the implication was that his place was not in an academic setting or respective a one like lymington in spite of the fact that he have earned his phd from mit and has authored more than ten books today. on some of which were published by major presses. even the latest work coming apart. it builds along the same evidence discussed and used in the bell curve. they spoke with indignation about the damaging decisions to campus and also promoted hate speech. and who would discredit those in my own apartment. the speaker ideas they do not deserve to be debated because they are racist, sexist and threatening in general. if you think that i'm exaggerating let's listen to what they actually said i will quote twice. here the views are not just one side of an interesting debate they are vile and wrong someone wrote. they are also being endorsed in some form from the highest office in the country right now and for many members of the congress it is an intimidating and frightening environment for many of us in the speaker brings that home. student actually said this for free speech and i am again