled, they actually led to his crushing defeat in the elections in 2010, and the similarity of archetypes does not mean that we necessarily have to move in this canvas, that is, history can in some cases... follow precedents, in some cases set precedents, but it would be much better for society if society understood what is happening, and in general what we see and what is disturbing, it the fact that there is some built-in desire within the state apparatus to objectify people, to objectify society, and it manifests itself in many factors, 30 sbushni